Perez Hilton Is a Hypocrite

perez-copythe-gay-marriage-question

In case you missed it, there’s a whole bunch of controversy surrounding Miss USA first runner-up, Miss California, Carrie Prejean.  During the interview portion of Sunday night’s competition, she was asked by gossip columnist Perez Hilton, one of the judges, her thoughts on gay marriage.  To this, she answered honestly (although rather awkwardly and maybe not politically correctly), “We live in a land where you can choose same-sex marriage or opposite. And you know what, I think in my country, in my family, I think that I believe that a marriage should be between a man and a woman. No offense to anybody out there, but that’s how I was raised.”

Her answer got a mixed reaction of boos and cheers from the audience, and immediately sparked controversy after the show, from a shouting match in the lobby of the Las Vegas hotel in which the ceremony took place, to every news outlet speculating that her remarks were the reason that she didn’t win the crown.

However, the most amount of heat Prejeaan has faced is from Perez Hilton himself, who’s attacked her on his blog and Twitter, calling her names like “dumb b***h”.  He’s even appeared on practically every major news show this morning, such as Good Morning America, Today, and The Early Show, as well as last night’s Larry King Live.

I understand why he’s upset with her answer–especially since it’s not an answer I personally agree with, either–but I do think that Perez is going a little overboard with this one.  I mean, isn’t he sort of acting like a hypocrite?  He spouts hate every day on his site, cutting people down for what they wear, the decisions they make in their personal lives and even how they look. He spreads rumors and ruins people’s reputations.

He doesn’t do this because he believes in it or was raised to believe in it; he does it to make money and to become the exact celebrity he tears apart day after day.

Yet, as soon as someone goes against something he believes strongly in, he goes off the deep end and makes this girl out to be totally evil?  Just because her opinion isn’t the same as his?

So let me get this straight, Perez: YOU’RE allowed to hate on everyone in Hollywood every single day on your site for the simple reason of making some money, but because this girl has religious beliefs that go against your own, she’s all of a sudden the bad guy? Yes, it is OK to disagree with her, but she is not a bitch for having an opinion, especially one based on her religious beliefs.

Like I said before, I don’t agree with Miss California’s opinion, either, but do I think she’s a bad person just because our opinions differ? No. I think she tried her best to not be too offensive (she even threw in a “No offense” just in case), while staying true to her beliefs.

Maybe Perez finally knows what it’s like to be on the other side of things. It’s not so funny, is it?

93 Comments on "Perez Hilton Is a Hypocrite"

  1. Jamielikewhoa says:
    Tue, 21st Apr 200912:08 pm 

    GREAT post. I felt this same way.

  2. Twitter.com/brittistheparty says:
    Tue, 21st Apr 200912:15 pm 

    He did go overboard!

  3. Gwenivere says:
    Tue, 21st Apr 200912:33 pm 

    I agree he did go overboard, but she answered that question horrendously. I do believe that is why she lost the crown. Being in the pageants you are supposed to be able to give your opinion in articulate and unbiased manner. Unfortunately she failed terribly. It doesn’t matter what her view on the question is. However, I wouldn’t want her going out and mentoring kids “that in her country marriage should be between a man and a woman”. Does she even realize that more than half those people that run the pageant shows are gay? The next generation is supposed to be making a more tolerant world. Not instilling the same narrow-minded beliefs from a world that no longer exists.

    On another note, I personally despise Perez Hilton. I don’t understand how he was chosen to be a judge in the first place. They couldn’t find a respectable gay member of the community to add to the panel?

  4. karen says:
    Tue, 21st Apr 200912:41 pm 

    i completely agree with you she was just being honest and i just dont understand we are a country of free speach and belief but yet when someone says what they believe everyone cuts them down. he is retarded and did go overboard. dont ask the question if you arent going to the take the answer they give seriously.. i do still think she should of won..

  5. Jess says:
    Tue, 21st Apr 200912:48 pm 

    Let’s think about degrees here. And context.

    Perez Hilton certainly isn’t my favorite person, but he’s a crappy internet blogger, not someone trying to represent the United States (albeit in a beauty pageant). Are you saying that Miss California should be given some slack because of the way she was ‘raised’? Or because of her fundamentally bigoted ‘religious beliefs’? Would we give the same rights to Chris Brown if he was ‘raised’ to believe that violence against women was acceptable? Would we give the same leeway to Mel Gibson because his ‘religious beliefs’ allow for antisemitism?

    To me, not believing in equal rights for homosexuals is the same as believing that miscegenation laws were acceptable, that segregation was a good idea. I’m not gay, but if Miss California tried to tell me who I could and couldn’t marry, I would call her a dumb stinking bitch too.

  6. Casey says:
    Tue, 21st Apr 20091:11 pm 

    I was raised Catholic, still am a Catholic. I have no problem with gay couples, if that’s what they choose to do then so be it. Everyone’s free to make their own choices. Does that mean that I agree with the choices they make? No. But I’m tolerant of them because I wouldn’t want someone restricting my personal choices and freedoms, as long as they aren’t harming anyone else.

    However, I do not believe that gay couples should be allowed to “get married” They SHOULD be allowed to have their own ceremonies and have all the benefits of a married couple, but can they call it something different? Something besides marriage? Because a Wedding was originally a religious ceremony between, yes, a man and a woman, who were inviting GOD into their married life. That is what a wedding was, a religious ceremony. That is why so many people have a problem with “gay marriage” not that they don’t think gay couples should be every bit as happy as regular heterosexual couples but because we feel like “gay marriages” completely demean our religious practices. Why would anyone want to partake in something they don’t agree with and don’t live their life by?

  7. Meghan says:
    Tue, 21st Apr 20091:36 pm 

    While I don’t agree with Miss California, I agree with everything you said about Perez one hundred percent. He is such a hypocrite! If a celebrity says something nice about him in an interview, he starts kissing their ass. Then if a celeb says something bad about him or doesn’t praise him in any way he tries to tear them apart. He needs to get over himself. His blog was good two years ago when nobody knew who he was, I was afraid he’d get famous and become a smug asshole, and now he has.

  8. Bre says:
    Tue, 21st Apr 20091:42 pm 

    I have been watching both Perez and Miss. California on all the media outlets, and I agree with everything here. My main problem with the way in which Miss. California answered her question is that she was biased. Good for her for standing up in what she believes in, but Miss. USA is not a political pageant.

    And really, when did it become ok to add “No Offense” to anything hateful and be able to get away with it???

  9. Renée says:
    Tue, 21st Apr 20091:49 pm 

    Casey – Wow… thank you. I can relate completely, and you’ve expressed my opinion perfectly. Thank you.

    Here’s something that bothers me a bit: we’re all entitled to our opinions, and our ideas will (more or less) be tolerated and even respected by others. I don’t believe in gay “marriage” because of my religious beliefs… but I’m a bigot? I have no problem with gay couples, but I don’t think that they should be allowed to “marry,” and I’m a narrow-minded, ignorant Christian? Hmmm… okay.

    And how dare somebody compare those of us against gay marriage to Chris Brown. Chris Brown beat a woman because he’s a violent idiot. I don’t support gay marriage because of a personal belief that I really don’t think I need to explain to you. I accept and respect gay couples, and, as Casey wrote, I’d be fine with something that doesn’t carry all of the religious associations that “marriage” does. I think that there’s a bit of a difference.

    Anyway… as far as Perez Hilton goes, a part of me is convinced that he did this all for the publicity. Really, it was a win-win situation: if Carrie Prejean had said that she supports gay marriage, then she might have won, and he could have written about it… but she didn’t, and we’ve all seen how many television shows he’s been on. It seems to have worked out well for him.

  10. megapotamus says:
    Tue, 21st Apr 20091:58 pm 

    Those of you who disagree with Miss California and object to this benighted troglodyte representing the nation in such an important post of course know that the oh-so-dreamy Barack Obama also supports civil unions and opposes “gay marriage”. Bill Clinton of course supported the Defense of Marriage Act which defined marriage as between one man and one woman. Such dangerous retrograde morons should not be allowed to represent the nation as Miss California is disqualified from being Miss USA. Right?

  11. Firio says:
    Tue, 21st Apr 20092:40 pm 

    The real test about the hypocrisy of the situation is this:

    Perez has been saying in most of the news interviews that if Miss California had said something more neutral, he’d been okay with it — but because she stated an opinion that he didn’t agree with, that he found offensive and that would be offensive to others, he and some of the judges felt she shouldn’t win.

    But — would the same have gone if she’d said she supports the right for gays to marry, even though that, too, is offensive to at least as many Americans? Hardly. He’d have been the first to vote for her.

    So the problem wasn’t that Miss California isn’t savvy enough to give a non-answer. The problem is that he wanted her to cheer-lead his position, and she didn’t take the bait, and so he’s making his mistake — to ask such a polarizing and leading question in the first place — into her problem.

    The real scandal here isn’t that Miss California stated something publicly that many find offensive and that the pageant shouldn’t be a forum for. It’s that Perez wanted her to say something to support his opinion — also something that the pageant shouldn’t be a forum for — and that he thought he put her into a position to either agree with his position or not have any opinion at all, and she didn’t take him up on that non-choice.

    And that’s the true hypocrisy here: Perez making it a situation where she had to choose between his agenda or oblivion, and then blaming her for refusing to play ball.

  12. Laura says:
    Tue, 21st Apr 20093:43 pm 

    1) I think the true “scandal” of the whole thing actually doesn’t revolve around gay marriage (although there is no denying that is where this issue is stemming from)

    2) Miss California answered the question posed by Perez on a personal level, reflecting her own beliefs as opposed to providing a neutral response. The ultimate reason why Miss America candidates have a question/answer section is to determine, or at least try to predict, the type responses they will give when they are Miss America when representing the entire nation. To her credit (?) it is a truly polar issue, especially made evident in her own state with Prop 8. By no means am I saying she should have responded with a pro-gay marriage response, but her statement of “I think that I believe that a marriage should be between a man and a woman” is taking a chosing a clear side on the issue. Personally, I would not want someone who is selected and represents political neutrality to distinctly go against what I believe in or support. Had she said “I believe a marriage should be between two loving adults”, she still would have upset a good portion of the nation. Although I have no idea what a neutral statement would entail (I’m not really Miss America material), that’s just my thoughts

    3) Perez calling her a b*tch and a c*nt is uncalled for. I understand that he is a member of the homosexual community, and her response hurt not only him but millions of others. However, the backlash is coming from a personal level. Him bitching to multiple media sources just proves that he is a media whore who despite criticizing other celebrities is a little desperate to be one himself. Hypocrisy, however, doesn’t really apply here. His blog is all about expressing his personal views and some how people like reading about it enough for him to have a career. Miss California entered in a competition where personal stances on deeply divided issues is not encouraged but rather a stance that encompasses the variety of different opinions and view points we have in this country.

  13. Linda says:
    Tue, 21st Apr 20093:49 pm 

    Woah.
    Some of you should chill out.
    Miss California spoke honestly, she didn’t say she HATED gay people or anything, she simply said she didn’t agree with gay marriage. .Why exactly does that warrant her being called a dumb bitch? Everyone is not going to agree with gay marriage. Take me for example, I also don’t agree with gay marriage,however, I don’t have a problem with anyone that is gay and chooses to get married…that’s their choice. I’m all for choices, I just personally don’t agree with it.

    I think Miss California’s actual mistake was saying “No offense” .. which implied that she was about to say something offensive which, I think, was enough, for some people to condemn whatever else came out of her mouth. I don’t think anyone should ever apologize for being honest..

    & to wrap that rant up .. Perez Hilton is a media whore & indeed a hypocrite.. he is probably the most hurtful celebrity “blogger” online…& his behavior towards Miss California only shows how ignorant he is when it comes to dealing with people whose opinion differs from his.. Ahhh… why the media chose to give him all this attention to make him feel relevant is beyond me…

    /rant :)

  14. Lauren - University of Michigan says:
    Tue, 21st Apr 20093:53 pm 

    Yeah lets move away frm the gay marriage issue. This post is about Perez being a hypocrite and being able to dish it out but not take it. Even when its not totally about him.

    I hate perez hilton. I dont think he’s funny or talented, I hate seeing him all over the media and I wish that people would celebrate the more talented people in the media…like this site :)

  15. Sam says:
    Tue, 21st Apr 20094:11 pm 

    I don’t agree with her, but I also don’t agree with how he acted. I still don’t think she should have won though. She could have re-worded her answer and made it sound much better than it did. Perez isn’t helping the whole gay rights movement – throwing hatred around for someone expressing their opinion isn’t going to change anything. It seems pretty immature.

  16. HNL says:
    Tue, 21st Apr 20094:18 pm 

    This is the first time since I’ve been reading College Candy, I am embarrassed to say I read it.

    FINE, Perez Hilton hates on celebrities… but guess what? They are getting paid millions to do what act in movies? do what they love? then drink heavily and throw it all down the drain? give me a break! Being targeted by the media is part of being a celebrity so get over it. If they get upset and cry, trust me they can wipe their tears with their millions of dollars.

    Secondly, I’m not sure how one cannot be outraged when they heard how she answered that question. Perez was completely correct when he posted the video blog and stated on Larry King that she should have just avoided giving a direct answer because she ended up making people feel excluded. Frankly, I don’t care how you actually feel, you’re Miss USA, you should “UNITE.”

  17. nia says:
    Tue, 21st Apr 20094:40 pm 

    so i know this post is about Perez being a hypocrite, but this controversy is all i’ve been hearing about lately, and it’s just upsetting that a lot of people are missing the point(not in the blog i mean everywhere else). Perez asked Ms. CA if she thought gay marriage should be legalized in all 50 states and she said she lived in a country where people could choose to have “same sex marriage, or opposite marriage” and that’s where the problem is! she was competing to win a crown and represent the country, but she seemed to know little about it…ESPECIALLY being from CA! i don’t condone Perez’s reaction off camera, but i feel that these debates and tv interviews shouldn’t be focusing on opinions because they keep missing the point! :(

  18. D. says:
    Tue, 21st Apr 20096:16 pm 

    Casey:

    By your reasoning, atheists (and agnostics?) shouldn’t be allowed to get married. There would be nothing religious in it and they are certainly not inviting God into their lives at all, let alone into their marriage. Gay marriage, or any marriage really, is primarily a legal issue and therefore religion should have nothing to do with it whatsoever.

    That said, Perez Hilton is a jackass and a hatemonger.

  19. carrie says:
    Tue, 21st Apr 20096:52 pm 

    Well I quess we have all learned that if you want to be miss universe you have to give the stepford answers. Personally, I would like to see someone who actually has a mind of her own win for once..as for Ms. Hilton..Hypocrite to the max..for someone who wants everyone else to be open minded about his lifestyle he sure is a close minded stupid B when it comes to others opinions. To have a judge to degrade and curse a contestant like that is just tacky (OH YEA, I FORGOT) and wrong, He should not be allowed to judge ever again.So because Ms hilton is so keen on telling everyone how he feels heres how I feel..Hes a slug on the butt of the earth!

  20. beth says:
    Tue, 21st Apr 20097:00 pm 

    Casey and Bre- I agree 100%.

    What Miss California did was probably one of the hardest things she’ll ever do- she had the guts to stand up and give an honest opinion even though she knew she was going to bashed by everyone with a different opinion.

    I hate that someone cannot give an honest opinion without being labeled a bigot or close-minded!

    And comparing her to Chris Brown is completely wrong!

  21. carrie says:
    Tue, 21st Apr 20097:08 pm 

    And that being said ..Yes I agree with Nia..maybe the point is being missed, and maybe Miss Ca. didnt technically answer the question correctly. But what a surprise that Hilton has turned it into a gay rights platform..even going so far as saying that Miley Cyrus supports same sex marriage. Well, THAT should change everyones mind now. Shes 15 for Gods sake (oops, am I not supposed to say God?) She will probably change her mind 28 times on the subject by the time she turns 18. Oh yea Miley.. just cause hes using you for his cause now dosent mean he wont cut you down later for a buck. I am not saying weather or not i believe in God or gay marriage..what I believe in is everyones right to believe what they want and to have others respect those beliefs without being degraded and vilified for it. Thanks

  22. Liz says:
    Tue, 21st Apr 20098:10 pm 

    Casey, you do not have your facts straight about the history of marriage. European marriages were affiliated with the Church because the Church was the most prominent power in Europe in the Dark Ages. Marriage has existed before and outside of God. Even ignoring history, we have marriages performed outside of Churches today.

    Furthermore, “separate but equal” has already been ruled as unconstitutional. See Brown v. Board of Education.

  23. Jodie says:
    Tue, 21st Apr 20098:12 pm 

    Why are we taking ANY of this seriously at all? This entire show is redic. We’ve got a playboy bunny, an SNL cast member, and a celebrity blog writer as judges. It’s cheap entertainment. Miss USA isn’t running for Senator, she’s running to become a talking head with free NY rent and a hair dresser. If I were to be crowned, I would just laugh it off.

  24. caro says:
    Tue, 21st Apr 20098:16 pm 

    i disagree with this miss but she’s honest! it’s not because you disagree with someone ,this person can’t speak!

  25. K says:
    Tue, 21st Apr 20098:53 pm 

    i agree with those post. Miss CA had the right to say whatever she wanted. and also who the hell hired Perez as a judge? what the hell does he know about pageants

  26. Poppy says:
    Tue, 21st Apr 200910:20 pm 

    I think you went a little over board with this post.
    So so did half the people reading this post.
    Bottom line it’s his Job, to hate on people.
    There’s no such thing as bad press.
    Even bad press is good press

  27. Casey says:
    Tue, 21st Apr 200911:10 pm 

    D, I don’t believe atheists should be “married” either. Civil unions, sure! a godless alternative to marriage, all for it! My sister and her new husband are atheist, she wanted me to be her maid of honor. I refused because I didn’t agree with the fact that she was having a wedding as an atheist. I still went to the wedding and congratulated her, but I didn’t want to be a part of it. So no, I don’t just feel that way about homosexual couples.

    And Liz, I will double check, but I’m pretty sure before the first french revolution marriages were all religious in some way. They weren’t all christian marriages of course, but they did revolve around the couples religion.

    And since marriage is a religious ceremony, state and religion are separate so it doesn’t fall under “separate but equal”.

  28. Mike says:
    Tue, 21st Apr 200911:27 pm 

    It’s pretty sad these days that the PC Police have gotten away with labeling anything they don’t agree with as “hate speech.” Hey Perez, you asshole, we are allowed to have differing opinions in this country.

    The only dumb bitch in this story is Perez.

    And for those who keep squawking about how Miss USA is supposed to represent all of the USA and that’s why her answer was wrong, guess what? Not all of the USA supports gay marriage, so stick it up your PC fascist asses.

  29. Jessica says:
    Tue, 21st Apr 200911:50 pm 

    Exactly! I totally agree with you… it’s not like she said anything horrible about gay marriage, she just gave her opinion and she said it in a polite way. I don’t agree with it either, but everyone is entitled to their own opinion, and she shouldn’t be getting the backlash she’s been getting because Perez Hilton didn’t like her answer. If she had said it in a nasty and offensive way, I would be more understanding of the controversy about this, but all she did was give her opinion, which is completely okay.

  30. D. says:
    Wed, 22nd Apr 20093:14 am 

    Casey:

    It is just a name, I find it hard to believe people opposed to gay marriage take offense to it being CALLED that, but not being essentially the same as a marriage. What’s in a name, and all that.

  31. Michael says:
    Wed, 22nd Apr 20094:02 am 

    Just as the gay community has a right to be…gay, the heterosexual community has a right to be…straight. It’s sad that in the pursuit of the gay community’s embrace of it’s equality and humanity, the heterosexual community is finding safer haven in the closet. Film at eleven!

  32. anelli says:
    Wed, 22nd Apr 200912:02 pm 

    Excellent post! My sentiments exactly. I wholeheartedly believe in same sex marriage but I also believe in respecting the rights of others who respectfully disagree with my beliefs.

  33. delectual says:
    Wed, 22nd Apr 200912:34 pm 

    Perez is a jerk…

  34. softmelon says:
    Wed, 22nd Apr 20091:54 pm 

    I don’t think her answer was offensive at all. I’d also like to state women shouldn’t be allowed to vote, black people shouldn’t be drinking from the same water fountain as me, and the holocaust never happened.

    Now I’m just going to pack up my things and move to the country of California.

  35. 5litrecat says:
    Wed, 22nd Apr 20092:22 pm 

    To sum it up in four words, Hilton is a fruitcake!

  36. NWerner says:
    Wed, 22nd Apr 20092:39 pm 

    Perez Hilton makes fun of people for choices they make… what they wear, what they buy, where they go. Miss California is discriminating against an entire group of people for something they do not have a choice about.

    He may be smug, but he’s not a hypocrite.

  37. Bethany says:
    Wed, 22nd Apr 20092:43 pm 

    Everyone is way overreacting about this…this is Hilton’s shtick. His job is to be controversial.

    She answered the question inappropriately, and whether or not it effected her loss, this is Miss USA. It’s not like anyone remembers who wins in a month anyways.

  38. Yoda says:
    Wed, 22nd Apr 20093:01 pm 

    Jess-

    Opposing same sex marriage is just as bigoted as opposing opposite sex only marriage. You just truly think your way of thinking is right. <—- Thats bigotry.

  39. Arthur says:
    Wed, 22nd Apr 20093:09 pm 

    You have the right to support same sex marriage but you dont have the right to oppose same sex marriage? Just like the tax day tea partiers that were protesting overtaxation were made out to be “racist right wing extremists” because they care about America’s future. Now the Media is trying to crucify this HOT chick who was very nice about her answer. Some people need to actually read the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights.

  40. Bobbie says:
    Wed, 22nd Apr 20094:07 pm 

    Perez has been in override on this issue. He has been vindictive too much on this topic. And his tendency of going after people he finds offensive is suspect if they don’t follow his mantra is also hypocritical. He is trying yo position himself as the spokesperson on all things gay. The woman was punished for her answer and he has made no bones about his stance on this beaten down issue. It’s all about your sexual desire. If you desire the same sex, that’s your emotional connection. What I’ve grown weary of is the attempt by gays to link this to racism. When 4 little black girls were killed in an Alabama church explosion during those early days, it was because of their skin color that they were born in. Your sexuality comes into play years later. If you have a desire for the same sex, animals, inanimate objects, pre-teen children, that is your choice. It doesn’t mean that everybody under the sun wants to keep hearing about it.

  41. Sir Joe says:
    Wed, 22nd Apr 20094:16 pm 

    I agree to large extent to what this article or opinion says with one exception. Her point of view is not just a point of view. It’s like saying Hitler had a point of view. I fully understand the difference between Hitler and her, I also understand that she’s only expressing a “view” and not out lynching gays. But, seed for dehumanizing a “class” or section of the population is there. When you segregate any segment of human beings and you, through direct words or actions, deem them as different or less than “normal”, you’ve taken the first step in allowing others with much more extreme views to start on the path of what happened in the US with blacks in the 50’s and 60’s. They weren’t lynching people like them cause blacks were beneath them. Regardless of the basis for your “views”, it’s still a lot more dangerous than “just” a point of view. Perez is a hypocrite but, that in noway addresses this girl and others like her that find it way too easy to classify others as different and undeserving to share in a relationship that was granted to no one group by no one authority. If marriage is a religious institution like a lot of these rednecks claim than NO AMERICAN government has the right to regulate it or sanction it. Separation of Church and State my friends. And if they recognize it from one religion.. then they must recognize it for all religions… including the ones that currently allow for same sex marriages.

  42. Sarah says:
    Wed, 22nd Apr 20094:37 pm 

    Jodie: You’re fucking hilarious. I’ll be your campaign president when you run for Miss USA. Count on it.

    Casey: Marriage is a social institution, not just a religious practice/ritual. Get off your high fucking horse and deal with the fact that TIMES HAVE CHANGED and marriage is no longer just a Christian man and a Christian woman tying the knot so they can get their freak on under God’s watchful eye without being sentenced to eternal damnation. I know that’s pretty radical, but come on–look at the numbers:

    Religion %Who have been Divorced

    Jews 30%
    Born-again Christians 27%
    Other Christians 24%
    Atheists, Agnostics 21%

    This is the way things are NOW. We’re not talking about how it was in the past or the way you think things should be. Adjust with the times or forever be a dormant volcano threatening to damn the masses with your religiously-fueled vomit.

  43. Loubo says:
    Wed, 22nd Apr 20095:21 pm 

    Hilton is a classless piece of s**t. No talent, no nothing. This was his chance at 15 minutes of fame by raising a stink about something he knows nothing about. Time for him to dry up and evaporate away into the nothingness he is. Just like an old dryed up piece of dog s**t.

  44. Steve says:
    Wed, 22nd Apr 20096:12 pm 

    The fact that he was a judge and is gay and asked a question that he is biased on shows he is not really looking for equal rights. What I am saying is, his behavior demonstrates he is not about equal rights, but about HATE. and HATE Speech. The whole California vote that bans gay marriage and the gay communities militant reaction and racist outbursts, show they are not in the moral right, but a continuation of moral wrong and morally bankrupt. Its all about a small minority trying to change the country for worse not better, This lifestyle does not make America better, healthier, or moraly better off, but worse off! The whole gay thing is about bad behavior that weakens us, do what feels good and don’t take responsibility for the consequances for AIDS , and poor moral judgement

  45. Anna says:
    Wed, 22nd Apr 20097:36 pm 

    Perez is an idiot. The poor girl definitely didn’t think her answer out and was unprepared for the question. Maybe she is politically incorrect, but the fact is, a lot of people ARE raised to believe that marriage is between a man and a woman. I personally don’t believe that, but we all know how hard it can be to change your mind on something you’ve been told your whole life. She’s young and made a mistake – she shouldn’t be crucified for it to the extent that Perez is. She’s definitely not a b*tch or a c*nt. And now that I think about it… those words are offensive to women, so who’s in the wrong now Perez?

  46. Anna says:
    Wed, 22nd Apr 20097:37 pm 

    Oh, and p.s. to Steve – AIDS isn’t caused by people being gay, it’s caused by people being irresponsible and having unprotected sex. If everyone got tested, AIDS would eventually be eliminated.

  47. Lex says:
    Wed, 22nd Apr 20097:44 pm 

    What I have a problem with is that people keep saying that she should have answered the question in an unbiased manner. It’s a biased question- there is no unbiased answer. And frankly, I have respect for her for answering honestly without abandoning her morals or trying to hide them.

  48. Sarah says:
    Wed, 22nd Apr 20098:02 pm 

    Casey – sorry to be the 800th person to pile on top of this, but I think you’re getting too caught up in semantics. I have to commend you for sticking to your guns with any marriage outside the Church, gay or straight, but I’m a Catholic too, and I feel I have to point out that government-recognized marriage is very important for insurance/inheritance/taxation/etc, all outside of religion. Would you want to get just a religious ceremony and not a marriage license/government recognition? It’s called marriage for everyone else who does it, so it should be called marriage for gay couples, atheists and what have you as well. Even in the Church, the word is not what is sacred – that’s the rite itself.

  49. Kelly S. says:
    Wed, 22nd Apr 20099:03 pm 

    Hey Lex, I agree with you 100%.I give miss california thumbs up for being honest and saying what she believes in,even if certain people(even in hollywood)don’t agree or like it.I am a christain too like miss california so of course I agree with her views, but I also feel, TO EACH HIS OWN, as long as you DON,T hurt anyone I feel what ever goes on behind closed doors should be your business.I believe people should be able to love whoever makes them happy,But,I believe GOD meant for marriage to be between a man and a women.REALLY!!No offence to the gays at all.I love you dearly.And oh yea Mr. Perez,GROW THE HELL UP.yOU’RE MAKING A big FOOL OF YOUR SELF.pEOPLE HAVE A RIGHT TO THEIR OPINION FOR PETE’S SAKE.iT’S HER OPINION!!!It’s seems to me she’s being discriminated against for her believes and religion.THATS NOT RIGHT!!Oh yeah miss california.YOU GO GIRL!I love you for being true to yourself AND MOST OF ALL TO GOD!!!!!

  50. misconduckt says:
    Wed, 22nd Apr 200910:34 pm 

    you are exactly correct about Perez, he just sucks

  51. Casey says:
    Wed, 22nd Apr 200911:06 pm 

    Sara, where is your statistic for Catholics? Catholics do not believe in divorce (with the exception of abuse victims). I am not on a “high horse” I have a right to believe whatever I want, AND I’m not running for Miss. USA.

    Seems to me you’re the one on a “high horse” being rude to someone just because they don’t agree with your beliefs.

    I am tolerant of other people and their beliefs. I am all for an alternative to marriage for homosexual, and atheist couples so that they can enjoy the benefits of married life. I don’t care if it’s basically the same thing as a non christian marriage, why does everyone else have a problem with calling it something else just for the sake of saving an argument?

    And sorry, as a christian, who believes in the bible (ridicule me for that if you want, but I have a right to believe in whatever I want, even if you don’t agree) I see the “times changing” just as they did in Sodom and Gomorrah (which was destroyed by God) and before “The Great Flood”. I don’t care if you, or anyone else believes in all that stuff, but that is why a lot of people won’t “change with the times” or are opposed to the way the world is “changing”.

    So stop being a hypocrite and let me continue have my beliefs, the way I let you continue to have yours.

    And to Sarah #2 (who I am assuming is not the same person since you had a very pleasant response, thank you), I do agree that gay’s and non-Christians should be allowed the same rights as married hetero couples are, I did say that in my original post, and yes, I want my “marriage” to be legally recognized (that’s what the marriage license is for anyways). But you do make a good point about the word itself not being sacred, I just feel like why would we call two different things the same word? Especially something that is supposed to mean so much.

  52. sauer kraut says:
    Wed, 22nd Apr 200911:08 pm 

    When did becoming a Miss USA contestant mean that a woman has to check her first amendment rights at the door? She was asked a question and, unlike most public figures, she answered honestly. We may not agree with what she said or how she delivered it but she has an absolute right to voice her opinion.

    As does Perez Hilton. But he need not be such a horse’s ass in the process. Bend over, Perez; Carrie wants to paddle your stupid ass. And, yes, you WILL like it!

  53. E. Michael Martin says:
    Wed, 22nd Apr 200911:16 pm 

    I would have given this contestant exactly the same score. It was not answered in an intelligent manner. As Miss America, she would have been a role model to many people, and Miss America needs to be a voice of reason and tolerance. Being against “Gay Marriage” is a political belief, not a religious one, no matter what her pastor tells her.

    As for Perez, well, we all knew what kind of fellow he was before the show began. I’m not fond of him, or his career. He should not have called her names or behaved irrationally.

  54. Lisa says:
    Thu, 23rd Apr 20097:34 am 

    Miss California answered a political question honestly. Good for her! Perez Hilton is a HYPOCRITE because had she come out in favor of gay marriage he would be just fine. Since when did Perez Hilton become captain of the Thought Police!?

    And by the way I am for civil unions whether they be for hetero or homosexual couples. However, churches should be allowed to perform (or NOT perform) marriages for whosoever they choose.

    Go ahead flame away!

  55. nearlynormalized says:
    Thu, 23rd Apr 200910:12 am 

    He gots the $ and Miss California sounded like a fool. She cannot think on her feet..Dykes do rule!!!!

  56. mark Bannon says:
    Thu, 23rd Apr 200910:14 am 

    Perez Hilton is definitely a hypocrite! She was right. I don’t believe in marriage for same sex either. It doesnt mean they cant do whatever, just dont tell kids this is right and NATURAL. IT ISN’T!!!

  57. secularspirit says:
    Thu, 23rd Apr 200911:10 am 

    Casey,

    Marriage existed prior to Christianity and Judaism. And it exists among cultures today that developed separately from Christianity, such as in India, China, and Japan. To assert that Christians should have some sort of ownership of the word and idea of marriage is ridiculous. If Christians want a Christian marriage, thats fine; but it is tyrannical for Christians to continue to create legal obstacles against people who would like marriages that are equally personally meaningful to those involved and are just as likely to endure. If I had a sibling who was so ignorant of the history of marriage and was so stubborn that he/she wouldn’t educate themselves and as a consequence refused to be my honored guest at my wedding, I would disown them until they got a library card and applied their brain to understanding the world they live in.

  58. kornaz says:
    Thu, 23rd Apr 20091:23 pm 

    E. Michael Martin says:
    Wed, 22nd Apr 200911:16 pm

    I would have given this contestant exactly the same score. It was not answered in an intelligent manner. As Miss America, she would have been a role model to many people, and Miss America needs to be a voice of reason and tolerance.

    You are an IDIOT. SHe voiced her opinion, which is great. What are you trying to say – she should’ve lied? That’s being a role model – lying and not voicing your opinion? If i don’t like damn oranges, then i will say i don’t like them. America is a fucking idiocracy.

  59. Mike Jackson says:
    Thu, 23rd Apr 20091:44 pm 

    Now that so many commenters have established that it is proper to use bigoted language against bigots I want to say that all blacks who favor racial discrimination against whites are dumb lazy coons, all women who favor gender discrimination against males are dumb lazy cunts, and all gays who favor orientation discrimination against straights are just plain twisted faggots, like Perez.

    It’s so nice to have the moral hign ground.

  60. Katie says:
    Thu, 23rd Apr 20097:10 pm 

    Intense guys!

    I sure wish Miss California could’ve won. I like me my Californians!

  61. Mads says:
    Thu, 23rd Apr 20098:19 pm 

    Casey —

    Just to clarify, what is your stance on Hindu weddings? Or wedding ceremonies of tribal Africa? I’m curious because your position seems to be based on the fact that you define marriage as an invitation put forth for “God” to be present in the union of a man and a woman. However, you are a Christian, and thus the god that you are referring to is the Christian god. What about people for whom marriage is still a religious ceremony, but the god(s) they are inviting into their relationship differ from your own? Are they not on the same level as atheists and agnostics then? Agnostics especially, since agnosticism is the absence of organized religion without the denial of spirituality. So my question is, do you think that each religion should have a different word for the union of a couple? Hindus, Buddhists, Wiccans, tribal Africans, traditional Native Americans, even Jews — since they are all inviting different god(s) into their unions, is it accurate to group all of their ceremonies under the heading of “marriage”? If not, I’m curious as to how you would address this issue (keep in mind the thousands of differing religions present in the world today, and the difficulty that would be faced in coming up with separate names for unions in each of them).

    I myself am happily agnostic — I think it is presumptuous and arrogant to declare that you know one way or the other that god exists, and what sort of god s/he is if s/he exists at all — and I am looking forward to hearing what my future marriage should be called under your belief system.

  62. Casey says:
    Thu, 23rd Apr 200910:48 pm 

    I love how everyone is picking on me, although plenty of other commentator’s have agreed with Miss. California as well.

    To secularspirit, Well, I guess I’m just glad that my sister is an understanding person who realizes that people, including her own sister, have different beliefs, and values everyone’s right to their own opinions, even if they differ from her own. (she was raised catholic as well, and although she decided to be atheist because her husband is, she knows my family values our religion and was understanding when I turned down her invitation).

    To Mads, I never said marriage was purely a christian religious ceremony. I just said it was a religious ceremony. To me, and many others marriage is much more than a government issue of proprietary rights, which is why I believe in civil unions for non religious couples, and marriages for people who value the religious aspect of their tradition, whatever that religion may be.

    And to your comment on being an agnostic, it’s not about “knowing” if a god exists, it’s about having faith enough to believe without proof. If there was proof, there would be no need for faith, and then (presuming there is a heaven and hell) there would be no reason for one or the other since everyone would believe and everyone would follow, or not if they chose to be eternally damned. That is the point.

  63. Casey says:
    Thu, 23rd Apr 200910:51 pm 

    Oh and also, in the past and still today in some cultures marriage wasn’t/isn’t about love at all. So if you’re not religious, and marriage isn’t about love, why get “married”? What’s wrong with a civil union instead? If we’re looking at all aspects of “the history of marriage” figured I’d point that one out.

  64. Casey says:
    Thu, 23rd Apr 200910:54 pm 

    Mads, I forgot to say, but I’m pretty sure (could be wrong though) but I’m pretty sure Jews have the same god as the christian god they just don’t believe that Jesus is the messiah, they believe the messiah hasn’t come yet.

  65. Nomad says:
    Fri, 24th Apr 200912:17 am 

    Perez Hilton is frustrated because he’s not pretty enough to win a Miss America pageant himself

  66. j0di says:
    Fri, 24th Apr 20092:39 am 

    He is convinced that because she is in a beauty pageant, she MUST agree with him or she does not deserve to be in a pageant, and/or representing California, which is as absurd as the whole irony you pointed out above.
    The funny thing is, if she had straight up LIED, Perez would have been satisfied. And the saddest part is I’ve seen tons of websites willed with responses from GAY PEOPLE where they are slamming Perez and calling him an idiot.
    Perez doesn’t bother to off his fat a** and do anything to support his cause the other 364 days of the year because he is too busy being a gigantic famew*****, but when one accidentally falls on his lap he will beat it to death until everyone is sick of the entire issue, thus hurting those wanting equal rights. Then he can pretend like he actually does something for the cause.

  67. j0di says:
    Fri, 24th Apr 20092:40 am 

    *but when an opportunity accidentally falls on his lap

  68. Chris says:
    Fri, 24th Apr 20092:56 pm 

    I think gays want this guy as their spokesperson like black people want Michael Jackson as theirs. This guy, who is suddenly trying to debate on the political stage with credibility, is the same guy who has made a living photoshopping cum stains on celebrity pictures. I made a drawing of this hypocrite low life.

    http://chrisillustration.blogspot.com

  69. LilPunk says:
    Sun, 26th Apr 20092:14 pm 

    I completely agree with this. When Prop 8 got deposed, Perez went out on a tangent about the LDS community. Where the LDS community was only 4% (I believe I’m not sure exactly) of the vote. As of that, I stopped going to his website because it was a lot of hate, and in our world today, we don’t need anymore. Opinions are part of who we are, respect what other people believe as long as it’s not going to hurt someone.

  70. Jackie says:
    Sun, 26th Apr 20096:21 pm 

    Laura I love the article you always do a great job I completely agree with what you said! :)

    Casey, I couldn’t have said it better and I agree with you as well! Doesn’t anyone remember that Barack Obama doesn’t believe in gay marriage either? I don’t see anyone addressing that at all…

  71. D. says:
    Mon, 27th Apr 20097:16 pm 

    Casey:

    If you’re going to say it, then you shouldn’t be surprised that people choose to argue with you. We are not ‘picking on you’, nobody minds that you don’t support gay marriage, but it is a tad bit ridiculous to say that they should call it something else.

  72. Casey says:
    Wed, 29th Apr 200912:28 pm 

    D, yes people can certainly disagree with me, it was just that I wasn’t the only person saying it, I’m not the only person with that opinion, and yet I’m the one people were calling “ignorant”. When many liberal politicians, including our president, disagree with gay marriage then there must be a reason. why is it ridiculous to call it something else? Or have civil unions? How come no one ever wants to compromise? It’s always either their way or no way. No one is ever going to be 100% happy, because then there will always be someone else that is 100% unhappy. I think it’s better for both parties to be 50% happy with a compromise. But we live in an extremely selfish world.

  73. Historian says:
    Thu, 30th Apr 20098:03 am 

    Casey,

    For most of European history, marriage was more or less a business agreement between two families who arranged the marriages of their children. Romantic love, and even simple affection, were not considered essential. Don’t give a history lesson if you aren’t a history major.
    Until 100 years ago, most societies agreed that it was dangerously antisocial, even pathologically self-absorbed, to elevate marital affection and nuclear-family ties above commitments to neighbors, extended kin, civic duty and religion. [...] From medieval days until the early 19th century, diaries and letters more often used the word love to refer to neighbors, cousins and fellow church members than to spouses.

  74. Casey says:
    Thu, 30th Apr 20091:18 pm 

    Umm Historian, isn’t that what I said? I’ pretty sure everyone knows that early Europeans had arranged marriages as business agreements. It is common knowledge, you DON’T have to be a history major to “give a history lesson” which I didn’t even do, I pointed out the obvious, thank you very much. How many popular movies have portrayed arranged marriages in Europe? Countless! Marie Antoinette, Shakespeare in Love, Ever After, I could go on and on. So it is not unknown that that is how it was.

    And you didn’t answer my question so seriously what was the point of your comment? To tell me something I already knew? To try and make me feel stupid? (major fail on that one!) To make yourself sound smart? Really, there was no purpose, you just wasted your time. Now if you’d like to answer my question go right ahead.

  75. Historian says:
    Thu, 30th Apr 20094:16 pm 

    Casey,
    You need to chill out. I skimmed your comment, and really only read “in some cultures marriage wasn’t/isn’t about love at all. ” and took it as you were being Eurocentric. I’m sorry for misreading, hey its finals week, it happens.
    Now, to answer your question:
    “So if you’re not religious, and marriage isn’t about love, why get “married”? What’s wrong with a civil union instead?”

    Well, let’s say some gay people are in love and want to get married and want all of the connotations that go along with marriage, and they are Christians, because yes there are gay Christians out there, shouldn’t they be allowed to get married? Also, the US government provides 1138 benefits to married couples, so it is about more than love or a ceremony. It’s about civil rights plain and simple, about giving people the same rights we give every one else. Here are some rights accorded to MARRIED couples:
    Medical Decisions on Behalf of Partner
    Sick Leave to Care for Partner
    Visitation of Partner’s Children
    Visitation of Partner in Hospital or Prison
    Wrongful Death (Loss of Consort) Benefits

    Also with Civil Unions they only offer some of the same rights as marriage on a state level, NOT on a national level.

    Furthurmore, copied from the web:
    1. It costs thousands of dollars in legal fees to obtain same benefits and rights within a civil union that a married couple has. A simple marriage license, which usually costs under $100 would cover all the same rights and benefits.

    2. Any of these can be challenged in court. As a matter of fact, more wills are challenged than not. In the case of wills, legal spouses always have more legal power than any other family member.

    3. Marriage laws are universal. If someone’s husband or wife is injured in an accident, all you need to do is show up and say you’re his or her spouse. You will not be questioned. If you show up at the hospital with your legal paperwork, the employees may not know what to do with you. If you simply say, “He’s my husband,” you will immediately be taken to your spouse’s side.

  76. Casey says:
    Fri, 1st May 200912:39 am 

    I don’t understand why the rights of civil unions can’t be extended to be the same as the rights of marriage. I am sure if that law is ever made the rights will be extended. That would be the only way to make it fair.

    And yes, there are homosexual “Christians”, but if they won’t abide by God’s wishes, then why should they be granted a marriage under God?

  77. Historian says:
    Fri, 1st May 200910:13 am 

    Jesus says nothing about same-sex behavior.
    The Jewish prophets are silent about homosexuality.
    Only six or seven of the Bible’s one million verses refer to same-sex behavior in any way — and none of these verses refer to homosexual orientation as it’s understood today.

    Also, why pick and choose Bible verses to take literally? Here are some we don’t take literally:
    DEUTERONOMY 22:13-21
    If it is discovered that a bride is not a virgin, the Bible demands that she be executed by stoning immediately.
    DEUTERONOMY 22:22
    If a married person has sex with someone else’s husband or wife, the Bible commands that both adulterers be stoned to death.
    MARK 10:1-12
    Divorce is strictly forbidden in both Testaments, as is remarriage of anyone who has been divorced.
    LEVITICUS 18:19
    The Bible forbids a married couple from having sexual intercourse during a woman’s period. If they disobey, both shall be executed.
    MARK 12:18-27
    If a man dies childless, his widow is ordered by biblical law to have intercourse with each of his brothers in turn until she bears her deceased husband a male heir.

  78. Casey says:
    Fri, 1st May 20091:59 pm 

    I know I have read in a couple places in the bible, about homosexuality being against God’s wishes. (Maybe Jesus doesn’t say anything, but God does) I don’t know bible verses and haven’t read the bible since I was at least 11 so if i am remembering wrong please point me in the right direction, but there is a part about angels and a man gave them shelter and all the men in the village wanted to sleep with them because they were so beautiful and the man offered his daughters instead because homosexuality is wrong. Another part mentions homosexuality along side bestiality. (I don’t think I have read that part personally, but my dad breaks out his bible and reads it every time my (bi) sister is around. So it must be in there somewhere unless he wrote it himself.

    But as for the verses you listed, it’s common knowledge that Christians don’t believe in sex before marriage (except almost everyone breaks that rule!) hey god forgives! But only if you ask him to.

    Also, adultery is wrong. PERIOD! Cheating is wrong! Maybe we shouldn’t stone them to death, but it’s pretty fucked up to cheat on your spouse/ significant other.

    I am Catholic, I don’t believe in divorce.

    I would never have sex on my period, that’s just gross, but that’s just my opinion I guess.

    ok that last one is a little ridiculous.

  79. Sarah #1...lol says:
    Fri, 1st May 20094:20 pm 

    Casey,

    Sorry, you’re right. I was pretty rude. I must admit I was feeling a little ranty and ravey that day and got a little out of hand. I was somewhat disturbed and upset by what you said about your sister. You refused to be her maid of honor simply because she’s atheist? I guess God definitely comes before family for you, which I can in no way relate to.

    I can’t imagine how hurt I’d be if my sister did the same. (Note: I only have a brother…but we’re talking hypothetically here.) You say you’re accepting of others’ faith (or non-faith) systems, yet you made a choice like that. That’s not acceptance in my opinion; that’s disapproval, which is an antonym.

    Acceptance (and yeah, I’m gonna quote Wikipedia) “refers to cases where a person experiences a situation or condition (often a negative or uncomfortable) without attempting to change it, protest, or exit.” By refusing to attend your sister’s wedding as her maid of honor, were you not protesting her choice to have a marriage ceremony by voicing your disapproval?

    Moving on…my source for the divorce rates I listed before (which did not include Catholicism) is this website:
    http://www.religioustolerance.org/chr_dira.htm
    However, you will find divorce rates for Catholics on that same site (21%). I guess not all Catholics are as staunch as you are. Oh well…nobody’s perfect, right?

    I’d address the rest of your response to me, but as soon as someone starts comparing Sodom and Gomorrah to current events, I can’t take them seriously anymore. It’s no offense to you; I just don’t see the Bible as pure fact and when the person I’m debating does, there’s no more debate. We’re just not on the same level anymore. There’s nothing I can say to convince you that it isn’t and there’s nothing you can say to convince me that it is. Simple as that.

    Happy trails. ^_^

  80. Casey says:
    Fri, 1st May 200910:19 pm 

    I appreciate the apology Sarah, It’s a shame the world can’t all see eye to eye on everything, but I think it would be a very boring place if we did. The only thing we can do is agree to disagree.

  81. John says:
    Sat, 2nd May 200912:34 am 

    I enjoyed the article, I’m so glad to see a young, successful woman stand up for her beliefs. Typical homosexual liberal if you ask me, this incident is the only one as of yet that has made it to mainstream media. Media couldn’t cover this one up though. Does it really surpise you the hypocrisy of Perez, it happens all the time mate, media, liberals, enviromentalists, etc. Liberals in general, if you are a liberal, well maybe this will open your eyes to what conservatives put up with every day. As for the Bible, yes it does say specifically that man shall not lie with another man, nor beast, as well as woman shall not lie with other women nor beasts. Look it up mate. Leviticus. I’m still don’t understand how people can say it’s not in there, because it’s there, black and white, all day.

  82. John says:
    Sat, 2nd May 200912:38 am 

    Not sure if your allowed to post links, probably not, but whatever.

    http://www.endtimeprophecy.org/Content/-VerseGroups/verse138.ssi

  83. Michael says:
    Mon, 11th May 200911:51 am 

    Why is it a person can’t be honest and speak their mind like Miss California did. The Gay Community wants to silence anyone who does not agree with the gay lifestyle. We are just not buying into the right you impose on others when it comes to marraige. Is there anything traditional that you won’t try to warp ? For years the gays bashed heterosexuals and the “Hippies of the 60’s” laughed at marraige now they all wanna embrace it to get the stamp of approval from Americans. So lets go ahead and give it to them since they will use the courts and government to get it anyway. I see my country going to hell fast. Why not let the bi-sexuals have the right to marry 2 people ? That way they can have either sex in a marraige. Progressive liberlism in this country will destroy all of our traditions/values/morality. Wait till you see what this country will look like soon. Goodbye America, hello sickos like Perez Hilton !

  84. Russell says:
    Mon, 22nd Jun 20092:39 pm 

    He is a moron. Obama is on video saying that marriage should be between a man and a woman, and Perez voted for him.

Tell us what you're thinking...




COVER STORY

21 Things I Learned in My 21st Year 21 Things I Learned in My 21st Year

#9: Reading for pleasure is magical. Make time for it! Just last February, I was... 

Take Action to End Violence Against Women Take Action to End Violence Against Women

One of the most important issues we are facing today is violence against women. Based... 

The Sober One The Sober One

It took until the middle of my junior year of college, but I finally went to my first... 

Read More Posts From This Category

HAHA

Show Yourself Some Love This Valentine’s Day Show Yourself Some Love This Valentine’s Day

For us single girls, Valentine’s Day can seriously suck. Even if you love... 

Single. On Valentine’s Day Single. On Valentine’s Day

So I don’t know if you’ve heard, but Valentine’s Day is coming up. Yes, as... 

The CC Weekly Weigh In: Significant Jerks The CC Weekly Weigh In: Significant Jerks

I'd rather spend my V-day crying into a bowl of noodles than have to hang out... 

Read More Posts From This Category
Feed Your…Brain

Feed Your…Brain

We’ve all heard of so-called “brain food.” Brain food should be healthy foods that stimulate your thinking, but I mainly use it as an excuse to eat during finals. When I started feeling sluggish after downing a bag of Skittles during my most recent study-a-thon, I decided to put down the bag of Sun Chps and look into what really constitutes “brain food.”