<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 5 Reasons Why You Need To See Showgirls (the Edited for TV Version)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://collegecandy.com/2008/05/21/5-reasons-why-you-need-to-see-showgirls-the-edited-for-tv-version/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://collegecandy.com/2008/05/21/5-reasons-why-you-need-to-see-showgirls-the-edited-for-tv-version/</link>
	<description>Advice on student style, collegiate dating discussion guides, relationship advice and women&#039;s studies.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 23:01:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Toni</title>
		<link>http://collegecandy.com/2008/05/21/5-reasons-why-you-need-to-see-showgirls-the-edited-for-tv-version/#comment-6674</link>
		<dc:creator>Toni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 02:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.collegecandy.com/buzz/9097#comment-6674</guid>
		<description>This is a very well-written, hilarious, and spot-on review of a movie which ranks near the top of my guilty pleasures &quot;so-bad-it&#039;s-good&quot; list.  But I concur:  see the original too, you won&#039;t be disappointed.  In her defense, I think Berkeley pulls off a part which would have left most actresses crying on the curb instead of kicking ass.  And in Esterhazs&#039; defense, Basic Instinct is a masterpiece of guilty pleasures, and the sequel is, in my opinion, even better.  Or so-much-worse-it&#039;s-better.  Depending on how you look at it.  Approach these seedy, sexy, silly movies with the desire to be entertained, and you will be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a very well-written, hilarious, and spot-on review of a movie which ranks near the top of my guilty pleasures &#8220;so-bad-it&#8217;s-good&#8221; list.  But I concur:  see the original too, you won&#8217;t be disappointed.  In her defense, I think Berkeley pulls off a part which would have left most actresses crying on the curb instead of kicking ass.  And in Esterhazs&#8217; defense, Basic Instinct is a masterpiece of guilty pleasures, and the sequel is, in my opinion, even better.  Or so-much-worse-it&#8217;s-better.  Depending on how you look at it.  Approach these seedy, sexy, silly movies with the desire to be entertained, and you will be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lola B</title>
		<link>http://collegecandy.com/2008/05/21/5-reasons-why-you-need-to-see-showgirls-the-edited-for-tv-version/#comment-6673</link>
		<dc:creator>Lola B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 21:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.collegecandy.com/buzz/9097#comment-6673</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t forget when she rips open her leopard-print shirt and in the next shot, after she&#039;s CLEARLY ripped open her shirt, you see the entire leopard print shirt squiggily drawn back on!  Then in the next scene, she&#039;s buttoning the real shirt back up.



Classic.  Genius.  VH1.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t forget when she rips open her leopard-print shirt and in the next shot, after she&#8217;s CLEARLY ripped open her shirt, you see the entire leopard print shirt squiggily drawn back on!  Then in the next scene, she&#8217;s buttoning the real shirt back up.</p>
<p>Classic.  Genius.  VH1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sady - The New School</title>
		<link>http://collegecandy.com/2008/05/21/5-reasons-why-you-need-to-see-showgirls-the-edited-for-tv-version/#comment-6672</link>
		<dc:creator>Sady - The New School</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 23:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.collegecandy.com/buzz/9097#comment-6672</guid>
		<description>Love it. However, I also feel the need to speak out in favor of the porntastic original version. My reasoning is quite simple: any SHOWGIRLS which eliminates the pool sex scene (in which our girl Elizabeth flaps around - dramatically! - so rapidly, and with such an utter lack of coordination, that she very literally seems to be getting electrocuted, rather than boned) is not my SHOWGIRLS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love it. However, I also feel the need to speak out in favor of the porntastic original version. My reasoning is quite simple: any SHOWGIRLS which eliminates the pool sex scene (in which our girl Elizabeth flaps around &#8211; dramatically! &#8211; so rapidly, and with such an utter lack of coordination, that she very literally seems to be getting electrocuted, rather than boned) is not my SHOWGIRLS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
