![Channing Tatum’s 18 Hottest Moments [Photos]](http://s2.wp.com/imgpress?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcollegecandy.files.wordpress.com%2F2012%2F01%2Fchanning-tatum-lead11.jpg&resize=225,135 "Channing Tatum’s 18 Hottest Moments [Photos]")
Creepy, Creepy PSA’s That Make Me Feel Weird
Pedophilia. I mean, not a popular subject.
Boobs. Popular subject.
Pedophilia combined with boobs: Weird…mixed…message…must…avert…eyes.
An ad agency called Serve, via the Family Violence Partnership in Milwaukee, recently launched some freaking weird ads featuring the faces of little girls combined with the giant knockers of older women.
“Just because she has the body” says one ad, “doesn’t mean she has the brain.”
(A catch phrase that also works really well when connected to Britney Spears…but I digress.)
Now, while it’s obvious that Pedophilia is wrong and we as a nation should be educated about the disease, I really don’t want to ever come across one of these posters in real life. They’re so creepy I can’t even make a good joke about them. I mean, I’ve been trying to think of something funny for the last seven minutes…but I can’t seem to take my eyes off those boobs.
What do you think? Are these ads obscenely, disturbingly weird? Or just shocking enough to get their message across?
These Ads Are:
Tell us what you're thinking...
Lindsay Lohan's New Photo Shoot Is Full of Cleavage
Someone Tried to Extort The Duggars… So They'd Be Cancelled
So Snoop Dog Recorded a Rap About Porn
Lady Gaga Is Starting a Social Media Site for Her Fans
Kris Humphries Has Some Interesting Divorce Demands
thestorysofar says:
Thu, 7th Feb 20089:34 am
the ads were never used.
Janers says:
Fri, 22nd Feb 20081:05 am
Is this supposed to make people want to have sex with kids? I am confused?
Kids don't have bodies like that, heck I don't have a body quite like that…but you put a bag over those mutants babe babies and I'd even hit it!
LOL, (just kidding!!!!)
no, but I don't know, I think they are a bit over the "too creepy" line,
maybe more than "a bit"
Sure they get your attention, but then once they have your attention you are too busy trying to figure out wtf? than the intended message.
Yeh, pedophilia is bad, but who doesn't already know that? Other than maybe those creepy child-sex cults, man-boy love groups, currupt priest, or that Jamie Lynn Spears' Baby's daddy.
and I doubt a pedophile is going to look at that and think "oh yeh, photoshopped boobs, that means I should NOT rape kids",
and would this even get a pedophile's attention? Are pedos even into large breast and womanly figures?
yeh, didn't think so
Patty says:
Mon, 19th May 20085:40 pm
I can’t help be a little suspicious of these groups that are obsessed with pedophilia, in the same way that I am suspicious of rightwing religious types who are obsessed with homosexual activity. Is it a case of projection based on self loathing? The case of Ted Haggart would seem to suggest so. These groups, chief amongst them the horribly, or perhaps aptly, named “Perverted Justice”, who aid in the stings on “To Catch a Predator” seemed fixated on the strangers involved in sex crimes. However anyone who was serious about combating child molestation would focus on familiar violations, since these are the more common cases.
Gary says:
Sun, 14th Sep 20089:43 pm
Yes, I’d have to say, WTF WERE the people who created these ads thinking. Naughty, naughty, naughty thoughts, I’d say! LOL!
Janers has it right of course. An actual pedophile, of which I’m one, is not interested in girls with 40DD boobs. Most of us would just say “GROSS!”
By the way, pedophilia is an attraction, or more likely, an orientation. Child molestation is a crime. The two are only tangentially related. Kinda like heterosexuality is an orientation, and rape is a crime, and the two are only tangentially related.
The target of these ads, I’d have to think, was men interested in curvaceous teenage girls, which is about the most natural and common attraction out there.