Comments on: Relationship “Expert” Rationalizes Cheating

By: Doug

Doug — Tue, 29 Dec 2009 16:32:47 +0000

Sorry: the link. (The last graph above is a quote from the link.) http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/asection...

By: Doug

Doug — Tue, 29 Dec 2009 16:31:28 +0000

The relationship expert you attempt to lampoon here seems to understand a lot more about the nature of successful alpha men than you do. I'm sure he's right about his ability to hot attract women for casual, including many feminist ones if he some desires. It's not just that he's very handsome; in fact that's only a small factor. It's the rugged, masculine nature of his good looks, and his arogant for a reason hyper confident attitude. And his "take no shit from feminists" attitude as well. I'm sure it gets him all the hot poon he wants (which is only rarely very feminist).

Here's an article from the LA Times on some evo psych (and other biological fields) insights and findings on this issue of male cheating and male power/fame.

But even a smidgen of evolutionary insight suggests that maleness plus money plus political power isn't likely to add up to the kind of sexual restraint that the public expects. A concluding word, therefore, to the outraged voters of New York state: You want monogamy? Elect a swan. Or better yet, a Diplozöon paradoxum.

By: fmyts

fmyts — Tue, 08 Dec 2009 08:50:08 +0000

Lol this guy is so stupid. He needs to update his views on a lot of things, I think he's just old. He says guys don't like short hair but every guy I have been with prefers short hair and I have done a lot of modeling. Would you say victoria beckham is ugly? Her hair is super short. He is stuck in the 90's. Also if "men" are programmed to look for sex and cheat, why is the number of female cheaters almost equal and why am I always trying to get more sex from my b.f.? This guy is so stupid.

By: Monique

Monique — Thu, 27 Mar 2008 05:35:18 +0000

J-NYU

By: Jaime

Jaime — Mon, 29 Oct 2007 20:37:10 +0000

It seems to me, that trying to globalize what cheating is, is… well, quite egoistical as well, (though on a whole different level of corse).

The point i'm trying to make is that cheating, innebitably comes down a "set of rules" that the couple (or more, lucky mormons, some arabs, etc) abide by. It should be noted, specially for anyone who is willing to believe that cheating is: “Doing anything you wouldn’t do in front of the person you love” that what you may do in front of the person you love they may still consider as cheating.

We all have different "boundries" by which we tackle the definition of cheating, and even these boundries can change and adapt depending on how much we love our partners or how we feel a "relationship" should manifest itself, be it fisically(sp?) or emotionally.