<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should Colleges Favor Guys?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://collegecandy.com/2009/11/11/should-colleges-favor-guys/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://collegecandy.com/2009/11/11/should-colleges-favor-guys/</link>
	<description>Advice on student style, collegiate dating discussion guides, relationship advice and women&#039;s studies.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 10:31:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: I Told You Carrie Prejean&#8217;s A Liar and Other Friday The 13th News &#124; Celebrity Gossip</title>
		<link>http://collegecandy.com/2009/11/11/should-colleges-favor-guys/#comment-132406</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[I Told You Carrie Prejean&#8217;s A Liar and Other Friday The 13th News &#124; Celebrity Gossip]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 20:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://collegecandy.com/?p=46002#comment-132406</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Should Colleges favor guys? [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Should Colleges favor guys? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andreas Moser</title>
		<link>http://collegecandy.com/2009/11/11/should-colleges-favor-guys/#comment-121828</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andreas Moser]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2011 10:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://collegecandy.com/?p=46002#comment-121828</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is the REAL reason why women earn less than men: &lt;a href=&quot;http://andreasmoser.wordpress.com/2011/02/19/gender-pay-gap/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://andreasmoser.wordpress.com/2011/02/19/gend...&lt;/a&gt; They have different expectations in life, and the female preference for rich men forces men to earn more. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is the REAL reason why women earn less than men: <a href="http://andreasmoser.wordpress.com/2011/02/19/gender-pay-gap/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://andreasmoser.wordpress.com/2011/02/19/gend" rel="nofollow">http://andreasmoser.wordpress.com/2011/02/19/gend</a>&#8230; They have different expectations in life, and the female preference for rich men forces men to earn more. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brandi</title>
		<link>http://collegecandy.com/2009/11/11/should-colleges-favor-guys/#comment-73085</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[brandi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 15:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://collegecandy.com/?p=46002#comment-73085</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Beg to differ, how about a woman being told for the first 18 years of her life that she shouldn&#039;t expect to work too hard because she won&#039;t get anything seeing as she&#039;s a woman...by her own mother? ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beg to differ, how about a woman being told for the first 18 years of her life that she shouldn&#039;t expect to work too hard because she won&#039;t get anything seeing as she&#039;s a woman&#8230;by her own mother? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://collegecandy.com/2009/11/11/should-colleges-favor-guys/#comment-62417</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 16:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://collegecandy.com/?p=46002#comment-62417</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brittany,  
 
No preferences in admissions for males.  If the women beat us out because of their higher GPA&#039;s, extracurricular activities or just higher intellectual capacity, more power to them.  I did not get accepted to an MBA program because I could not score high enough in 2 attempts on the rigorous 3.5 hr. GMAT exam, due to my confusion and brain fatigue.  I met lots of women who beat me out on the GMAT and are doing extremely well in the MBA program or have earned their MBA.  Admissions must be merit based and , when it is, the women win! ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brittany, </p>
<p>No preferences in admissions for males.  If the women beat us out because of their higher GPA&#039;s, extracurricular activities or just higher intellectual capacity, more power to them.  I did not get accepted to an MBA program because I could not score high enough in 2 attempts on the rigorous 3.5 hr. GMAT exam, due to my confusion and brain fatigue.  I met lots of women who beat me out on the GMAT and are doing extremely well in the MBA program or have earned their MBA.  Admissions must be merit based and , when it is, the women win! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beg to differ</title>
		<link>http://collegecandy.com/2009/11/11/should-colleges-favor-guys/#comment-61603</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Beg to differ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 13:16:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://collegecandy.com/?p=46002#comment-61603</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the adult woman around here I will explain my perspective.  For the last 40 years I have seen the tables turn on men and women.  Men are every bit as intelligent as women but beside the fact they develop later they have been neglected. They have basically been told their perspective is inconsequential.This isn&#039;t healthy.  Young men need a higher purpose in life and to be appreciated. How  would you like being told for the first 18 years of your life that women are better than men? This wasn&#039;t true for older men so they don&#039;t understand how this affects the boys. Nobody can argue that taking the maturity gap into account makes sense. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the adult woman around here I will explain my perspective.  For the last 40 years I have seen the tables turn on men and women.  Men are every bit as intelligent as women but beside the fact they develop later they have been neglected. They have basically been told their perspective is inconsequential.This isn&#039;t healthy.  Young men need a higher purpose in life and to be appreciated. How  would you like being told for the first 18 years of your life that women are better than men? This wasn&#039;t true for older men so they don&#039;t understand how this affects the boys. Nobody can argue that taking the maturity gap into account makes sense. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the violator</title>
		<link>http://collegecandy.com/2009/11/11/should-colleges-favor-guys/#comment-60567</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[the violator]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://collegecandy.com/?p=46002#comment-60567</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[women have far more opportunities for colloege than men do these days and it has been that way for quite a while now. there are many scholarships that are for women only as well as those for minorities only. i have not heard of scholarships that are for us guys only (that would of course be sexist or racist). many guys end up not going to college because they cannpt afford it. lets face the truth people- college aint free and it sure as hell ain&#039;t cheap either. 
the ratio of women going to college over men will only get worse as opportunities (scholarships) for women only continue to grow and the guys are left out in the cold. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>women have far more opportunities for colloege than men do these days and it has been that way for quite a while now. there are many scholarships that are for women only as well as those for minorities only. i have not heard of scholarships that are for us guys only (that would of course be sexist or racist). many guys end up not going to college because they cannpt afford it. lets face the truth people- college aint free and it sure as hell ain&#039;t cheap either.</p>
<p>the ratio of women going to college over men will only get worse as opportunities (scholarships) for women only continue to grow and the guys are left out in the cold. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa</title>
		<link>http://collegecandy.com/2009/11/11/should-colleges-favor-guys/#comment-60344</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lisa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 19:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://collegecandy.com/?p=46002#comment-60344</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They do it for racial minorities, to the point of, in some overwhelmingly white areas of the country, admitting people who don&#039;t meet the admissions criteria, just to guarantee diversity. So preferring guys over girls, even if more girls applied, would be consistent with minority preference policies already in existence. If you can get into school based on your race, why not on your gender? (I&#039;m not saying that this policy has merit, just that if you&#039;re going to criticize gender preference, it&#039;s necessary to also disapprove of any kind of minority preference.) ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They do it for racial minorities, to the point of, in some overwhelmingly white areas of the country, admitting people who don&#039;t meet the admissions criteria, just to guarantee diversity. So preferring guys over girls, even if more girls applied, would be consistent with minority preference policies already in existence. If you can get into school based on your race, why not on your gender? (I&#039;m not saying that this policy has merit, just that if you&#039;re going to criticize gender preference, it&#039;s necessary to also disapprove of any kind of minority preference.) </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darwin - New York Un</title>
		<link>http://collegecandy.com/2009/11/11/should-colleges-favor-guys/#comment-60341</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Darwin - New York Un]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 19:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://collegecandy.com/?p=46002#comment-60341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I care not to discuss the normative arguments about affirmative action. Instead, I consider the legitimacy of the interest in ensuring gender diversity in establishments of higher education. 
Rather than focusing on Title IX, I redirect the argument onto the Fourteenth Amendment. We have substantial, and relatively recent, cases dealing with race diversity in higher education (Grutter v. Bollinger and Gratz v. Bollinger). While these cases applied the scrict scrutiny test (race classifications are of the upmost suspicion, Adarand Constructors v. Pena), gender by the Supreme Court is held at intermediate scrutiny (Craig v. Boren). 
I would argue that   there exists a compelling state interest to have a diverse student body. However, the procedures in utilizing affirmation action must not be quota based (Regents v. Bakke) and take a wholistic view of the applicant when considering gender (Grutter v. Bollinger). ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I care not to discuss the normative arguments about affirmative action. Instead, I consider the legitimacy of the interest in ensuring gender diversity in establishments of higher education.</p>
<p>Rather than focusing on Title IX, I redirect the argument onto the Fourteenth Amendment. We have substantial, and relatively recent, cases dealing with race diversity in higher education (Grutter v. Bollinger and Gratz v. Bollinger). While these cases applied the scrict scrutiny test (race classifications are of the upmost suspicion, Adarand Constructors v. Pena), gender by the Supreme Court is held at intermediate scrutiny (Craig v. Boren).</p>
<p>I would argue that   there exists a compelling state interest to have a diverse student body. However, the procedures in utilizing affirmation action must not be quota based (Regents v. Bakke) and take a wholistic view of the applicant when considering gender (Grutter v. Bollinger). </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate</title>
		<link>http://collegecandy.com/2009/11/11/should-colleges-favor-guys/#comment-60326</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kate]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://collegecandy.com/?p=46002#comment-60326</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Erich- it should be a club owner&#039;s personal business what they decide to do with their private company.  If a club wants to make it free for women to get in but 20$ for men to get in... if men don&#039;t like it, they don&#039;t have to go.  Or do you want the gov&#039;t interfering and stepping in even further in the matters of privately owned businesses?   
I find it ironic that the same men who argue that affirmative action represents too much government infringement on the private sector will then go and say such a thing as Erich did (that clubs shouldn&#039;t be allowed to charge less for a sex- if that&#039;s what they want to do, then the business owner should have the freedom to do so). 
I don&#039;t agree with affirmative action and I don&#039;t agree with people like Erich who think they&#039;re making some profound point... consider, Erich, that if a club was empty of girls, NO GUYS WOULD GO TO IT.  Clubs make ladies night knowing that if there are a lot of women at a club, a lot of men will show up... we all know no straight guy wants to go dancing at a &quot;sausage fest&quot;.  Therefore, the club has to entice women to come in order to stay in business.   
No affirmative action, regardless of race, sex, whatever... if someone works for it, let them in to a school (Can you tell I&#039;m a Libertarian?).  If a minority student doesn&#039;t have the grades or skills to go to a prestigious university, she or he can go to a 2 year school first and work her or his way up... no need for favoritism here.  All affirmative action does is perpetuate the myth that &quot;race&quot; even exists as a biological fact. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Erich- it should be a club owner&#039;s personal business what they decide to do with their private company.  If a club wants to make it free for women to get in but 20$ for men to get in&#8230; if men don&#039;t like it, they don&#039;t have to go.  Or do you want the gov&#039;t interfering and stepping in even further in the matters of privately owned businesses?  </p>
<p>I find it ironic that the same men who argue that affirmative action represents too much government infringement on the private sector will then go and say such a thing as Erich did (that clubs shouldn&#039;t be allowed to charge less for a sex- if that&#039;s what they want to do, then the business owner should have the freedom to do so).</p>
<p>I don&#039;t agree with affirmative action and I don&#039;t agree with people like Erich who think they&#039;re making some profound point&#8230; consider, Erich, that if a club was empty of girls, NO GUYS WOULD GO TO IT.  Clubs make ladies night knowing that if there are a lot of women at a club, a lot of men will show up&#8230; we all know no straight guy wants to go dancing at a &quot;sausage fest&quot;.  Therefore, the club has to entice women to come in order to stay in business.  </p>
<p>No affirmative action, regardless of race, sex, whatever&#8230; if someone works for it, let them in to a school (Can you tell I&#039;m a Libertarian?).  If a minority student doesn&#039;t have the grades or skills to go to a prestigious university, she or he can go to a 2 year school first and work her or his way up&#8230; no need for favoritism here.  All affirmative action does is perpetuate the myth that &quot;race&quot; even exists as a biological fact. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnE</title>
		<link>http://collegecandy.com/2009/11/11/should-colleges-favor-guys/#comment-60299</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JohnE]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 10:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://collegecandy.com/?p=46002#comment-60299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Further proof why engineers should rule the world.  We&#039;re results based.  We don&#039;t care if you feel good about the results we care that you get results.  College isn&#039;t a place to make you feel good aout your life it is a place to educate.  The best candidates should get in regardless of race, gender, creed.  Title IX is a crime against humanity. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Further proof why engineers should rule the world.  We&#039;re results based.  We don&#039;t care if you feel good about the results we care that you get results.  College isn&#039;t a place to make you feel good aout your life it is a place to educate.  The best candidates should get in regardless of race, gender, creed.  Title IX is a crime against humanity. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

