Saturday Read: The Movies Are Better Than The Books!
October 24, 2009 11:30 am Posted in Cool Stuff Alex K. g+ page
Making a great book into a movie is often the kiss of death. Fans of the book criticize the movie to no end, critics shame the director for fouling such a work of art, etc, etc. Everyone and everything surrounding a book-to-movie production seems very, well, dramatic. And unsuccessful. However, there are a few movies out there that got it all right, enhancing the book and even telling the story even better than the book itself.
And this is coming from a self-proclaimed reading snob.
I’ve created a list of my top 4 books made into movies. Granted, I have not seen every movie ever made that is based on a book, but I think I have a pretty good base to choose from. Let me know if you agree or add your own to the list
I know that I’m probably going to get flack for this one from the hard-core fans, but making “The Lord of the Rings” novels into movies was not only one of the best financial decisions ever made (raking in a cool BILLION on ticket sales and rentals alone), but also a smart pop culture move. Before the movies, the books and whole “culture” of LOTR were fairly underground; some people read the books in school, but other than that, they weren’t terribly popular. And I’d like to think I know why.
I tried to read the books. I barely got through the first one and had to give up. I’m not a detail person so I found several pages describing the movement of grass in a valley to be WAY too much. But then I saw the movie – which obviously eliminated all that need for boring description – and it. was. awesome. The story, the drama, the imagination that went into coming up with all those characters and details. Good move with the movie, LOTR people. A good move, indeed.
“Girl, Interrupted” is actually an autobiography. Susanna Kaysen was committed to a mental institution in 1967 because reality had become too “dense.” Susanna was certainly not crazy, so her account of her 2 year stay makes for a super interesting read. However, the visual is so much more compelling. You can read about the interesting characters she encounters all you like, but when you actually see them there is a much greater impact. Matched with Angelina Jolie and Winona Ryder’s superb acting skills (critically acclaimed, in fact!), the story just takes flight. I found myself to be much more attached to and affected by the movie compared to the book. Some things you just have to see for yourself, I guess!
After I realized that the Jason Bourne movies were actually based on action novels, I rushed to the library to pick up “The Bourne Identity.” I was shocked at the size of it: a whopping 544 pages! Needless to say I less-than-quickly read through it and was left wanting more. The movies were so action-packed and kept me on the edge of my seat and the books fell a little bit flat. Perhaps this was because I had already seen the movie, but I really feel like the book is a bit of overkill. For example, the first 60 or so pages explain how a Frenchman found Jason floating in the middle of the ocean and nursed him back to health on an island. In the movie, that same part took about 30 seconds to explain. I just found that the screenwriters did a really good job of cutting out the unnecessary junk in the book and making a really streamlined, fast-paced thriller (as all action books and movies should be).
#1. The Notebook
Originally written by Nicholas Sparks, “The Notebook” was a best-selling novel. But despite how well it did as a book, the movie just blows it out of the water. I won’t give away too much plot for those 3 people on earth who haven’t seen it, but basically, it revolves around the epic love story of Allie and Noah. From their humble beginnings as teenagers, to a rough time where they almost lose each other due to family problems, to them as seniors, the movie encompasses their entire lives together.
The film is heartfelt and tells the story so perfectly, jumping between the past to the present. The cast was perfect and everything from the script to the scenes to the superb acting just draws the viewer into the story. I’m typically not a crier, but I cry every. time. I watch this movie. It truly is book-to-movie perfection.
Tell us what you're thinking...

Amanda Bynes Arrested
Kim Kardashian Defends Her Sexy Maternity Clothing
What Does Your Favorite Sex Position Say About You?
Heavier Blogger Poses as A&F Model
The Secret To A Lasting Relationship
Cannes Misses
What Guys Really Think of Texting
Carrey Mulligan Nails It
Dita Von Teese is Fabulous French-Blue
Uhh.. Rhianna Likes Attention
grace b says:
Sat, 24th Oct 20097:27 am
I think that Atonement is the best book-to-screen adaptation with Love Story a close second. But read Atonement. It will blow you away.
A.C. says:
Sat, 24th Oct 200910:23 am
This list is ridiculous. Are you kidding me? Yes, the movie adaptations were good, like you said. And yes, for books like LOTR it was very smart to make them into movies, look at the amazing money they raked in. But does that make the movie BETTER than the books? Not in any way. For LOTR, why do you think they made so much money? Not because "Before the movies, the books and whole “culture” of LOTR were fairly underground; some people read the books in school, but other than that, they weren’t terribly popular" but because there were lots of people who really, really loved the books and their characters. "The story, the drama, the imagination that went into coming up with all those characters and details." Ya…those pages of details you were complaining about?
And for The Notebook? I read the book after I saw the movie. Not going to lie, I LOVED it so much more than the movie, which is admittedly AMAZING. So just because a film didn't eff up completely when adapting a book, doesn't make it better than the book where the story came from.
Liz says:
Sat, 24th Oct 20092:10 pm
The film adaptation of Girl, Interrupted is an insult to anyone who has ever been in a psych hospital.
Ness - Sheridan says:
Sat, 24th Oct 20092:20 pm
Alex, you seriously have the best taste in books ever.
Jay says:
Sat, 24th Oct 20097:47 pm
I could not agree more!!! I am an avid reader, but sometimes the adaptation surpasses the original. You could add a couple of titles to your list, such as Divine Secrets of the Ya-Ya Sisterhood, and The Devil Wears Prada.
On the other hand, when I finished reading Bridget Jones: Edge of Reason, I thought "they should totally make this into a movie!!". And then I remembered that they already had, and the results were… fleh.
Vicki says:
Sun, 25th Oct 200912:56 pm
A.C. , you just phrased my argument about the LotR trilogy perfectly.
Erinn says:
Mon, 26th Oct 20091:21 pm
I think The Prestige would fit on this list; the movie was amazing, but the book was just boring and terrible.
avo says:
Mon, 26th Oct 20093:47 pm
Complete agreement with A.C. Granted, I was only in middle school when I first read the trilogy and FotR came out within the next couple of years, I knew adults who had been waiting for such an adaptation for decades. The recent explosion resulted from the generations of fans and devoted readers. The completeness of the world exists because Tolkien created an entire history from the beginning of the world, not because of the movie sets or technology. Props to Peter Jackson, for sure. Fantastic films, but they can't be compared to the books [and their companions].
R says:
Tue, 27th Oct 20095:12 pm
I agree with A.C. It is kind of dumb to say a movie is better than a book, esp since it wouldn't even exist without the book. Books give so much more background information and you can get inside of the characters' minds.
Karissa says:
Sun, 27th Dec 20096:23 pm
Alex, I just started reading your blog and I love it! I am obsessed with reading and love reading reviews and having books recommended. I completely agree with Lord of the Rings. I LOVE the movies and have watched them countless times. I thought, well if I love the movies so much, I should like the books. Wrong. I am still trying to get through The Fellowship of the Ring. I am just bored. But I will finish it sometime. But the movies are definitely better in my opinion.
Anonymous says:
Sat, 20th Mar 20107:14 am
I find it funny how people say the LOTR movies are better than the books when they have admitted that they haven't actually read the books, only tried. Ask anyone who's seen them and actually read them (all of them, all the way through) and 99% of the time you will hear that the books are better than the movies.