WTF Friday: Baby Daddy. Literally.
February 13, 2009 Posted in Buzz

13-year-old Alfie (who lookes 7) is just your typical kid. He likes video games and sports. He gets allowance. He can’t get into R-rated movies.
Oh yeah – and he’s a dad.
OMFG. WTF?
16 Comments on "WTF Friday: Baby Daddy. Literally."
Tell us what you're thinking...
















Reality Shows We Miss
Comedy is So In This Season
New Round of Shops at Target!
Unscripted With MIB 3
Most Controversial Comedies





Christy says:
Fri, 13th Feb 20098:11 am
He likes videogames and sports. He gets an allowance. ….Doesn't sound that different from a lot of 20 year old guys I know….hah.
LCallahan says:
Fri, 13th Feb 20098:27 am
OMGOSH! that is so so sad!!
and why is he even having sex @ 13!!? is that when kids start these days? and yea, he looks like hes about 7!
omg i feel bad for that little baby… hopefully these kids have good parents who can take car of him or her. bc what 15&13 yr old are ready to raise a child.
Mandy - Hofstra says:
Fri, 13th Feb 20098:35 am
Are you effin kidding me this kid?
he's not 13..he's 5
and this girl is no way 15…she looks 29!!
Alex says:
Fri, 13th Feb 20098:47 am
LCallahan, you say you hope these people have good parents, but the fact is that if they had good parents I doubt they would be having sex this young!
Casey says:
Fri, 13th Feb 20099:06 am
actually the article said he was 12 when they had sex. They did it once, and that baby was conceived. This whole thing is just disgusting. Not to mention that girl looks diseased.
Gwenivere says:
Fri, 13th Feb 20099:19 am
What is wrong with that 15 year old girl!! She looks much older than her age. But even that aside, why would she want to have sex with someone who was years younger and also LOOKED that much younger than her. Maybe the boy didn't have the sex talk in school yet, but she sure did by 15. Their parents should have stepped in and told them to give the baby up for adoption. Then at least the baby could have went to a family who could provide and support her properly. That boy will be nothing but a big brother to that baby. He doesn't even know what finacially means. This is just horrifying.
this guy says:
Fri, 13th Feb 200910:48 am
That baby is screwed. The tax payers will end up paying for that kid. I'll take bets right now that both the father and the baby end up in Jail and the mother will have another kid before she is 20.
Samantha says:
Fri, 13th Feb 200911:16 am
Yeah, the (UK, if you didn't notice) government will be taking care of that baby. Neither kid has a job, obviously. The mom is one of 6 kids, her dad is unemployed, and the family was already living on benefits. The dad's parents are divorced, and his father has nine kids. They can't support their own families, much less their new grandkid.
maddie says:
Fri, 13th Feb 200911:36 am
good GOD this is disgusting!!! when that kid grows up and realizes his father was 12…. i can't even imagine the psychological trauma. i also wonder what kind of trauma the dad is going to experience when he's older and realizes what he did AS A CHILD! and: what girl wants to have sex with a kid who looks like he's 7 years old?!
Lauren, University o says:
Fri, 13th Feb 200912:03 pm
If this isn't an ad for Abstinence, I don't know what is.
nina says:
Fri, 13th Feb 20091:52 pm
This is sick! And SAD!
AJ says:
Fri, 13th Feb 20096:37 pm
OH GOD THIS IS SICK!!!
I feel so bad for that baby.
They are kids, the mom was holding that baby like it was a frikin doll.
What the hell is this world coming to.
Kudos to them for not having an abortion, but for that baby's sake they need to give that baby up for adoption.
sara says:
Sat, 14th Feb 200911:20 am
I know this is probably un-ethical to say, and puts the government in too-controlling of a position for some, but I think there should be laws as to how old you should be before you can be a parent. I mean, really? If you can't even get a work permit yet you obviously cannot support a kid. As a taxpayer I WISH this couple would have gotten an abortion! Why should I be forced to pay for their mistakes?
Jes says:
Sat, 14th Feb 200911:41 am
The article says this story was broken "exclusively by The Sun," which is basically like The National Enquirer…
How do we know this is even true?? If so, its quite sad.
E says:
Sun, 15th Feb 20094:11 pm
Kid should be put up for adoption. The new one, not the idiot ones.
Jes, I looked around and it's also on The Telegraph and Times Online.
E says:
Sun, 15th Feb 20094:12 pm
That said, I think it is absolutely horrible to wish they'd gotten an abortion. They were unbearably irresponsible, but the poor infant shouldn't have to pay for that. Again: they should be forced, by law, to give that child to a loving, STABLE home.