Sexy AND Smart = Eternally Single?

fashion1a.jpgI consider myself to be a female of average to above-average intelligence. I can effortlessly pump out research papers, calculate how much I can spend on eBay without overdrawing from my bank account and I can even pronounce and use words like “ubiquitous” and “ostentatious” in daily conversations.

I never thought that my innate intellectual prowess was affecting anything but my ability to make the Dean’s list. According to one Lisa Daily, though, I might be wrong. Being a smart and sexy female comes with its own catalog of setbacks, including the inability to find a man to love for life.

Basically, according to this article from the author of “Stop Getting Dumped: All you need to know to make men fall madly in love with you and marry ‘The One’ in 3 years or less”, smart chicks are less likely than their dense counterparts to snag a marriage license (and the man to go with it). Studies conducted in both Britain and the U.S. showed the same ludicrous results: the higher the woman’s IQ, the lower her marriage prospects.

Wait, what?! You mean, men don’t want women who can actually hold a real conversation about real issues? No freakin way.

Okay, actually, who am I kidding? I totally saw that one coming. But it’s not really their fault. The male decision to date dumb (and the female decision to “marry up”) is a matter of simple biology. Stats show that men want women who are younger, dumber and shorter. And, conveniently, most women want to find the best possible mate to raise the little ones. This generally means someone who is taller, smarter and older. Another big reason men want airheads? One theory is that men desire a wife who will stay at home, watch the kids and clean his dirty socks. And obvi, us smart b*tches will have none of that Holly Homemaker crap.

Men might also be afraid that their smart sphinx will go astray. A study conducted at the University of Michigan showed that men like to date women in subservient occupations because women in higher-level jobs seem more likely to cheat. And the theory is that men are biologically-charged to do pretty much anything possible to eliminate the need to raise kids that they did not, um, produce, which means staying far away from women who might commit adultery.

So what does this mean for women who can not only solve quadratic equations, but also want a hot hubby to come home to? Daily says not to worry, ‘cause there is somebody out there for everybody.

Basically, no matter how smart you think you are, there’s always someone – like, your future husband – who is smarter.

11 Comments on "Sexy AND Smart = Eternally Single?"

  1. Casey says:
    Wed, 21st May 20086:25 pm 

    I wouldn’t say I was smarter than my boyfriend, But I have had more school and I have a lot more knowledge. And I haven’t asked him directly but he seems to enjoy learning things from me. So maybe the stats are wrong. Or I found one of the few oddballs out there lol.

  2. happy says:
    Wed, 21st May 200811:31 pm 

    I met her on a dating site called richkiss.com, she’s beautiful, sweet and elegant and I think I fall in love with her. But she is smarter than me. Should we continue?

  3. kayla says:
    Thu, 22nd May 20085:05 am 

    I think it’s a bit ridiculous to say that smart women will have “none of that Holly Homemaker crap.” There’s nothing wrong with staying home and raising children if you can do it, or want to do it..regardless of your intelligence level. I know plenty of women who have college degrees, MBAs, etc. who made the decision to stay home with their kids, and most of them ARE smarter than their husbands.

  4. hanabira says:
    Thu, 22nd May 20087:47 am 

    This article only really concentrates on the theory that smarter women are kess likely to settl down because of men not liking their intellect… Could it not also be because often smarter women may have the sorts of jobs which might be leading them up the job hierarchy so they have much more to have to give up in order to compromise ambitions when meeting another person. If you aren’t looking to the sky then I think it would be much easier to settle down because you aren’t thinking of the life you have to give up for your man.

    My boyfriend really found education hard when he was there (I met him subsequently, and didn’t pick up on this at all until much later since I think in his own way he is very bright), and so I may be conventionally “smarter” than him but I don’t think it’s ever been an issue because I don’t see it the way that tests would and nor does he. I think there is more of a problem when people have superiority/inferiority complexes…

  5. jes says:
    Thu, 22nd May 20089:47 am 

    I agree, maybe it’s because smarter girls are simply more picky about whom we’d choose to settle down with, not because we can’t “get a man.”

    Don’t get me wrong, I love my boyfriend to death (who is, coincidentally, much smarter than I, he’s a chemical engineering major) but I honestly think there are simply less good men for a smart girl to choose from, rather than settling for the first guy “who will have her and not break her heart.”

    And also, smarter women probably would rather not deal with men’s unnecessary crap if the only reason they need them is for emotional support and friendship, rather than financial support. They simply might not care to run off and get married because they’ve already got everything they need! :)

  6. Natalie says:
    Fri, 23rd May 200811:51 pm 

    First of all, I resent the statement that a woman’s decision to stay at home is in any way related to her level of intelligence or education. As the daughter of a stay at home mom, I fully appreciate my mother’s decision to raise her children instead of allowing a nanny or a random daycare center to raise us. Second of all, that article does not surprise me in the least; after all, there are less “above-average” people out there than “average”. Intelligent and educated women are more likely to be drawn to equally intelligent or educated partners, and let’s face it, the pool of the intelligent and educated is less than the less-educated population.

  7. hanabira says:
    Sat, 24th May 20088:14 am 

    I wasn’t trying to say that stay at home mothers are dumb: my mother was also a stay at home mother and I appreciate that. For both of our mothers the time will have been right in their minds for them to decide that they want to focus entirely on the family, but that’s not to say that they weren’t giving up on other opportunities, it was their decision and clearly with their priorities family had the most weight in it.

    HOWEVER, it is statistically correct that women who are set on their careers will have their children much later and marry much later, since it wouldn’t be possible to carry on their career path as well as having children. This isn’t to say that they are bad mothers but have to wait until they feel the time is right to sacrifice what they have built up. The longer you wait to find a man, the fewer good singletons of your age there are to find. Success in career, although not entirely, is also influenced by intelligence level: how many dumb, uneducated MDs have you come across?

    It isn’t viable to say that there are less intelligent people in the population which is why it is hard for women because there should be an equal amount of men with the same issue in that case, so it wouldn’t be a problem.

  8. j says:
    Mon, 26th May 20081:21 pm 

    this is bs. from the mouth of an intelligent AND engaged 22 year old girl.

  9. Still Sexy says:
    Mon, 26th May 200810:17 pm 

    Well, I remember a time not too long ago where I wasn’t in a great job and guys didn’t give me a shot even though they were attracted to me. They’d ask me out but would always marry someone with a degree and good job. Now that I’m older, have a college degree and a good job, and I exude confidence, I can’t keep them away. So, I think that the guys in the studies are just saying that because they want to appear to be the “man” rather than what they truly feel. The only guys I’ve ever run into that did date supposedly subservient women were guys that thought poorly of themselves. They would always go for the women who were upbeat on the outside but turned out to be as fake as they come- and crazy according to these guys (of course!). This is just what I’ve seen in my 20 years of being in the dating scene where I’m at.

    Have I ever been married? No. Have I been proposed to? Yes. Did I accept any offers? No. Have I found true love? Yes. Do I want marriage? No. Am I picky? Hell, yeah. Never settle for less than what you want. You’ll never be happy and it’s harmful to the other person to be someone you settled for. It’s not that you want the perfect person; it’s your idea of perfect for you. That’s how I view it. Yes, men and women can be picky. Sometimes we’re pickier about the clothes we wear and the cars we drive versus the people we date and marry.

  10. Vance says:
    Thu, 2nd Oct 20087:15 pm 

    Are you kidding me? I would LOVE to be with a woman who’s inherently smarter than I am. That means I don’t have to explain myself repetitively to get my point across, and if she also happens to be the nurturing type she can help me become smarter than I currently am. Sounds like a great deal to me.

    Then again, I’m 28, male, average or above-average intelligence as you are, and would love to be the Harry Homemaker to complement the Holly so that both of us could achieve our dreams. I’ve also never been on a date in my entire life. Maybe your formula applies to men as well as women.

  11. Chris says:
    Tue, 2nd Dec 20081:56 am 

    Before we even get as far as the question of “should smart men marry smart women?”, the question that men are really dealing with is, “should men marry at all?”. …and the conclusion that more and more men are coming to is that men in America should not marry, and under no circumstances should they father children.

    The truth is that more than 67% of marriages will end in divorce. 92% of the time it will be initiated by the woman for no other reason than she is “unfulfilled” – oh, and because she gets the kids, the house, at least ½ the assets and most of his future after tax income for the next 18 years. The man will get raked over in family court. He will lose the house. He will see his kids 2 out of 14 days (if the ex doesn’t level unsubstantiated “abuse” claims.) He will be forced to hand over 40-50% of his take-home pay. If he loses his job due to illness or downsizing, the State will toss him in jail. While jailed the arrearage will grow and the state will charge interest. The State will revoke his driver’s and professional licenses, make him virtually unemployable.

    If you were to take up sky-diving, and the instructor informed you that 67% of the parachutes were defective, would you take the plunge?

    The men’s Marriage Strike is alive and well, thank you.

    nomarriage.com

Tell us what you're thinking...




COVER STORY

It’s a Twihard-Knock Life It’s a Twihard-Knock Life

WTF? So you can sleep with Edward?? When I was waiting outside of the Scholastic... 

Bar Fails: These Offenses Deserve a Penalty Fee Bar Fails: These Offenses Deserve a Penalty Fee

Easy on the soda water, homegirl. A couple of days ago three bars at Penn State were... 

It’s All Fun and Games Until You Live Together It’s All Fun and Games Until You Live Together

"I'm smiling but if she doesn't take out the garbage soon I'm going... 

Read More Posts From This Category

HAHA

I Kissed A Girl…And I Wanna Do More I Kissed A Girl…And I Wanna Do More

Like Katy Perry, and probably many of you, I kissed a girl. And I liked it. More... 

Coupled. It’s the Little Things That Count Coupled. It’s the Little Things That Count

I remember watching Say Anything with my sister when I was a kid and wondering if... 

Ask A Dude: I Refuse To Be A Friend With Benefits Ask A Dude: I Refuse To Be A Friend With Benefits

Hey Dude, I’ve done the Friends With Benefits thing, and, to say the least,... 

Read More Posts From This Category