<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Relationship &#8220;Expert&#8221; Rationalizes Cheating</title>
	<atom:link href="http://collegecandy.com/2007/10/22/steve-santagati-relationship-expert-rationalizes-cheating/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://collegecandy.com/2007/10/22/steve-santagati-relationship-expert-rationalizes-cheating/</link>
	<description>Advice on student style, collegiate dating discussion guides, relationship advice and women&#039;s studies.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:29:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Monique</title>
		<link>http://collegecandy.com/2007/10/22/steve-santagati-relationship-expert-rationalizes-cheating/#comment-6700</link>
		<dc:creator>Monique</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 09:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://collegecandy.com/sex/5868#comment-6700</guid>
		<description>J-NYU</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>J-NYU</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaime</title>
		<link>http://collegecandy.com/2007/10/22/steve-santagati-relationship-expert-rationalizes-cheating/#comment-6699</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaime</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 00:37:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://collegecandy.com/sex/5868#comment-6699</guid>
		<description>It seems to me, that trying to globalize what cheating is, is... well, quite egoistical as well, (though on a whole different level of corse).

The point i&#039;m trying to make is that cheating, innebitably comes down a &quot;set of rules&quot; that the couple (or more, lucky mormons, some arabs, etc) abide by. It should be noted, specially for anyone who is willing to believe that cheating is: “Doing anything you wouldn’t do in front of the person you love” that what you may do in front of the person you love they may still consider as cheating.

We all have different &quot;boundries&quot; by which we tackle the definition of cheating, and even these boundries can change and adapt depending on how much we love our partners or how we feel a &quot;relationship&quot; should manifest itself, be it fisically(sp?) or emotionally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me, that trying to globalize what cheating is, is&#8230; well, quite egoistical as well, (though on a whole different level of corse).</p>
<p>The point i&#8217;m trying to make is that cheating, innebitably comes down a &#8220;set of rules&#8221; that the couple (or more, lucky mormons, some arabs, etc) abide by. It should be noted, specially for anyone who is willing to believe that cheating is: “Doing anything you wouldn’t do in front of the person you love” that what you may do in front of the person you love they may still consider as cheating.</p>
<p>We all have different &#8220;boundries&#8221; by which we tackle the definition of cheating, and even these boundries can change and adapt depending on how much we love our partners or how we feel a &#8220;relationship&#8221; should manifest itself, be it fisically(sp?) or emotionally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
