Comments on: Male Science: Flirting

By: Liz, Flagler

Liz, Flagler — Thu, 21 Aug 2008 22:16:13 +0000

Conan, fabulous explaination of the male psychie. And I like the addition of Rick, since he seems to be all I'm ever attracted to. I'll sometimes go for the Steves but I'm so much of a Rick-ette myself that I always wait far too long and Steve has already found a (more than likely) Doug-ette to be with.

Life is infuriating. Any advice for the Rick-ettes out there?

By: J - NYU

J - NYU — Thu, 19 Jun 2008 21:52:06 +0000

Joe,

I *think* those statistics might have been made up.

…Just a guess.

By: joe smith

joe smith — Thu, 19 Jun 2008 21:09:15 +0000

Wow. I don't know how this post made it as a hot topic on this website, but it was damn near impossible to read. To start it off, I don't know where you even came up with a basis for your random statistics. Secondly, your thought process was harder to follow than someone's mindset who is on magic mushrooms. And thirdly, as previously mentioned, even saying irregardless says a lot about the writing abilities of the author. Hopefully your next post will have some type of insight/meaning.

By: Chris

Chris — Thu, 19 Jun 2008 10:52:48 +0000

Oh man, I am such a Rick. My problem is that I am too pleasant. I am too nice a guy. I vault straight over the relationship yardage and land firmly in the friend zone.

I always assume that if a girl is being nice to me, she is just reciprocating my friendly-ness, in the same way that I would be nice to a girl whether I'm attracted to her or not. I can't tell if she digs me or if she is just being sociable.

Do girls prefer nice, Lloyd Dobler type guys, or douchebaggy, hard-ass guys?

By: Wu-TangDorkfoshizzle

Wu-TangDorkfoshizzle — Wed, 18 Jun 2008 12:13:48 +0000

I was just thinking that sex with a nerd would be humiliating for any college girl (it sure as hell would be with me), so it therefore follows that it would make a perfect haze!

By: ya right

ya right — Tue, 17 Jun 2008 13:38:32 +0000

what the fuck is wutang dork talking about.

is that sarcasm or like, sexism? or both?

By: Lauren, University o

Lauren, University o — Tue, 17 Jun 2008 06:27:09 +0000

Haley…your attention to detail is uncanny. But you focused on a single word. What do you think of what Conan has to say as a whole?

By: Conan - Columbia Col

Conan - Columbia Col — Mon, 16 Jun 2008 22:26:12 +0000

WHOOPS ERROR

By: Wu-TangDorkfoshizzle

Wu-TangDorkfoshizzle — Sun, 15 Jun 2008 11:00:27 +0000

Here’s an idea for a great sorority haze–Screw the nerd! But not in public, cuz we’re uncomfortable with public sex unlike u sluts!

By: Haley

Haley — Sat, 14 Jun 2008 22:58:23 +0000

"Irregardless of your inability to slip that compound . . ."

Irregardless? you're kidding right? From dictionary.com: "Usage Note: Irregardless is a word that many mistakenly believe to be correct usage in formal style, when in fact it is used chiefly in nonstandard speech or casual writing. Coined in the United States in the early 20th century, it has met with a blizzard of condemnation for being an improper yoking of irrespective and regardless and for the logical absurdity of combining the negative ir- prefix and -less suffix in a single term. Although one might reasonably argue that it is no different from words with redundant affixes like debone and unravel, it has been considered a blunder for decades and will probably continue to be so. [Probably blend of irrespective and regardless.]"