<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vogue Magazine &#8220;Too Feminine&#8221; For Hillary Clinton</title>
	<atom:link href="http://collegecandy.com/2008/01/21/vogue-magazine-too-feminine-for-hillary-clinton/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://collegecandy.com/2008/01/21/vogue-magazine-too-feminine-for-hillary-clinton/</link>
	<description>Advice on student style, collegiate dating discussion guides, relationship advice and women&#039;s studies.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 05:20:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Casey</title>
		<link>http://collegecandy.com/2008/01/21/vogue-magazine-too-feminine-for-hillary-clinton/#comment-11131</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Casey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.collegecandy.com/buzz/6661#comment-11131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s the whole &quot;Damned if you do, damned if you don&#039;t&quot; If she does, she may not be taken seriously by the public therefore loosing her votes, if she doesn&#039;t she appears to be promoting the idea that being a woman isn&#039;t good enough to run for presidency you have to be masculine for anyone to take you seriously, and well, that idea just rubs some people the wrong way, so she&#039;ll lose votes there too. I&#039;m not a fan of Mrs. Clinton but this kind of makes me feel sorry for her. Kind of.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s the whole &#8220;Damned if you do, damned if you don&#8217;t&#8221; If she does, she may not be taken seriously by the public therefore loosing her votes, if she doesn&#8217;t she appears to be promoting the idea that being a woman isn&#8217;t good enough to run for presidency you have to be masculine for anyone to take you seriously, and well, that idea just rubs some people the wrong way, so she&#8217;ll lose votes there too. I&#8217;m not a fan of Mrs. Clinton but this kind of makes me feel sorry for her. Kind of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Natalie</title>
		<link>http://collegecandy.com/2008/01/21/vogue-magazine-too-feminine-for-hillary-clinton/#comment-11130</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Natalie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.collegecandy.com/buzz/6661#comment-11130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with the Vogue editor about how distressing it is that Hillary should even have to worry about these thinks as a Presidential candidate. Most of the other candidates wouldn&#039;t bat an eye at being asked to be on the cover of GQ. I think she should be able to do it, but I also think that she&#039;s right. Also, there is the SLIGHT possibility that she doesn&#039;t really want to be on the cover of Vogue.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the Vogue editor about how distressing it is that Hillary should even have to worry about these thinks as a Presidential candidate. Most of the other candidates wouldn&#8217;t bat an eye at being asked to be on the cover of GQ. I think she should be able to do it, but I also think that she&#8217;s right. Also, there is the SLIGHT possibility that she doesn&#8217;t really want to be on the cover of Vogue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

