Comments on: Caption This: When D-Bags Unite

By: Soona

Soona — Thu, 15 Mar 2012 02:40:54 +0000

I gave up on duty shags or rather not iatnwng to be mean to him shags aka oh go on then shags a long while ago. I found they had a negative effect on my sex drive. The initial nagging & whininess wasn’t very attractive to me either, surprise. The brilliant simplicity of deciding only to have sex when I actually want to was a stunning revelation and I still get a kind of heady thrill from asserting the choice. That Robin West quote has it right : The will of the married woman who learns to accept routinized rape is no longer ruled by or even connected to her desires. Eventually, her desires are no longer a product of what she enjoys or what she has learned to enjoy. It’s that disconnection from the self that freaks me out and as a heterosexual woman in this male-serving culture, woman-objectifying culture, that disconnection was already fostered in me without any need for coercion. I could have easily gone through life just adequately performing sexy . One day I realised, I’m not inhabiting my own body, I’m looking from the outside, identifying with the male gaze. Where the hell am I (as in my sense of self) during sex?What do I actually feel?The duty wank is of course the fucking obvious solution to this couple’s problem. He gets an orgasm. She gets not driven up the wall by him. If the orgasm isn’t enough for him, then surprise, maybe they’ll realise that what he’s actually demanding is the ego-validation of his partner putting herself out for his sake. Or that he requires her to go through the motions just enough for him to fantasise that she’s into it. Kind of like live-in porn. The main personal reason I would never freely choose to go into sex work, aside from the institutionalised misogyny and gender inequality and all, is because I don’t want sex to be work. Hetero sex is largely women’s work, paid or unpaid, another service provided to a man.(I often wonder why the Hite Report isn’t referenced much these days it showed that dissatisfying, disappointing sex was the norm for het women.)

By: Weekly Wrap Up: Friday The 13th Has Us All In a Tizzy : College Candy

Weekly Wrap Up: Friday The 13th Has Us All In a Tizzy : College Candy — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 22:31:28 +0000

[...] it would be. I’ve got stupid group projects, the college gender gap, and the Gosselin-Johnston unholy d-bag alliance to worry [...]

By: Keep Your Clothes On, Levi Johnston! : College Candy

Keep Your Clothes On, Levi Johnston! : College Candy — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 20:03:22 +0000

[...] be conventionally attractive, but his status as Bristol Palin’s baby-daddy, Jon Gosselin’s new buddy—Michael Lohan must be green with envy—and an all-around jerk (in response to New York Magazine [...]

By: Amy

Amy — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 07:35:30 +0000

Jon will do anything for money. Not too sure about Levi though. He is young and most likely being manipulated by Entertainment Tonight with a paycheck!

By: jackson

jackson — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 00:03:52 +0000

Is this actually the required attire for the, I should have kept my dick in my pants, because I have no brains or morals contestants.

By: jackie wood

jackie wood — Tue, 10 Nov 2009 23:15:48 +0000

these are two guys that both got castrated regularly and got dumped on and now the press is dogging them. Learn the real story. Two men who got walked on by two women; excuse me, one woman and one girl. Leave 'em alone.

By: chiqui

chiqui — Tue, 10 Nov 2009 23:08:09 +0000

two dodos in trench. ewwww.

By: Gwen

Gwen — Tue, 10 Nov 2009 23:04:40 +0000

I cannot even look at John Gosselin…he makes me SICK and if he says one more time ! I am only 32" I want to throw up on him….Grow up before you kids beat you to that too………

By: Observer

Observer — Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:40:44 +0000

Sperm donors on display in Times Square

By: dskjflkdsjfklsjlf

dskjflkdsjfklsjlf — Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:36:40 +0000

The real question is why are they wearing matching jackets? And what is the cause for that smug smile on Levi's face?