Women Are Sluts and Men Are Suffering?

yourwife says:
Tue, 9th Feb 20108:18 am 

I'm speechless.

Don't get me wrong, I actually AM a bit traditional and old fashioned.

I think people getting married later and women having careers ARE making it harder for kids and families.

On the other hand, it's not very affordable to have a one income home, and why SHOULDN'T women get an education and have a career?

I am educated, have a career, and am actually mulling over leaving my job because we have two children who I feel aren't spending enough time with us.

On the other hand, it infuriates me that as a woman, the writer would say essentially that all women are sluts until they are bout 28 and become desperate. I got married at 21, baby at 22, and another baby at 28. Happily.

So all women are sluts, but let me guess, she's somehow different?

Roberto says:
Tue, 9th Feb 20108:48 am 

I think charlotte has a point to a certain extent. Usually women do go out and hook up alot, but never find true love. Then [sometimes] end up with a wack husband, I can definitely agree with that, because it happens.

And to be honest women don't have ALL the power in dating, if you play your cards right, you can be on top, if not on the same level. Women having more liberty over who they date has made dating alot more fun.

UofT Alpha Male says:
Tue, 9th Feb 20108:50 am 

Given the hyperbole you spew in this entry and the fact that you've conveniently failed to mention much (much) more of Allen's other points, it's clear to me that you haven't read her essay at all. If you have, in fact, read it, then you've grossly (and perhaps, like so many other amateur bloggers, intentionally) misinterpreted the information that was presented simply to generate discussion and traffic. In that case, kudos!

Don't get me wrong. I don't agree with some of Allen's points, either, but your glib interpretation of the complex material covered is troubling. Are you in the business of deliberately misleading your readership?

And if your inflammatory and trite rhetoric wasn't enough, you resort to ad-hominem, stating that "maybe for her, an arranged marriage was the only way she could nab a man…."

Is this the kind of behaviour you feel is empowering and representative of a liberated woman? You've offered no intellectual counterpoints whatsoever. How unfortunate.

Roberto says:
Tue, 9th Feb 20108:52 am 

And beta or "ugly" males can get the upper edge and have sex with prime women if they style themselves correctly and have a really awesome personality, but IMO i think it is alot more difficult for a "ugly" girl to get the prime men.

Roberto says:
Tue, 9th Feb 20108:54 am 

yeah I agree with alpha male, alot of her argument is just emotionally fueled, and doesn't really make a good counter-argument, but then again, this isn't law school its a freaking girls blog site

Jessica- Delaware says:
Tue, 9th Feb 20109:10 am 

UofT Alpha Male-

This is a blog site, and I was obviously not able to touch on all of the points in Allen's (very long) essay. I assure you though, that I did in fact read it, and this is my take on SOME of the points she made. It's supposed to be humor, not a literary analysis (I do enough of that at school, thank you very much). You're entitled to your opinion of course, but I'm also entitled to mine

Lauren-MU says:
Tue, 9th Feb 201010:02 am 

It seems to me that you just read the first couple of paragraphs of Charlotte Allen's essay. Her essay hardly focused on demonizing woman. It merely suggested that women play a role in the hookup culture too.

Furthermore, most of her essay included OTHER people's opinions. She was just bringing it all together. She rarely made a bold comment; it was those who she was quoting who did.

Next time, you should really read the whole thing a lot slower. It's not that bad.

imjustasmalltowngirl says:
Tue, 9th Feb 201010:02 am 

The woman who wrote that article is obviously off her rocker. Because first of all I'm offended that she says all women are sluts, I'm 21, a virgin, and I sure as hell don't dress like a hooker when I go out. As for my friends yes they have sex but it's not with every Tom, Dick, and Harry that comes along. And what is this nonsense about being past our prime, at 28! I personally think it's awesome that women can be independent and take care of themselves. That article makes me so mad, how could a woman say something like that about her own gender?

M says:
Tue, 9th Feb 201012:42 pm 

You know, the more I think about it, the more it seems to me that "sexual liberation" is just a euphemism for women acting exactly the way men WANT them to–dating casually, not looking for commitment, and often having sex without being in love with (or knowing, in some cases) the person they're sleeping with.

This is not to say that such women are "sluts." That's a personal judgment call. They ARE, however, turning themselves into sex objects for men. While it's great that women now have the freedom to choose what they do with their lives and bodies…what a price to pay!

Before we had one gender that stereotypically fooled around casually and wanted no strings attached. Now we have two. Equality, yes. But in my opinion, it should've gone the other way.

Mar says:
Tue, 9th Feb 20101:11 pm 

You did not read beyond the first few paragraphs of the article. It is not criticizing women for being "sexually liberated" but rather outlining the consequences that the sexual revolution. Sleeping around with a bunch of guys does not make you "sexually liberated", it makes you insecure.

Tamara says:
Tue, 9th Feb 20101:59 pm 

I don't know what the fuss is about; it doesn't really matter "what else" did this so-called writer wrote. If she did say something remotely like what Jessica is commenting, she's a fuckin antifeminist and deserves everything Jessica said and much more. Also, great for you, Jessica! It's very important that we young women speak up and show that these kind of messages are just bullshit: that's the onl way these messages are actually going to dissapear (someday). And before someone jumps: I'm all for free speach but I'm no relativist. I believe these kind of voices should also be heard, but when society is mature enough, they will just dissapear.

Anonymous says:
Tue, 9th Feb 20105:33 pm 

I just read the article, and I in no way got the impression that you did. She never came across as an anti-feminist or a misogynist, rather she expressed concerns about the sexual liberation of women. If not done properly, a woman can simply turn herself into a man's sex object instead of achieving the sexual liberation she was after. I see so many girls sleep around, thinking there are no consequences, thinking that they are somehow liberating themselves, only to be under some asshole's thumb. It is possible to be a sexually liberated woman without being seen as a slut.

Anonymous says:
Tue, 9th Feb 20105:42 pm 

I actually thought the article was really thoughtful and well researched. Her point about men preferring less "experienced" women for marriage is, unfortunately, the truth and a truth that is not being communicated to young women in today's society. Instead of saying "just no" or "WTF," I think your criticism would be more effective if you addressed specific claims in her article and provided your reasoning as to why you believe those claims are incorrect.

College guy says:
Tue, 9th Feb 20107:30 pm 

as a "beta male", I say the alphas can keep the skanks.

College guy says:
Tue, 9th Feb 20107:37 pm 

Am I the only one who finds it funny that your average "alpha male" is neither classically attractive, or classically employed?

In college it doesn't make much of a difference becuase everyone is in the same boat, but from what Iv observed any girl whos reasonably intelligent if not mature doesnt even take the alphas seriously. How could they, have you ever seen the Pick Up Artist. Wow, just wow. Keep the inbreeding in the nightclubs.

Bama boy says:
Tue, 9th Feb 20107:44 pm 

I know a ton of young guys who point to "sexual liberation" as the biggest turn off in finding a wife. I guess when your too young for that stuff it seems empowering like "fuck you and that purity shit."…but eventually you have to get old and youll most likely be a lonely ldy if you did that stuff…someone should do a study asking successful, eligable bachelors to ratew women in order of atttractivnes, now women have done these studies and rated the richest and most athletic as the most attractive from pictures and the information given…i bet if you showed a set of dudes pics the hottest slut would be turned down for the average limited very loyal girl next door type….seriously we have moms.

Marla says:
Tue, 9th Feb 20107:59 pm 

It seems, from both this article and the comments on it, that the best route to take is the middle one. Yeah, some of the authors comments were not "literary" or "well-developed counter-points" but dear God, this is a BLOG. I personally would have been disappointed to NOT have found any sort of humor encased in this entry, because then we just have yet another essay about women's rights, politics, sexual liberation blah blah blah. If I saw a Works Cited at the end of the post, I think my brain would have exploded simply from having to look at (and create) far too many of those in my own college career

In any case, it sounds to me like some of the comments were a bit strong when placed against the chick's essay. There is no strict definition of what is misogynist or anti-feminist. Just because a lady writes that she doesn't agree with women going around sleeping with the entire frat house doesn't mean she's anti-feminist. Rights for women have been hard fought for, and yes I am thankful that I will not be stoned to death for looking at a man in the "wrong way" but at the same time I don't feel that every woman should be out late-night prowling for a sex partner… unless, of course, they just really want to. It's great to have the ability to choose what we want to do. It's GREAT to be able to say that it's not just certain men that want to fool around casually with no strings, but that certain women want this as well and can openly say so without reprimand (well, aside from the unoriginal "slut" comments)!

Yes, some women sleep around because they are insecure, and those are the girls who become "men's sex toys." Some sleep around because they enjoy sex, and so the playing field is equal. What is so wrong with women getting to go out to the bar to pick up men, whenever that's what men have gotten to do to women since the beginning? And then, some just don't sleep around due to personal choices or situations.

Summary: stereotyping genders when it comes to sexual preferences and lifestyle choices is a very unintelligent thing to do, and the best way to prevent raging due to an opinion in a blog is to shut down the computer, cut off your electricity, and live in your own happy little bubble

Tamara says:
Wed, 10th Feb 20103:11 am 

If young guys want unexperienced girls, well, they are antifeminist: the times are changing, but they have not changed yet, and that is why books like this one are so dangerous. They reinforce the old stereotypes and values.

If guys are still thinking about women like their parents did, the only way to educate them is to show them there is no way back. We're free to sleep around when we want to, chace boys when we want to, commit when we want to and not commit when we want to. Just as you guys. And you better start liking it or you'll be left alone…or alone with christian girls (and that means "equality" too: she gets no experience…but neither do you!)

Anonymous says:
Wed, 10th Feb 20104:40 am 

For me personally (as in I'm not preaching what is right in general, only what I feel is right for me), sex isn't casual. I'm very guarding of my emotions and really independent, so I'm not always comfortable with the idea of being attached to someone. Sex is a vulnerable experience, an experience that not just anyone gets to be a part of. I feel my views on sex allow me to be in equal amounts of control as my boyfriend. I don't like the idea of being more in control than him, because for me that does not equal a good relationship. And I feel the same way about casual flings: it is not about having more control, but equal control.

P.S. Not all Christian girls practice abstinence. Though their faith tells them they should, I have no problem with them making their own personal decisions.

Asia says:
Wed, 10th Feb 20105:34 am 

I prefer to take the middle road approach when it comes to as everyone else puts it "sexual liberation". I have my occasional one night stands (maybe once a month if that), but for the most part I keep my cookies to myself, for the guy I intend to see for longer than an hour or two (and possibly in the morning for good morning sex =)). I get my needs met, enough to keep me from not going completely nuts (because let's face it…sex is awesome!), but I don't want nor need to sleep with almost every reasonably attractive guy thrown my way. It's not cute, and its definitely not healthy (physically, mentally, or emotionally).

I use to be the girl who wouldn't necessarily go prowling for booty, it just happened to land in my lap (and my bed), and I'd take advantage of it (safely for the most part, because thankfully I've never had a drunken hookup). That was my first year of college though, a time of my first taste of true independence. I looked back at the end of that year and said…Wtf am I doing? I'm playing with my Russian roulette with my body and safety each time I bother with these "quick to get in there" men. I don't need the ever mutating STI's, and I damn sure don't need a kid that attaches me and this loser forEVER. Slowed it down, and I can truly say I am happier with that decision.

You can be liberated and all that without having to look like a slutbag.

nessa says:
Wed, 10th Feb 20102:02 pm 

Tamara how is being abstinent being anti-feminist? So are you defining being a feminist as having lots of sex? I haven't taken a sociology class on gender (yet), but I thought that being a feminist was about wanting equal rights, and proving that you're just as competent as your male counterparts.

Maybe us inexperience gals with our "old traditional values" don't feel the need to have sex yet. While religion isn't a main reason for keeping my "innoncence", I don't feel the need to go through the hook-up after affect that many of my friends go through.

And inexperience does not equal boring. I mean I might sit in my special dorm with no electricity, go to school in my horse drawn carriage, and pray fourteen times a day but I'm pretty sure my sex life will be pretty amazing.

I'm not bashing pre-marital sex, its works for a lot of people. But I wouldn't necessarily bash being a virgin in these times either. Sorry to turn your whole world upside down, but it's not accurate to stereotype people these days. (And this isn't a mean spirited not btw, just a response)=)

Anonymous says:
Thu, 11th Feb 20107:05 am 

Totally agree with you nessa! It seems like being abstinent today is looked down upon. I'm a modern woman, who has no faith whatsoever, and I feel like sex is something worth waiting for. I've been with my boyfriend for almost three years, happily, and abstinent. I'm not waiting for marriage, I'm making sure my life goes the way I want it to: without diseases or unwanted pregnancies. It's simply ignorant to think that all modern women want to be more casual about sex, just because society is more relaxed about it.

megan says:
Thu, 11th Feb 20102:26 pm 

i'd be interested to know your age, jessica from delaware. i'm 21 and i've hooked up enough to feel the pain after the fact. now that i'm just looking for true love, it's hard to transition from hooking up and perverting the idea of intimacy to having a true relationship. i'd be interested to see when you grow up, how "liberating" the hooking up really was…how beneficial it really was to your goals and sense of worth. it's not the idea that women are the fairer sex and weaker and stupider because of it. it has to do with how we're wired. science, hormones, and nature have a lot to do with traits that we can't change.

Tamara says:
Thu, 11th Feb 20107:50 pm 

nessa: being abstinent doesn't mean being antifeminist…unless you believe only women have to be pure till mariage, which many people do (but not neccesaryly you). That is what I said: an experienced guy who wants an unexperienced girl is using a double standard, and that's sexist. The book is not preaching chastity for everyone, apparently, is saying "guys can sleep around, but if you do, you're a whore". That is what I find antifeminist, not the value of chastity for everybody.

Anonymous says:
Fri, 12th Feb 20103:31 am 

It's an essay, not a book. You are correct in what you say about the double standard, but she (Allen) does not say if you sleep around you're a whore. By your use of apparently you are admitting that you haven't actually read the essay, only this blog entry, so it is not reasonable for you to judge the actual work.

Tamara says:
Fri, 12th Feb 20104:05 am 

You're right, I didn't read the essay, and I wouldn't bother; I'm a philosophy major, with 2000 years of astonishing reading to do, why would I waste my time in this lady?

I still wanted to make my point about the blog's entry; in my first post, I said "if she did say something remotely like what Jessica is commenting…". If she doesn't, then what I say is completely irrelevant.

Anonymous says:
Fri, 12th Feb 20107:50 am 

alright so you didn't read it. thats fine. but what you did, under assumption that this blog was accurate, was call her a fuckin antifeminist. so don't pull "i'm a philosophy major, with 2000 years of astonishing reading to do", because you make irrational statements, and admit that they are likely so because you didn't bother to do any research to see if your claims had any merit.

Tamara says:
Fri, 12th Feb 20101:13 pm 

You waste your time in ridiculous essays; I'll go make myself smarter reading real thinkers.

mtler says:
Sat, 13th Feb 201012:00 pm 

This argument is all because promiscuous women are jealous of women who preach abstinence because they know all other things considered equal a guy would rather marry the abstinent one than the other one.

Scott Free says:
Sun, 14th Feb 20108:41 pm 

Equallity an all that jazz does not make a difference when men and women have different goals and objectives.

If a boy can't get laid in college it's his own damn fault for having no game whatsoever. If he makes it through college he will at least have the necessary skills to earn a wage and with time and maturity realize that there are plenty of fine liberated women out there willing to share an hour of their time for a couple of beniji's. No questions asked. If the enterprising young lad wants a family there are plenty of past their prime early thirty ladies looking for a sperm doner. They however usually require that you have wages they can garnish from. So beware boys. But if you want something real and long lasting than this requires a compact a major undertaking that frankly will no be available to all and will like result in failure for most. (I think over 50% of marriages still end in divorce). You see a succesful and fruitful marriage requires co-commitment and self sacrifice. Something that may sound anti-feminist to some is pro-family to others. The bounty of this sacrifice for both parties are children which are pure joy to those inclined to want them. But the dowfall is when this burden is not equally shared. By equall I do not mean taking turns doing dishes but instead by not negotiating and compromising on what each member of the familial unit wants and needs to be healthy and happy and to constantly renegotiate as time goes on. You see marriages fail for many specific reasons but in most cases it is generally some form of selfishness. No suprised here.

Moral of this tall tale??

If you fine young liberated ladies want a family and commitment in the future. Don't sit on every dick just because men throughout history have done so and now it's your turn. All you are doing is giving up your moral authority and relieving men of the shame and guilt they should feel for not commiting to a better half in the first place. The end result??? Only time will tell but from my vantage point the boys of tomorrow will have it made. Get back to work honey you earn more and I need a new playstation.

logic says:
Mon, 15th Feb 20104:45 pm 

the problem with people like Scott Free is that they say a bunch of stuff without anything other than anectdotal evidence to back up theit opinion.

And the 50%-of-marriages statistic is only in the USA. It is worthless without comparing it to other countries' rates.

logic says:
Mon, 15th Feb 20104:46 pm 

come to think of it, that is the main problem with this article and the review of it–nothing but opinion and anectdotes. For all we know, that DC guy in the article is a shut-in

jackie :) says:
Tue, 16th Feb 201012:53 pm 

"M says:

Tue, 9th Feb 20105:42 pm

You know, the more I think about it, the more it seems to me that “sexual liberation” is just a euphemism for women acting exactly the way men WANT them to–dating casually, not looking for commitment, and often having sex without being in love with (or knowing, in some cases) the person they’re sleeping with.

This is not to say that such women are “sluts.” That’s a personal judgment call. They ARE, however, turning themselves into sex objects for men. While it’s great that women now have the freedom to choose what they do with their lives and bodies…what a price to pay!

Before we had one gender that stereotypically fooled around casually and wanted no strings attached. Now we have two. Equality, yes. But in my opinion, it should’ve gone the other way."

I agree 100% with this comment, I feel that women should have the right to do with their lives and bodies as they please, and have every oppourtunity to succeed at whatever. But I caution every female to remeber that while it is important to date and have relationships and experiences before settling down, this new "hook-up" culture is damaging to women physically and emotionally. We are not men. And while this may seem like it has no consequences while we're young, eventually the effects of giving your body to so many different people will catch up with you, we were not intended to have such an array of different partners.

Ryokko Sands says:
Tue, 16th Feb 20109:21 pm 

Up late for a test? Here's some great study tips!

http://www.helium.com/items/1745036-best-ways-to-…

logic says:
Tue, 16th Feb 201011:00 pm 

jackie said: "But I caution every female to remeber that while it is important to date and have relationships and experiences before settling down, this new “hook-up” culture is damaging to women physically and emotionally. We are not men. And while this may seem like it has no consequences while we’re young, eventually the effects of giving your body to so many different people will catch up with you, we were not intended to have such an array of different partners."

You have no proof to back up this claim. In fact, you don't even have evidence to even attempt to prove it.

logic says:
Tue, 16th Feb 201011:06 pm 

Most people just have personal biases and emotional arguments when it comes to this sort of sexy stuff.

Some people, like a few of these commentors, call women "sluts" for having sex. They think women are worse the higher their partner number is.

Other people, other commentors in fact, will say that women are "making themselves sex objects" and "damaging themselves." I can see where they are coming from, but they remove personal agency totally. This line of thought basically, like the other one I describes, says that women should not be having so much sex. It does it in a more complex fashion: by claiming that they are hurting women everywhere by making men respect them less.

Both these dumb-as-hell virgin/whore men and third wave feminist types seem intent on limiting sex in one way or another. It's strange.

mtler says:
Wed, 17th Feb 20106:17 am 

jackie, its the boys that want women like that. real men dont need easy girls… women in the usa are just shooting themselves in the foot on this one.. and logic you might want to choose another name. Proof? Check divorce rates in the usa vs other countries, ur really fine with that? for a society as a whole u think its fine for half the families in the usa to have no father because both their parents are too juvenile to keep it in their pants? (dont mean with each other) A society of entertainment at its best, i mean at birth there is a 15% chance in the USA that the child is not yours. Yes indeed we are going uphill. Women were always a moral compass for men, now all they do is enable us.. nice reading here:

http://ca.askmen.com/dating/curtsmith/42_dating_a… add a .html at the end

Tamara says:
Wed, 17th Feb 20107:06 am 

It's funny that people say "women are becoming sexual objects". Women have always been sexual objects; they couldn't actually choose who they wanted to sleep with (or wanted not), they were just defined by the man's desire. Feminism is all about empowering: sleeping with whoever you want, for the reasons you want, and rejecting the ones you don't want (for whatever the reason, again) is not being a sexual object: it's being a sexual subject, with its own desire and power to choose. I'm definitely glad we're heading in that direction (we're definitely not there yet: not when so many young girls are calling their pairs sluts and whores. A slut or a whore is a woman that uses sex to get money, a job, or something like that, not pleasure. Don't you see the difference?), and many progressist (do you use that word in English?) feminist men are too.

mtler says:
Wed, 17th Feb 20108:54 am 

Tamara you may want to learn a bit more about feminism. Has nothing to do with sex. Bottom line men will always think of promiscuous girls as sluts. That doesnt mean we do not like them, theyre great for regular hookups but to raise a family with a woman like that or a woman who gives it up freely no thank you. And i can guarantee u 99% of quality men agree.

Tamara says:
Wed, 17th Feb 20101:39 pm 

I know my Butler and my de Beauvoir preety well: gender studies are among my area of academic specialty. Feminism is, among other stuff, about sex. Look it up if you want to.

And I definitely don't wanna have nothing to do with a man who believes owning my body is being a whore; so don't worry, I won't be calling you up.

logic says:
Wed, 17th Feb 20108:19 pm 

mtler, just because you are misogynistic to the level of thinking women having sex is dirty, does not mean a thing.

and you must provide evidence explaning why divorce rates are higher here than in other countries, as well as actually providing statistics on countries' divorce rates.

As it stands now, you just make yourself out to be some bitter man. I especially like this quote: "Bottom line men will always think of promiscuous girls as sluts. That doesnt mean we do not like them, theyre great for regular hookups but to raise a family with a woman like that or a woman who gives it up freely no thank you. And i can guarantee u 99% of quality men agree."

Sounds like you've got a virgin/whore thing going on there.

Please define these terms:

Promiscuous Woman, Quality Man

where is the pioc fr says:
Wed, 17th Feb 20108:19 pm 

aw snap where that pic from???

mtler says:
Thu, 18th Feb 20107:40 am 

where did i say women having sex is dirty? So your idea of answering someone back is to put words into their mouths to make yourself have a point? As for the evidence abotu divorce rates and why they are why they are is unobtainable. Its like asking why are crime rates as high, you cant give a definitive answer but you can infer that perhaps its the ability of people over here to cheat on their significant others, look at france per 1000 people their rate of divorce is half of the USA. Im not referring to women only, but men aswell. Im not saying there is something wrong with being promiscuous i made that much clear but u chose to ignore that… im just telling women what MEN see from our perspective. And yes i consider myself quality and you know why? cos im rich, good looking, young, come from a good family, part owner of a company, and im still 24. then again people from different classes have different mentalities. I for example look for qualities other than she has a great rack when im looking for a woman..

and a promiscuous woman is some1 who gives it up within hours of meeting her, you know the type u forget their name?

John says:
Thu, 18th Feb 20104:13 pm 

The author not only sounds like a slut but a dumb one to boot. The statistics don't lie. Feminism, birth control and relaxed social mores about what women are "allowed" and "expected" to do have destroyed the family, destroyed the institution of marriage and fostered two generation of children growing up in single-parent home. In the black community, for example, the rate of illegitimacy is in the 60-70% range year after year. For whites, the rate has doubled since the 1960s.

Since you like cutesy abbreviations, I've got one for you: STFU.

logic says:
Thu, 18th Feb 20107:06 pm 

"As for the evidence abotu divorce rates and why they are why they are is unobtainable. Its like asking why are crime rates as high, you cant give a definitive answer"

So you can not explain it.

Cyp says:
Fri, 19th Feb 20103:41 am 

actually this is what really happenes. And beta -males don't get less action, they get no fuckin' action. Of course you do not like to admit it , becaus ethen you could not complain that you are so unlucky and that you are dating only jerks…

lol says:
Fri, 19th Feb 20109:15 pm 

"A slut is a girl who gives it up within hours of meeting her"

Wait a minute. Doesn't that mean you give it up just as quick? what kind of "Quality" male are you. Get over yourself.

shekhar1066 says:
Sat, 20th Feb 20102:25 am 

let's know how you get on from that…i uses the mens sex toys and i found them the good alternative..

Casey says:
Sat, 20th Feb 20109:53 am 

Tamara, how can you say that this woman and her writing is a waste of time if you haven't even read it? It's pretty evident, especially with all the comments saying this post totally missed the mark, that the essay is nothing like the author is saying it is, so it may be worth your time to give the essay a chance. You comment on this site quite a bit, and are always very quick to respond, so perhaps you don't have THAT much philosophy reading to do that you can't give this essay a shot? And if you DO have that much reading, maybe you can sit out the College Candy arguments for an hour or so and actually read the essay that you are defaming, so you can come back with a valid point and not just wasted space in the comments. Even if you don't agree with the essay at least your argument will be valid.

oh and another thing, you're a liberal, liberated feminist woman, you have your own thoughts and beliefs and you argue them constantly while putting down closed minded conservatives. But what you are failing to realize is that you're just as closed minded as those you're putting down because you refuse to read that which you don't agree with. That's a major no no in politics and controversy, because arguments are ALWAYS changing and new ones are always forming, if you're not constantly keeping an open mind and re-educating yourself on issues then you and your opinions are just going to fall to the way side and all your arguments will just become null and void. So try to remember that you can have your convictions, but to be open minded means you are open to ALL ideas, on either side, not just the ones YOU think are right. Closed minded-ness is an issue on BOTH sides.

Elizabeth says:
Sat, 20th Feb 20107:33 pm 

I’m late to this discussion, but I have a few points I would like to make.

1. The “sexual liberation” of women is both good and bad. It’s good because it is commonly accepted now for women to be sexual being – which we are. We like sex and can admit it without the negative backlash in societies of the past. However, it is bad because I think many girls are taking the idea to the extreme. Casual sex means just that – it’s casual. There are no expectations, no emotions, no future plans, no connections, zip nil nada. It means not wondering if the guy is going to call you. It is completely NSA. Why are guys so good at it? It’s because they don’t care about the girls they’re having casual sex with. They do view those women as sex objects because that is their present main purpose – to have sex with and to get off. Women can have casual sex as well, but they must view it the same way as the guys do. If emotions are present, then a girl should NOT be having casual sex because chances are the guy doesn’t feel the same way. If he did, he would be expressing an explicit interest in the girl as a whole – not just the sex. This is a recipe for disaster.

2. It’s common knowledge that sexuality is an easy way to get attention. Girls know that and the whole hookup culture has made it accepted to turn that sexuality up full force. So let’s say Girl X wants attention from Boy X. A little bit of sex is a quick hook. However, there are two caveats to this. For starters, while sex yields instant results, it doesn’t guarantee staying power because there are a thousand other girls out there who can offer great sex. In addition, using one’s sexuality as the main selling point can quickly box a girl into the predicament of guys seeing her only as a sex object.

3. Finally, there will always be people who associate sex with “I like you” and they should just avoid casual NSA sex altogether unless they want heartbreak. Also, I’ve seen my fair share of girls who have the belief that the more guys that have sex with them (thus are attracted to them), the higher their worth as a woman is. What they fail to realize is that many guys will have sex with almost any girl that doesn’t have three eyes and horns on her head. The girls are merely reduced to numbers.

I have no problem with casual sex as long as

a.) it’s not a substitution when the girl really wants a relationship
b.) the girl isn’t harboring any expectations or wants more from the guy (when he only wants the sex)
and
c.) it’s not being used as a basis of self-esteem/self-worth.

Parabola says:
Mon, 22nd Feb 201012:50 am 

"Beta-males" should step it up? "Beta-males" lack personality? That is a steaming pile of crap. These so called "beta-males" are the ones who actually care and respect women, guys who actually try.

The "alpha-males" can just bark and wistle at a womans body, have sex with anyone he wants, never care, and he can get away with it all simply because of his sex appeal and ability to kick the little guys ass.

The most troubling part is the fact that every time a dumb brute gives her a black eye, cheats on her, or dumps her when he knocks her up, she goes straight for another dumb brute. The lesson is never learned. It's only accepted when she becomes too old and worn for the so called "alpha-men."

Of course the alpha-male usually becomes the typical drunk, fat, wifebeating, child abusing piece of crap we all know and love.

Just my observation.

Tamara says:
Mon, 22nd Feb 20103:55 am 

Casey: I lef the discussion when people started discussing the essay 'cause I have no interest in reading it. I do read some current discussions, this one is not in my particular interest. And don't tell me how to lead my life or use my time, I never tried to do that with you. I've always been respectful with the user exposing my points of view, not getting personal, and you're getting all personal with me and using a whole post just to insult me. I'd like you to stop, thanks.

Oh, and I find collegecandy really interesting; it gives me a pick on what the young american people think, in a very broad spectrum. I find it sociologically and politically more interesting than many essays. So forgive me if I post too much for your taste.

Casey says:
Mon, 22nd Feb 20106:39 am 

Tamara, I'm sorry, maybe that came off the wrong way, I didn't mean to insult you, and you don't post too much, I've been accused of posting too much so I certainly wouldn't say that to another reader. But all I was trying to say is that if you're going to argue against something you haven't even read and make completely unsubstantiated comments, then it might make people disregard your future arguments, I enjoy debating with you on topics because you do keep it clean, unlike most others, so sorry if you felt I was insulting you, it wasn't my intent.

Tamara says:
Mon, 22nd Feb 20107:47 am 

Well, this is interesting.

I used the conditional in my first post. "If this woman says anything remotely like this…". If she doesn't, of course, what the author of this post says is irrelevant, also what I say is irrelevant. I was never argueing against the author, but against the many commenters who did defend some preety sexist stuff. I'm not criticizing the author here, it's very unlikely she reads this or even cares about our argument. And again, I used the conditional.

Oh, and when I said I didn't think this essay is worth it, is because I haven't read this particular essay, but I know who this author is: I read that article about women being dumber than men, and her argument agains militant atheist. I don't think it's worth my time: those pieces were real bad in my opinion. If you do like her, then it's worth your time. Noone has time or wishes to read every single thing written in the world; we all have to make choices. Maybe my post was unclear, but I didn't mean to talk about the actual essay, but about the account the blogger made. Sorry if that was missunderstood.

The thing about "respecting the other side" is the one I find most interesting. There is a sense in which I respect everything everyone says: everyone is entitled to have an opinion and speak up. But there is a sense in which I don't, and I believe noone does: you don't go reading nazis authors just to see if they convince you, you know they won't (if you feel strongly about human rights). That's how I feel about people who are antifeminist (and saying women are dumb definitely is) or anti atheists. I do bother reading some religious positions on arguments, or some more conservative authors, because I know they might make valid points, I'm not anti christian or anything of the sort: but a woman who's as openly anti feminist and anti atheist as Allen? No way.

And I accept your apology, we all get preety sensitive and agressive in the internet. It happens. Let's move on.

Casey says:
Mon, 22nd Feb 201012:32 pm 

Sorry, I just went back and re-read this and it still kind of rubs me the wrong way how you commented on this post in the first place making terrible accusations about the author of the essay and then admit you didn’t even read the essay, and STILL say it’s a waste of time, then in your reply to me you said that this topic doesn’t strike your interest, yet you said, “gender studies are among my area of academic specialty”, and it obviously struck enough interest for you to comment in the first place. You said you didn’t appreciate me attacking you personally (which I didn’t really), yet you did so to others. This is the internet, you have to be prepared for people to disagree with you and pick you apart for whatever you decide to put out there. Most of the time you make pretty good arguments, but if you’re not even going read what you’re arguing about, and no, you didn’t leave the discussion when they started talking about the essay, you ignored the essay and continued to make claims about the issue without reading the other side which your arguing against, that is being uninformed, and makes your argument invalid. You can comment on the issue, but you can’t refute the essay or put down the writer, because you didn’t read it and based your opinions of it off of someone else who didn’t read it. This is why I commented to you, the fact that you automatically assume since this woman is arguing for the other side that she isn’t worth your time, and nothing that she says could possibly hold any merit, greatly diminishes the validity of your arguments for me, and possibly others, since you obviously don’t have enough respect for the other sides way of thinking to read anything you may not agree with (which honestly, how can you know until you read it).

As long as one keeps and open mind, is informed on both sides of an issue, and knows why they believe what they do then they have an argument, but if one refuses to educate themselves then they will always be wrong. The second half of my original comment wasn’t aimed entirely at you, but anyone who refuses to educate themselves on both sides of an issue.

It wasn’t my original intent to insult you, but it was your original intent to put down an author and essay you hadn’t read.

Marc says:
Sat, 27th Feb 20106:04 pm 

Woman are supposed to be caring, loving, motherly figures who act with class and are modest. So many young girls are whores, then they're suddenly girls in their mid-20s who are still sluts, are mean to guys and wonder why they cannot find a good man. Reason being… You can't make a whore into a housewife, no guy wants to settle down with a slut. Being "Powerful" in the dating scene creates whores, and whores aren't going to make good wives and mothers. A guy wants a good looking, modest respectable woman who has a loving heart. No 25 year old, club going drunken mess of a woman ( no matter how attractive ) is going to EVER attract a good man for long.

Beast says:
Mon, 1st Mar 20101:55 pm 

First off, you seem like you were one of those offended girls that DID dress up like a prostitute to bring home any guy you want. Some of that essay did seem pretty harsh, but some of it was also too true. Deal with it. Yes, I do agree that women should enjoy sex. Thats fine with me, as long as it's NOT with 50 guys in one year, cus do you know what that is called?? A TURN OFF. You want to know why guys leave you after the first night or month that you try to find a serious relationship? Because those alpha males that you are talking about have been with about a hundred of the same "easy" type of women like you and end up being the cheater and wife beater. Those "beta" males are the ones that will love you like you want to be loved. So whenever you want to get married and NOT die alone, how about you learn a lesson or two and don't go after the same idiots over and over again. In the words of the famous philisopher Dave Chappelle, "yes. Chivalry IS dead, AND WOMEN KILLED IT"

mtler says:
Tue, 2nd Mar 20106:29 am 

lol, u mentioned that i am giving it up just as quick. Actually i made a general statement, and i have been known to be quite rude to women who are so forward. Does not mean i turn down alot of women but if i do hook up with someone after 1 hour and then after we had sex she wants to stay and cuddle and have a relationship i will make it a point to make her cry and feel bad about herself. The point you are not understanding is that you want men and women to be exactly the same.. im sorry but that will never be. Now i know you will say that is sexist, and it may be but bottom line its the truth. Rich, sucessful men will NEVER marry the type of women you strive to be, you know why because he has the choice, because women will chase after him, and i guarantee u the one who gets him will be the one who makes him fight the most for it. Just saying hi to a girl in a club should not allow u to bang her all night i dont get it and u want guys not to call women like that sluts? Guys arent like girls where they get approached 50 times a day so we will take it when its offered which is why a guy will go for an easy girl but if he is worth anything he would not have a relationship with her.

Natalie says:
Mon, 8th Mar 20106:25 pm 

Roberto: you're wrong it's easier for ugly women to get a date than an ugly man. Men are easier to get it's getting a good man that's hard. As for a man pulling it's harder for him even if he is good looking cos other men give all men a bad image. And so call good guys dont seem to show it so naturally women will be harder to please – blame it on men but many men refuse to take responsobilty so women don't bother with them. And the said men complain about how hard done by they are but the bottom line is those men will end up alone thanks to their delusions. As for women it's a proven fact they're most happiest single so ladies never rush the settling down part.

raffaelli says:
Tue, 9th Mar 201012:27 am 

Age – 20

Occupation-sex worker

I am only serving womens and girls who want a play boy to humiliate and have sex fun activities.

Expirience by many mistrisess in femdom i serve women like there slaves .


if u pay me money ready to lick , clean ,wash pussy and toilets

I am a slim male and very athletic 


Contact number – 9664818461

Casey says:
Tue, 9th Mar 20107:07 pm 

According to mtler, he will fuck girls and then call them whores and make them feel bad about themselves if they want something more with him. A lot of you are saying he's a hypocrite for this since he gave it up right away too, but in reality, he's not. HE didn't want any more than a hookup, if SHE wanted more then it was her mistake for not making her intentions clear from the beginning. Girls need to learn that sex is not a way to get what you want from a guy, and just because you sleep with him doesn't mean he's going to want to marry you. Guys and girls are different in that way, a girl tends to be more emotional when sex is involved and guys are more primal. If a girl DOESN'T want a relationship with him, then that's fine with him, thy both have the same intentions and want nothing more to do with each other after the sex, it's when she gives it up after an hour and then wonders why he wants nothing more to do with her that there's a problem, HE didn't want anything but sex from the beginning, YOU'RE the one who was trying to be manipulative and use sex as a way to persuade him to date you, or like you, or whatever.

It's not REALLY being a hypocrite when there are different intentions to begin with. If your feelings are that tender then you probably shouldn't be sleeping around.

Basically he's saying, "If a guy sleeps with you after an hour, they just want sex, if you don't just want sex, don't sleep with a guy after an hour, because you both want two different things and YOU'RE the one who's going to get hurt."

That's the problem with women trying to act like men, SOME women can do the whole promiscuous thing/ one night stands, and not think anything of it, but a lot of women can't because sex and emotions go hand in hand for them, and that's fine because honestly, that's how we're made, but you need to know what you're getting yourself into and be prepared for the consequences.

AWholeNewIdea says:
Sat, 17th Apr 20108:44 pm 

Okay seriously, lets just all make a deal here to quit fucking being shady idiots and stop cheating in relationships, that's the goddamn problem here, men and women being sneaky and fucking around, both genders should suffer some sort of brutal consequence for that bullshit. Yeah women are sluts, so aren't we men, lets stop being idiots for a change and start LEARNING wtf it means to be loyal and stop flirting around behind their lover's back and being swayed by some piece of shit home wrecker, sound good?

I firmly believe that anyone who disagrees with this should be tied to a chair, sodomized, and executed.

dose28 says:
Sun, 18th Apr 20106:38 am 

Question for ya'll:

How many people does one have to sleep with to be considered unfit by you for a long term relationship? 10, 100, 1,000, 10,000?

The term "slut" is commonly used to describe a person that is too promiscuous to take seriously. It's like the word thief, no one wants to be called a thief even if they are one, but a person can't be offended by being called what they are. When it comes to being a slut, well, if there's genuine proof, like admission, that's the end of it. I'll not have anything to do with a person like that, as in a relationship. If you catch a person cheating on you that also seems like pretty damning evidence that a person is a slut, no excuses there.

Jason says:
Tue, 27th Apr 20109:15 am 

Men have a constant desire to have sex with many diverse partners, to increase the likelihood of passing on their genes/seed. This is all subconscious however and is translated to the individual as "being horny", "just wanting to get laid", etc. To achieve this goal, men will lower any possible standards just for sexual gratification. It is vastly different for women. Women, are subconsciously programmed by nature to only accept the BEST seed and accept the BEST genes. They have to carry the seed inside them for 9 months and have evolved to be able to raise the offspring – so they have also evolved to be gatekeepers to only allow the best possible genes to be passed. Hence, why women will not lower their standards and how even fat, hideous women still want only rich, handsome, alpha type men.

This simple biological determinism acts out quite literally in the casual encounters section of CL. Make an ad as a man requesting for sex, and you'll receive about 10 spam emails from people attempting to exploit this biological fact. And perhaps maybe one male, thinking he can convert the horny guy into trying gay sex out of sexual frustration. But what happens if you make an ad as a woman requesting for sex? You will have over 60 replies from real men within an hour. The woman simply has to sift through her choices until she finds the one who is "most attractive, richest, holds most value, etc.". It has nothing to do with the CL section, it's just human nature. This of course happens in clubs, bars, and other places where singles mingle as well.

What is curious however, is some women's reasoning that there is a "double standard" that exists because men are congratulated for being sexually promiscuous – and women are given negative connotations such as "slut" or "whore". Why some women can't understand this very simple concept has always baffled me. Men have to compete with one another to get picked for sex. They have to display that they have the best genes or the most value. Women have to compete too, but only for the BEST male. They can have sex anytime they choose, just not with the best choice. But if they were to lower their standards as men have to do, they would get to pick from a long line of men. "Getting laid" is not something that can happen every day for the common Joe. He has to navigate the maze of a woman delicately in social situations to convince her he's the best pick. If a woman goes to a bar, club, or casual encounters looking for sex, and only wants sex, she will have zero problems getting it. Therefore, over time, women have gained a negative connotation, because they are not "beating anyone" or doing anything remotely impressive, they are simply manipulating basic human biology for sexual gratification. And thus, poof, the term "slut" was manifested. I didn't even have to go into this long winded rant to make my point invincible – think female prostitution. Is there a reason why the porn industry is so huge but only for the male population? Is there a reason female prostitution is a global epidemic, but you don't hear problems about male prostitution? Why a female prostitute can make quite the living, while male prostitution isn't very profitable for the average Joe? Good luck guys, let the best man win

Bella.b says:
Tue, 27th Apr 20107:37 pm 

Jason…beautiful!

malik says:
Tue, 4th May 201011:09 am 

charlotte is totally right for about 85% of all women under age 28……again i said about 85%…..there are always exceptions….

I can talk from experience being a brown indian alpha male(me thinks dont want to brag), i have had sex with over 30 brown/some white asians women, and some of them had bfreinds/husbands too……women just love the felling of fucking the hot alpha male, but yes for marriage they sometimes settle wit the beta males……

got to feel for those beta males…….and yes drunk alpha males will also have sex with ok looking women…….ALPHA MALES ARE TAKING OVER NOW THANKS TO NO ARRAGNED MARRIAGE – natural course of evolution is taking place here…..

Tina says:
Fri, 7th May 20108:54 pm 

Wow you people love to use the excuse that you are genetically wired to spread your seed….are you primitive animals… do you do other things primitve animal do… hmm????

If you think women want a man who has a plethora of sexual partners you are sadly mistaken…sluttiness is not attractive be it a male or female slut!

malik says:
Sat, 8th May 201011:41 am 

Tina you are a confused little girl…..who said i would tell that number of partners to my current partner, hell no……just like sluttly women out there lie…….everything about a woman is a lie, have u ever truly seen those hot women without makeup??? omg they look like guys if not worse thanks to years of make up ruining their skin quality…..

all im saying is that, arranged marriage sed to be the only way that beta males used to get goodlooking women, but now thanks to no arranged marriage women usually always want the alpha males, which are rare about 5% i wold say of all men, are fucking all the women.

but as i said, this is just a natural course of eevolution….in 100 years, there will be higher percentage of alpha males most likely due to selective breeding by women now with alphas, and those poor betas and omegas are going to go extinct slowly…….jmho

Robby says:
Mon, 10th May 201010:53 am 

Tina,

If you call men primitive for wanting many sexual partners – than you must also agree to call women primitive that seek out and prefer the "confident, attractive, wealthy" men. They are programmed by their genetics to behave that way – so if men should have to suppress their biological coding, so should women? No?

MarkyD says:
Tue, 11th May 20108:52 am 

This is sillyness what are all the bitches argueing against exactly, men don't like sluts for relationships thats not going to change. women aren't neccarsarily designed not to sleep around, but men ARE designed not to like sluts so live with it whores. If a woman was argueing for her right to take steroids, weight train and grow a beard, then i'd say sure go ahead it's your right but i don't have to sleep with you or date you and i reserve the right to call you a freak. Women like manly, aggressive men. Men like petite, feminine women. In the same way women might like players and jerks but men don't like sluts. So live with it. You have a right to be a slut, but you don't have a right to try and make men like it. They don't think it's clever, they dont think its liberated and they never will because fundamentally you are obscuring paternity certainty and risking your life through pregancy and STDs and men have important inbuilt biological/psychological defenses against sluts that make them unloveable and contemptable to us. There may be (male invented)pills to protect you from the consequences of your "liberation" but there aren't any pills to stop men hating sluts, or do you want those invented too? If a woman is allowed to judge me for my past(accumulated wealth, property, education, career) and everything from my height to my confidence to my muscularity then i am sure as hell allowed to judge her for her slutty used up past. Women want us to be blinded by superficial beauty and charm so we don't ask the hard questions like wtf have you been doing with your vagina for the last decade, but men can be just as clinical as the bitches when sizing up a mate and you better believe it. Read it and weep you hoeesss.

Brice says:
Tue, 11th May 20107:52 pm 

Markyd,

Great points, and well said. I agree – if men are expected to suppress their natural defenses against "loose women", why aren't women forced by society to also have to suppress their desire for only rich, handsome, confident men?

MarkyD says:
Thu, 13th May 20106:53 am 

I think that Tamara character further up is a bit of a joke, i doubt she's reading now and as well as not reading the article i'm not sure if she even actually studies philosophy at all. What did the greek philosophers have to say about women? what did her good friends friedrich Nietzsche, Arthur schopenhaur and Georg hegel think of women's liberation?!?!

Schopenhaur and Hegel famously had a great and open disdain for eachother's character and ideals, but one thing they did agree on was the amorality of women and openly ridiculed the very concept of female emancipation.

Perhaps she should have chosen a field less hostile to the feminine, the "great thinkers" of ages past would turn in their graves at this "student" of philosophy.

Kurt says:
Thu, 27th May 20101:12 am 

There are a lot of sluts, but guys pick up on this quickly. Guys might have fun with a slut, but most aren't stupid enough to marry one. The women who sleep around are screwing themselves over – many of them waste their most attractive years slutting around and then expect a decent guy who wasn't like that to want to marry them. Many of these women are also extremely bitter by the time they hit their early 30s because they are not yet married and the clock is running against them.

This is precisely why I prefer younger women myself. I worked my butt off throughout most of my 20s and don't want to settle for a woman who freely gave her body to random strangers.

I personally think that 10-15 years from now a lot of women who slutted it up will regret their actions when they have to settle for a lesser mate if they ever want to get married and also missed their chances to have children

darknight says:
Thu, 1st Jul 20102:16 am 

Womens who are whores must be burnt in public.being a whore is a sin it is said in bible,quran and all other relegious books.feminism is not about having the choice to fuck anyone at anytime they want.they may soon ask to fuck men in public places imagine if all women fuck everyday with many people do we have family and generation after us.most men really not like the sluts.there are also manwhores they are also be burnt in public places its just not somemen are murdering.so that all women have the rights to murder.we must not talk equality about genders commiting sins.i agree with whoelenewidea 100% men are women who were whores must suffer brutalconsequences.equality must be given in punishments for both genders.and many whores like tamara are bold to say that i will have sex with anyone i want.i soon wish u will get aids and die.men must marry only conservational girls and left trash like tamara without getting aids.

Jester31 says:
Thu, 1st Jul 20102:50 pm 

Darknight: Though your Religious books carry some excellent messages, it's not a good idea to enforce brutal consequences for people who choose to be sluts and whores in a free country. They'll eventually suffer from the consequences, whether it be STD's or extremely low self-worth.

What Women don't seem to understand, is that their idols in Sex in the City will never find a good man to Marry, because good men do not Marry loose women. Modern women seem to equate femenist equality with screwing anyone and everyone they want. It's not about that. It's about having the CHOICE to screw anyone and everyone they want. The thing is, every choice has a consequence, be that positive or negative. Here's a couple positive points for "Sexually liberated" women:

- Your girlfriends will call you "sexually liberated" and commend you for being with a variety of different players from the club. You go girl!

- You'll get miles of cock in your punched out vagina. Yay! doesn't that feel good?

Here's a couple negative points for "Sexually liberated" women:

- Men know "sexually liberated" is just a nice term for "SLUTS", and have zero respect for them.

- When you lie about your past to marry a good "beta male" (who is in essence an Alpha Male who chooses not to sleep around and respects his body, as well as the female form), he will eventually find out either through friends, aquaintances, or your inability to stay faithful, because you crave the fun and attention of your "sexually liberated" single years.

Sexual equality doesn't exist, as it has always been heavily skewed in the female's favour anyways. Ask any non-alpha male. Unfortunately, the "Modern Woman" is the current downfall of a family oriented society. Hurray for skanks.

darknight says:
Fri, 2nd Jul 20107:24 pm 

You are right jester i am happy that people like you having good thoughts and to led moral life.if we let women whatever they wish they can do they will then use men as slaves and prostitutes.but there are more bad people in the world who want to fuck everyone they like and doesnt care about beta males or females.women should not use their freedom in doing imoral activities.freedom is limited you cannot have sex in the centre of traffic busy roads.and i have heard stories of many men killing their cheating wives.many good men cannot stand them and they will get angry and kill their unfaithful wives.we men should limit their freedom and sexual freedom is only being a whore.we must not give that freedom to women.

Hunter says:
Sat, 3rd Jul 20101:59 pm 

So basically, all you purty little "liberated gals" want to just party during your most fertile years, whilst us good men work our tails off to ensure our financial security/stability, and after you've partied a bunch, you expect a nice guy (many of which you outright rejected/humiliated during your prime) to come pick up the tab?

Screw that. You're a free woman now. So go enjoy your freedom some more.

Oh wait, what's that? Oh yeah! You're past your prime now! What with the wrinkles, and increasingly sagging boobs, and your lack of fertility, plus the off chance that you may have contracted at least ONE STD from one of the many hot studs (A.K.A. "Bad Boys" or "Playas") you handed your vagina out to, I imagine it'd be rather difficult to attract any decent guys at that point.

Well, you could always just get a cat, maybe 2, maybe even a few…

darknight says:
Mon, 5th Jul 20107:37 am 

women who are sluts are garbage they are used by many men.will any men eat food with a same spoon that many man ate.same goes for a woman.women are now saying why cant they do the same slutty thing men are doing.two wrongs does not become right.both are immoral activites

FM says:
Mon, 12th Jul 20109:05 am 

I found out MOST women are sluts anymore, just often good at hiding it. I wouldn't take today's women all that seriously for relationships or anything. Especially if you have a temper to you. Women aren't raised right anymore. Go figure.

manonymous says:
Mon, 12th Jul 201010:30 am 

jeez, you bitter men really need to stop acting so needy

manonymous says:
Mon, 12th Jul 20104:34 pm 

also here's a good rebuttal to this article full of shitty anecdotes and barely any data!

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/caryl-rivers/the-ne…

slinger says:
Wed, 21st Jul 20103:27 pm 

GREAT POINTS by everyone… And YES us men DO NOT want a whore for a wife, so what gets me pissed is that when I'm dating a girl, who for her stupid and naïve ways, let me in on her past, because I persuaded her to tell me it, and made her feel comfortable doing so because I act soooo openminded, and con her into telling me it, and in the process she leaks out a story like "yea I have had 4 serious boyfriends of 1 year or more, and I had a 3 month fling where I had sex with the guy twice and one of the times I fucked him in his car, he had a M3 BMW and the sex was good I must admit" wtf is that?? Then she turns around and gets PISSED at me because when she started to ask me for something serious after 6 months of dating, I lashed out on her telling her that she's not "marriage material" because of her actions, and that I will NEVER marry a girl who decided to have a fling and had sex twice with the guy and one of the times it was in a car in some random place in the street?! How the fuck can she get mad at me for that?? Her dumb ass let me in on her pass, she should've been smarter and at least keep that fling out of the story, I mean the 4 boyfriends is cool at the age of 26, but the fling and the way that she let this guy who she has only known for 2 months slut her out in a car in some random place, isn't a good choice by her, and she ISNT marriage material…. Sorry hun!! So u women have to really take care of your images, as us alpha males do NOT want to marry a whore, or even a slight whore like the girl in the story that I just said, it isn't how many men you've fucked, it's how you chose to take the approach to fuck these men that makes u look bad.. If you fucked a guy only twice, PLEASE don't let one of the times be in a public street in a car!! That's not a "Ladylike" type of thing to do, at least make him take you to a room for christ sakes!!! FUCK!! If you're a slut, or a whore, then you need to recognize that and not be offended when a man tells you tha you are, instead of acting like miss goody two shoes…… TAKE CARE OF YOUR DAMN IMAGE!!

Katie says:
Wed, 4th Aug 201011:48 pm 

It's absolutely ridiculous to claim that men are biologically wired to have lots of parteners. The fact is, men manipulate most girls causing them to become skanks. Nobody should be going around having casual sex, but guys, if you don't want a girl to become a slut, control your fucking dick. What about the 15 year old girls who get their hearts broken by finding out that they've been cheated on or were just used for sex? It's their faults right, cause guys are wired to do that? The media has influenced people into thinking this way and it's ruining relationships everywhere.

Tim says:
Tue, 10th Aug 20106:57 pm 

Jason says:
Tue, 27th Apr 20101:15 pm

Men have a constant desire to have sex with many diverse partners, to increase the likelihood of passing on their genes/seed. This is all subconscious however and is translated to the individual as “being horny”, “just wanting to get laid”, etc. To achieve this goal, men will lower any possible standards just for sexual gratification. It is vastly different for women. Women, are subconsciously programmed by nature to only accept the BEST seed and accept the BEST genes. They have to carry the seed inside them for 9 months and have evolved to be able to raise the offspring – so they have also evolved to be gatekeepers to only allow the best possible genes to be passed. Hence, why women will not lower their standards and how even fat, hideous women still want only rich, handsome, alpha type men.

This simple biological determinism acts out quite literally in the casual encounters section of CL. Make an ad as a man requesting for sex, and you’ll receive about 10 spam emails from people attempting to exploit this biological fact. And perhaps maybe one male, thinking he can convert the horny guy into trying gay sex out of sexual frustration. But what happens if you make an ad as a woman requesting for sex? You will have over 60 replies from real men within an hour. The woman simply has to sift through her choices until she finds the one who is “most attractive, richest, holds most value, etc.”. It has nothing to do with the CL section, it’s just human nature. This of course happens in clubs, bars, and other places where singles mingle as well.

What is curious however, is some women’s reasoning that there is a “double standard” that exists because men are congratulated for being sexually promiscuous – and women are given negative connotations such as “slut” or “whore”. Why some women can’t understand this very simple concept has always baffled me. Men have to compete with one another to get picked for sex. They have to display that they have the best genes or the most value. Women have to compete too, but only for the BEST male. They can have sex anytime they choose, just not with the best choice. But if they were to lower their standards as men have to do, they would get to pick from a long line of men. “Getting laid” is not something that can happen every day for the common Joe. He has to navigate the maze of a woman delicately in social situations to convince her he’s the best pick. If a woman goes to a bar, club, or casual encounters looking for sex, and only wants sex, she will have zero problems getting it. Therefore, over time, women have gained a negative connotation, because they are not “beating anyone” or doing anything remotely impressive, they are simply manipulating basic human biology for sexual gratification. And thus, poof, the term “slut” was manifested. I didn’t even have to go into this long winded rant to make my point invincible – think female prostitution. Is there a reason why the porn industry is so huge but only for the male population? Is there a reason female prostitution is a global epidemic, but you don’t hear problems about male prostitution? Why a female prostitute can make quite the living, while male prostitution isn’t very profitable for the average Joe? Good luck guys, let the best man win

Wow, best post by far on this topic. Thanks for your thought without bringing in the highly emotional posts that we’ve all read.

Moravec says:
Mon, 16th Aug 20108:18 pm 

Interesting viewpoint. I've thought about this issue for a long time and have a few things to contribute. At one point in life I WAS an alpha male (to women, at least), but am no longer.

1. Beta males are not 'coasting through life'. They are actually the ones putting up with being sexless, then paying the bill when these women actually decide to leave the players alone and settle down.

2. Beta males cannot 'step up their game'. Women will go after the top 15% no matter how desirable the other 85% is.

Honestly, women have nothing to complain about. Complete and absolute power to choose who to mate with in the dating game, coupled with the ability to choose whether or not they want to work.

Imagine if only 15% of women got any sex from men, and men refused the other 85%. It would suck – and would be even worse when those men decide to 'settle' for you when they are done banging their first choices.

Moravec says:
Mon, 16th Aug 20108:29 pm 

Oops, forgot to add my thesis to this.

Why men hate that women do this….

Who would want to marry a girl who never would have wanted you back when she was busy only dating alpha males? Why be the second choice?

Moravec says:
Mon, 16th Aug 20109:38 pm 

Whoops, one more:

The only way for women to win is to stop going after men for shallow reasons and try to get to know men for their true personalities.

The only way for men to win is to avoid committing themselves to a girl who has mated with alpha males. Being the second choice means she will never truly love you more than she loved the players.

Jester31 says:
Mon, 16th Aug 20109:53 pm 

Try asking a guy who seems afraid to approach you for his number… The guys asking for your number ask several ladies every day. They probably have Aids. Just Saying…

dave says:
Tue, 17th Aug 20104:42 am 

ive read most of these comments and the article and i have to say that i agree that women have the upper hand regarding sex but if ur goin to be 'easy' dont expect me to treat you like the little princesses your mommy told you that you were when you were a kid. u can have all the sex u like ladies, its just a shame i and most men wont have any respect for you haha so when you are 30 with 2 kids n nobody to love you go give that guy wiv the dodgy glasses and greased up hair a bell cus he mite just take u in. o wait he's not interested now haha shame

Muse says:
Tue, 17th Aug 201011:50 pm 

I only read the first paragraph. With this being said i rememberd the the question: "Why are girls called sluts and not men" that has been asked soo many times. and after readying the first paragraph i stoped cause i realized the answer…

Women have the power to say no to that guy that wants to fool around with her. If the guy doesnt listen and etc then it becomes rape, harassment etc etc. idk just a thought…

geoff says:
Sun, 22nd Aug 20103:25 am 

The fact remains that women are absolute dogs and deserve to be treated as such. They have no idea what personal responsibility means, are ALL, yes that means, EACH and every one of them, (there is no such thing as a good woman), they are all, selfish, egocentric, narcisstic, social climbing, spoilt, entitled, brattish, vaccuous, duplicitous, backstabbing, two-faced, liars, cheating, manipulative, self-centred dogs who frankly deserve what they get. I will never condone men hitting women or anything like that, but women should not and cannot complain, when men screw them over because they deserve it. They are not to be trusted, never to be believed and most definitely not to be commited to. There is no such thing as love, marraige is just another occupation for women to live the champagne lifestyle they so desperately crave, and has been made acceptable, how, I do not know, and because women have absolutely no idea what substance is, coupled with their staggering princess mentality, means that they want everything on a plate, let alone the apocalyptic scenario they may actually have to work hard for something, means that women simply are not worth the time or the effort, there is simply no such thing as a good woman, they have no idea what commitment is about and are just a bunch of selfish, cheating whores who have become good for only one thing, and as a result, love does not exist, marraige is an absolute crock, and women are just a waste of time, space and are at fault for most things that have gone wrong in society and are just an absolute joke and quite frankly a waste of time, and they cannot start whinging about how they get screwed over by men, because they bring it on themselves. I will now finish as I start, women are dogs, and deserve to be treated as such.

jake says:
Tue, 24th Aug 20107:38 am 

Like some philosophers have said in the past its human nature to give an inch but its also human nature to take a mile. Feminism I feel is a power movement not one for equality. Power usually corrupts even the best of people. That's why if a guy steps over a boundary he gets a rape charge. If a girl steps over a boundary she gets called a slut. That's real fair. Women aren't so innocent anymore and should play on the same playing field with the same rules. Not to mention as sexual promiscuity rises so does the divorce rate. I wonder why 50% of the marriages fail in the United States. Sexual promiscuity for both males and females comes with a price. That's why when a man looks for a mate he is not looking for a slut for it most likely might not work out because of cheating on both parts. America has been fucked literally.

fools2234 says:
Wed, 25th Aug 201010:49 am 

Typical feminists rant.

darknight says:
Sun, 29th Aug 20101:36 am 

Shut the fuck up you slut katie you are such a whore that you will fuck the sons of your fucked alpha males.good men dont want any sluts its considered as a crime by us so we should not let it happen.we could not control our dicks seeing you sluts wandering and fucking everyone.men have gone to the extent of killing whores like you.god have finally made diseases like aids for you whores who fuck extremely.it is not right to judge to become a slut by seeing somemales behaving wrong.a sin is a sin no matter who commits it.

Jester31 says:
Thu, 2nd Sep 201012:23 pm 

FemiNazi's should shut up and remember what a Good Woman does for a Good Man. Close your legs until you find the right man to share your life with, otherwise, good luck being lonely in the future…

Jester31 says:
Thu, 9th Sep 20101:13 pm 

I'm now dating a European woman who seems to appreciate me and the things I do for her. Anytime she talks about her past relationships, I'm left thinking I'll eventually be one of her "past relationships", and should just enjoy the time we have together now.

Haven't said "I love You" because well, I don't trust Women and know how flakey they can be. One minute they're in Love with you, the next they hate you and want to fuck all your friends. Such is life these days… When the hell did Marriage turn into a huge mistake for guys, meant for ruining their lives and emptying their bank accounts?

There are so many guys out there looking for their "One True Love", while on the other hand, there are so many Women out there who Lie and only want to have dramatic shit to talk to their friends about (Lying, cheating, winning a divorce by getting half of everything a guy earns, sleeping with alpha males etc…). It's so sad. Good guys cannot trust anyone.

g-man says:
Wed, 15th Sep 20103:44 pm 

Haha this woman talks like she's in the group of women that the alpha males go for. News flash for you, while the beta's might not be getting much, the only way you're getting any is if the really hot girls turn the alpha's down. Hey, if you're happy being leftovers then that's fine but kinda goes against your feminist views…

ABlackGuy says:
Mon, 20th Sep 201012:57 pm 

If it wasn't for the fact that all women want commitment they wouldn't give two flying fucks about being sluts. The common stigma is that men don't like sluts. That couldn't be farther from the truth. MEN LOVE SLUTS…just not as wives and girlfriends. They don't RESPECT sluts. That's why all the women (specifically sluts) are upset. A man can fuck loads of women which is perceived as a challenge therefore he gets respect. Since it's relatively easy for women to get sex it isn't perceived as a challenge therefore no respect is granted and some respect is actually lost. Since no man want's to commit to a woman he doesn't respect that presents a problem for the sluts because they desire commitment later on. That leaves only two solutions to the problem. Lie about their past or get men to change their views on sluts telling them they're being "sexist" "chauvinists" and so on and so forth. Truth is you actions have consequences. If they're not desirable then take another course of action. In other words stop being sluts or STOP FUCKING COMPLAINING!

criolle johnny says:
Mon, 20th Sep 201012:56 pm 

Jester, the reason Asian/Latin women and American men get along so well is obvious. They're both looking for the same thing in a relationship … respect.

Asian/Latin women don't get it from their men, and American men don't get it from their women.

It's marvelous symbiosis. The divorce rate is less than 10%.

Phrase Not Found says:
Mon, 1st Nov 20103:23 pm 

Why worry? Tits or GTFO! Women are sluts, men are dogs, so whats the prob? Everybody fucks… everybody is happy

women are whores says:
Wed, 17th Nov 20109:15 am 

oh look the fat whore is mad because she realized all women really are whores

michael says:
Thu, 18th Nov 201011:13 am 

all women, even the average looking ones, lease their sex to the highest bidder,it aint about passing and carrying genes, its money….and i say lease, because ,sooner or later their gonna take it away,put on a new mask and lure the next money guy in with their venus man trap,nobody gets to get it for free anymore, unlike in the past, when all men were alpha males just because they were men…who was sitting in the third row of the roman coloseiums,slaves and women…..and in parting i will ask,how many of us were born… out of love,or an accident thats just put up with…could explain a lot of bad vibrations and violence in the world…..and how many men are really the fathers of their children,probably around half, men just accept what the women says and do not bother pursuing the issue any further because the only way a guy can proove if hes the dad is if he can come up with the thousand bucks for the test

michael says:
Thu, 18th Nov 201011:19 am 

women "act " sex to get love and men " act " love to get sex , both are lying to eachother at the same time just like countries do to eachother on the playing field of evil politics

davud says:
Fri, 19th Nov 20108:43 am 

i agree,

Chuck says:
Sat, 20th Nov 20104:02 pm 

Marriges between American men and Latin American women and Asian women especially Chinese women who are super traditional and seem never to want to displease their man is on the rise..
This type of long term mutually respectful marriage is very hard to pass up in light of the divorce rate of American men marrying American women which is close to 70% percent with financial and child custody nightmares for years to follow. American men are marrying latin and asians to save their long term sanity, self respect, financial health and being able to see their children grow up. Todays American women has zero value in the institution of marriage. Statisically she is a HUGE fianncial and legal liability for any man and have no problem emasculating the "husbands" for thier own whimsical entertainment. American women are sick, mentally sick..

feministbulls__t says:
Sun, 5th Dec 20109:06 pm 

This quote from the feminist shows her true ignorance: "If the so-called “beta” males are suffering at the expense of their better looking peers, maybe it’s time they step their game up a bit. It’s not our fault they have zero personality or a bad sense of style and we shouldn’t have to cater to them just because they are there and they are available."

It is such a shame that more and more western women are adopting this attitude and thus making it totally undesirable to marry them (whether you are alpha or beta). Superficial women who want to sleep around like this are an embarassment.

Anonymus says:
Thu, 9th Dec 20105:25 pm 

This is the reason why I'm single. There are too many damn shallow women out there. They will only take a guy if he's hot or if he's rich.

Also, in answering this Feminazi rant, the women who are called whores because they are WHORES! Whores have sex for money or have sex for shallow reasons. Also whores have their legs open 24/7

Dick says:
Mon, 13th Dec 201011:56 am 

Actually LOL at your defense of "No. Just no." as a well reasoned, soundly supported argument.

It's like saying "all women are whores b/c I said so!" Child, please! Get back in the kitchen

Bob Smith says:
Sat, 25th Dec 20101:13 pm 

Today's young women are malleable whores for one very simple reason – they have been socially engineered to BE that way. They dress in slut uniforms – jeans and low-cut tops with spaghetti straps (very similar to the way their Soviet counterparts dressed during the "feminist movement" which spanned the early portion of the first half of the 20th century). The feminist movement was created in a think tank in Soviet Russia. It was imported to the West with malice aforethought. What I'm saying here isn't some crazy conspiracy theory – it's a fact. The objective of feminism was to destroy the family unit in order to hasten the introduction of socialism/communism – mission accomplished! Ever meet a feminist in her 50's who was content and happy? Me either! They are alone, confused, burned out, and bitterly disappointed at the fact that they never had children. Women are genetically hard-wired to CRAVE being monogamous, and to crave having children. Men are genetically hard-wired to serve as provider and protector. The whole thing was stood on its ear to set a trap for fools. So…shave your man trap, put on that slutty dress, go out to clubs and compete with similarly idiotic whores to bed the cutest stud muffin in the club. When you wonder why you feel miserable and dissatisfied in 20 years or so, come back and read this post of mine. At that point, you might actually feel the need to verify some of the FACTS I've pointed out here. In which case, Google this – feminism +imported +Russia +destroy +family (A quick FYI to all you "liberated", uber-intelligent feminazis out there who might be reading this…when you do that search at Google? Do it exactly as you see it, including all the plus signs. It's called a Boolean search query, you retarded, robotic whore-slut. And if you weren't a deliberately dumbed-down, feminist, penis-holster, you'd know that. Enjoy!)

awhiteguy says:
Fri, 31st Dec 201012:49 pm 

Right on, I love sluts, but don't be surprised if I don't want to marry one. I am not bringing the town skank home to meet my mother and bare my children.

hopenfaith says:
Wed, 5th Jan 20112:41 am 

women are sluts because men watch porn and because they get cheated on with sluts and because men drool at their slutty friends.. they get tired of being on the sideline and not getting the male gaze

Leah says:
Sun, 16th Jan 20115:51 pm 

So many misogynistic comments, what the hell? Who ARE you people? Anyone's welcome to read & comment, but you do realize this site is by/aimed at college women, right? I've seen a lot of really nasty comments towards authors. If you're looking for a place to pounce and sound off, this seems like an odd choice since readers here probably won't be sympathetic, because you're, you know, being really disrespectful and just plain mean, whether or not you touch on valid points.

What I don't get is the "beta males'" beef, according to this article. What would be their preferred alternative to hookup culture?

@psitutor says:
Sun, 16th Jan 20118:05 pm 

I do not consider either gender a slut because they choose to have casual sex.

We do not, as a society value sex~ not the way our prehistoric relies did, and some first nation cultures continue to~ from their artwork, mythology and social roles, sex without commitment has been and is ok for all with no moral qualms.

When one respects the concept of pleasure as not a means to an end (where the other becomes an object)~ sex without strings is fun, intense, connecting, uplifting, nourishing and just an absolute pleasure.

It is not for woman's vulvas to uphold the moral fabric of Western society. We are biologically built to separate pleasure and procreation~ respect for others is respect for the self~ this is possible with casual sex, some of us have not forgotten how ~:-)

Albert Resse says:
Wed, 19th Jan 201112:54 pm 

it is amazing how right you are "ablackguy".. "Stop being sluts or stop fu*king complaining".. That feels so good just saying it becuase it's true… You always hear of women saying " oh i want a hubbie" (annoying to hear that by the way).. So yes, you hear women saying that all the time & us men step back and think, "maybe if you wouldnt have spread your legs so many times for so many different guys, you would have what you want.. A strong women with high morals is the ideal wife & Sluts tha's not you.

Albert Resse says:
Thu, 20th Jan 201112:06 pm 

it is amazing how right you are "ablackguy".. "Stop being sluts or stop fu*king complaining".. That feels so good just saying it becuase it's true… You always hear of women saying " oh i want a hubbie" (so annoying hearing a slut say that) So yes, you hear women saying that all the time & us men step back and think, "maybe if you wouldnt have spread your legs so many times for so many different guys, you would have what you want.. " oh men do it all the time, why cant women, blah blah blah" this is the #1 slut quote in existence.. Yea!! you keep living by that!! Let me just say this – A strong, self respected women with high morals is the ideal wife & Sluts that's simply not you!! You cannot turn a HOOD RAT into a house wife! For all you young women not considered to be sluts as of yet – REMEMBER this, the respect you give yourself will determine the respect you get from men. In the long run, being a slut is nowhere near worth it.. Trust it.. You are hearing it straight from us men!!

Irrational Woman says:
Mon, 31st Jan 20112:20 am 

Thank you for providing evidence completely disproving your arguement in every regard.

wiz says:
Tue, 8th Feb 20119:42 pm 

being a slut is not a personal judegement call, it is a sterotype just like a jock, nerd, prep, etc. you earn your stereotype based on the marketing brands/preferences that you display. This includes what you do, who you do it with, what you where, what you eat, etc. Being a slut has no positive results. And there is no such thing as sleeping you way to the top, cuz once you have it all, no men will marry that and you will find yourself alone and used up. its easy to spot slutty girls, and once I do, I do not give them the time of day. The thing you have to realize is what matters to you and if you are comfortable with being a slut then do it! just be ready to accept the consequences of low self esteem, lower inteligence, and the guilty feelings after you are raising your own children praying that they dont turn out like you. As far as sluts who think they can succed, bring it on. In the corporate world, sluts cant intimidate the inteligent alpha and beta males one bit

dude says:
Fri, 18th Feb 20118:35 pm 

jester it sucks man, theres a quote that explains this even on a movie, "you die a hero or you live long enough to become a villain" it sucks, i never played with the feelings of any girl, i was just honest,i met a girl that cheated on me on my birthday, just because she didnt feel i was important because at the time i didnt have any money, now im really gonna be a real fucking villain…. no weakness this time

Heartless Jerk says:
Sat, 26th Feb 201111:35 am 

It's articles like this that make me glad I'm more attracted to a woman's shoes than her body. I also love how much it hurts her that she'll never be enough for me. Payback for being ignored by the opposite sex while I still cared. Now I get what I want and don't have to give a thing! It's going to be even more fun when I'm rich and successful. Same game, prettier women. Guess I am an Alpha Male after all…

Anonymous says:
Sat, 26th Feb 201112:58 pm 

Feminism is to America what Wahhabism is to Saudi Arabia. A culture of rampant abuse, nothing new, I mean History tends to repeat itself, isn't it? Don't ask a woman if there is something wrong with America. Because just go to Saudi Arabia and ask a man if there is anything wrong with Saudi Arabia, the man will say no, obviously.

WorldofWhoreCraft says:
Fri, 4th Mar 201112:26 pm 

I could write something meaningful but the other "Beta" males beat me to it hehehe, so what am I now? A gamma male? News Flash, I switch up, Alpha to bag and dump, Beta to make em love me until they can leave after getting me a new car, tv, home stereo, cash, yeah, you think you are game free? Go ahead girl, you'll need more than a condom and birth control. Go ahead, build walls and trap yourself. Men, Wake up, teach other MEN. TEACH MEN. Women, you are like pets I keep. And for those of you talking about mothers and sisters, yeah, we have them, and they'd be whores too if they were growing up in this feminist infested society. I am from a REAL culture where our women stand by their men. That's because they were taught not to open their legs by MEN for thousands of years. Men who understood their own nature, learned from it, and then taught it to their women. You wanna reverse that? Go ahead, give it a try, but your "Liberation" is not going to beat Science. Why don't you vote? Get a real job, and invent time travel…If you dont like past, you wont like the future. Plus this article is interesting coming from a woman who probably HATES every other woman in any group she hangs out in. Trust me, your personality will give you off, tell me just how happy you are now, and in 20 years, come back and write an article admitting your defeat. Ofcourse you won't do that, you'll live off the crumbs of some wealthy beta ignorant fool of a man who didn't learn from other men, all the while screaming rebellion and independence. You are dependent. On Men. Learn it now, or suffer for the rest of your life.

Ambrosia says:
Mon, 4th Apr 20113:36 am 

It's not just the promiscuous women that pay the price. The sexually active and perhaps voracious man who can only handle a woman who is sexually inexperienced and somehow chaste inevitably ends up frustrated. Secure, with his wife, yes, but often frustrated. He wants sex every which way and she doesn't want it. What a surprise. But that's the result of his insecurity and inability to deal with a woman who has sexual proclivities just like him (the "slut" who he looks down upon even though she is his mirror image ONLY because she is female). After he gets married and has no sex life, he'll go into a virtual world at best, desperately addicted to porn and doing other things behind his wife's back. At worst, he'll end up spending his life being a cheater and a liar and maybe even giving his wife an STD. She'll be the moral one and he'll be scum. Too bad he passed up the "slut" (the woman who enjoys sex because it's natural and feels good – how morally corrupt). She's probably off somewhere having GREAT SEX.

@Albert "A strong women with high morals is the ideal wife & Sluts tha's [sic] not you." Men who threaten women that sluts don't get married are just on a male privilege power trip and in truth it's an empty threat. It shows you disrespect women. Besides, any woman who doesn't sleep around and "saves herself for marriage" to one degree or another who is also looking for a monogamous relationship would be an absolute moron to marry a promiscuous man. A promiscuous man who feels entitled to sow his oats while his fiancee remains chaste because he's taking advantage of male privilege, will continue to do so after they are married. He will most likely cheat on her during their marriage. He is under no circumstances an ideal husband, even if she is an ideal wife. Living with a low-life would only bring such a woman misery.

Ambrosia says:
Mon, 4th Apr 20114:09 am 

The motivation for feminism was no more complex than females liberating themselves from slavery. When basic civil rights and even personhood are not afforded to a human being, it's only NATURAL that they would seek liberation from that depraved state. Get a clue.

Ambrosia says:
Mon, 4th Apr 20114:14 am 

Some (not all) beta males call themselves "nice guys" and bitterly hate women for making them victims in life. These guys often cannot figure out why women don't like them. What the author is merely saying to these guys is get a clue. These types of men should wake up and stop blaming women for their preferences. It's not bad advice. It's the anger, the personal inertia (sloth, depression, passive-aggressiveness, etc.), and the irrationality in your thinking that makes you unattractive, not your beta maleness.

As an aside, by saying that "women who want to sleep around" ( they have to merely WANT to sleep around not actually do it) are an embarrassment to you, you're demonstrating both a false sense of superiority over women as well as discomfort with natural, female sexuality. You must be a real joy in relationships.

Ambrosia says:
Mon, 4th Apr 20115:06 am 

Men love sluts. Men hate sluts. Men can't make up their minds, can they? I think sluts have got men all a flutter, if you ask me. Sluts are intimidating to men. Sluts are dangerous. Men want them badly and can't resist them and then turn around and hate them for reminding men of their own weakness. When men are tempted by sluts it can be a real challenge because so many of you consider women to be lesser, inferior beings. Being tempted equates to being overcome by the sexual magnetism of the slut, to being dominated so profoundly and deliciously by the one you consider to be less than you. To have these women seduce you and make you feel out of control, endangered, subject to the unknown, it's nothing less than an existential crisis of the masculine. And you have so many aggressive, hateful ways of responding to it. Many of you men who spew hate at women might benefit from coming down out of the trees (primates) and embracing your humanity.

Ambrosia says:
Mon, 4th Apr 20115:23 am 

Don't blame anyone else but yourself for being a villain.

Ambrosia says:
Mon, 4th Apr 20115:29 am 

Not all women can have sex any time they want. It's silly for men to think that because it's not true. But.. for argument's sake let's say that's true. Given that the question is can women get GOOD SEX? Men will often find that women are willing to please but in our increasingly pornified culture, men are becoming obsessed with their own sexual pleasure at the expense of their female partners. So for a woman the challenge isn't getting sex but getting good sex. And sex isn't really worth it unless it's good.

The fact is that men have made the rules for themselves. The reason men don't respect women who sleep around is because they're threatened by it and have a strong need to control women. Men don't want women to leave them for another man or sleep with another man behind their back, so they disrespect women who sleep around, even though they themselves sleep around. It's completely selfish and exists only in the patriarchy, where men are given entitlements to be selfish where women have not. It's the result of men dominating culture and making the rules in favor of themselves and nothing more.

The reason that women can more easily obtain sexual partners is because there are fewer women than men willing to be promiscuous. Women have to deal with violent men (rape), potential pregnancies, as well as loss of reputation, so there are less women in the pool of potential casual sex partners. Those who are willing have more choices because so many ladies are still locked behind closed doors trying not to be sluts. And what's really funny about that is that men are raving madmen about the unfairness of it all, of not having as many women from which to choose, at the same time they are the ones that locked women behind those doors.

Some of you are a real mess. That's the price of being privileged, I suppose.

eve says:
Thu, 7th Apr 20111:09 am 

There's an agenda to divide the sexes much like racism divides the races. The same can be said for social class (aka caste system).
The media releases an article that says men are wired to be promiscuous and men believe it. The media releases an article saying women should embrace feminism because they have been treated like crap for decades/centuries and women believe it.
MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!
Now you're divided.
You have become easy to control.
You were conned into hating each other because you trusted the manipulator (aka the Media).
Respect and understanding can rebuild burned bridges.
Turn off your TV's and stop believing the lie.
Everything on the TV is a lie and designed to manipulate you into wanting things you do not need and believing things which aren't true.
It isn't glamorous, it's manipulative and designed to destroy your beliefs, while installing new/harmful ones in their place.
Please stop believing the lies and mend the fences between the sexes.
Females, stop acting like Lady GaGa and start acting like a lady.
Men, stop acting like "a playa" and be a man.
Lastly, F the media.

Paul says:
Mon, 11th Apr 20116:30 am 

nice dude…the only sad thing is that its too late for the good guy……all are sluts man and the good guy loses

frankop says:
Mon, 25th Apr 201111:33 am 

where i live there are a lot of whores today. the women here are having a contest with their girlfriends to see how many men at one time they could sleep with. just like that song in the 70s that said so many men so little time how can i choose. this is going to make it very hard for guys like us that are trying to find a good normal woman to be with. lets not forget the lesbians that are out there too which will ad to the problem. i hope to find a normal woman out there someday. to me it would be like winning the lottery.

franko says:
Mon, 25th Apr 201112:00 pm 

there are plenty of women out there today that are filthy whores.lots of them are having a contest with their girlfriends to see how many guys they could sleep with. they cannot seem to stay with one guy today .there are a lot of us good men out there that can be fateful to one woman. i know i can if i found the right woman to be with.lets not forget the low life lesbians out there too. this is the reason that guys like us are single and do not have a girlfriend to be with. in my area where i live there are a lot of whores and lesbians out there.

Vale says:
Tue, 26th Apr 20112:14 am 

Yawn.

Vale says:
Tue, 26th Apr 20112:28 am 

Gender studies! Ha! LOL!

Jane says:
Tue, 26th Apr 20113:30 am 

Bob Smith,
No woman has been socially engineered to be a slut or a whore, rather it is society (and a rather patriarchal society at that) who engineers the labels of slut and whore to create a position of power and uses these to demean a woman who challenges stereotypical roles. By using these words yourself you are playing into this fight for power over another sex. Our "civilised" western societies have been playing into these gendered notions created by language and its power for centuries, and still today a woman must defend herself against being either a "damned whore" or one of "God's police", and trust me, you can not be both! However, in the English language there are no such demeaning labels for men. That is why it is so important that instead of being rude about women who consider themselves feminists, or blaming it on the society we live in, you take responsibility for yourself and stop using these words and buying into the power play. Men and women are equals and deserve equal rights and opportunities. That is what feminism is about. Feminism is not about trying to destroy families or dressing "slutty". It is about the freedom of choice and equality. I have met plenty of women who are in their 50's, consider themselves to be feminist and are content and HAPPY. Some have husbands and children (even grandchildren), some are divorced, some have decided to for-go a family and focus on other aspects of their lives. None of these decisions are wrong, rather they are ALL right for the individual.
So before you start labelling any woman who identifies herself as a feminist and wants to be acknowledge and have equal rights to her male counter-parts, consider what it makes you… Ignorant.

joe says:
Tue, 26th Apr 20117:38 pm 

I despise the modern woman. She is a slut. Modern "men" are sluts also. I despise them all. I will never have sex with a slut. Never.

joe says:
Tue, 26th Apr 20117:52 pm 

It is extremely liberating when you get to the point where you hate the human race because they are all sluts and you know you don't need sex. Fuck em. I will stay alone. Nobody will get my time or my money. I don't need "love" either because if they had love they would never be sluts so love does not exist in this society. Love is dead, killed by feminists, players, and sluts.

Ihatefeminists says:
Wed, 27th Apr 20111:01 am 

You aren't going to fool anyone. Fucking feminist. I plan on dying without being in any kind of serious relationship with a woman because all women, when it comes down to it, are liars, gossipers, and manipulators who will eventually con you out of all your money. Women are only good for sex and then to throw away. Fuck marriage and fuck serious relationships. Take that whores and bitches. You ain't getting anything from me. And sex is definitely overrated. I get more pleasure from masturbating to porn than from sex with a woman – plus having sex with a woman means that you have to deal with her insanity (all women are insane and have emotional issues). Trust me guys, if you meet a woman, fuck her and chuck her because she won't be much use after that.

frankop says:
Wed, 27th Apr 20118:52 am 

good men like us today are hurting because there are too many slutty women out there today.they cannot seem to stay with one man today. i guess for them it is a contest to see how many men they can go to bed with.they are the reason a lot of us men are single today and cannot find a decent woman to be with.

frankop says:
Thu, 28th Apr 20116:51 pm 

i just wish i could meet the right woman out there that is not a filthy slut. where i live there are so many whores and lesbians too. that is the reason why so many men like us are single today.

Ron Diggity says:
Sat, 7th May 20118:46 pm 

Most have said this well – "if you want the bull, be ready for the horns." Women DO have a huge sexual adantage. If you want to exploit that and take advantage of that, by all means do. Just drop that sad pussy face when you get called out on it. It's not only men who have to be responsible for their actions/decision. i.e. you act like a slut, you deserve to be judged as such. "The past doesn't matter"??? Haha…try that shit on a job interview or a mortgage application!

Sara says:
Sat, 14th May 20113:07 am 

A key that can open many locks is called a master key. A lock that can be opened by many keys is called a shitty lock.

mike says:
Wed, 18th May 20119:09 am 

women of today are lucky they arent back in the not so distant past, cuz you would all be the servants and sex toys of men…i wont fall for the lies of mentally disturbed bitches any more, do you know any that arent warped in some crucial emotional way ? guys… just buy a cheap whore, its the only way to go these days ,no dishes, no trash to take outfor her , no going right home after work ,no explaining where you were every day, no extortion through child support just pick up a whore why not you have to buy the sex one way or another ….right

mike says:
Thu, 19th May 20111:05 pm 

buy a working girl for the evening, then theres no dishes to wash for her,no trash to take out for her, no car insurance to pay for her,no rent to pay for her, no lying ,no deceiving, no telling her where you've been, no telling her where your going,and you'll never have to hear "dont pull out i love you"and end up getting emotionally shafted and finacially ruined with child support because you beleived her lies,if you could go back in time to rome and tell a guy there ,that you come from a time, where men are finacially raped with state and government backed extortion, so the courts and lawyers and judges and prosecuters and dss get stuffed with cash,he'd probably die laughing,the coloseiums had three levels one was for senators and statesmen two was for middleclass men and the third was for slaves and women !think about that and compare it to the way things are now,all men back then ,and not so long ago were alpha males because they were mon not henpecked railroaded shadows of our former selves like we are now! i have to go now i'm feeling sick………

Jean says:
Sun, 22nd May 20116:40 am 

You obviously don't know anything about men… You sound just like the idiotic male who doesn't know a thing about women. Sad… There are so many females losers in our society. They've all been misguided for the purpose of governance. Single parenting creates POVERTY and dependence on Government.

A HOUSE DIVIDED CANNOT STAND!

Its all about reproduction and having children. Love is a key ingredient in that. Trust is the foundation that is needed to have true love. You normally wouldn't do business with people with whom you wouldn't trust? Think of the Stock Market. Would you ever invest you money if there weren't any rules and regulations to vouchsafe your investments?

Ever realize of how much more violent a society we've become over the past couple of decades? Theres no love.

They sexually liberate women which of course means the precipitaton of the sexual liberation of man as well. Neither sex trusts the other and enter the MILLIONS of bastard children who become born out of wedlock. Children suffer.

Women control sex and history dictates and literature (1984 and Brave New World) that Governments have always try to sway and control women's activities through propaganda.

They told women that it was alright for them to experiment. Hollywood flicks show women being mocked at for not "experimenting enough". Its everywhere, the brainwashing I mean.

They told women they had a "career" that was more important than anything. Careers are a relatively new thing. Look it up. They didn't exist 60 years back and everyone knows that a career doesn't genuinely love you back. You can get fired, layed off or get bullied. The stress associated with workplace environments.

Men and by men, I mean not the playas or ass kissers, who'll comply to your every demands, to exploit your idiotic VANITY…

Men do not like to "settle" for sluts. A slut is a dishonorable person. A person who sleeps around will more likely hurt him in the longer term because a woman's abandonment of a man is just as equally painful as it for a woman. Duh!!! She would be the male equivalent of a player, except that men truly despise these kinds of exploitative women.

It breaks allot of mens hearts to see or to come across so many lovely and compatible looking women turn into sluts. So much so, they become completely turned off with the idea of settling down with ANY women. The men fashion themselves as playas and the whole cycle begins anew.

Often times in other countries, its the other women who shame sluts because the good women are afraid that men might devellop negative stereotypical views concerning all of womankind. It is human nature to steriotype against that which hurts us.

Science has recently proven that men hurt allot more than women when it comes to breaking up.

Modern day propaganda does not serve wisdom. Another thing, don't compare humans to other species in the animal Kingdom… Its stupid.

ACCEPT THE FACT THAT CURRENT DAY FEMALE BEHAVIOUR IS THE CAUSE OF ALL YOUR PROBLEMS. Women control sex. Stop spreading your legs. Don't believe what you see on TV like Sex In The City which caused humanity more problems than you can possibly even begin to even imagine.

As they say… Education is mostly Re-education. Learn.

Egocentric behavior in our society always compels everyone to voice out their dumb down opinions, preventing them from learning anything worthwhile. You sound extremely "opinionated" and egocentric, like you've got a bone to pick with REALITY.

jean says:
Sun, 22nd May 20116:56 am 

Wake up child… You've been brainwashed… "I" know… "I" "I" "I"… You have absolutely no idea what your talking about and yet, you've attended a matriculated university institution with a government instituted curriculum. And then you were told that you were a "chosen" one and blah blah blah…
Your ego is way up there. I challenge you to challenge yourself to think outside your pedogagol box. "Your" academic specialty??? Pfft!

For starters… Learn about the Education system… Why cling so hard to people's beliefs? Since when is having a Phd, equivalent to being a genius?

Being a ladies man… I can assure you that Simone was a person with deep seated mental issues.

Feminism destroys family through the promiscuouty of women. Maybe your academic specialty ought to have included History and Literature. You see then… You could have formulated your "own" opinions with the presentation of the facts.

According to you even… I'm the rebel here for going up against the government, Hollywood and entire population of zombie drones like yourself. In spite of that, I'm sticking to my guns.

michael says:
Sun, 22nd May 201111:17 pm 

at any time, during the morning day or night ,a woman can get herself laid ,with no trouble or cost at all. a man cannot do this,unless he buys it and even, then he has to search out the willing whore,spend a lot of money and hope shes not setting him up to be beaten, or robbed , or worse and he has to do all this without getting busted by the cops who in conjunction with the state, have set up laws to extort money out of people for just trying to have sex….we live in a police state, a country that has more people in jail than any other nation in the world. mens instinctive desires are turned against them so the elite can stay rich,what a warped society im stuck in , its evil and wrong and solidarity is dead because in the usa, we are trained to be afraid of eachother so people wont stand together against the tyranny that blinds our eyes and minds from the truth,they say we are free,nothing could be further from the truth!!!!!!!

mike says:
Wed, 25th May 201111:30 am 

how are brought into this materialistic realm ?…" women ' , yeah i know it takes two to tangle, but their wouldnt be any tangling if men werent lured inside a womans body in the first place, with their thin veneer of makeup,hypnotic strut and lies and i think a girl can buy sperm,then marry a bull dyke,wow thats sooo gross, even the hot ones sh#t and pi$$, whos thinking what ive been thinking for a long time now? women are literally demons in disguise, the living portal through which souls are brought into hell to experience pain, suffering ,work, taxes, solitude, war , disaster ,lies ,cheating, stealing, murder, arson, disease , religious molestation, government domination, prison, being poor , and death… and no i dont pay childsupport,i never had to because i never let a bitch trick me into giving her a free ride ,although ive had sex over 2000 times not bad for a regular guy like me

mike says:
Wed, 25th May 201111:48 am 

just a correction… how are "we" brought into this materialistic realm…..and oh yeah i forgot to mention, tidal waves earthquakes volcanic eruptions asteroid and comet strikes child abuse and terrorist attacks

ben says:
Wed, 25th May 201110:17 pm 

I graduated, took a high stress, high paying job and worked my ass off to give my lady everything she ever wanted, we met in college and I was the overly caring type who made sure I met her every need…I got in the shape she wanted…ect, I mean this girl dressed me, but I put up with it because she made me happy and I wanted to be with her. we were together for 3yrs. I recently found out she was cheating on me for the past year. This bitch ruined my fucking life!! Girls are whores flat out, they flirt and dress like skanks and I fell for it. My hats off, you bitches dont deserve a good guy, and youre ruining it for good women by acting like its a big feminist empowerment tactic…whores have been around forever, you prove nothing. To all the good women out there, keep it up and dont fall into these patterns, please dont join the push to set women backwards.

mike says:
Thu, 26th May 201110:55 pm 

ben , this is mike ,did you read my comments? theres like three, sort them by date, mine are a little before yours, tell me what you think. and keep in mind, the girls could not do what they do to ruin a man, unless it was set up and allowed to be that way by the state and government , you can bet that i dont vote for any of them, never have, never will….

frank says:
Mon, 30th May 20113:50 pm 

where the hell are the decent women today/ they are a bunch of filthy whores today.

mike says:
Mon, 30th May 20116:42 pm 

if we can find a time machine and travel into the past when a woman looked and acted like one,wore a dress and had manners ,and to start up a relationship with a girl back then, all it took was a love letter and some flowers! ,my grandmother was alive then and she told me how it was! and women back then, say from the 1950s and further back, wouldnt live to ruin men by spreading her legs for money,i saw a fat girl the other day riding a harley, greasy hair and dirty jeans with a muscle shirt on i coulda cried or threw up! whats going on? are souls being put in the wrong bodies?

Pork42 says:
Tue, 31st May 20115:28 am 

Ladies, the cards will always be stacked against you. Now go watch a season of “sex and the city” you whores!

mike says:
Tue, 31st May 20118:52 am 

decent women are a thing of the past ,if your a halfway successful man these days and enter into a serious relationship with a woman today its like putting your foot in a finacial bear trap, they lie, they tell you what you want to hear, but its not what they are thinking,sex and love are two different things and love died when women stopped wearing dresses,nobody gets to get it for free ,unless your a gold digging witch and can cast your sexy spell on a man dumb enough to fall for your mind games,men have to stop looking at the surface of a woman,its just a veneer,dont get married,because if you do ,she will be living in your mothers house,but you wont be there anymore

mike says:
Tue, 31st May 20119:01 am 

women all they do is… talk talk talk …and lie…and talk talk talk…and scheme…and talk talk talk…and they never really say anything at all….they were put here for one reason,to satisfy a man,oh well,i guess i was born in the wrong time

Adam says:
Thu, 2nd Jun 201110:41 am 

It's hard for me to find words to express my sympathy for this poor excuse for a person who wrote this article. The sad thing is that more and more women are starting to think like this. The beta male is not something that a man has a choice in. Women appoint this position in society to them. If you can't see the negative impact that a minority of men getting the majority of the sex has, then there really isn't any hope for you. You are lost in your own stupidity and false sense of entitlement. You are just lucky that you live in a world that still chooses to shield you from your own stupidity, greed and responsibility. Enjoy it while it lasts….

mike says:
Thu, 2nd Jun 201110:04 pm 

out of every 10 guys that i talk to, 7 or 8 of them were lied to, emotionally shafted, then dragged into court and finacially screwed by women!!! thats 70 or 80%!!! of men kicked out of their own home !!! by a scheming greedy witch who told them what they wanted to hear ,all the while planning to turn against them!!! the same woman who a few days or weeks earlier had taken the guy to bed and said i love you !!! what a joke!!! and the state laws allow them to do this, actually encourages them!!! and no i dont pay child support because i never let a woman trick me with her body and her mind games

MyAmazingfemalelife says:
Mon, 6th Jun 20116:42 pm 

The men who are complaining on this post, are no different from the Nazi's or the racists of the past who hated non-whites, the men posting here seem to hate all women, despite the fact that all are making massive generalizations and are quite hypocritical. You will attract what you put out their in the universe, the more you focus on women being liars and whores, the more you will attract those experiences, and saddly never find true love, respect or happiness. I am a women who has had sex with a handful of men, mainly those i was in a relationship with, I by no means waited till marrigae, though i have always considered sex sacred and have tried to keep it that way. Whether you want to title me a slut or not, i still "managed" (: to settle down and have children, while maintaining a postive career (clinical psychologist) with a good salary and a great husband. Alot of my female friends have had the same sucess in life, (likes attract likes) and their sexual history had no effect on their future, whether they were "loose" or not. I feel sorry for those of you that hold such hatrid in your hearts- i really do, if you do not exhibit humanity expect non in return. KArma

tom says:
Thu, 9th Jun 20117:16 pm 

These days, men can only be in love with IDEA of a woman, not the woman itself. I`ll never get married…cos thats a big fuckin joke, just like girls we all date from time to time. No respect = no love.

I had my hopes, my dreams and was very romantic about it, but now, I can only be a horny guy that percieves women like sexual objects and entertainment. I know these things for couple of years now and my dissapointment is still as big as I first figured all this. Very dissapointed and in the same time pissed.

You know the feeling, right?

Find something holier than a woman guys, cos 40 miles of bad road is ahead.

Tom says:
Thu, 9th Jun 20117:51 pm 

hahahahahahaha

So true…

alice says:
Thu, 9th Jun 20119:05 pm 

What the fuck? I don't think I've ever seen a paragraph with the world "slut" used so many times. Stop calling ANY woman a slut and maybe your opinion will be worth something.

Fink says:
Fri, 10th Jun 20112:35 am 

Welcome to the new age of malignant narcissism.

Fink says:
Fri, 10th Jun 20116:14 am 

' Find something holier than a woman….'
Well said, and the same goes for women. We're all familiar with the definition of insanity right ?
Change the pattern people. Stop hating. Neither sex holds the answers to true happiness or love for the other. Wake up.

Tom says:
Sat, 11th Jun 20115:46 am 

Thats true Fink. Another important aspect that is closely linked to the whoreish women is the fact that they have no skills at all, are boring to live and to talk to and really arent good at anything…cos they spent so much time doing basically nothing except spreading their legs and talk about it with their friends. They already spent and shared all the best of them with some strangers so there is nothing left to share; physically contaminated, emotionally drained. "I was young and stupid and I thought it was love…" sentence, women like to use, really tells all, and shut us all up, cos at that moment we realize that we are in a blind street with only 2 options: a) Stay in there and have option to go nowhere b) Go back using the same way you entered and return to the main road.

Tom says:
Sat, 11th Jun 20116:23 am 

Thesis: Women are trash

EXPERIMENT A : Romantic approach (Beta males style)

I dont have to explain this part of the experiment much, we have all been there and tried that…you know, romantically in love with some girl, day dreaming, carefull preparation of things we are about to say when I meet her next time…long story short, fatal love.

Result: REJECTION!
Reason: "You are a sweet guy and one day you`ll find someone who will really love you." OR "You are a loser who dont have the balls to grab my ass right here right now."

EXPERIMENT B : "I want some pussy" approach (Alpha males style)

Start treating women like trash and enter the conversation with no respect towards women at all. Talk to her like she is nothing special and just grab her in the middle of the sentence. Look at her like she is totally unimportant and at the same time look at her friends like they are unimportant too. Be agressive and uninteresed at the same time.

Result: Not only you can fuck her the very same day, but also, chances are, you will be able to fuck her friends behind her back the very next day.

CONCLUSION:

Women like to be treated like trash and romantic males (beta males) are being lost in translation. If you want to have sex, be alpha male and go find yourself a piece of ass. If you dont want only sex, if you are seeking a true love, then women in your life is a bad and pointless thing…avoid at all costs, find a hobby, a lifetime project to work on.

SOLUTION:

Your true love can only be a woman that:

a) Is as inteligent as you are
b) Have same moral values as you have
c) Had the same path in life and same experiences as you had
d) Comprehends the world and values in the same way you comprehend world and values
e) Has the same passion for things you are passionated about

Result: Trust, loyalty, joy, excitement, mutual fullfilment

mike says:
Sat, 11th Jun 201110:28 pm 

women say what you want to hear, but its not what they are thinking, love died when women stopped wearing dresses and started looking and acting like men,hair,clothes,mannerisms…look at an image of a woman from say 1890,then compare it to now,whats going on? MEN !!!!! DONT FALL FOR THEIR SEX LACED LIES !!!!! DO NOT GET MARRIED !!!!!! THEY ARE GOLD DIGGING WITCHES IN DISGUISE !!!!! YOU WILL BE EMOTIONALLY SHAFTED AND FINACIALLY RUINED SOONER OR LATER, believe me, get a prostitute, its easier and a lot cheaper, with no strings attached…….

frank says:
Wed, 15th Jun 20111:38 pm 

you are so right. my first wife was a filthy whore. come to think of it she still is. she moved down south with the guy she cheated on me with and i found out she is still with him. my second wife is bipolar and always talked about killing herself. i told her you should not talk like that and told her how much i loved her but it was not good enough. she started coming home late from work which she never did.when i asked her about it she started screaming at me. she knew my first wife cheated on me. i would not be surprised if she a whore as well. now that i am single again meeting women is hard because most of them are filthy whores today.

Tom says:
Thu, 16th Jun 20119:55 pm 

Men dont need to make up their mind. Clock works for us and on the other hand, by the minute, women grow older and are running out of options. You maybe have the upper hand early on, but at the end, nobody wants to marry a slut. Women like to recycle, men like to buy new. Damaged goods are good enough for entertainment and R&R, but thats about it.

Jokes aside, men love women for what they are and in the same time hate women, for what they are trying to be.

Alien quote: "I can`t lie about your chances, but you have my sympathies. "

engineeringstudent says:
Fri, 17th Jun 20114:08 pm 

Unfortunately Charlotte Allen is correct. Alpha males are “dragging women by the hair into their caves– and the women love every minute of it.” It is true, except one thing: not 'all' women.

This is a cultural problem not a gender problem. I strongly disagree that all women are sluts, there are many who are the polar opposite. One being my beautiful sweet cute girlfriend. She will never go out to a nightclub, never drinks, and is actually very shy around boys including me! She is the best thing in my life. She is of a superior culture. She is a good muslim. This is nothing to do with religion, but culture: good christians, good hindus, good atheists does not matter: the point is to be good and have a good culture. (she does not wear a hijab, although maybe when she is older and i dont care what she wears actually, but instead she wears a good heart and that is priceless)

Arranged/suggested marriages are awesome, and possibly the future norm. Must watch:

(I promise you will like watching this short clip, and kudos to the production team

Tom says:
Tue, 21st Jun 201110:39 pm 

Why do people have to fuck around? Why can't we just find one partner? Woman complain guys are dicks. We are dicks because you girls fuck around. I had asked a girl once why she fucked around. She told me because guys do. I was like well guys fuck around because girls give it up like it is going out of style. Imagine if people could all be nice and just find someone. Girls also complain that guys don't want to settle down. Of course they don't they get sex anytime they want and they are not married. The reason people used to get married was because then they could have sex anytime they want. People get married now when they have fucked so much and now it is time to settle down. I am a guy but I hate being good. I could fuck so many woman but I don't. I have brought so many woman home from clubs and just kisses and no sex. The girls are like you are so nice. They all give me there phone numbers but I never call. I just met these girls I am just thinking how many other guys have they went .

tom says:
Tue, 21st Jun 201110:39 pm 

home with. Don't get me wrong I love to have fun and crazy nights. Why does crazy nights have to include sex. Girls if you want a good man and you want to know if the guy likes you don't have sex with the guy to fast and see what happens. The real players will have many girls on the side

god says:
Wed, 22nd Jun 20112:00 am 

dear whore,
any woman with your opinion deserves death, you are in capable of being a proper mother and deserve eternal damnation for you're stupidity, tell the devil i say hi

tom says:
Wed, 22nd Jun 20118:16 am 

I love woman. I wish woman loved themselves. Woman tell me that guys fuck around so they do. Well the only way guys can have sex and fuck around is if the woman want to. I am a guy who has respect for myself and only have sex with girlfriends. Woman that just sleep around have no respect for themselves. Then woman want a man to respect them. I can handle a woman that has some boy friends and have sex with them. I can't handle a woman that just fucks around with anyone. I would rather go home and sort myself out. That is just me and guys stop fucking sluts let them be. I have had so many girls get mad at me for not fucking them. Well I do have standards and fucking a slut is not one of them.

tom says:
Wed, 22nd Jun 20118:35 am 

Not all woman are sluts but woman want to be respected. Woman try closing your legs and you get more respect. You will never land a guy by having sex with them. Quicker you have sex with a guy less they respect you. The strange thing about woman is that they slut around then they meet a nice guy and everything changes. They tell you that them being with all these other guys did not mean anything. I say to them why did you get fucked my all these guys if it did not mean anything? When a girl says she fucked a guy last night I say no you did not the guy fucked you. The penis fucks and the vagina just takes it. A woman can never fuck she can only get fucked.

Guy says:
Thu, 23rd Jun 201110:31 pm 

Women are sluts. Plain and simple.

Yes, I'm an alpha, and I wouldn't wife a single one of you club whores.

mike says:
Mon, 27th Jun 20119:29 am 

remember… strap ons ?!?!?!

mike says:
Mon, 27th Jun 20119:55 pm 

the other day i saw a fat "bull dyke" lezzie riding a harley,wearing greasy jeans,workboots,and a dude haircut ! she probably pisses standing up ! shes a "genetic mutant" of what a woman use to be! whats going on here ? THEIR TURNING INTO MEN !…OH GOD!…NOOOOOOOOOOOO !!!

mike says:
Mon, 27th Jun 201110:00 pm 

i dont wanna see how far its gone anymore ! wheres that time machine?…I'M OUTTA HERE

mike says:
Mon, 27th Jun 201110:04 pm 

hope you've got a time machine…if you do, get me outta here !!!

mike says:
Wed, 29th Jun 20111:27 pm 

the pen is mightier than the sword…

Forsakendemogorgon says:
Fri, 1st Jul 201112:02 am 

hey used to sing songs for girls, but i cannot kiss the lips that sucked someone's d***k. I am going to buy a REALDOLL. I hear its like the real thing. Goodbye Women.

mike says:
Sat, 2nd Jul 20117:50 am 

seriously !!! look at what a woman looked like, dressed like and acted like, in the past and not so long ago….and compare that to now !!!! its F@#@#@G frightening…if every one was a lezzie and a homo the human race would die off in a hundred years !!! so much for gay rights !!! oh !!! i almost forgot !!! the bull dykes would just "strap it on" for their unnatural sex !!! and buy sperm at a store!!!…the destruction of the american family is almost complete !!! those evil bastards we call our leaders…blame them !!! remember the" fruitloop" women that were "crying and shaking" during the campaign rally speeches ??? what a joke !!! emotionally warped actresses….the end IS near…….

William says:
Sat, 2nd Jul 20114:03 pm 

Why would a man want to marry and invest his resources into supporting a wife,children,household,bills,,, with a woman whose history has proven to not be longterm committed yet goes and whores where ever the money flows?….YEAH! LET ME PUT ALL MY LIFE SAVINGS IN A BANK THAT HAS A HISTORY OF LEAVING ITS VAULT OPEN AND LETTING LOTS OF PEOPLE TAKE WHATEVER THEY WANT!!! One of the great reasons why we have so many men loosing interest in their wives and children,,, is cause their wives are whores(fashion whore, attention whores, adultry whores,,,) and while their at work their kids are being trained by the mom in the way of whoredom so when the man comes home and isnt the latest fashion trend, doesnt have tickets to the coolest show in town, tall dark and handsome according to modern polls,, then his wife and children see right through him as if he wasnt there or just in the way. It doesnt matter that he has a heart of gold, wisdome overflowing, in great shape and generally the type of real man that is now condisdered mythical(and somewhat dangerous to a selfish and sissyfied world). Most americanized women are selfish girls in womens bodies just looking for a real man for the same reason an alchoholic wants a keg and a designated driver.

slut detector says:
Sat, 2nd Jul 20114:07 pm 

slut

Christian says:
Sat, 2nd Jul 20114:25 pm 

Very quick lesson…

Sex is for procreation not recreation. The orgasmic climax is a soothing chemical release from the brain to compensate for what would be an otherwise painfull experience(tearing of the genitals). Many people have come to use eachother for this orgasmic pain reliver as like a drug addict uses a loaded bong to escape the responsibillities of reality. Anyone useing anyone else sexualy as like a drug as such than having sex within a life long faithful marriage so as to be as one greater force to raise their procreation/children than if they were apart/divorced is sinning against God. Such sin is a symptom that this person is in hell when they die. The cure is repentance of sin and trusting in Christs salvation on the cross….an exhange of our sins for His righteous will living in us unto all we do.

Important note….Women and men are the same just rearranged…..her penis failed to mature in her moms womb and so remained inside and is known as a clitoris(think of it as fepenis), while her testicles failed to develope outwards and so remained inside as ovaries(fetesticles) as such their sperm/eggs(fesperm) await a mans sperm of which her breast are developed outwards to nurse the fertilized egg.

This explains why women are periodicly unstable because their bodies are constantly hosting failed fertilized eggs which manifests into mentaly consumed,distracted minds.

marcowone says:
Mon, 4th Jul 20118:28 am 

yep good to see men are in tune with their senses modern woman have an inverted value moral code they give their best years to the bling feel good whore life style and think we have to accept it !! um no way second hand trash can on legs ! our inner built senses tell us we dont wont to feel ashamed of walking with you down the street for all people to laugh behind our backs about how they treated you like the whores they disrespect and we know we dont want the lips of a whore kissing our children good nite,they dont deserve that nor do we.Sure we all have had some sexual experience in life we are human after all but todays standards with the help of pills have gone beyond what nature has allowed as acceptable.Its funny how weak modern woman actually are the confuse alpha male bad boys for excitement when the real strength of men are self controlled those other men are weak minded and have mental issues but hey they chose to stay the dick heads they are and not be strong and grow where it counts most sucked in woman who chose their path it hurts in the end knowing it was your weak minded sucked in nature that ranks you among the lowest of woman and the weaker links in keeping human life pure and true

Anon says:
Mon, 4th Jul 20113:12 pm 

and all men are sluts too

mike says:
Mon, 4th Jul 20118:51 pm 

all men have to " buy " sex, one way or another, because all women " sell " their sex, one way or another….a girl "can" get laid any day she wants, a guy "cannot" do this…..$50 for dinner…$40 for a movie…throw in another $50 for gas, cigarettes, drinks!!! and a guys gotta do "all this", just for the "chance" that he "might" get lucky !!! then she'll leave him high and dry and still horny and ask to be brought home and she'll actually "get off " on the excitement of doing this, of using another guy !!! and the next night she'll be out "golddigging some other sucker!!!…ITS UNBELIEVABLE!!! MEN, STOP FALLING FOR THIS BULLSHIT !!! go out and get it from a prostitute,its easier, no strings attached,she wont say no,and its a lot cheaper !!!!

Rahul says:
Fri, 15th Jul 20112:08 pm 

This is the reason why I'm NEVER marrying an American woman. I'm a singly physician, and already found my beautiful match outside the country.

nondorite says:
Wed, 27th Jul 20117:19 am 

ambrosia you are a psycho, if you really think men are a good catch because they are confident then you really dont have a clue. Thats like saying women who have big boobs are a good catch.

Confidence is just a trait it doesn't tell you anything about a man hitler was supremely confident btw and einstein wasn't no where near as, doesn't mean hitler was the better man.

Are women really that superficial? seriously if they are they need to grow up, money and saying the "right" things doesn't equal the love of your life its not a job interview or bank investment fgs its courtship…

Mike says:
Wed, 27th Jul 20112:23 pm 

*shrug* you're talking to women that have bought into the dogma of social conditioning. men and women evolved to have a very different view towards sex… but women don't try to understand men's POV

haha but in the end… a key that can open any lock is an awesome key, but a lock that can be opened by any key is a shitty lock.

i feel no pity for sluts

Mike says:
Wed, 27th Jul 20112:24 pm 

Dude, most women just rationalize that they age like wine. In the back of their minds they know you're right, but they don't care.

they live for the moment, so the fuck tons of guys then magically find themselves valuing commitment when they get to the point u described.

and of course they project their psychologies onto men and ramble about how immature men are for not wanting to commit (once they reach that point)

Mike says:
Wed, 27th Jul 20112:27 pm 

Wow absolutely. its scary how true this is

but of course you still see the giggling sluts with their dozens of partners taking pride in their loose bodies

Mike says:
Wed, 27th Jul 20112:31 pm 

a rant born of bother bitterness and truth

i am guessing you have experiencing the true soul of woman.

i am sorry for you my man. it is not a pretty thing, when you take away all the warm and fuzzy words we drape over it

grande combo says:
Sun, 31st Jul 20113:52 pm 

women deserve to be raped

grande combo says:
Sun, 31st Jul 20114:12 pm 

I hate modern women. Rape should be legal. The idea of a slut crying, because she is getting what she deserves? OH YEAH! Rock hard.

AdamS. says:
Wed, 3rd Aug 20115:33 pm 

You're absolutely right. I find women from ethnic backgrounds to be more loyal, dependable, ladylike and a hell of a lot more traditional than Western American women. One of the main reasons I dislike dating American girls is their constant need to sleep with every man they meet and emasculate any male that they're with. Men can no longer be men in this country, it's ridiculous. And then they wonder why men don't respect them! Respect is what we deserve and want from women and if you don't give us that, we'll look elsewhere!
I've found some of the most loyal and traditional women to be from Latin, Black/Mixed Race, and Asian backgrounds. American girls are whores. Plain and simple.

AdamS. says:
Wed, 3rd Aug 20115:46 pm 

Ha! Fucking brilliant.

AdamS. says:
Wed, 3rd Aug 20116:01 pm 

Rock on brother.

Adel Ritthard says:
Sat, 13th Aug 201112:52 pm 

Jessica, what are you doing in college? You wrote:

"While us girls may not have the upper hand in dating right now, once college ends and the real world begins, guys are the real victims of the hookup culture. And according to Charlotte Allen, it’s because all women are sluts."

Sweetie, Charlotte says the woman’s advantage begins in the twenties – i.e. during college – and ENDS in your less-fertile, less-desirable 30s. Can't you read? You got the whole summary wrong!! But maybe you are just incapable of understanding Charlotte’s point, because you think you are always the victim, and you are too narrow-sighted to be empathetic towards anybody’s suffering other than what affects you or, as a woman, could have affected you in some other century. This is clear from your argumentation skills.

You wrote:

”First and most obviously, she discusses the sexual liberation of women as a bad thing. No. Just no. Second of all…”

Don’t go onto your next point. What kind of counter argument is: “No, just no.”? But that’s all you have to offer, your opinion. And your claim that Charlotte is “wrong” because you like to sleep around looking for the wildest evening rather than a life partner.

Funny but, in rebelling against gender roles (as this whole feminism thing you women support was supposed to be about), women simply picked up the worst traits of the worst men and discarded everything that made them cuddly, cute and desirable, not to mention comforting and soft. Forgive me for disapproving of this "woman's right of choice and freedom".

I want the old age back, where women ran around in fear and attached themselves to good guys who protected them. No need for that now. And women wonder why chivalry is dead? Because women treat men like shit! They want everything from us men and give nothing back. Except Sex. Every time its about power and bringing the man to his knees because it inflates the ego.

Searching for "The one?" Well, if she ever existed to begin with…she has long since turned into a monster, probably during "the age" I apparently never knew about, in the early 20s, where women just whore themselves out for the fun of it and became primates instead of passionate, compassionate and emotional beings capable of sharing something special exclusively with someone special.

Cute, real cute. Fucking slut.

Truth says:
Sat, 13th Aug 20111:03 pm 

You'll understand when you are 28 and no longer half as attractive. It's natural, part of the aging process. It also makes you less desirable.

"how can a woman say something like that about her own gender?"

Hilarious. Your gender consists of some of the most malicious, evil, scheming and selfish folks I have ever met. But oh, you'd never criticize them because it's "your gender"? Ridiculous.

Tom says:
Mon, 15th Aug 201112:30 pm 

You probably wont read this, but just shut up and learn to think before you talk.

Lion of Moz says:
Wed, 17th Aug 20119:54 am 

Do you really believe all the crap you wrote here? Men have have their minds made up long ago about having a slut for a steady companion: they just do not want them! Sluts are not intimidating to us, they are disgusting which is quite different. Sluts are only dangerous to themselves! Men are not weak: they take advantage of the slut's weakness! Sexual magnetism of the slut??? where do you live? On the moon?
About the primates: what is a slut? A woman succumbing to her most animal desires and opening her legs to whomever comes by like there's no tomorrow is what? Not even a primate! A neanderthal more like it!
Get real!

Lion of Moz says:
Wed, 17th Aug 201110:42 am 

This is not about the equal rights for men and women! This a behavioral issue that is rocking society like a hurricane. Nobody wants women to be or have lesser rights than men. The equal rights have nothing to do with moral standards. It is wrong to behave like a slut both for men and women. No woman likes a man that lays around with every woman that opens her legs. Why should a man like or want a woman that does it?

Lion of Moz says:
Wed, 17th Aug 201110:58 am 

I have read many of the comments here and feel sorry that many fellow men confuse the issue. People like you make me believe there's still hope out there! Thanks!

I am sure that you will sometime sooner or later find the right one and hope that he will be worth of you!

No Skanks Please says:
Wed, 17th Aug 20111:37 pm 

I'm one of those beta males. Now that I own my house and businesses, the used up hags are interested in me. No thanks, I like my intact immune system. I only date widows 30 -40 who married young.

Lion of Moz says:
Wed, 17th Aug 20119:22 pm 

Who gives a f*** about what these kind of women say anyhow? With so much laying around with their legs wide open, would anyone think that they would have the time to be studying? Philosophy???!!! Hegel? Schopenhauer? Nietzsche? Not even as a joke, to say the least! Maybe we should all be in silence and let this story end up where it belongs: in the garbage bin!

jon says:
Tue, 23rd Aug 201110:42 am 

well i c it this way… wome say eather become a alpha male or just stop complaining… its always the mans fault… i think the same if we dont waa settle down with a slut stop being a slut or stop complaining…. i mean a woman complains i cant find a good guy but shes looking i the wrong places… settle down later in life but ur gona settle 4 a peace of shit cause like u said u only want alphas i ur prime well 2 a woman a man i his prime is a man with a good job caring good looking good in bed and tough mature…. i mea common men want a woma that r good looking not been with may men… caring and ot bitchy…… how many men r like that? how many women r like that? now days men dont want 2 settle down cause alot of women cheat… they blame everything on us… most relationship articles r get ur wife 2 love u agan…. says nothing about mens happyness… if ur man cheats its not ur fault but if a woman cheats u didnt make her fully happy…. y is that? hes not big enough… he dont care enough…. he dot make me feel sexy…….. ok maybe u just have a big vagina… maybe u dont show him eough affection or u dont make him care…. maybe u dont make him feel sexy…. women turn men down 4 sex way more than men do…. if ur being told o all the time than maybe u gota make him feel sexy

Steve says:
Thu, 25th Aug 20113:18 am 

Bottom line, whoever wrote this article is a slut whore.

guy says:
Mon, 29th Aug 20119:35 pm 

This article is so inconsequential to me. First off the author is arrogant enough to assume she and woman like her are the barometer for what a woman is. Hardly. Just like there is a large cross section of males there is a large cross section of females. I also think the harsh comments are off base as well, in the grandscheme of things. Most women are not immature, imppressionable little Kesha wannabes. Most are in fact betas themselves. The problem is as much the dweebs here complaining and bitching. You guys give 100% of your attention to maybe the top 15% of the female population. Why? becuase you have been duped into beleiving only the cool kids hang out at cokehead night clubs, and asshole trendy yuppy bars. I think youll find that the qaulity of person that spend alot of time at these places as social hangouts tends to be superficial and selfish. Christ theres more women than men walking the street and they are everywhere who the fuck says I have to go for a girl like in the picture above? I'll gladly be the beta male and have a nice conversation with the normal looking girl with a few brain cells at the bookstore or art show, or talk to the girl who is actually living her life and going out and taking up a real hobby. This sort of social scene has been around for decades and the only difference our generation is dumb enough to think its reality. real women and men work theyre asses off and spend theyre free time doing what they want not what sex and the city or tucker max says they should. Come to think I cant think of ever hearing one instance where a good healthy relationship involved club rats or bar fiends, and that should tell you something right there. only deluded people would live a lifestyle where they class others as alpha or beta. as if most folks have the time to care.

guy says:
Mon, 29th Aug 20119:47 pm 

you guys still dont get it. the whole reasoning being made post by post is self contradictory. its the general observation that most desirable (physically) young women want "alphas". fine im with you so far. Then in the next sentence its bitching about how any guy has trouble getting laid and women have it so easy. well that doesnt make sense. If society is dating musical chairs and the tune stopped there would be a assload of women standing alone. by sheer numbers alone there more of a type of girl than there is a type of guy and they know this. Your problem like many guys problems is they behave like monkeys and go after the same exact girl over and over again. Of cours that type of person is going to be selective to the point where it seems like shes cruel. I mean please Ill never say women are perfect but you guys act as if they are all these evil genuises sitting in theyre layer mapping out how to fuck over the male species. Dating is like real estate homey. You think the asking price for a property is outragous then stop buying that type of overpriced housing to impress youre dickhead freinds. be happy and true to yourself and search for mere contentment in a modest house you can make the mortgage on. becuase trust me that gated mcmansion reapplying her lipstick for 90th time tonight is nothing special once you take the for sale sign off her.

guy says:
Mon, 29th Aug 20119:53 pm 

and look whos hes often abusing and wifebeating….the airhead that 90% of dudes hit on in her 20's. people arent stupid and fortunately they learn from theyre mistakes. to suggest that caniving and manipulating hot chicks are getting over on every decent guy with a good job and no criminal record in his 40's is stupid. I have never ever seen a case where the slutty wench like the one who wrote this article ended up with the doctor or small business owner whos a decent dude. most good men are averaging looking guys and they up with good women who are by no shock….average looking. I would never want to be in any sort of relationship with someone so into themselves they preen themselves three or four nights a week to impress other strangers.

guy says:
Mon, 29th Aug 20119:57 pm 

well i for one have a penis and could care less whoever calls me alpha beta gamma delta or other gay moniker used by assholes whos jobs obviously dont take up enough time and probably will be done by robots in 30 years.

guy says:
Mon, 29th Aug 201110:04 pm 

why? just becuase she has a vagina shes beholden to all of womankind? or just becuase she has a uterus it makes her more of a human being than any man? You may disagree with that womans points but dont be disingenuous. Shes a journalist writing for a national publication, not a feminist writing for the girl power fan club of her middle school. grow up. Its refreshing that a female made a judgement like that, right or wrong, becuase being that critical in the face of harsh judgement is what defines a feminist or a true civil rights crusader. Remember, and i know it may be hard to believe but every female is still an individual with theyre own opinions and they may even dislike listening to lady gaga too….shocker i know.

guy says:
Mon, 29th Aug 201110:10 pm 

sexual liberation is just that. being liberated to choose. when your forcing or wrenching the collective opinion on certain behavior to suite an agenda to your liking your not fighting for anyone choice, only your own selfish interests. Anyone who sleeps with strangers in frequency or makes it a habit is a slut, man or woman. this will never change becuase it shouldnt. its not the norm to have an enormous amount of casual partners and you would be just hard pressed to change the viewpoint on other social deviations like many piercings or tattoos. Both of which i personally have in abundance. Was it my choice to do this? yes. Is it anyone elses business? not really. Do I care how I am viewed? hardly. The fact I had the choice in the first place means I won my individually the act of adorning my body was a personal choice. I owned my shit and I think alot of people here, specifically this author and the people the original article was written about should too. Fuck people who judge you. Also fuck people say you dont have the right to judge either. Its a free country folks.

guy says:
Mon, 29th Aug 201110:18 pm 

the truth has been spoken. Like I said before own your shit and your choices and fuck other peoples opinion. However, don't make the choice if your not comfortable the social consequences of it. This sexual liberation debate could be swapped with the social media employer debate. same point in the end. you want to be taken seriously in a certain aspect of life then dont make decisions to the contratry. You want a corporate job, dont expect drunken posting of your debauchery to fit in with company image. you want a faithful, stable, and potential father figure of a husband then you should seriously ask if you yourself are able to match that on the other hand. Being a guy I can certainly say the best of us dont find you swooning over gym tan laundry at the bar as a very promising option for "wife material". tis is just the way the world works kids. right or wrong your an adult and adults live with their decisions. Its the people who get up in arms like the delaware girl who sue mcdonalds after getting diabetes or philip morris after getting emphasema. grow up is all the world asks of you.

guy says:
Mon, 29th Aug 201110:24 pm 

i also find it funny that alot of guys here act as if women of yesteryear were puritanical angels. certainly there is less hesitation to play the field for a woman today but i think the same percentages havent changed since the days world war 2. some people man and woman are going pathologically fuck around , and equal percentage wont fuck around at all, and the rest will generally be somewhere at the center of that bell curve. human behavior doesnt change only the scenery does. Of cource there are variences that be accounted for with protection like condoms but fact is most young women are not going fuck guys they just met. lmao it just doesnt happen. I wish it did but its only in the movies where every chick is ready to blow any halfway charming guy in the bathroom.

Truth says:
Sun, 4th Sep 201111:40 am 

So an entire generation of women sees "Jenny" from the movie Forrest Gump as a role model…and you don't see a problem with this?

What the hell is wrong with you?! I hope you get AIDS and die.

phil gary says:
Tue, 6th Sep 201111:18 pm 

it's all in The Women's Liberation Act and The Freedom Informaton Act. Its all about these two laws Dr. Martin
Luther King tried to tell congress not to pass. Dr. King stated passing these laws would create a new way to practice racism and discrimination against the minority people. There are complaints of this nation going into socialism, the Constitution of The United States and The Declaration of Independance being stripped away.
The women take away the value of men (especially the black men) and his substance. Its not about sluts,
sex, gay people, atheism, or the occults. its about women taking the value of men away from god.

Johnny Neptune says:
Wed, 7th Sep 20117:27 am 

I am a political scientist and there is serious validity to your argument, and a lot of scholarly data to back up your claim. What American's fail to understand is that the Soviets and communist for that matter throughout history have been very successful at brain-washing and psychological warfare. This goes as far as stating that they are the creators of Sociological warfare, which is another can of worms all together.

T.L. says:
Fri, 9th Sep 20119:57 pm 

i think ya'll need to cool down. not every girl is like that, not every boy is like how they are described in this article. just learn to really choose your friends, and you'll be okay.

nextnyc says:
Sun, 11th Sep 20114:09 am 

I live in a college town. EVERY local has noticed this. College now have skewed gender ratios. It's quite disgusting to witness this. You can tell u are back home if all the 20 something girls are talking with artificial husky accents.it's pathetic and not at all about liberation.
You see all this talk of liberation only leads to more imbalance due to upsetting styles of living we've had for centuries. The destruction of marriage has really screwed with young ones-it's sad this is all done in the name of liberation.
Blacks,sorry it turned out to be too difficult to liberate you(because we aren't willing to be critical of our govt policies , capitalism , and class immobility in urban areas). Now we will "liberate" women.

brent says:
Thu, 29th Sep 201110:16 am 

So, do sluts actually change over time? There is some indication they do change but I think some still desire to be a slut. They are shallow and only get their egos boosted by being sluts.

Does anyone agree with this? That a slut at 20 is still a slut at 40 or do they change?

anono says:
Tue, 4th Oct 201112:09 am 

You are awesome!!!! I love this post. Enjoy your STDs/STI's/ whatever you call them now cheetering whores…. and your friggin cats!!

so very true says:
Thu, 13th Oct 201111:23 am 

there seems to be so many more whores today than ever before. more and more women are filthy pigs now than ever. so many women out there that are garbage, making it much harder for us good straight men that are looking to meet a good straight woman now. i wonder what god was thinking, when he created such filth like them. we men can really blame these women for us not meeting the decent ones today. by the way, lets not leave out those lesbian pigs that are out there as well. we must not forget these diseased, infested, low life, dirty pigs. what a shame if we did.

Nice Guy says:
Fri, 14th Oct 20114:58 pm 

Facebook is going to make is worse for these ladies in the future. "huh. I wonder how this hot woman made it to thirty without ever getting married and I've been looking for a wife since I was 20, and can't find any takers?" *checks Facebook and sees over 1000 male friends* "if she's even fooled around with 10%, I guess I have my answer…"

Yup Yup says:
Fri, 14th Oct 20115:06 pm 

According to "the evolution of desire" women who pull this shit run the risk of never having children . If a woman is serious about marriage and children she needs to get married WHILE SHE IS YOUNG AND HOT. if not get used to being a single mom or forget about kids altogether

John says:
Fri, 14th Oct 20115:08 pm 

Hookers all the way my friend, hookers all the way

GYPSI says:
Sat, 15th Oct 20114:14 am 

I LIKE YOUR POST, VERY INTERESTING. HOWEVER, I CAN THINK THE SAME WAY OF MEN BEING: "They are all, selfish, egocentric, narcisstic, social climbing, spoilt, entitled, brattish, vaccuous, duplicitous, backstabbing, two-faced, liars, cheating, manipulative, self-centred dogs who frankly deserve what they get."

YOU SEEM INTELLIGENT, I LIKE YOUR EMOTIONS, IT'S JUST THAT I CAN THINK THE SAME FOR "ALL" BAD PEOPLE. IT'S NOT A MATTER OF YOUR SEX AND OUTSIDE SHELL. IT ALL BOILS DOWN TO YOUR INNER CONTENT, AND THAT MY DEAR VARIES FOR "ALL" OF US.

Rahul says:
Fri, 21st Oct 20115:16 pm 

I'm a hot confident single physician, however, American women disgust me. They're a bunch of lying, cheating, selfish whores. Furthermore, I'm marriage minded. I'll just get a nice wife from my own country of origin (India) if I do decide to get married.

used 2 b nice says:
Sat, 22nd Oct 201112:41 pm 

I got shot down so many times in my early twenties by my mid twenties i was so frustrated i wanted to give up. Now in my mid to late twentiesand with a lot more focus and confidence and im in good shape.
Now im finnally preety good with women but now all i want to do is fuk them and use them and hurt them because im bittet

See the thing is a lot of us guys who didnt have much experience early think that women are as beutiful on the inside are they are on the outside. And that all they want is to be loved and protected… But thats not the case.. A lot of them are just greedy self centered and narcissiticill. Who enjoy playing cruel and confusing mind gameson guys to see if there worthy of their pussy.

And now that i do know how to play the stupid games ive lost all respect.
I think its a sick society

andy says:
Mon, 24th Oct 201110:14 am 

Jessic,a some of your points are valid but you are missing the big picture. It is not about women being free, they should be free, the problem is their personality of wanting to have sex with everyone when they are in their best years.

Both men and women are free, but men tend to stay with a girl they like, instead of trying to hook up with anyone. Women are usually the ones to leave a first relationship, even when they are with a hot/great guy. They just get bored and want to try everyone. Once they realize it is not easy anymore to have sex with the decent people (when they reach 28) they start to look for something serious (usually someone like the guy they first dumped, who was hot, nice and loved her). This is the experience from almost anyone, you can find this talking to friends, reading forums, etc. And I am sure, Jessica, that you are doing/did this as well.

This has made me want to stay single. I don't really feel like spending my life with a person with that mindset.

andy says:
Thu, 27th Oct 20112:45 pm 

They are always sluts, but at 40 it is harder for them to get anything decent, that's why they settle. If they could look young forever they would keep acting like sluts until they die.

ObsidianDragon says:
Thu, 27th Oct 20114:55 pm 

The only thing that this illuminated "feminist" fails to realize is that those who she calls "Beta males" are simply males that aren't interested in wasting their material and emotional time into flakey sluts like her. I'm glad I got a decent girlfriend myself who doesn't act like this.

We'll see if she'll still act as bold when she'll reach her 30/40's and still won't have settled down with a good man who will be there for her, for any problem that might arise. Really, sluts mostly only have themselves to blame.

Lee says:
Sun, 30th Oct 201110:56 pm 

Well a Big Amen to wise insight and smart observation, HaHa! Weather male or female or the season of life it is still picking a good one and holding on to her or I quess a him. Iam 56 and going strong, and have never had any date pick up problems, men and women have the same desires every year, You have a good post and hang in there Hunter, and good hunting Bro. Lee D.

Lee says:
Sun, 30th Oct 201110:58 pm 

Big YEP , You nailed it !

HotDrumSticks says:
Sun, 30th Oct 201111:19 pm 

WOW !! A real Hot woman for a change, Very hard to find and worth their weight in gold, so to speak. Stay that way Honey and get a real Man. You Rock !!

domiziano galia says:
Sun, 13th Nov 201110:09 am 

It's funny reading a girl complaining about (beta) males "personality". Because that's what the majority of girls totally lacks.

exactly right says:
Tue, 15th Nov 201111:45 pm 

it is very true, all of us good straight men are now suffering because of the filthy whores that are out there now. that is why a lot of us men cannot meet a decent woman today. i cannot blame myself for what they have become now. i am a sincere straight man that would like very much to meet a good woman for me, but they are very hard to find. they are very nasty today, especially when i try to start a conversation with the one that i am attracted to. you would think going to the book store would be easy to meet them, but its not. i guess they were very badly abused years ago, that may have a lot to do with it.

so very true says:
Wed, 23rd Nov 201112:22 am 

it is very true that most of the women out there now are the filthiest whores on the face of this earth. they need at least ten guys at one time to make them happy, instead of just being with the one man that would really love her. then again, they will always be garbage. these are the ones that like men, and will also go to bed with as many men as possible. then there are the carpet munchers, these filthy lesbian pigs will go with as many women as they possibly can at one time. what low life piece of shit women out there now. whatever happened to the straight women that we had years ago, for us straight men?

Lahdeedah says:
Sat, 10th Dec 20117:36 pm 

Ha! How can you reject/not marry a slut if you don't know that she is one? If she does not wear her sexual past on her shirt, you'll have no idea will ya?
Keep in mind that many of the non-slutty, respectable girls would not want a man with a promiscuous/slutty past either, I know I don't! A man who bangs loads of women is just a used, disgusting tool to me!! So don't bitch, got it Blackass?

guest says:
Tue, 13th Dec 20112:40 am 

I know alot of these sluts,they are heartless and cruel.They sneer at selective breeding,d what they select is pathetic!They also pop out illegitimate,bastard,kids that no one wants.After all the exessive partying and boozeing,they are all used up before thirty,and look alot older than they are.The alpha dominate male is the thing of the past,women don't want to be protected,and before any can self rightously object,why do you put youself in harms way knowing that you might be date raped,or just raped because stupid you just teased someone you shouldn't have.Show too much ass or cleavage and you will be someones bitch like or not.Your daddy won't be there to throw around money and pull your perky stupid,spoiled ass out of the fire!If a man has old fashioned, traditionall values,well dumbas,that might be agood thing.DUH!

MrMe says:
Tue, 20th Dec 201112:08 am 

Thats exactly what they do the only offending thing about this article is that it is true, I had a girl I knew since she was 17 who gave me the cold shoulder for years, after she had been married and messed that up she got pregnant with some other loser then when he left her after 6 months to run away with some prostitute he met lol, she had the gall to come knocking on my door with a proposition holding the friggin baby in her hands. Congradulations good sir, after your years of being ignored because you have a house and a job you get the gift of me, so I can cheat on you with the same losers while your at work, because lets face it, from years of sex and partying im a used tire now and need extra attention.

Yeh I said no thanks. I advise you other average guys to do the same. They usually come calling after pregnancy but dont want to have your babies, they like to lay the eggs THEN make the nest, marry a nice Asian woman or a Mexican. You wont regret it.

Just A Smart-ass says:
Tue, 27th Dec 20114:20 am 

Ralph says:
Tue, 27th Dec 20114:37 am 

First of all, the author is female and, yes, she said she feels women should be able to have as much sex as they want. No penises forced her to write that she would like to able to have sex with anyone, anytime, anywhere.

Secondly, you put everything in an entirely new context. Cheating is wrong. Plain and simple. Agreed. But that is not what anything is about. It is about multiple partners for women and men who are not in a committed relationship. Men who cheat are douche bags and women who cheat are whores.

Last, you are rejecting the fact that women are independent. From what you say, women don’t know how to control themselves. As soon as a man whips out his dick, the girl automatically goes to town. I would like to think women are better than that.

Clitty says:
Sun, 1st Jan 20127:04 pm 

Boo fucking hoo! "Good" guys can't coast through life and get a maid-servant/son-maker way out of their league simply because they're a man and she needs somebody to feed her in a world that gives her no option of supporting herself. Boo hoo you have to exist on a level playing field in which women can flex the full power of their sexuality! Boo hoo some of those same woman are competing with you for jobs instead staying home to wash the skid marks out of your drawers! Boo hoo, boo hoo! I thought men were supposed to be strong. Guess you're not so strong when all that privilege is taken away. Welcome to the world of being treated like a human being along with everybody else. Deal with it babies.

Emma says:
Tue, 3rd Jan 201210:50 pm 

What exactly does a job after a collage education have to do with being a slut? What makes a woman a slut is the way she dresses (to legally sexually harass men) and letting a man use her body for his own sexual gratification instead of as an expression of love.

I'm married to the same man for 13 years (I'm 33). I pretty much get sex on demand. What husband doesn't love for his wife to be the biggest slutty whore while in his bed with him? Seriously, there is nothing wrong with loving sex and wanting to explore your sexuality–I have done things I never thought I'd do because my husband asked if I'd like to try. Some things I didn't like and we don't do it, and other things I loved and we do it as often as we can–and other things I do because he enjoys it.

Sexual liberation isn't actually about giving women the sexual upper hand. It's about turning them into sex objects for men to use. My husband does call me *his* little slut or *his* little whore in our bed room, but he'd punch another man for calling me that because I behave like a lady in all social situations.

I was a virgin when we met. He was not. I appreciated his experience because he knew what he was doing and how to make our first time together a wonderful experience for both of us.

I am not saying all women need to cross their legs and keep themselves pure until you find "The One." Where else are men going to gain the experience needed to be fabulous loves from day one if their weren't sluts for them to practice with?

I'd hate to see all the sluts go away. It gives girls who are like I was a fabulous selection of men to choose from while we are still young and pretty, and now that my looks are getting a little stressed from age, kids, work and everything life has thrown at me, I know I have a husband who loves me with that rare kind of love everyone says they want but refuse to do what is required to get.

All the choices we make have consequences. I feel lucky being the kind of woman I am. I don't have to worry about finding someone to love me as I am at this time in my life when even I can feel the clock starting to tick on my youth. I have my kids and I have my home. My husband has been my home and safe place in this cruel world. Because of the choices I made when I was young, I know I will always have the warm, safe place to go to. He also supports me in my career choice now that our children are at an age I don't have to constantly be with them.

I have it all and I didn't have to be a slut to get it.

Also take the time to look up scoundrel and cad. Men may have wanted to behave like horny tom cats, but want and get are usually two very different things. At any time in history only about 40% of men were getting sex while 80% of women were. Which sex was it that sexually repressed?

Tombstone juice says:
Mon, 9th Jan 20126:43 am 

Everyone always goes to the extremes with shit about sluts or loser guys who have no game, but the truth is that there are good quality people out in the world you just have to use a little thing called intelligence. Everyone has hate in their blood, that was put there by a thing called fear by ignorance, or fear of the past(traumatized). The world will always be full of good and evil. All a person needs to do is use their brain. If your an asshole you eventually get your ass kicked, if your a slut you end up getting fucked in more ways than one period. No one ever remembers the golden rule "do on to others as you want to be done on you".

bhayes says:
Mon, 9th Jan 20126:09 pm 

My words of advice to the fellas is just f$&@em and leave’em, trust me I’ve been through the wh043$ and most women are but there are some out there that have respect for themselves and hasn’t been with a bunch of guys. Just wait and have fun cause there is plenty of ass out there and wait for a decent women but dont expect a cherrie unless you meet them in highschool. Good luck and good feasting!

bhayes says:
Mon, 9th Jan 20126:14 pm 

.

billy grotton says:
Wed, 11th Jan 201210:48 pm 

Final comment,The world would be a better place if all men and women had a low libido or sex drive then maybe all the hurt and drama wouldn't take place

Jester31 says:
Sat, 14th Jan 201212:13 pm 

An update on my experience with Women. The European initiated a break-up after 8 months of dating, and after a few months of being on my own and moping, I moved onto another Euro. I'm actually surprised to find my old post on here, which basically looks into the future at an imminent break-up with the girl I was falling for. One thing I've learned is this: Women are wicked, and not to be trusted. But the rush of falling for them is likened to an addictive drug.

Never trust a woman, always follow your gut-instinct and to all the women who don't know a good thing when you've got it: Fuck you.

Bossman says:
Sun, 15th Jan 20122:52 am 

If men would start to realize women are not worth their time or money, more time could be spent on activities that men enjoy. We don’t enjoy talking to a woman half the night just to find out she has a boyfriend. We do not enjoy taking women out just to find out they are whores who f*** any guy who treats them badly. We do not enjoy being deceived just before a whore breaks up with us; whores use their current man as a placeholder until they find another man to f***. Then they leave you! We DO enjoy just about anytime that is not wasted in pursuing a woman who is most likely just a whore. MEN! IT IS OUR OWN FAULT. STOP GIVING WOMEN SO MUCH ATTENTION. JUST GIVE THEM THE IMPRESSION THAT YOU DON’T GIVE A F***. IT WORKS! THEY DESERVE IT. ALSO, NEVER EVER MARRY A WHORE!!!!! DONT LET THAT VAGINA TRAP TAKE EVERYTHING YOU HAVE ACCOMPLISHED!!

duke says:
Sun, 15th Jan 201210:30 pm 

these comments made me laugh so much!! some very immpressive comments.. Sluts are great fun.., but men wont commit to them and respect them. not because of there history but because once a girl has been with about 50 guys, he know the buck wont stop with him.. Wrong place wrong time of the month, she'll spread em for the next dude who knows how to play game. My last gf was a slut, – cheating whore.. I was pissed off even though i knew she was slutty from the outset.., so its my fault really. sluts cant help opening there legs – its in the blood. they'll eventually find a guy who enjoys swinging and live happily ever after..

Scott says:
Tue, 17th Jan 201211:41 am 

Wow, you hit the nail right on the head. What this author is doing is only enforcing the rising trend in bad behavior. "Step up your game"? If she means changing myself from being a nice, decent human being into an asshole, then I'd much rather be alone.

StraightA says:
Thu, 19th Jan 20128:58 am 

Yeah, I've also wondered about her counterpoint. But then I figured that "No, just, no." was the most intelligent thing her daft little brain could come up with and left it as that. What I feel sorry for, however, is the coming generation of girls who are going to grow up reading mindless drivel written by "women" like her and be influenced by it.

I must admit, I was an "alpha" in college, so I had my fun with these kinds of girls. But now, as a 25 year old man who's starting to pull in a 6-figure income, I'm more inclined to the girls who respect themselves and treat themselves better than a piece of trash just for the sake of "liberation". Those girls satisfied me for the moment, but they will never be able to sleep in my bed.

StraightA says:
Thu, 19th Jan 20129:12 am 

My sympathy for your loss. However, spending a few months moping over a girl is way too long. Anything over 2 weeks is way too long and you need to get back on the saddle and fuck some more of these "liberated" women to get the last out of your system.

This radical feminism wave is starting to hit Europe. Which is a shame, because Eastern Europe breeds some of the world's most beautiful women.

StraightA says:
Thu, 19th Jan 20129:32 am 

shut up you whore liar

Adam says:
Thu, 19th Jan 201210:17 am 

A man makes a million sperms in an hour — therefore, he was designed to spread his seed. A woman makes 1 egg per month — therefore, she was designed to be SELECTIVE about those seeds.

If you want to talk about the book and god and equality, then blame god for people like my calling girls like you whores and sluts.

Jerry Sandusky says:
Thu, 19th Jan 201210:39 am 

I also love it when people use the excuse that you are genetically wired to eat and breathe before I lock them in my basement.

StraightA says:
Thu, 19th Jan 201211:11 am 

that would make the male a stud

StraightA says:
Thu, 19th Jan 201211:14 am 

And yet, you sound like the dumbest person in this comment section.

StraightA says:
Thu, 19th Jan 201211:18 am 

"Feminism is all about empowering: sleeping with whoever you want"

"Um. No. Just no."

StraightA says:
Thu, 19th Jan 201211:20 am 

Women make 1 egg per month. Men make millions sperm cells per hour.

Boom. There's your proof.

Jeremy says:
Fri, 20th Jan 20125:30 pm 

Girls everywhere and all you emasculated “men” who are trying so hard to be politically correct at the expense of your masculinity, listen up.

Men and women are equals. This does not mean that they are equal in every single thing they do. For example, men are, on average, physically stronger than women. It is much easier for a semi attractive (even a 6/10) woman to go out and get laid. The same cannot be said about men. Men have to work at it, have some skill (game) and thereby get a woman to sleep with them. It is a LOT harder for an equally attractive man to get women than it is the other way around. This is one of reasons behind why we, as a society, naturally celebrate men who are successful in bedding multiple women; while at the same time shame women who bed multiple men.

Let us briefly visit the topic of virginity from both perspectives. Virginity in a man is not a desirable state or label when it comes to an attribute that the opposite sex wants. This is because he has obviously not been preselected by other women. However, female virginity is not looked at negatively in the least by men. If she looks decent, no man cares if the girl is a virgin or not. In fact, a female virgin is often wanted more.

Now don’t get me wrong, men LOVE sluts. We will never turn down an opportunity to sleep with a good looking slut. Partly because she’s good in bed, partly because it’s sex. But any decently intelligent, self-respecting man will know that it is a terrible idea to emotionally involve himself (i.e. date) a slutty girl. That would be a very dumb move. Why would any man want to get emotionally involved with a girl who’s had 15+ sexual partners? We would just be setting ourselves up for failure. There are many nice worthy girls out there who don’t have daddy issues and haven’t slept with an entire fraternity house. But, by all means, fvck the brains out of sluts in the meanwhile.

Most guys can detect when a girl is a slut by the first few dates and by what he hears about the girl from other people and from the girl herlself. We put this information together and figure out if she is dating material or not. If not, I like most guys, will still go in for the prize but have no intention of following through with dating the dirty little tart.

To put it simply, a lock that can be opened by many keys is a useless lock and of little worth. But a key that can open many locks is a master key and is valuable.

Jessica says:
Fri, 20th Jan 201210:36 pm 

Just because a woman doesn't act as your personal domestic servant/sex toy doesn't mean she has wronged you in anyway. She's just living her life just as your living your life. Please try to see things from the perspectives of other people, it's really clarifying.

For the record we're made of flesh and blood too. We women ARE sexual beings, even though all traditional societies have tried to portray us as sex-less beings who need men to sexualize them. You need to understand that in order to fully understand women you have to undo some of your cultural programming. You may not have realized this but women have wet dreams, clitorises and masturbate…OMG women are sexual beings!! society will collapse!!!

The point is, we're not living for your fucking special standards or society's. Now We live up to our own standards, for our own approval and we will do whatever the fuck we want to. It's a nice change of pace after thousands and thousands of years of serving as mens' domestic servants/sex slaves/punching bags/baby-making machines. We have autonomy now, get used to it.

Ann says:
Fri, 20th Jan 201211:24 pm 

Judging from all the comments here, it's apparent that womens' newfound autonomy really does threaten the egos of men who haven't liberated themselves from traditional male practices and beliefs.

Just because a woman doesn't act as your personal domestic servant/sex toy doesn't mean she has wronged you in anyway. She's just living her life just as your living your life. Please try to see things from the perspectives of other people, it's really clarifying.

I'm living my life independently and I have no regrets-if any of you have a problem with that you can fuck off

Jane says:
Sat, 21st Jan 201210:11 am 

I actually feel sorry for men nowadays because it seems the media are always concentrating on women more now. I also feel sorry for girls like me who don't like promiscuousness and prefer old values because we're always being bashed or made fun of by other women/ girls, men and especially the media. I believe in only having sex with only 1 person and it seems that everyone makes fun of me because I still hold traditional/old values. I hate sexually liberated women and I HATE the media. I feel sorry for men because I feel they are confused especially in todays society, because they don't know what role to take now because those damn liberated modern women are taking their roles not only in the workplace but in the home too! I think the reason why girls in my generations are becoming sluts or sexually promiscuous and open is because they think men love sluts and want them for keeps and because of the media especially ones where the girl sleeps with men on the first date and lots of men. I just hope women will become smarter and actually see the light, because when I grow up and have children growing up in a immoral society where being sexually liberated and women sleeping with numerous men is seen in a positive light.

Rain says:
Wed, 1st Feb 201212:17 am 

How the hell does calling women sluts, bitches and ugly make any of you men nice?? None of you are nice you are manipulative betas worst men in the world.

rain says:
Wed, 1st Feb 201212:19 am 

Betas are NOT good nice men. Zeta's and omega's are good men. Betas are whiny, manipulative, cowardly, passive aggressive, entitled bastards NO-ONE should ever EVER date a beta. Seriously women never make that mistake and don't pass on their horrible genes.

steve says:
Mon, 6th Feb 201210:33 am 

what that was an incredible response, i couldnt have put it better myself…
ever played a woman at chess, or pool? 99% are useless, they cannot calculate what they are getting themselves into and the poor decisions they are making…
they have pushed falling in love away, as though it were a disease for the weak, and we all know how modern woman LOVE STRENGTH now dont we. those rude abnoxious woman you see of an evening drinking away with selfish ignorant apathy. they are also damaging the eggs in the bodies, and there future offspring. and the younger ones are even worse now, they love cocain and other drugs to…
well guys i for 1 am sick of having to pick up the pieces of all these nasty useless sex addicted chlamydia ridden vile hoes… we need to band together men, and turn this culture around.
it wouldnt be so bad if these woman had nice personalities, but no, they are angry, useless and create further depression within our heartbreaking society.

steve says:
Mon, 6th Feb 201210:33 am 

all these refuge centres for beaten woman and the like that we have to sponsor – majority of these woman get their angry, lying selves in them because their bad boy of excitement turns on them! but they were too stupid to see it coming when all of us could, she was to cool at the time and defiled herself with evil! good decision making ladies!!!
how many woman could keep themselves chaste until their brains were grown up enough to see the dangers?

the story of adam and eve is more genuine than i used to appreciate!

steve says:
Mon, 6th Feb 201211:12 am 

this is really the most amazing forum topic ive ever seen, ive had reinforced what i think and know everyday, and i see that so many men are feeling it also now…
there are very few good woman out there who arent compulsive liars back stabbers, and enjoy toying with your emotions, it makes them feel so powerful. it is clear we dont live in a society anymore, or a big society. things have gone too far now.
how many woman are lesbian or bisexual nowadays?!
what is happening to this world?
i would love to meet a nice virgin and settle with her.

steve says:
Mon, 6th Feb 201211:13 am 

woman get sex very easily, and in this modern society they are encouraged and even peer pressured into having sex too young. this pressure on woman allows the media to sexualise woman very early, and sex sells right? so someones get rich of this suffering!

and as hitler said, if you wanna control a nation, control its woman and the men will have to follow!!

steve says:
Mon, 6th Feb 201211:23 am 

woman and men can never truely be considered the equal in terms of sex.
woman catch everything going because she sucks everything in to her!
a man it is harder unless he has rough sex and bleeds, this is another reason why woman should not be promiscous.
also the reason that all these woman are rude nowadays, is because the are not ALPHA FEMALES, so they harbour resentment and anger…

true ALPHA FEMALES can be recognised, the trouble is guys, you are playing with woman who are not alpha, but have been sexualised, there in lies the problem… i assure you.

Joey Deacon says:
Mon, 6th Feb 201212:39 pm 

All snakes with tits

Renashka says:
Tue, 7th Feb 20124:21 pm 

ok im not even sure how i came across this but that article is very wrong, not all women are sluts, i for one am not and never would be, i think once night stands are gross but if thats what you want to do that is your own preference and choice, i hate it when people stereotype!

Jester31 says:
Tue, 7th Feb 201211:18 pm 

If men did "whatever the fuck we want to", all hell would break loose in the world, and you wouldn't have any of the comforts that men, both past and present, have created for you silly broads to enjoy today. Enjoy it while it lasts, because with each passing day, Men are becoming wise to your selfish, childish behaviour. Men will no longer put up with such manipulative broads, and will seek out the untarnished "overseas" women, or go straight up whore style, paying for sex and not giving a fuck. You want a decent, honourable man to settle down with eventually? Then you have to earn the respect and show a little discipline, or we will use you for what you are. A walking, talking, annoying as fuck, vagina.

^this idiot says:
Fri, 10th Feb 20124:46 am 

Are you serious? People actually liked your idiotic comment? You and those people are what's wrong with this world. No one deserves to get raped. Douche.

Anon says:
Fri, 10th Feb 20125:04 am 

And you're one the "nice guys"? What a fucking crock! I pity the woman who ever has the great misfortune of ever laying eyes you. And really? World of War Craft? Men are going down the drain just as much as we apparently are.

Kevin says:
Sun, 12th Feb 20123:27 am 

Women should be used and abused.

Jen says:
Wed, 15th Feb 201210:18 pm 

cough… someone's self conscious of their "sexual liberation" …cough

Scott says:
Thu, 16th Feb 20124:23 am 

Yep, my thoughts on this so-called "author" exactly.

I must say though, it's women like this woman that make me so happy I'm single. "Women's Liberation" was probably a good thing when it began, but now today's women have twisted it into a joke. If anything today's women only use it as an excuse to BE sluts.

If women today prefer to be sluts, fine by me. I'd rather be alone for the rest of my life than taint my excellent genes with their filth.

Philosophy says:
Sun, 19th Feb 20121:53 am 

It is the natural development of people… evolved from rspe…. the strongest and the fittest…. the raped the most is by the strongest.

The Truth says:
Tue, 21st Feb 201211:25 am 

Jessica is obviously mad that one wants to get inside that worn out, used up, smelly piece of rotting flesh between her hairy legs.

Lourdes says:
Tue, 21st Feb 20122:09 pm 

i am impresed how sexis american men are…and they think they have the right of marry women from other cultures like mine! WTF you have in mind? that we like men who see us like slaves? men who act like sluts and afterwards want a decent woman to marry? how about us,why we should accept a slut guy? How stupid and sexist!

lourdes says:
Tue, 21st Feb 20122:15 pm 

"think female prostitution. Is there a reason why the porn industry is so huge but only for the male population? Is there a reason female prostitution is a global epidemic, but you don't hear problems about male prostitution? Why a female prostitute can make quite the living, while male prostitution isn't very profitable for the average Joe? Good luck guys, let the best man win "

Yes,there is: patriarchy! Men made us sexual objects and think they have the right to treat us in that way.Who told you that we love to be prostitutes,that we choose to be prostitutes??American men are disgusting,they create demand for women´s trafficking in poor countries like mine and afterwards come up with this shit talk ,this "biological determinism" juhgding women for being slut when thay are slut and don´t respect women!Now i see why you are hated in many latin countries,now i know why many american women look for a latin lover! you all are craps!

Hitler says:
Thu, 23rd Feb 20127:45 pm 

Bullshit!
People are born in all personality types! Nature wouldn't have it any other way unless you completely removed the beta genes… if there are such genes that is! lol

Steinke Regina says:
Thu, 23rd Feb 20127:57 pm 

LOL Well very well said!

Oh and on another note, based on the fact that so many people are bred from broken homes, I'm actually very afraid of what the future holds.
I wouldn't be surprised if incest, beastiality, and pedophilia become the new liberation movements in this culture of debauch… just a though.

Geoffrey says:
Thu, 23rd Feb 20128:29 pm 

Judging from your response, it is apparent that your newfound autonomy is really driven by your selfish and narcissistic entitlement issues. I am glad you have liberated yourself from traditional male practices. Now you can start working on lobbying for equal rights for men, because I am sure you would hate to reap the benefits of being a women.

Lets start on the incarceration rates. For example the 19 year old NC black man who spent 6 years in jail for sleeping with a 16 year old, versus the 44 year old female teacher who slept with multiple children as young as 13 and got probation.

Then lets move on to grants for women in college. For some reason women make up the majority of college students (for the last 14 years), yet still get grants for being a minority.

Lets level grants for students entering gender weighted programs. Women get a free ride for entering into science and mathematic degrees, yet no man gets a free ride for entering a female dominated degree, such as nursing, one of the highest paid and largest gender dominant degrees in all of U.S universities.

After that lets take a stroll over to the women's clinic and try to find a government funded mens clinic next store, oh wait, there is none.

Lets not forget child custody laws, women are more nurturing right? Ha. Lets see how many "dead beat mom's" there would be if the roles were reversed and the government stripped your children away from you all while commanding you to pay child support.

Oh and heres the great one, since women never lie and are always victims of physical abuse, when a domestic violence call is made to the police and both man and women have marks of violence, it is automatic procedure to arrest the man.

Chivalry……. I won't even go here…….

But now lets take a stroll to the mall…. I like to find a mens store….Thats weird, consumerism is dominated by women….. 80% of departments stores carry products that cater to women…… Majority of stores cater to women…. women now for the first time dominate men in consumer electronic sales….see what I'm getting at?

Huckster says:
Thu, 1st Mar 20125:52 am 

I'm 20 and I've never felt the love of a woman. That's male privilige for you. Now, I'm glad that you as an independent womyn live in an age where you can wrap any man you want around your thumb, but don't turn around and act like we're responsible for all your problems.

Chick123 says:
Fri, 2nd Mar 201210:14 pm 

I'm right here!

adriano says:
Mon, 5th Mar 20124:22 pm 

your right on the money bro!!!

adriano says:
Mon, 5th Mar 20124:23 pm 

wow!! what a whore!!!

udolipixie says:
Sat, 10th Mar 20127:18 am 

Women lose quantity then quality.
Men lose quality then quantity.

Not all those sperm are good ones.

udolipixie says:
Sat, 10th Mar 20127:27 am 

Always amusing to see how much men defend the sl*t double standard.when they most likely rail against the hitting double standard.

Both double standards have the same bs argument- biologically different & it's easier for one gender to do the same thing aka easier for men to hurt women/easier for women to get laid. Most men would rather hit a woman then have to think of themselves just as slutty as the woman they consider easy when they get her in bed.

Notice defense is the key/lock thing when the argument is that it takes more effort for men to get laid. The key/lock thing isn't about effort since neither the key or lock is putting more effort since both open to all. It's about value apparently a slutty man has more value than a slutty woman.

udolipixie says:
Sat, 10th Mar 20127:30 am 

"but men tend to stay with a girl they like, instead of trying to hook up with anyone."
LMAOXD

Most guys dread commitment and disdain marriage. That's not a modern thing as bachelorhood has always been portrayed as more freedom & fun than marriage for men.

Huckster says:
Sat, 10th Mar 20127:33 am 

Value = how much you're sought after and men aren't really sought after, slut or no slut.

udolipixie says:
Sat, 10th Mar 20127:34 am 

LMAO XD at beta males actually caring and respecting women.

Most men who define themselves as betas say more degrading and insulting things about the female gender than the alphas they deem jerks.

These are the well liked comments on here most likely liked by betas:
"women deserve to be raped"
"Women should be used and abused."
"All snakes with tits"
"The fact remains that women are absolute dogs and deserve to be treated as such."

The alphas at least tend to have confidence and good looks to overlook their jerk behavior while the betas don't and instead lack looks, lack confidence, and are socially awkward.

udolipixie says:
Sat, 10th Mar 20127:39 am 

LMAOXD at men love women for what they are.

Men love women for what they look like.

Men love women's bodies they do not love women.

No jokes.

Though this seems to apply to just American men.

udolipixie says:
Sat, 10th Mar 20127:44 am 

The defense is the key/lock thing as it takes more effort for men to get laid. The key/lock thing isn't about effort since neither the key or lock is putting more effort since both open to all. It's about value apparently a slutty man has more value than a slutty woman.

Misconception here is that a woman's sexual history is what she tells unless the guy is a private detective or has been in a social circle.

udolipixie says:
Sat, 10th Mar 20127:50 am 

"The only way for women to win is to stop going after men for shallow reasons and try to get to know men for their true personalities."

That's unfair since men go after women for shallow reasons then get to know her true personality as most men approach by physical attraction.

Then again most guys want to get a woman who is far more attractive than him or at the least a bit more attractive. That is the guy's ideal where he gets the attractive girl who'll overlook his looks based on his personality something he wouldn't do in return.

udolipixie says:
Sat, 10th Mar 20128:26 am 

Beta males would not love a woman like she want to be loved.

Most beta males are angry bitter and filled of hatred and resentment for women not doling them out sex for being nice.

Beta males tend to degrade and insult women far more harshly and often then they claim alphas and jerks do.

Chivalry should be dead it's amusing to think that basic decency has to be some special treatment for women rather then being decent to women because they are human like you would other humans.

udolipixie says:
Sat, 10th Mar 20129:31 am 

These are the well liked comments on here:
"women deserve to be raped"
"Women should be used and abused."
"All snakes with tits"
"The fact remains that women are absolute dogs and deserve to be treated as such."
"oh look the fat whore is mad because she realized all women really are whores"

I find this hilarious because those who most likely posted & liked these comment are the same guys who claim:
they are beta males
nice guys
women only like jerks

No it's not their bitter hate filled attitude towards women and most likely lacking looks it's because they're too nice. LMAO XD

This is what they believe: "This is the reason why I'm single. There are too many damn shallow women out there. They will only take a guy if he's hot or if he's rich."

Despite the fact that plenty of ugly/average and middle/lower class men are taken. Seems like for these guys it's more of a the women you want just don't want you.

Always amusing how men tend to think the majority of men are good & a minuscule minority is bad while the majority of women are bad and a minuscule minority are good.

While claiming that women are the ones who claim the female gender is mostly good & the male gender is mostly bad.

Karl says:
Tue, 13th Mar 201212:16 pm 

Charlotte Allen happens to be right. Men and women were happier back when marriages lasted, and it was a man's duty to support the family. Virginity before marriage was a more popular idea back then, too. Women are not men in women's bodies. Something about the psychology of a woman working outside the home with a boss and then having her husband to deal with at home is a mix that leads to disaster. Something about a woman's psychology diminishes her ability to bond with another man once she gives up her virginity, too. Feminism was a Marxist movement designed to ruin Western Civilization. Women were too eager to let the Frankfurt School manipulate them into accepting the garbage that they had been oppressed and needed liberating. Now they can't find their way back to the happier ways of previous generations, and it's their own fault. All that anti man garbage has been written into laws and policies on affirmative action, sexual harassment , discrimination, etc. You women want more alpha males, more manly men? Tough! You campaigned to have them outlawed, discriminated against in employment, and ground under your heels, and so now neither you nor men are happy.

Karl says:
Tue, 13th Mar 20122:17 pm 

Going after a woman for her physical attractiveness and then getting to know her is not being shallow. That's nature. A woman's reproductive health shines through in her youthful good looks. A man's looks are not as important because he was not designed to bear children. Male sexuality is not going to change to have men seeking fat, ugly, and old women simply because someone deems it shallow to do otherwise. While it's true that an attractive woman can be unsuitable or undesirable because of her psychological issues, physical unattractiveness in a woman is rightly perceived by most men as an insurmountable problem.

how right says:
Tue, 13th Mar 20123:16 pm 

most of the women out there, are certainly the best of what they can do. that is, being the filthy whores that they always will be.

udolipixie says:
Tue, 13th Mar 20124:58 pm 

A woman going after a man for his physical attractiveness and then getting to know him is not being shallow either.

That's nature.

Women are less visual than men. Not blind.

Both genders reproductive health shines though in their youthful good looks. Studies have shown that youth is the healthiest for both genders to procreate and that attractiveness often equates to healthy for both genders.

A man's looks are as important depending on how much the woman places it. After all to bear said man's children she has have sex with him and most women want physical arousal not to fake it or play starfish/dead fish for a guy when they're having sex.

Seems like you want men to be shallow & call it that but nature but deny women that same nature.

Then again it's typical of guys to want to pick by attraction but call women shallow for doing the same.

udolipixie says:
Tue, 13th Mar 20125:04 pm 

"Men and women were happier back when marriages lasted, and it was a man's duty to support the family"
What statistics and studies do you have to back up that claim?

Have you talked to women & men who lived during those times?

Of the women I've talked to most were certainly not happy having to depend on someone else for their especially in a time where women had less rights, marital rape was not illegal and domestic violence was swept under the rug in most cases.

"Something about the psychology of a woman working outside the home with a boss and then having her husband to deal with at home is a mix that leads to disaster."
What studies/statistics do you have to back up this claim?

What seems to be a disaster is households where women are financial contributors but expected to do most of the household/childcare work because they own a vagina.

"Something about a woman's psychology diminishes her ability to bond with another man once she gives up her virginity, too. "
What studies/statistics do you have to back up this claim?

" Women were too eager to let the Frankfurt School manipulate them into accepting the garbage that they had been oppressed and needed liberating"
What's garbage about the fact that women had less education opportunities than men,, less rights, and couldn't vote?

Check history women were oppressed. So were men. So were blacks. Pretty much everyone has been oppressed throughout history.

"All that anti man garbage has been written into laws and policies on affirmative action, sexual harassment , discrimination, etc."
Please cite these anti-man laws and policies on sexual harassment.

Geoffrey says:
Tue, 13th Mar 20126:54 pm 

How do you know that those these commenters are the same… seems like a big generalization. I guess its ok when you do it……

Geoffrey says:
Tue, 13th Mar 20126:57 pm 

udolipixie, your lack of empathy for a mans issues and high empathy for the exact situation except for that of a women shows your true colors. Your just another misandrist, but no worries, misandry is accepted here in the west.

udolipixie says:
Tue, 13th Mar 20127:13 pm 

Explain how it's a lack of empathy to think a woman or man going after their partner for attraction is not shallow but nature and should be accepted equally?

Show me where I lacked empathy for men & had high empathy for women.

When my premise was that both genders should be free to pursue attraction then personality rather than men pursue attraction then personality & women only pursue personality.

Exactly where's the man hate in that both genders should be able to pursue physical attraction not just the male gender?

Turnaround time:
Geoffrey, your lack of empathy for a woman's issues and high empathy for the exact situation except for that of a man shows your true colors. Your just another misogynist, but no worries, misogyny is accepted here in the west.

Karl says:
Tue, 13th Mar 20127:17 pm 

I will not even bother answering questions from such an anti.

udolipixie says:
Tue, 13th Mar 20127:17 pm 

Do you lack reading comprehension? Or were you just so set on attempting a snide that you overlooked the following:
"I find this hilarious because those who most likely posted & liked these comment are the same guys who claim"

Stating that it's most likely these guys is not claiming that I know that the commenters are the same.

Go to any nice guy site. forum, blog, or chatroom and you'll see the same and very similiar comments posted by self-claimed betas, nice guys, and guys stating women only like jerks.

Karl says:
Tue, 13th Mar 20127:30 pm 

I may be naive, but I'm not ready to say that womanhood is so hopeless that most of them will always be filthy whores. I do acknowledge that things are very bad. Women have been indoctrinated with tons of man-hate and the notion that they can screw like men without consequences. All of that was and intentional campaign by the Left to destroy Western Civilization.

Karl says:
Tue, 13th Mar 20127:31 pm 

"an" — so my typing has mistakes sometimes. There should be an "edit" button with these posts.

Karl says:
Tue, 13th Mar 20127:55 pm 

"Misandrist" is putting it too politely for one such as her. She's an outright ball crusher. Unfortunately her kind is quite common, and more than merely accepted here in the West, constitutes a "protected group" with rights and privileges greater than those of men. Likely she lost her virginity too easily to Mr. Wrong and only then discovered what a huge irreversible mistake that was and so now is bitter for life.

Geoffrey says:
Tue, 13th Mar 201210:33 pm 

I try not to concentrate on the negative, others like yourself bathe in it and wonder why your alone and bitter.

P.S I was right in my comment, its just that your logic is illogical

Karl says:
Tue, 13th Mar 201211:25 pm 

Marc, you are exactly right. I wholeheartedly agree. Thank you so much for your excellent post.

udolipixie says:
Wed, 14th Mar 20121:49 am 

Seems you do lack reading comprehension if you believe that P.S.

Or you're unable to admit your read what you wanted not what was there.

How are you not concentrating on the negative if you actually responded to a comment that you thought was negative and having a dialog with said person o.O

udolipixie says:
Wed, 14th Mar 20121:53 am 

Where's the ball crusher in that it's unfair to state that men get to pursue attraction then personality but women should pursue personality?

Where's the ball crusher in that both genders should be able to pursue attraction?

Or do you throw out terms when you're unable to be rational?

Cute these rights & privileges greater than those of men that the female gender has.

You're likely is incorrect. I'm still a virgin and planning on staying that way while in America as nice guy mindset and Moravec, Karl, and Geoffrey seem to be the quality of men in America.

So evading rational and ad hominems are your tactic when you can't be rational?

Tell me what's so misandrist & ball crushing about that both genders should be free to pursue attraction then personality rather than only the male gender?

udolipixie says:
Wed, 14th Mar 20121:56 am 

Should be "Cite these rights & privileges greater than those of men that the female gender has. "
The only one I know of is that women aren't enlisted in the draft and that's not for a lack of trying as many pro-draft feminist and humanist groups have tried to do so and were declined by the military

Still amusing that it's misandrist & ball crushing suggesting:
it's unfair that men are following nature to pursue attraction then personality but women are shallow.
both genders should feel free to pursue attraction then personality not just the male gender

udolipixie says:
Wed, 14th Mar 20122:12 am 

Seems more like you won't bother because your statements about how men & women were happier back then, women's psychology, and that it's garbage that women were oppressed and needed liberation garbage without statistics or studies.

Nice evasion.

udolipixie says:
Wed, 14th Mar 20122:14 am 

Men are sought after depending on their social status, wealth, attractiveness, and/or how interesting/fun to be around they are.

Plenty of hot guys are pursued. The guys who tend to be sluts are highly sought after.

Jacques says:
Wed, 14th Mar 20124:30 pm 

In other words, men are sought after based on social class. Women are sought after based on whether they have a heartbeat. The is no slut double standard because women aren't shamed for being sluts, or not being sluts, because men don't actually care if you're a slut.

Exactly says:
Wed, 14th Mar 20125:09 pm 

Omg so true… SO SO TRUE… LOL. Thank you! I know so many guys like this… and I just dumped one of those poor suckers. He just tied the knot and with a girl he knows won't leave him. He is deeply insecure. He also loves sex and has a porn addiction. The wife won't give him enough and certainly not the things he REALLY likes to do and craves. I don't know who I feel most sorry for… him or her…. cause he isn't focused on pleasing the female, that's for sure (so I bet SHE isn't having the best sex either).

I cannot deal with this strange and backward thinking that some men have. I am off for greener pastures with a guy who actually is READY for an intelligent woman like me who believes amazing sex is possible within a relationship! Yes for life!! I'll be a hot 80-year-old too! What? A sexually active 100-year old.

Guys like the ones you describe are what make girls actually not want to commit to men anymore and make girls want to just 'sample' and 'shop around' some more. I mean there has GOT to be something better out there for us females. Don't give up hope!

Exactly says:
Wed, 14th Mar 20125:10 pm 

My reply was to Ambrosia's comment

Exactly says:
Wed, 14th Mar 20125:19 pm 

I STILL can't believe how well you hit the nailo on the head as I have SEEN THIS with my own eyes and I know guys JUST LIKE THIS. ANd they are very, very if not extremely frustrated. I think to some extent, guys like this are sick in the head and there is also something between being a 'chaste girl' and a 'slut'. I would say some guys worry when they ahve a girl who is too attractive or just comfortable with her sexuality to where she NATURALLY ATTRACTS many guys. This is not a slut, but the deeply insecure males, whether alpha or not, would find that threatening, the idea that his beloved would run off with 'someone better, bigger or whatever'. Sexism to the core. This is the reason baby girls in Africa get circumsized and the reason they used to bind the feet of women in China as a beauty ideal (and a way to rpevent them to ever walk away!).

Men… please try to just better yourselves as human beings and you will see that girls WILL be attracted to you and stay with you IF YOU TREAT THEM WELL. It ain't rocket science.

Exactly says:
Wed, 14th Mar 20125:55 pm 

well don't u sound charming and desirable.

Exactly says:
Wed, 14th Mar 20125:56 pm 

(my reply was to Beast)

udolipixie says:
Wed, 14th Mar 20126:09 pm 

I was quite confused on the support on Moverac's question.

It's an unfair to stipulation for women not be shallow and show pursue personality as men tend to approach by attraction thus are shallow pursuing for shallow reasons then considering personality.

So both genders should feel free to pursue attraction then personality rather than just the male gender.

The responses:
1. it's not shallow but nature for men to pursue attraction
2. women's youth/beauty are fertility/health indicators
3. mens appearance isn't important on bearing children as a woman's is.

My responses:
1. it's also nature for women as most people want attraction women are less visual not blind
2. youth/beauty are fertility/health indicators to both genders as most equate attractive and young to mean fertile and healthy
3. a man's appearance is as important as to bear such children a woman would have to have sex and most women want sexual attraction/arousal not to fake it or play starfish/dead fish.
* really unsure on the 3rd one as the man makes the genetic material of the children as well. Reverting back to most equating youth/beauty to fertile/healthy his appearance may infer bad quality genes. Some gals even think short, fat, and/or bald guys mean bad genes *

Apparently to all commenters that's misandrist, showing low empathy for mens issues but high empathy for women in the same situation, and being a ball buster.
Thought both genders should be able to pursue attraction is equal empathy for the same situation. Apparently not.
Thought it's nature when men do it but shallow when women do it is low empathy for one gender but high empathy for the other in the same scenario. Apparently not.

No responses to my requests on how it's misandrist, showing low empathy for mens issues but high empathy for women in the same situation, or being a ball buster.
Other than my statements are an indicator that I'm not a virgin and lost it to some alpha and regret it.

Any takers answering on it's those those things? Not the indicator as I'm a virgin and if the commenters mindset are prevalent in America I'm staying that way while in America.
I've asked guy friends they couldn't see it then again these guys don't seem to hold as much venom as the male commenters on here hold for women and most likely would be considered alphas or the rumored 10% that 90% of women are sleeping with.

Exactly says:
Wed, 14th Mar 20126:17 pm 

Emmm yeah. We don't like 'jerks'. At all. What we also don't like is being labeled as a 'slut' when there is absolutely no reason for that. OK I get it, some women (I don't know any of them) might have slept with a LOT more males than I have and perhaps could be called 'promiscuous'. But just because a girl looks good and is comfortable with her sexuality and a stylish dresser, does not mean she is a slut. Just because she gives you an erection, does not mean she is a slut. Some of the sluttiest LOOKING girls I know are the most chaste in terms of sexual experience. But, I am sure these could be the exception, I don't know. You have to get better at recognising the good women. Just because other girls have jumped your bones does not mean EVERY good looking girl is like that. SO stop treating the picky, snobbish Alpha females as sluts! Yes we love sex, but will not sleep with you just like that.
At least the alpha males are charmers who know just what to say to girls to make them feel desired. Of course when they are among other men, they talk sh*t about women, pretending that's what they do to women too. THEY DO NOT. Alpha males are usually the pleasers and the charmers that make girls feel respected. Until they figure out the guy was just after one thing. The beta males don't understand that the alpha's purposely deflect and distract the beta's by ruining even more of their 'game' by pretending they act like jerks around women. They don't! LOL. Most of the time, after they give us a headache, we are left with some cool memories.
Beta guys are like guys who expect to date a model when they don't make an effort to exercise or work on their own value and what they would have to offer. They are delusional and victims of their own wishful thinking and laziness. Just like the fat girls who expect to date hot guys. Fair is fair… you work out>> you look good. You surround yourself with awesome people and you study interesting things and develop some autonomous ideas, creativity…. hey your personality might become interesting.
The problem is that some men will make some women into 'sluts' in their heads, based on appearance or something really superficial. It has been said before, but unless you hire a detective or something, you cannot know the sexual history of a person.

And.. just because she LOVES SEX does not mean she sleeps with just anyone. More power to the women that do though! I would love to be them and not have that many standards. I would certainly get laid more often. Maybe they are the girls that truly get it… as the rest of us are still looking for that kinky yet sweet male to make our own.

I met a male a few weeks ago and was instantly attracted to him. This rarely happens. My first thought was "OMG ask him to come to your room", but he invited me to sit down for a chat. HIS first thought was "OMG why isn't she inviting me to her room?". Yeah… he told me that later that day. We ended up fondling and cuddling a bit and I was the one to drop the STD bomb on him, saying… You know, have u been tested lately? Cause I don't sleep with anyone unless they are tested. I swear he must have been the first ever male to get that thrown at him at it DID throw him off!! In hindsight, I guess I was treating him like a possible man-slut who, jusding from his height and good looks, musty have had numerous girls throw themselves at him. I am not naive… If a snob like me gets turned on within 5 seconds of seeing a guy, he is a hunk. I ended up not sleeping with him. Don't worry… we found a creative a fun way to 'relieve the pressure'… I mean I have standards, but I am not cruel!
That's one of the moments I wished I was a slut cause I am sure the life-long STD would have been well worth it. LOL… seriously… it would have been.

So anyway….what on earth IS a slut????

Exactly says:
Wed, 14th Mar 20126:43 pm 

you're naive. look at all the practices in history and in other culture to make sure beta's can procreate. I am sure you are educated enought to know of these? No? Female circumcision, female foot binding, neck rings, MARRIAGE (whether arranged or not), RELIGION (oh yes name ONE currently active religion where females actually have some power or value. ETC.!! People WAKE UP!
Double standard: so it's not OK for us girls to like handsome charmers who can kick your butts and protect us and who have good sizes tools (hey they might make for some pretty offspring, since that's so darn important it seems)… but it's apparently OK for the guys to drool over good looking women with FAKE BREASTS. Uh yeah…

Exactly says:
Wed, 14th Mar 20126:44 pm 

Also, you don't understand a wholoe lot about genes and evolution. I suggest reading some books. Google what that means.

Exactly says:
Wed, 14th Mar 20126:50 pm 

I agree with you… finally a guy who gets it. I proclaim u to be Alpha male… as I am into intelligence!! I hope you DO win what you deserve.

Exactly says:
Wed, 14th Mar 20126:52 pm 

Ambrosia, you are comverting me to a lesbian. I must say you are brilliant.

Exactly says:
Wed, 14th Mar 20126:54 pm 

"coNverting'

And how funny to see a male make a demeaning comment the minute a woman shows her superior intelligence. That just demonstrates one of the points Ambrosia was making… the control issue. Keep trying guys, us girls aren't buying it anymore. Step up your games.

Exactly says:
Wed, 14th Mar 20127:01 pm 

Actually, I mainly agree to your explanation about women biologically seeking quality and the bitterness of males regarding the dating disadvantage. I must say I agree with Ambrosia much more.

Exactly says:
Wed, 14th Mar 20127:22 pm 

we don't like guys that have chlamydia either. Someone had it first. Stop being a hypocrite.

Exactly says:
Wed, 14th Mar 20127:26 pm 

I am one of those 'good women' and your post is extremely offensive to me. And stop attacking lesbians, they have nothing to do with this discussion.

"i would love to meet a nice virgin and settle with her. "

Yeah… and I want to be the Queen of England. What makes you think this virgin would want you? What DO you have to offer. Males and females BOTH look at what the other has to offer. SO WHAT if women do this too? You're making yourself sound like some victim. It takes 2 to tango.

Exactly says:
Wed, 14th Mar 20127:28 pm 

If it was so hard for males to have things, then why do SO MANY males have STD's?

Exactly says:
Wed, 14th Mar 20127:39 pm 

Boo hoo go cry me a river. Try a sex change and see if it's better on the pother side. You'll be running away crying.

Oh yeah and I'm European. I will NEVER date an American guy ever again.

Exactly says:
Wed, 14th Mar 20127:39 pm 

'other side'

Exactly says:
Wed, 14th Mar 20127:41 pm 

Guys, name ONE guy you know that you would date if u were a female (other than yourselves). Yeah…. didn't think so.

Exactly says:
Wed, 14th Mar 20127:45 pm 

"I want the old age back, where women ran around in fear and attached themselves to good guys who protected them."

There is still no actual proof that this is actually what happened 'in the old days', but your personal fantasies are quite amusing to more probing minds. Mind you, women most likely had their own ways to protect themselves too as well as strong tribes around them.

Stop whining about not being the guy that hot girls choose. Stop whining about your dick not being big enough. Go watch some porn and leave us alone with your stupidity.

Exactly says:
Wed, 14th Mar 20127:48 pm 

Ha ha more than one woman played you for a fool! Classic! Gotta remember to THINK when it is erect. oh wait… u can't.

udolipixie says:
Wed, 14th Mar 20127:54 pm 

" want the old age back, where women ran around in fear and attached themselves to good guys who protected them. "
Exactly how do you know the times were like that? Do you have any statistics and studies? Have you talked to women & men who lived during those times?

Of the women I've talked to most were certainly not happy having to depend on someone else for their survival.

How good do you think the men were in a time where women had less rights, were seen as less, marital rape was not illegal and domestic violence was swept under the rug in most cases?

"And women wonder why chivalry is dead? Because women treat men like shit!"
I though chivalry was dead because most men seem to equate chivalry with being nice to women. Sort of insulting as if women aren't humans so basic human decency isn't expected so they must have a special treatment.

FYI generally men treat women like shit as well as people treat people like shit often. Some people do and some people don't but generally it's a shit fest.

"They want everything from us men and give nothing back."
Exactly what do you think women want and what do you think men offer to women that women aren't returning?

"I apparently never knew about, in the early 20s, where women just whore themselves out for the fun of it and became primates instead of passionate, compassionate and emotional beings capable of sharing something special exclusively with someone special. "
Really did you know that in the early 20s some men just whore themselves out for the fun or it. Or want to be whores? Do you think men engaging in such behavior are primates instead of passionate, compassionate and emotional beings capable of sharing something special exclusively with someone special.

Or do you think men should be able to pursue sex for the fun of it but when a woman does it's whoring herself out rather than sharing something special exclusively?

Exactly says:
Wed, 14th Mar 20127:56 pm 

Whatever, I am still not f*cking YOU.

udolipixie says:
Wed, 14th Mar 20128:00 pm 

I'm quite amused at this:
"I apparently never knew about, in the early 20s, where women just whore themselves out for the fun of it and became primates instead of passionate, compassionate and emotional beings capable of sharing something special exclusively with someone special. "
Now many guys attest to that men naturally do or want to spread their seed with a variety of women.
Did it never once occur to guys that if you can see the appeal in having sex with various partners that women may as well. That some women enjoy sex and want to enjoy sex with guys outside of a relationship?

Or is men doing it just nature but a woman doing it is whoring herself out and being a primate so it was never given anything but a fleeting thought that was quickly put down with an insult?

Exactly says:
Wed, 14th Mar 20128:03 pm 

Your ignorance hurts my brain… not even going to begin to comment on this. I am sure all is great in your little bubble and you should stay on your high horse where you can feel worthwhile. Women like you make it harder for other equally fantastic women who CHOOSE OTHER THINGS FOR GREAT REASONS TOO.

And yeah.. little too much info on the boring marital 'love making'.

Exactly says:
Wed, 14th Mar 20128:12 pm 

Or you just don't have what they want…

Exactly says:
Wed, 14th Mar 20128:16 pm 

You REALLY want some religious 'god-fearing' programmed chick to be your wife? Seriously? Is it because at the core of Christianity lies undeniable partiarchy and female submission the the male? Be honest now.

Megan says:
Wed, 14th Mar 20128:19 pm 

Let me get this right…they don't want you so they must have been badly abused lol

Exactly says:
Wed, 14th Mar 20128:20 pm 

Ha ha ha someone isn't getting any. Go watch some porn.

Terry says:
Wed, 14th Mar 20128:26 pm 

Is that your way of implying that alpha is short for whore?

Megan says:
Wed, 14th Mar 20128:30 pm 

hey, we women learned all that from the best–men!

Jeff says:
Wed, 14th Mar 20128:58 pm 

The biggest problem with your logic is that you and many other women believe men think and act in this way. I nor my friends have ever gone whoring out. What I have seen on spring break makes me never want to get married, and I probably won't and will live a much happier life for it.

Karl says:
Wed, 14th Mar 201211:12 pm 

I stand by what I've said before on here. Women were not designed by God to screw like men. When a woman does, she is a slut, "damaged goods," loose woman, strumpet, trollop, whore, etc. Not only does a slut not have the psychological ability to form a strong bond with one man as does a virgin, but she is more likely to have diseases and spread them to her sexual partners. "Serial monogamy" and "recycled virgin" are just euphemisms to try to put a less negative spin on slutty behavior. A slut by any other name is still a slut.

Research studies? Where are yours? I speak from experience, observations, personal accounts of others, and logical deductions. One doesn't need to experience having a 900 pound cow on their lap or a scientific study about it to know that one doesn't want to have a 900 pound cow on their lap. Similarly, a man doesn't need to marry a filthy slut or experience a divorce in which a woman with the aid of a crooked judiciary decimates his wealth to know that he doesn't want either.

Yes, there were horribly brutal wife-beating and child-abusing men back in the days before man-hating feminism, back when marriages lasted. Fortunately, they were not common, certainly not as common as failed marriages, single-parent households, and live-alones are today. And do we not still have such terrible men in society today? Society is never perfect regardless of the particular period under consideration. What we have today is the loss of wholesomeness, personal integrity, and civility, among other things, from those days of Ozzie and Harriet, Leave it to Beaver, and Father Knows Best of a few decades ago.

udolipixie says:
Thu, 15th Mar 20124:52 am 

There are men who do act this way or wish to act this way.

Hence the defense of the slut double standards, he's a stud, or the spreading seed.

There are men who see the appeal so logically if one could see how men can see the appeal why not women.

udolipixie says:
Thu, 15th Mar 20125:02 am 

You can stand by whatever you wish however it's a bit of reach to claim "a slut not have the psychological ability to form a strong bond with one man " without any factual evidence backed by studies or statistics.

I speak from plenty of experience, observations, an d personal accounts. 123 to be exact.

Many virgin have left their partners because they felt limited and wanted more experience other than their single one.

Many virgins have left their partner because they felt it was unfair that their partner was their the first, only, and last while to them they were one of the many. 305 to be exact.

As for my research studies evolutionary psychology studies that state men are biologically wired to spread their seed.

As for my research studies try any polls by men of who believe the slut double standard and one would see that many men can see the appeal in sleeping with various women.

As for my research try looking at society which applauds and encourages men to sleep around.

Note how I'm not claiming a fact or something psychologically as you are.

I'm stating
1. "Now many guys attest to that men naturally do or want to spread their seed with a variety of women. "

That's backed by the many believers of the slut double standard and evolutionary psychology take a look at some of he male commenters on here and you'll see statements showing that.

2. "Did it never once occur to guys that if you can see the appeal in having sex with various partners that women may as well. That some women enjoy sex and want to enjoy sex with guys outside of a relationship? "
Take a look again at some of the male commenters on here with the lock/key and he's a stud and it's clear that some men can see the appeal in sleeping with various women so it stands to reason why not women can see th e appeal in that.

udolipixie says:
Thu, 15th Mar 20125:08 am 

Quite interesting that you comment on my answer when you evaded all my questions on your claims with:
"I will not even bother answering questions from such an anti."

Recall:
"Men and women were happier back when marriages lasted, and it was a man's duty to support the family"
What statistics and studies do you have to back up that claim?

Have you talked to women & men who lived during those times?

Of the women I've talked to most were certainly not happy having to depend on someone else for their especially in a time where women had less rights, marital rape was not illegal and domestic violence was swept under the rug in most cases.

"Something about the psychology of a woman working outside the home with a boss and then having her husband to deal with at home is a mix that leads to disaster."
What studies/statistics do you have to back up this claim?

What seems to be a disaster is households where women are financial contributors but expected to do most of the household/childcare work because they own a vagina.

"Something about a woman's psychology diminishes her ability to bond with another man once she gives up her virginity, too. "
What studies/statistics do you have to back up this claim?

" Women were too eager to let the Frankfurt School manipulate them into accepting the garbage that they had been oppressed and needed liberating"
What's garbage about the fact that women had less education opportunities than men,, less rights, and couldn't vote?

Check history women were oppressed. So were men. So were blacks. Pretty much everyone has been oppressed throughout history.

"All that anti man garbage has been written into laws and policies on affirmative action, sexual harassment , discrimination, etc."
Please cite these anti-man laws and policies on sexual harassment.

udolipixie says:
Thu, 15th Mar 20125:14 am 

How do you know that they were not common? Statistics, studies, talking to men & women during those times?

I've talked to 650 women & 400 men and it doesn't seem like it common coming from those talks. Those men weren't the norm but they sure weren't some minuscule minority.

Are you aware how many marriages from those times would have been failed if women were able to divorce without the societal stigma and fear of financial survival? Of the 650 women I've talked to it's 450 that would have divorced.

Yeah we still have such terrible men in society today however times are different- women no longer have less rights, marital rape is illegal, domestic violence isn't as swept under the rug, and women no longer have to marry a man for their financial survival.

Seems you're stuck on male dominance in times where women were less than, had less rights, and less protection from abuse and rape by men.

I know plenty of wholesome people.

I know plenty of men in relationships similar to Leave It To Beaver where the man works and the woman takes care of the home. The difference is that he sees her as an equal, she doesn't have less rights, and there are the sex/abuse laws of today.

udolipixie says:
Thu, 15th Mar 20125:18 am 

Please show men where I state men act this way?

I stated "Now many guys attest to that men naturally do or want to spread their seed with a variety of women. "

That's just thinking not acting.

That's true as many men believe in the slut double standard as fair as men want ot spread their seed and tout evolutionary psychology.

My logic is that many men see the appeal in sleeping around so how come so many are shocked that some women can see the same appeal.

Jeff says:
Thu, 15th Mar 20124:48 pm 

Very few men actually act this way. I'm not saying a women shouldn't be allowed to be a whore. I think a lot of people are arguing about this topic because they just have a different logic of whats going on. My problem with many women is they seem to want it all. You don't see many male whores acting the way they do and then turn around and play the father role. Lets be honest, its easy to tell between a decent guy and some turd frat boy. Many women on the other hand want to spend there spring break between the sheets and then when they have had there fill act like they are virgins and expect a great guy. Its just down right deceitful.

udolipixie says:
Thu, 15th Mar 20127:57 pm 

I wasn't attesting to how many men act this way so I'm unsure why you still bring that up.

Especially right after I've stated that I wasn't and asked you to show me where you got that from/

I was attesting to that many men can see the appeal in having sex with various partners so why it's not that

Unless the status quo is "men doing it just nature but a woman doing it is whoring herself out and being a primate so it was never given anything but a fleeting thought that was quickly put down with an insult?"

udolipixie says:
Thu, 15th Mar 20128:12 pm 

1. "My problem with many women is they seem to want it all."
It's not just women who want it all. Many men do as well.

One common example of men wanting it all is how often men want tob e judged by their personality having women overlook their looks but judge women by looks & personality.

Take a look at the replies on Moverac's question.

I stated it's an unfair to stipulation for women not be shallow and show pursue personality as men tend to approach by attraction thus are shallow pursuing for shallow reasons then considering personality.

So both genders should feel free to pursue attraction then personality rather than just the male gender.

Apparently that's misandrist, showing low empathy for mens issues but high empathy for women in the same situation, and being a ball buster As well as men following attraction isn't shallow but nature.

2. "You don't see many male whores acting the way they do and then turn around and play the father role."
Perhaps you don't.

Different experiences.

Take a look at some commenters on here about how men want to and do have sex with sluts but don't settle down with them. Is that not the same behavior?

Actually I don't tend to see many men wanting to play the father role at all. However I do see many men attesting it's natural for a guy to be a whore so him later settling down is a non-issue. Whores settling down seems only to be a issue if the whore is female.

3. "Lets be honest, its easy to tell between a decent guy and some turd frat boy. "
Even if it was easy that true there's something called attraction. Most people have more than good for a partner. Some general things are attractive, interesting, and fun to be around.

Now how many good guys do you know that are attractive, interesting, and fun to be around that have trouble getting gals?

4. "Many women on the other hand want to spend there spring break between the sheets and then when they have had there fill act like they are virgins and expect a great guy. Its just down right deceitful."
No different from the mindset that men can be sluts be applauded for it but don't want sluts for gfs/wives .

Many male commenters on here stated the same things that men want and do have sex with sluts but don't settle down with them.

The mindset is that behavior you state is downright deceitful when down by women is generally acceptable in men.

After all not many men who have sex with a gal quickly think less of themselves for it just less of her. They see her as having no to low self-respect and not gf/wife material but make no impressions on their material value.

udolipixie says:
Thu, 15th Mar 20128:13 pm 

Edit:
Even if it was true that it's easy there's something called attraction. Most people have more than good for a partner. Some general things are attractive, interesting, and fun to be around.

udolipixie says:
Fri, 16th Mar 20121:38 am 

Honestly, men today are trash and should just go extinct

udolipixie says:
Fri, 16th Mar 20127:28 am 

That comment was not me.

Karl?

Jeff because you communicate logically so you attempt character defamation?:

Karl says:
Wed, 21st Mar 20124:12 pm 

That's not from me, either, but it fits with the man-hating crap that you spew.

udolipixie says:
Sun, 25th Mar 20128:45 am 

Do tel where's the man hating in that both genders should feel free to pursue attraction than personality?

You keep saying man hating and misandry yet have not shown one quote that states it, suggests it, or implies it.

udolipixie says:
Sun, 25th Mar 20128:55 am 

It's quite amusing how fast and quick a lot of guys throw around misandry and man hating.

Yet no takers on my multiple requests to answer how it's misandry, ball busting, or man hating in:
1. it's unfair to state that men get to pursue attraction then personality but women should pursue personality
2. both genders should be able to pursue attraction the personality

Apparently stating both genders should feel free to pursue attraction is akin to spewing man hating crap and stating "Honestly, men today are trash and should just go extinct." Yet no one can answer why.

Amusing. Seems it's to be the trite "I can have standards to suit my attraction but you can't have standards I don't fit or approve of" and anything stating otherwise of women being able to say no t o me or have their own preferences is misandry, man hating and ball busting.

Karl says:
Sun, 25th Mar 201212:37 pm 

It is simply the matter of the nature of a being. Women are not men in women's bodies, and neither is the converse true. Pigs don't fly because it's not in their nature to fly. Trying to pretend that the whole world can be converted to unisex and still work is ridiculous. Porn sales are overwhelmingly to men because the visual component is a huge part of men's sexuality. Knocking down the differences between men and women to have them both be much the same causes them to lose their appeal to each other, which is exactly what the Cultural Marxists who imposed the man-hating feminist movement on society want.

udolipixie says:
Sun, 25th Mar 20128:05 pm 

That's not the nature of a being as most beings want attraction.

Most human beings are visually attracted and women are less visual not blind.

Pursuing attraction then personality has nothing to do with gender. It has to do with being a human being.

After all in most cases a man approaches by visual attraction and a woman will reject said guy by visual attraction and if he passes that then may reject him for mental attraction.

It doesn't matter than women are not men in women's bodies. Most women want to be attracted to their partner and it's a visual thing unless the guy has even qualities or status/wealth to compensate for that and avert her with a far greater mental attraction as women are more open minded.

Trying to pretend that women pursuing attraction the personality is somehow being like men or ignoring the gender differences is ridiculous.

I'm not knocking down the differences between the genders. What you're doing is taking the gender differences to the extreme taking women are less visual to mean they can't pursue attraction.

Something that misogynists and bitter resentful men who dislike that women have their own preferences and can exclude them or say not to them certainly would want as it means they get to decide what women should want and.

udolipixie says:
Sun, 25th Mar 20128:13 pm 

Quite amusing that you have yet to answer how both genders should feel feel to pursue attraction then personality is man hating, ball busting, spewing man hating crap, or how that can equate to "Honestly, men today are trash and should just go extinct.".

Then again seems you are quite the extremist with your whole refusal of accepting that both genders should feel free to pursue attraction then personality.

It's not that women consider visual attraction less than men and can be averted with mental attraction or status/wealth.

Nope it's the extreme of no visual attraction consideration for women as women are less visual means it's not in their nature to be visually attracted to a person or pursue it.

Something that scientific research, multiple studies, various surveys, women themselves will disagree with, and plenty of men who were rejected for their looks can disagree with.

Amusing.

Truth says:
Tue, 27th Mar 20121:55 pm 

udolipixie, feel free to sleep around and "pursue attraction" as much as you want. As soon as you smarten up and realize that men and women are inherently different and therefore shouldn't be judged using the same standard, it will be too late and your vagina will be too worn out and used up for any decent man to settle with. Have fun whoring around while you're young. Just remember to be nice to those cats.

Truth says:
Tue, 27th Mar 20122:21 pm 

udolipixie, http://www.hookingupsmart.com

learn it. live it. love it.

Truth says:
Tue, 27th Mar 20122:23 pm 

Dear confused girls who need to smarten up and learn about life:
http://www.hookingupsmart.com

Learn it. Live it. Love it.

udolipixie says:
Wed, 28th Mar 20121:14 am 

Feel free to make up as many ASSumptions about me as you want.

As soon as you smarten up and realize I wasn't talking about sleeping around but that both genders should feel free to pursue attraction then personality when selecting a partner.

Then again I think it's too late because you seem to lack reading comprehension and rational reasoning.

Have fun ASSuming , making wild baseless claims, and insulting others.

Just remember to be nice to your fellow suffering betas and nice guys in this pity party that women won't overlook attraction and chose them based on personality while they get to choose attraction & personality.

udolipixie says:
Wed, 28th Mar 20121:21 am 

Dear confused whiner with lacking reading comprehending and rational reasoning.

Do tell how did you get me stating both genders should feel free to pursue attraction then personality when selecting a partner towarrant telling me to have fun sleeping around and that by the time.

Or does your seemingly low mental capacity just start off making wild ASSumptions about others character and sexual history?

Yeah…probably best suited not to make ASSumptions.

I already stated I'm a virgin and if Karl, Jeff, and several other posters are the quality of the average beta guys in America I'm staying that way in America. I wouldn't be surprised if the claims that most women chance a msmall percentage of males going by the posters here.

FYI many gals tend to attest that cats would be a far better loyal, loving, and trustworthy company and partner than the average American male seems to be so of course they're nice to them.

udolipixie says:
Wed, 28th Mar 20121:25 am 

All that trite spews out are teaching on how to sell yourself to the highest bidder and quit e unlikely a bidder you'll genuinely like or be attracted to but at least he'll be there because he likes your youth/beauty and personality.

If a gal wanted to that she could just get into the sugar baby business.

Truth says:
Wed, 28th Mar 20126:40 am 

Dear annoying virgin who borderlines a troll. Go to that site. Read around. You will find your idiotic question answered many times over.

Truth says:
Wed, 28th Mar 20126:43 am 

I highly doubt you've read enough articles on that site to know what it "spews out". Don't make ASSumpstions, little girl, and go learn some reading comprehension skills.

Truth says:
Wed, 28th Mar 20126:46 am 

I'm glad I've struct a nerve.

udolipixie says:
Wed, 28th Mar 201211:36 am 

Struct what nerve?

LMAO XD you've made ASSumptions.

You also seriously lack reading comprehension and rational reasoning.

So care to answer how both genders should pursue attraction the personality equate to your baseless ASSumptions?

Or just more illogical irrational ad hominems and evasions?

udolipixie says:
Wed, 28th Mar 201211:39 am 

Awh how cute you're using my ASSumptions.

Something I first used when you ad hominems and evasions.

I've read that blog.

It's by an ex self proclaimed slut who now goes around spewing trite teaching gals to sell themselves to the highest bidder a bidder that it's highly unlikely they'll genuinely like or be attracted to but at least he'll be there because he likes their youth/beauty and personality.

udolipixie says:
Wed, 28th Mar 201211:40 am 

You're amusing.

So not only do you make wild ASSumptions, evade rationality, you're also using my ASSumptions & you lack reading comprehension bit.

Tell me will you be using my you lack rational reasoning as well? LMAO XD

udolipixie says:
Wed, 28th Mar 201211:46 am 

Borderlines a troll…lmfao

I'm not the one making ad hominems.

I'm no the one making insulting comments on others comments.

I do like how you call troll when faced with rationality. LMAO XD

udolipixie says:
Wed, 28th Mar 201211:48 am 

I've been to that site.

It's by a self proclaimed ex seller advising gals to sell themselves to the highest bidder a bidder they'll highly unlikely genuinely like but genuinely like or be attracted to but at least he'll be there because he likes their youth/beauty and personality sparing them the shame of being a pathetic cat lady.

I guess it's idiotic to think both genders should pursue attraction then personality in a partner.

That would mean some gals would say not to a guy because they didn't find him attractive.
That would mean a guy wouldn't be able to get the gals he finds attractive if she doesn't reciprocate his interest. Those things don't placate men's interest so of course it's idiotic.

By deeming it idiotic would seriously benefit guys after all the gal doesn't even need to be attracted to him as long as he provides and is decent it doesn't matter.

A gal would probably be better off doing the sugar baby bit.

Truth says:
Wed, 28th Mar 20123:57 pm 

Grow up, little girl.

Truth says:
Wed, 28th Mar 20123:59 pm 

You're an idiot. Go learn to read.

udolipixie says:
Wed, 28th Mar 20124:04 pm 

Don't sound too mature yourself.

Amusing you're telling me to grow up when:
you insulted me without provocation
made wild ASSumptions about myself, sexual history, and future

udolipixie says:
Wed, 28th Mar 20124:06 pm 

Don't sound too mature yourself.

I know hot t read.

That blog is not worth reading to me. t's by a self proclaimed ex seller advising gals to sell themselves to the highest bidder they'll highly unlikely genuinely like or be attracted to.

Different opinions. Quite interesting those that disagree with you are idiots who need to learn to read yet you tell me to grow up.

Truth says:
Wed, 28th Mar 20124:32 pm 

Fine. Don't read stuff that will make you smarter. Just go be an idiot like the rest of them.

Karl says:
Wed, 28th Mar 20125:26 pm 

Me, too. I imagine she might be so bitter because she's not getting much interest in her vag because she looks like one of those huge fatties seen at Wal-Mart who look like they would squish you. HaHaHaHa

udolipixie says:
Wed, 28th Mar 20125:38 pm 

Karl you've yet to display any rationality.

Not unsurprising that you jump at ad hominems and insults.

I'm not the one whining about how women should negate their attraction so beta whiners whose looks most likely rule them out can get a chance.

I've got plenty of interest in my vag from hot, equality financially independent, interesting, fun guys. I'm just not that bothered.

To me relationships/marriages are more of a con than a pro for women.

udolipixie says:
Wed, 28th Mar 20125:49 pm 

I have read that stuff.

I know gals that have.

Those gals are how I know about HookingUpSmart. They followed her advice to the letter they even got email discussions with her and she had considered them her success stories.

Most are now divorcing their husbands and making a killing in divorce. After all they weren't attracted to their husbands they just didn't want to be labeled pathetic cat ladies and wanted a secure stable relationship.

The rest are off cheating with guys they are attracted to. Some are even having

Gals I know don't equate gal friends.

I wonder how often she follows up on her success stories. LMAO XD

udolipixie says:
Wed, 28th Mar 20125:50 pm 

You mean make me smarter in the sense of selling myself to the highest bidder.

A bidder I'd be highly unlikely to genuinely like or be attracted to since I'll have to overlook appearance and force myself to grow attraction if at all .

A bidder I'll have to constantly admire, make sure I'm not competing with (), and do equal work with while being treated like a subservient.

A bidder who expects me to overlook his looks and judge him solely on personality aka how nice he is while he judges me on my youth, beauty, and personality.

Since I don't care about societal norms and I'm not interested in selling myself to the highest bidder I likely won't like or be attracted to for a secure relationship. I'll stick with not reading that trite by a self proclaimed ex slut.

Yep I'll go be an idiot and not sell myself to the highest bidder I likely won't like or be attracted to just to have a secure relationship rather than a happy & healthy relationship with a guy I like and am attracted to.

udolipixie says:
Wed, 28th Mar 20125:59 pm 

* edit
Some are even having children with the men they cheat with and claim it's the husbands.

Truth says:
Wed, 28th Mar 20126:31 pm 

Troll on, troll.

Truth says:
Wed, 28th Mar 20126:33 pm 

Good call, Karl. This one is definitely a fatty.

udolipixie says:
Wed, 28th Mar 20127:14 pm 

Unprovoken insults.

Evading logic.

Yet you tell me to grow up LMAO XD

udolipixie says:
Wed, 28th Mar 20127:16 pm 

No troll.

It's amusing.

Well not to their partners.

Truth says:
Wed, 28th Mar 20128:13 pm 

Shut up, fatty.

Karl says:
Wed, 28th Mar 20129:39 pm 

I can't answer for women because I'm not one. I have read survey results of preferences in the past and recall that visual attraction was not high on the list for women.

Women would be wise to look back to the time when society wasn't so dysfunctional, shrug off the leftist indoctrination of feminism, suppress tendencies to be angry hormonal nut jobs, and resume the important roles of being good wives and mothers.

Karl says:
Wed, 28th Mar 201210:03 pm 

Your last sentence about relationships/marriages and women is the problem. It's not just your viewpoint. Many women have that viewpoint. It's one of the major reasons Western Civilization is in decline.

udolipixie says:
Thu, 29th Mar 20127:31 am 

It's only a problem to you.

To many guys relationships/marriages are more of a con than a pro for men.

Many western men have this viewpoint to the extent that there are anti-marriage movements.

I'm not seeing a problem. Those that want relationships/marriage will pursue them and those that don't won't.

udolipixie says:
Thu, 29th Mar 20127:34 am 

Yet you tell me to grow up LMAO XD

I do like your one note

First it's shaming, ad hominems, ASSumptions for pursuing to be a slut

Then it's ad hominems, shaming, ASSumptions for being unattractive

Quite typical of those that like HookgUpSmart

udolipixie says:
Thu, 29th Mar 20127:52 am 

Interesting you state that you can't answer for women because yu're not one

Since you've already done that.

Recall when asked how it's misandry, man hating, ball busting to say both genders should feel free to pursue attraction then personality:
"Women are not men in women's bodies, and neither is the converse true. Pigs don't fly because it's not in their nature to fly. Trying to pretend that the whole world can be converted to unisex and still work is ridiculous."

Interesting how it's not human nature to pursue attraction that the idea of a woman doing such a thing is like pigs flying.

udolipixie says:
Thu, 29th Mar 20127:57 am 

Only similar survey without questionable methodology was in 1990 so yep that was certainly in the past.

Survey results tend to state money, height, confidence, looks, personality, sexual performance. That's pretty high to me as well as pretty similar to what my gal friends and the majority of gals I know pursue.

The minority of gals I know that don't are the ones that read HookingUpSmart. Most of those gals are now divorcing and the rest cheating on their husbands so….

Women would be wise to look at the time now where many bitter, resentful, hateful men claim women as a whole are worth less, gold diggers, sluts, evil, and deserved to be rape.

Women would be wise to look at the time now where many men who don't share the same mindset as the men above say I'm naive but I don't want to think this way about women.

Women would be wise to look at the time now where many bitter, resentful, hateful men what to demand and dictate what women should select in a partner.

Women would be wise to look at the time now where many men want to be able to select a partner they're attracted to and genuinely like while women should only select a guy based on how nice he is.

Women would be wise to look at the time now where many men want a partner who contributes equally in the relationship to treat her like a subservient because she has female genitals and despite doing equal work "women and men aren't equal" aka men are superior and should be wearing the pants.

Women would be wise to look at the time now where many men see themselves as majority good & minority bad while viewing women as majority bad & minority good while being hypocritical and stating that women see men as majority bad & minority good.

Women would be wise to look at the time now where many men who call themselves nice/decent/good quickly degrade and insult women as a whole.

Women would be wise to look at the time now where many men resent and hate that women can say no, have rights, and can be financially dependent thus they don't need to depend on a man for survival.

Women would be wise to look at the time now where many men think it's the woman's role to take care of the house/children but also must be an equal financial contributor yet these same men often say it's women who want to have their cake and eat it too. After all if he was so stuck on gender roles he'd be the sole breadwinner.

Women would be wise to look at the time now and only be a good wife and mother to a man they're physically/sexually attracted to, find interesting, have fun with, who can provide a happy & healthy relationship with love, trust, and communication.

Women would be wise to look at the time now and realize men like that are quite rare as many men will whine and complain about women wanting physical attractiveness and take women are less visual to be women are blind.

udolipixie says:
Thu, 29th Mar 20127:59 am 

If that survey results of preferences in the past applied now I would think there would be far less unattractive guys complaining about how difficult it is to get a partner. As well as far less average guys complaining about how difficult it is to get an average gal as many tend to pursue the attractive guys.

If that survey results of preferences in the past applied now I would think there would be far less theories from men based on their dating experiences of how 80% of women chase 20% of attractive guys.

Karl says:
Thu, 29th Mar 201212:16 pm 

Sentence by sentence:
1.) Not true because if it were, we wouldn't be seeing the declining Europid birthrate problem covered in that vid I posted above. People in 1960 knew their neighbors, but people now don't. Whatever factors are behind those interaction disjunctions are surely contributing to the failure of men and women to successfully bond for the long term. Scholarly research shows that the problem is worse in urban areas.

2.) I probably have to agree with you on that. Something about society today has given rise to relationships/marriages being highly problematic. From a male perspective, women presenting resistance and conflict is not conducive to friendship let alone anything more. Throw physical unattractiveness into the equation, as in obesity, and the chances of bonding are zilch. I also acknowledge that the man-hating feminist movement has socially and politically made men appear weak and effeminate to women.

3.) I can't speak for other occidental men, but it is a fact that The Tribe set out to destroy the nuclear white family, and the feminist movement was one destructive weapon that was used to accomplish that.

4.) You wouldn't see an elephant until it knocked you down if even then. There are very many people, certainly many men, who want relationships/marriages who have been forced into giving up the quest. There is a behavioral phenomenon known as extinction or extinguishment. That is when a behavior that was displayed in pursuit of a positive reward ceases either because insufficient positive reward materialized or negative rewards were received instead. There must be a positive reward or expectation of it for behavior to continue, or that behavior becomes extinct.

udolipixie says:
Thu, 29th Mar 20121:43 pm 

1.) Not true because if it were, we wouldn't be seeing the declining Europid birthrate problem covered in that vid I posted above.
Only right on the not true part.
It's more like:
To you and some others that's a problem.
To me and some others that's not a problem.

To me it's not a problem as most likely those that want relationships/marriage will pursue them and those that don't won't.

Or are you interested in obligating people to dole out sex/relationships in order to solve your problem?

2.) " People in 1960 knew their neighbors, but people now don't. "
That doesn't have much to do with declining birth rate but declining interest in social interaction.

3.) Whatever factors are behind those interaction disjunctions are surely contributing to the failure of men and women to successfully bond for the long term.
Those factors to me most likely being society and it's changes aka selfishness, narcissism, me attitude, entitlement issues of both genders.

4.) Scholarly research shows that the problem is worse in urban areas.
Scholarly research also shows that this was a common trend for non urban areas to be more socially interactive than urban areas.

udolipixie says:
Thu, 29th Mar 20121:54 pm 

5.) "Something about society today has given rise to relationships/marriages being highly problematic."
To me that something is:
bitter, hateful, resentful men.
bitter, hateful, resentful women.
men who want to dictate what women should select in a partner
^males can pursue attraction then personality but females can't
^ wanting a gal who fits your standrds to overlook her standards that rule you out
narcisstic selfish entitled influences in American society

6.) "I also acknowledge that the man-hating feminist movement has socially and politically made men appear weak and effeminate to women. "
I acknowledge that the woman-hating male rights activist movement has socially and politically made men appear as bitter, hateful, resentful men who wish to control women and have them obligated to dole out sex/relationships to men that want it from them.

7.)" it is a fact that The Tribe set out to destroy the nuclear white family, and the feminist movement was one destructive weapon that was used to accomplish that."
Research, studies, statistics, factual aevidence to prove this fact?

8.) " There are very many people, certainly many men, who want relationships/marriages who have been forced into giving up the quest. There is a behavioral phenomenon known as extinction or extinguishment. "
Perhaps it's Darwin at play the survival of the fittest.
Those that want it enough and will do something about it will get it.

10.) That is when a behavior that was displayed in pursuit of a positive reward ceases either because insufficient positive reward materialized or negative rewards were received instead. There must be a positive reward or expectation of it for behavior to continue, or that behavior becomes extinct.
To me in relationships/marriage the positive reward is subjetive.
Having a life partner could be positive to some & negative to some.
Having sex with one person for the rest of your life oculd be positive to some & negative to some.
Having a family could be positive to some & negative to others.

I'd ask what positive reward has ceased to be insufficent positive or negative rewards were rewards in regards to relationships/marriage but I think I already know your answer going by your ad hominems, evading questions that ask for proof of what you claim, evading logic, how quick you are to insult rather than discuss.

Still have yet to answer how it is man hating, ball busting, and misandry to state both genders should feel free to puruse attraction then personality.

Karl says:
Thu, 29th Mar 20123:41 pm 

Sentence by sentence:
2.) You missed my point. That's all part of the larger picture of what has changed, but certainly if people have become more avoidant and/or self-focused, that would lead to the same result, a lower birthrate.

7.) You go into your "studies and research" mode as a form of attack against positions you dislike, but you offer none in support of your outlandish positions. That Marxism is Jewish and so is the Frankfurt School are facts from history. You can start you research by looking up the Frankfurt School of Cultural Marxism and radical feminism. Who were the activist speakers and promoters behind the big feminist demonstrations of a few decades ago? These links will give you some names to look up. Recognize what those names have in common? http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=76422 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m9OO8MDlICc http://frankfurtschool.us/history.htm http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q0TCHuwVZSs

udolipixie says:
Thu, 29th Mar 20123:52 pm 

"You missed my point."
Sort of how you repeatedly missed answering how it is man hating, ball busting, and misandry to state both genders should feel free to pursue attraction then personality.

Sort of how you repeatedly missed citing evidence, studies, statistics for your claims or things you state as facts when asked for them.

As for my outlandish positions.
Do tell what things have I claimed are facts as you have done?

Do tell what outlandish positions have I made as definitive statements about how people psychologically function as you have done?

Do tell what is outlandish about most human beings are visually attracted?

Do tell what is outlandish about and women are less visual not blind?

If you want studies & research about how it's human nature to pursue attraction I can provide that. You have yet to ask for it.
If you want studies & research about how women are less visual not blind I can provide that. You have yet to ask for it

Note the difference:
I ask for things you claim are facts or speak definitively for the general population which you deny and evade.

You haven't asked for any evidence about anything I've stated.

Rather you used ad hominens and shaming language.

Karl says:
Thu, 29th Mar 20127:04 pm 

Aww, I didn't mean to shame you, but heck, if the shoe fits.
You would need a study or research to prove that lawn grass is green or that the fresh dog crap on it stinks. Such things are easily observable and constitute common knowledge in the population. I don't need to ask you for any research about women being less visual than men because that's already in my knowledge base.
Something that's outlandish to me is your position that it's normal or okay for men and women to live relationship-free. I think it's unreasonable that you expect men to fulfill their traditional family provider role in the face of societal engineering that has discriminated against men and stupid economic policies that have hurt both men and women. Women conveniently ignore those changes when being judgmental of men. Your notion that a man's youthful appearance is equally important to reproductive health as is a woman's is ridiculous. It reminds me of the woman I once argued with who insisted that men have a membrane that's homologous to the female hymen that breaks during first intercourse. I finally gave up and agreed with her just to get her to shut up. Marc's post below is quite correct about men not wanting pushy powerful women. You seem to make the case that today's independent masculine woman is okay. It's not okay for the reasons I've stated elsewhere. It's dysfunctional, cold, and sterile. A new equilibrium has been found in which there is more social isolation, failed relationships/marriages, and fewer white babies, but that doesn't mean that it's good or normal.

Casting everything else aside, the reasons women are eschewing men are frivolous in comparison to their serious long term consequences. The children not raised in a wholesome two-parent household have a bad model for their own lives. The potential parents who don't have children end their bloodline forever. They've failed all in their line who lived before them going back thousands of years. The biological definition of an inefficient organism is one that does not reproduce.

Karl says:
Fri, 30th Mar 201212:12 am 

and so where did my embedded vid go? That makes my point about The Tribe suppressing the truth. They want to monopolize mind control and absolutely hate it when the truth shows up where others might see it. The truth is "offensive" according to them.

Karl says:
Fri, 30th Mar 20121:34 am 

It's back now, but it was gone for a while.

udolipixie says:
Fri, 30th Mar 20128:29 am 

1.) Something that's outlandish to me is your position that it's normal or okay for men and women to live relationship-free.

I didn't state it was normal.

I stated it was okay to me and it's becoming increasingly common in areas. Note the keywords "to me" as and increasingly common doesn't automatically mean normal.

To me you're not obligated to be in a relationship if you don't want one so if you don't want a relationship you don't have to have one

What's outlandish about finding a person's personal choice which is not ilelgal or harms children/animals okay?

2.) I think it's unreasonable that you expect men to fulfill their traditional family provider role in the face of societal engineering that has discriminated against men and stupid economic policies that have hurt both men and women.
That's a lie.

Show me where I stated I expect me to fulfill their traditional family provider role.

That's right you won't be able to.

I haven't stated anything that I expect men to do.

In fact when I stated I think both genders should feel free to pursue attraction then personality that wasn't a "I expect you to do this" it's a "feel free to do this".

3.) Women conveniently ignore those changes when being judgmental of men. Your notion that a man's youthful appearance is equally important to reproductive health as is a woman's is ridiculous.
It's not a lie according to human biology.
Most humans associate youth to fertility and beauty.
Both genders reproductive health shines though in their youthful good looks. Studies have shown that youth is the healthiest for both genders to procreate and that attractiveness often equates to healthy for both genders.
It's only ridiculous to you as you may have the notion that because a man can produce sperm it means it's healthy. Try looking up older male linked disorders, sperm quality and quanitty affected by aging, and sperm quality decrease after 23. The autism increase is due to aging men.

4.) You seem to make the case that today's independent masculine woman is okay. It's not okay for the reasons I've stated elsewhere. It's dysfunctional, cold, and sterile
It's okay to me as I thnk if it's not illega or hurting animals/children you can have whatever persoanlit yyou wish.
As well as your views on independence and what makes a woman masculine is subjective.

5.) Casting everything else aside, the reasons women are eschewing men are frivolous in comparison to their serious long term consequences.
Yes because cheating, out of wedlock children, mistreese, domestic abuse, and not being in love or loving your partner are frivolous reasons. LMAO XD

6.) The children not raised in a wholesome two-parent household have a bad model for their own lives.
Keywords wholesome. Studies have shown a two parent household is damaging to the child if the partners don't have a happy & healthy relationship or make a show of having one.

udolipixie says:
Fri, 30th Mar 20128:38 am 

So again do tell what outlandish positions have I made?

Things I've stated were:
1.)
me: both genders should feel free to pursue attraction then personality
you: that's misandrist, man hating, and ball busting
…still no answer on how it's any of the things you claimed

2.)
me: women are less visual not blind
you: that's not in the nature of the being as women aren't men in women's bodies. Pigs don't fly because it's not in their nature to fly."
…yet now you claim what i said was common knowledge

3.)
me: it's okay if people don't want relationships as they aren't obligated to be in one.
you: emotive rant made up of "facts" and definitive statements about psychology without evidence
….if you think it's outlandish to be okay with people not wanting relationships okay then different opinions.

So that's 2 outlandish positions #1 & #3.

Yet still no answer on how both genders should feel free to pursue attraction is misandrist, man hating, and ball busting as you claimed.

jamesey G says:
Tue, 3rd Apr 20125:15 am 

does udolipixie not get it? right and wrong doesn't matter….it's like argueing if it's right or wrong that women like money or tall guys, it's just a fact of life. Men don't like sluts and it will act on it by not marrying them…simple. conform to their needs or don't it's your choice. It's about maximising opportunity and utility, more experienced women are a much greater divorce risk for instance….generally younger+less experienced is just…BETTER.

a woman might not be pleased with a man that has wasted the last ten years doing drugs and lazing around not getting money or house, but a man will not be pleased with a woman who wasted the last 10 years being impregnated by many men, or even simulating such. pills and condoms are not real in the DNA or the ether of the mind. all a man will see is a slut.

what a man has that is valuable are his time, his energies, and skills. what a woman has is what is between her legs. She should use it wisely. The biggest sluts are looked upon as equivalent to the male bum, hobo or crackhead, however they try and dress up their activities or proper they want to act now….but while theres still a slim chance for the hobo or crackhead to go straight/clean or even make it big…..A SLUT IS ALWAYS A SLUT. A foolish or decieved man simply may not know it…

jamesey G says:
Tue, 3rd Apr 20125:46 am 

actually pretty much every STD out there is more prevalent in females than males, some up to twice the frequency….look up "hypergamy". one man can mate many women, it's more reality for one man to mate all women than a woman to mate with all men. So one man with an STD is more likely to infect many women than a woman to infect many men….by her nature she is probably only sleeping with guys that already have the STD….all men cannot be blamed for the actions of one man….but if all women sleep with that man, or find him attractive….they can be blamed for that….women like studs and players didn't you know?

udolipixie says:
Tue, 3rd Apr 20121:40 pm 

You seem not to get it.

I wasn't talking about men liking sluts or not liking sluts.

I was talking about both genders should feel free to pursue attraction then personality in a partner rather than just men.

The only slut bit I stated was that it's amusing that so many guys are shocked because if guys can see the appeal if sleeping with lots of gals why are they shocked that some gals may see the appeal in sleeping with lots of guys. Yet nothing about men liking or disliking sluts in there.

That's some seriously lack of reading comprehension you got there..

A slut may always be a slut but the man may never know. LMAO XD

There's vaginal tightening surgery and hymen reconstruction surgery. I know plenty of gals who've gotten new hymens after slutting about.
Gals I know does not equate gal friends.

Truth says:
Tue, 3rd Apr 20121:44 pm 

These stupid sluts will never get it. Just let them have their fun now then spend the rest of their lives with cats. It's already happening according to marriage and childbirth statistics.

udolipixie says:
Tue, 3rd Apr 20121:48 pm 

They're most likely not nice.

They're most likely guys who equate being a nice guy with not being a rapist, sexual harasser, and abuser. Rather than not being a rapist, sexual harasser, and abuser and judging whether they're a nice guy on how they treat others. Especially how they treat others when things are bad and when they don't get what they want.

The nice, good, and decent men who are interesting, average or attractive, and fun to be around tend not to have these views.

They also tend not to be single when they desire a relationship.

Truth says:
Tue, 3rd Apr 20121:50 pm 

You are an idiot if you still can't figure out why men are meant to sleep around but not women. Go study basic biology. Or read around more at http://www.hookingupsmart.com . You have some serious smartening up to do, fatty.

Truth says:
Tue, 3rd Apr 20121:57 pm 

Also, I know for a fact you're making shit up about knowing sluts with fake hymens. But to further point out your stupidity, men will always be able to tell when hymens are fake because it's impossible for surgery to bring back natural and real looking hymens.
http://www.revirgination.net/hymenrepair.html

udolipixie says:
Tue, 3rd Apr 20123:16 pm 

You are an idiot if you got that I was stating I can't figure out why men are meant to sleep around but not women.

Do show me where I stated I can't figure out why men are meant to sleep around but not women?

Your lack of reading comprehension is showing there.

HookingUpSmart to me is just an ex-slut telling gals to sell themselves to the higest bidder a bidder they'll highly unlikely genuinely like or be attracted to but at least he'll give loyatly for her youth/beauty.

udolipixie says:
Tue, 3rd Apr 20123:19 pm 

I'm not making up anything.

I do think you're making up shit that "men will always be able to tell when hymens are fake". Seeing as how female anatomical knowledge seems lacking in many men as they don't know where the clit is or what it looks like. Many men aren't even aware of what a hymen is or that not all virgins bleed.

Truth says:
Tue, 3rd Apr 20126:51 pm 

Are you seriously retarded? Men nowadays are raised on porn. We know more about your vaginas than you do, virgin.

Truth says:
Tue, 3rd Apr 20126:55 pm 

You obviously haven't read 1 article on http://www.hookingupsmart.com . Either that or you got slapped in the face with the truth so hard that you are in denial about it.

Go take a basic biology course, idiot. Then you will see why men are meant to sleep around, hence why they ALWAYS feel rewarded after casual sex; and why women aren't meant to sleep around, hence why they ALWAYS feel awkward and regret having casual sex. Again, men and women are different genders, what appeals to one sex doesn't appeal to the other. Get that cum out of your brain and stop being such a retard, fatty.

udolipixie says:
Tue, 3rd Apr 20128:59 pm 

I've read enough articles on that site.

The first article is just more fluff for as I said an ex-slut advising gal's to sell themselves to the highest bidder who they'll highly unlikely genuinely like or be attracted to but at least he'll give loyatly for her youth/beauty.

No different than mercenary matchmakers aka gals who marry a guy for money the match being her looks/youth for his money.

udolipixie says:
Tue, 3rd Apr 20129:04 pm 

I took a biology course as well as anatomy, physiology, chemistry, and physics.

Basic biology will tell you that guys can reproduce without having to engage with the pregnancy.

It's evolutionary psychology theories that tries to rationalize why men are "meant" to sleep around.

No factual evidence or scientific fact has stated that men are meant to sleep around but women aren't. Not even evolutionary theories makes that claim it only claims that men spread seed & women seek the best seed. There's even an evolutionary theory that men are wired to fall asleep after sex so that women can continue seed seeking.

Care to tell you know what every guy thinks/feels after sex to state that guys always feel rewarded after casual sex? Care to tell why your always doesn't apply to countless of guys I know and met?

Perhaps it's best suited to stop being a sheep and following whatever bs spews out of HookingUpSmart and MRAs.

Then again it's highly unlikely as you've shown no rationality just insults and shaming language. Not unsurpsising as that seems to be the basis of HookingUpSmart and many MRAs "logic"

Truth says:
Wed, 4th Apr 20127:21 am 

Basic biology:

How many sperm cells does a man make in a day? How quickly does he make them should they all be used up?

How many eggs can a woman make in a freaking month?

Now which sex is biologically designed to sleep around and which sex is designed to be selective? Are you seriously this dumb that you needed me to explain this to you?

udolipixie says:
Wed, 4th Apr 20127:00 pm 

You're showing you're lacking reading comprehension again:
"Basic biology will tell you that guys can reproduce without having to engage with the pregnancy. "
"No factual evidence or scientific fact has stated that men are meant to sleep around but women aren't. Not even evolutionary theories makes that claim it only claims that men spread seed & women seek the best seed."

udolipixie says:
Wed, 4th Apr 20127:04 pm 

Basic biology:
Sleeping around doesn't automatically equate to reproducing. You can have sex without reproducing something contraceptives have made easier.

The sperm/egg difference shows men can reproduce more efficiently than women as they produce more and don't have to engage the pregnancy thus having time out periods.

The sperm/egg difference doesn't show men are meant to sleep around and women aren't. Sleeping around is about sexual desire and sex drive.

No factual evidence has stated that men are biologically designed to sleep around and women are biologically designed to be selective. Plenty have stated that men can reproduce more easily and faster than women.

udolipixie says:
Wed, 4th Apr 20127:10 pm 

Being raised on porn doesn't equate to knowing how the vagina works or what the names of the parts are. Unless most guys are watching educational porn that names the parts and instructs men on how to induce orgasms. Plus there's the factor that most commercial porn is digital edits and enhances the vagina.

I highly doubt men in generally know more about women's vaginas than women themselves considering how many men routinely score low on identifying the parts, what the parts do, and inducing orgasms.

Being a virgin doesn't mean you don't know your genitals. UNless you were intending to use it as an insult then LMAO XD the HookingUPSmart which you so highly touts constantly regurgitates how much of a selling point to a bidder that is for females.

Truth says:
Thu, 5th Apr 20126:54 am 

Are you so stupid that you're including contraceptives in this conversation??? Are you fucking kidding me? You want to talk about human biology and evolutionary psychology theories and then put in the factor of contraceptive? Do you realize how you're being delusional and trying to rationalize your false logic with such an irrelevant factor here? The human brain is millions of years old. Our evolutionary wirings when it comes to sex and reproductions are millions of years old. Stop being a dumbass and talk about something that was created only recently that doesn't at all affect the way out primal brains feel about sex.

Truth says:
Thu, 5th Apr 20127:04 am 

You're an idiot. Of course porn don't teach you the names of vagina parts. Do you need to know the name of vagina parts to make a girl cum? Do you technically need to know how a vaginas work in order to make a girl cum? You obviously never seen porn in your life if you think most of them are digital edits. Do you think people shoot porn on a green screen and then put in special effects during post-production like fucking James Cameron? Get the fuck out of here with your stupidity, fatty.

udolipixie says:
Thu, 5th Apr 20127:41 am 

I didn't want to talk about biology or evolutionary psychology.

You brought up biology.

Only false logic here is yours since you have no factual evidence not even evolutionary theory to back up your claim. There's no factual evidence or even evolutionary theory that states that our primal brains feel about sex the way you claim- men are meant ot sleep around and women aren't.

Only rationalizing is you since you take that men can reproduce more efficiently to equate that men are meant to sleep around and that women aren't.

Only delusional one is your since you've consistently ad hominen, shame language, evade rationality, state things as facts without having any factual evidence, and repeatedly show your lack of reading comprehension

udolipixie says:
Thu, 5th Apr 20127:58 am 

Again you show your lacking reading comprehension.

I stated "Sleeping around doesn't automatically equate to reproducing. You can have sex without reproducing something contraceptives have made easier. "

I didn't include contraceptives to state it changes the human brain, biology, or how the human brain feels about sex.

I included contraceptives because they have made it easier to have sex without reproducing thus making the distinction between reproducing and sex even wider.

Most humans desire sex and seek to reproduce however sex doesn't automatically equate to reproducing as biology can tell you. If you doubt that perhaps take a rerview on fertility, periods, anad pregnancy.

Your sperm/egg argument:
Men are able to reproduce more efficiently than women because of the sperm/egg difference and they don't have to engage in pregnancy. The sperm/egg difference is about reproduction not sex, desiring sex, or seeking sex from desire. There's no factual evidence or evolutionary theory about the sperm/egg difference correlating to sexual desire or seeking sex from desire except for menopause.

Your primal brain argument:
There's no factual evidence or even evolutionary theory that men are meant to sleep around but women aren't. Only thing that is remotely is that men seek to spread and women seek the best and there's even an evolutionary theory that men are wired to fall asleep after sex so that women can continue seed seeking. Again that theory is about reproducing not solely sex, sexual desire, or seeking sex from desire.

Do tell how you jumped from the sperm/egg difference means men are meant to sleep around and women aren't to human primal brains? LMAO XD

udolipixie says:
Thu, 5th Apr 20129:10 am 

Again you show your lacking reading comprehension.
1. " Unless most guys are watching educational porn that names the parts and instructs men on how to induce orgasms" <- induce orgasms

Nowhere did I state, imply, or suggest you needed to know the name of the parts of the vagina to make a gal cum.

2. "Plus there's the factor that most commercial porn is digital edits and enhances the vagina." <- commercial porn is the keywords here

Nowhere did I state all porn is mostly digitally edits. Many guys attest to that all or most the vaingas in commercial porn look nothing like the vagina in real life thus they watch amateur porn now.

udolipixie says:
Thu, 5th Apr 20129:16 am 

Seems you're forgetting there's a lot of fake orgasms in commercial and amateur porn.

I do like how you overlooked this:
"I highly doubt men in generally know more about women's vaginas than women themselves considering how many men routinely score low on identifying the parts, what the parts do, and inducing orgasms. "

If men know more about women's vaginas then women themselves care to explain why routinely the majority of men are rated lowly for sexual satisfication and inducing orgasms especially considering how many men watch porn.

I'm amused by your insults first it was your ASSumption that I'm a slut who's going to be used up and etc. Now it's that I'm a virgin because I'm too unattractive aka fat to get laid. LMAO XD

Typical HookyingUPSmart and many MRAs tactics if you can't discuss logically it's ad hominems, evading logic, and shaming language.

Yet you tell me I'm the one who needs to grow up…lmfao

Karl says:
Fri, 6th Apr 20123:12 pm 

Truth, that's the sad truth nowadays. The powerful assertiveness, meanness, and sluttiness brought about in women from the Cultural Marxists' radical feminist movement has resulted in much divisiveness, leaving men and women to live apart. Women and men would both be happier if women would go back to the basics of being wholesome, sweet girlfriends, wives, and mothers.

Udolipixie, it's not that women can't screw like men. Plenty of sluts have proved that they can. It's that it's not good or right for women to do that. The marriage and childbirth stats and indeed the decline of Western Civilization have demonstrated that raising women to live outside of their traditional character and roles is not working.

absolutely right says:
Sun, 8th Apr 20122:40 pm 

i am just an average good looking straight man that hopes to meet the right woman for me again, but they are very hard too meet. like i have said before, i seem to meet all the LOW LIFE LOSER WOMEN instead. it is very bad enough that life sucks for me now. at least having a good woman in my life to share with, would certainly make things easier for me. the only problem now, is to meet a good woman that is not FILTHY GARBAGE.

udolipixie says:
Sun, 8th Apr 20126:41 pm 

Why feel sorry for gals who don't like promiscuity as there are guys who don't like promiscuity? Do you think there aren't enough guys for the gals or that the guys available aren't worthy?

If you feel it seems everyone is making fun of you because of your values perhaps it's best suited to get another social circle.

Or see if it seems everyone is making fun of you as a reaction to your hatred of those who are sexually liberated.

I think some extremely young gals are becoming sluts under the notion that guys like sluts I don't think it's the majority as most gals know of guys hatred and double standards hence the shushing and lying about their numbers. From my observations/experiences most gals are promiscuous because they can and want to be.

As for feeling sorry for guys as they are confused about their role. I know many guys who aren't confused by what role to take because they define their own roles rather than follow blindly what society suggests or dictates.

On the immoral society bit to me it's been quite some time since society was moral considering sexual liberated for men and men sleeping with numerous women have been seen positively for quite some time.

Truth says:
Mon, 9th Apr 20129:09 am 

1. Using contraceptives as a point of argument about basic biology and evolutionary instincts already showed how stupid you are as a troll. I have no need to further prove how wrong you are.

2. Women orgasm aren't induced by physical stimulations so much as emotional/psychological stimulations. You thinking a guy needs to know basic vagina parts in order to make a girl cum shows how stupid and clueless you are when it comes to sex.

3. Vaginas in mainstream porn aren't digital edits, they are results of surgeries. And the only form of that is vaginoplasty, to make vaginas look less used and worn out. I work in post production in the film industry, and you talking about digital effects in porn shows how clueless you are about about this kind of thing. Please stop making up these lies before I pull out some technical knowledge and further prove your ignorance.

4. Stop saying "many guys" like you know any. You are a clueless child.

Truth says:
Mon, 9th Apr 20129:27 am 

You are an idiot. Sex is an act toward reproductions. Only in the modern day of contraceptives is it an act of pure unregulated desire.

Men are designed to sleep around because he can produce sperms at a rapid pace and doesn't have to go through childbirth.

Women aren't designed to sleep around because they only make a 1-2 egg per month, and have to go through childbirth, therefore they need a male to commit his resources to them and the child. A male wont commit his resources to a woman if she is promiscuous and he doubts the child is his.

Your talk of contraceptives and me lacking proof after I provided such undeniable scientific facts only shows how ignorant and in denial you are. Seriously, you have a lot of smartening up to do, fatty.

Truth says:
Mon, 9th Apr 20129:35 am 

Seems you're forgetting there's a lot of real orgasms in commercial and amateur porn.

Most men don't give women orgasm because most women are sluts who don't deserve orgasms. Look up statistics on women having orgasms when having casual sex to having orgasms when they're in committed relationships.

Truth says:
Mon, 9th Apr 20129:43 am 

There's no such thing as a man whore. That guy is called a stud.

Men are applauded for being studs shamed for being virgins. Women are applauded for being virgins and shamed for being whores. That is how sex works. There's no such thing as the double standards because men and women aren't the same to begin with.

udolipixie says:
Mon, 9th Apr 20127:55 pm 

Even before contraceptives sex didn't automatically equate to reproduction. If you doubt that perhaps take a rerview on fertility, periods, and pregnancy.

Contraceptives made the distinction between reproducing and sex even wider.

You haven't provided any undeniable scientific facts that men were designed to sleep around.

You made your own interpretations on the sperm/egg difference.

The sperm/egg difference means that men can reproduce more efficiently than women. That's reproduction not solely sleeping around aka solely sex, desiring sex, or seeking sex from desire.

There are no facts not even an evolutionary theory that makes the claim you do.

As for smartening up if you stayed updated on human biology you'd see that historically generally men haven't been doing as your interpretation dictates.

DNA analysis shows that most of our ancestors were females seeing as how 80% of women reproduced while only 40% of men did. Seems women did more sleeping around and reproducing than men.

udolipixie says:
Mon, 9th Apr 20128:03 pm 

1. Four days ago I already stated that I didn't use contraceptives.as a point of argument.

Recall:
"I stated "Sleeping around doesn't automatically equate to reproducing. You can have sex without reproducing something contraceptives have made easier. "

I didn't include contraceptives to state it changes the human brain, biology, or how the human brain feels about sex.

I included contraceptives because they have made it easier to have sex without reproducing thus making the distinction between reproducing and sex even wider. "

2. Show me where I stated that a guy needs to know the basic vagina parts in order to make a gal orgasm.

Recall
"Nowhere did I state, imply, or suggest you needed to know the name of the parts of the vagina to make a gal cum. "

3. The majority of vaginas in commercial porn are digital edits are vaginaoplasty is a relatively new procedure. I actually know porn starts and those who work in the industry so I'm highly doubting your creditability or if you're just dismissing that there is more digital edited vaginas then surgical vagians on commercial porn seeing as how digital editing has been around long before vaginoplasty.

4. I do know many guys and many gals.

I do like how the one who is insulting, evading logic, and using shaming language is calling me a child.

udolipixie says:
Mon, 9th Apr 20128:14 pm 

The seems you're forgetting was a bad attempt at a turnaround as I'm not forgetting the real orgasms.

Your claim was that guys nowadays are raised on porn and know more about my vagina than I do.

I doubt many inexperienced/newbies would be able to tell the difference between a real and a fake one or know which moves produced a real orgasm and which ones produced a fake orgasm.

Seeing as how you're stating men are designed to sleep around it seems to me that would make men the sluts. LMAO XD

I've also seen the statistics about happiness in relationships. Not too many happy women in committed relationships and marriages.

I've also seen that in many relationships the quality/quantity of the romance declining is considered acceptable and the honeymoon phase while the quality/quantity of sex declining is not considered acceptable.

Not unsurprising to me with less effort in romance and maintaining attraction but expectation of sex not too many women are orgasming. As well as many men have the mantra of "her orgasm is her responsibility"

Karl says:
Tue, 10th Apr 20122:33 pm 

Udolipixie, you have hit on a big part of the problem, supply.

Take any time in postwar America before radical feminism and compare it to any time since radical feminism. It's night and day different. That indicates that what went wrong went wrong at the time of radical feminism. It isn't only radical feminism because other destructive things of the Left's agenda were implemented at about the same time.

Diminished supply has affected both sexes. From a man's viewpoint, take out the too young, the too old, the infirm, the masculine assertive women, the mean ballcrusher bitches, the sluts, the fatties, and the ugly dogs, and there are very few suitable women left with whom to mate. Those few desirable women have an incredible number of men pursuing them from what I've seen. That leads me to conclude that the shortage of desirable nubile women is far more acute than any shortage of eligible men and has been brought about by the Cultural Marxists' assault on traditional America, an assault that included radical feminism.

I do acknowledge that there exists a shortage of eligible men, but that shortage largely has its origin in the same Marxian assault on traditional America. Men were displaced from their traditional roles by free trade, hiring preferences for everyone else, and an excess supply of labor that both made jobs scarce and pay low. Men were told that they had to be "more sensitive" and that any interest they displayed towards women constituted "unwanted sexual advances" and "sexual harassment" for which there would be consequences. Most women seem unaware of the greater societal factors that have reduced the supply of men they find desirable and instead have chosen simplistically to blame men for everything that has gone wrong. Couple that misdirected blame with the indoctrination of women with the misandry preached by the feminist activists and voila, it's the advent of the modern ballcrusher.

udolipixie says:
Tue, 10th Apr 20126:42 pm 

You can type all that yet still no answer on my multiple requests on how is it man hating, ball busting, and misandrist as you claim to state that both genders should feel free to pursue attraction then personality.

Then again I wasn't honestly expecting much of an answer from someone who jumps at ad hominems and insults unprovoked. Such as this:
"Me, too. I imagine she might be so bitter because she's not getting much interest in her vag because she looks like one of those huge fatties seen at Wal-Mart who look like they would squish you. HaHaHaHa"

What happened to not being interested in communicating with me after my requests on facts, studies, and research to back up the statements you making as definitive facts?

udolipixie says:
Tue, 10th Apr 20127:39 pm 

To me what went "wrong" is that as women are generally no longer relying on men for financial survival and divorce not being as shunned as before. So now gals are with guys mainly out of desire and many may think there is no to low reason to consider being with a man. Not too many happy gals in relationships/marriages, most marriages end in divorce, many guys aren't interested in relationships/marriages, many guys that are interested in releationships/marriages a gal may not be attracted to, and there's rising misogyny and misogyny directed at American women

None of the attractive, interesting, fun to be around guys I know have that view of diminished supplu. They often say it's like a candy store they get to slut about and then settle down with a pretty or cute gal with less experience. They tend to bounce back and forth from slutting or having a gf but it's never for a lack of quality gals just a lack of desire to commit. The limited supply view in my experience tends to come from guys/gals with not much to offer. I've seen plenty of bitter guys/gals complain about the lack of quality when they weren't offering much themselves.

Your conclusion of it desirable nubile women is far more acute than any shortage of eligible men may be biased. To many guys for women to be considered eligible they have to be desirable & nubile but for men to be eligible they have to be heterosexual and have a male genitals. From my experiences guys tend to offer little and expect a lot such as expecting sex/relationships to be doled out to them because they're nice, good,decent guys rather than because the gal is attracted to him or likes him. It seems to me the standards many guys have to be considered a decent, nice, or good guy is quite low. Him being a good, nice, decent guy isn't based on good actions, lack of bad actions, and treatment of others, and but rather him not doing extremely negative things such as rape/abuse/harassing. To me that's an off way to define nice, good, or decent as I've met & know plenty of awful people who weren't rapists, abusers, or harassers.

As for the role displacement society/culture tends to progress and roles are either redefined, eliminated, or added. To me guys are best suited to either find gals who want the traditional role or define their own role. As I've stated I know many guys who aren't confused by what role to take because they define their own roles rather than follow blindly what society suggests or dictates.

If men were told these things not too many listened or lived it as many insensitive guys roam about and many guys have no issue displaying interest towards women that is sexual harassment as the hollaback sites will show. Most guys I know still go by traditional view of masculinity and sensitivity however many guys I know don't display interest towards women and it's not of fear of sexual harassment and consequences but fear of rejection and humiliation by the woman. Women blaming men for everything may occur to your experience however I doubt that's the general or majority of the population. I know many gals who blame men for everything and it seems no different than the many guys blaming women for everything.

As for the misandry and modern ballcrusher I'm doubting how much misandry and ball crushing is involved as you considered it misandry and ball busting for me to state both genders should feel free to pursue attraction then personality.

Truth says:
Sun, 15th Apr 20125:45 pm 

You don't know any fucking porn star you liar. I live in The Valley. The bars I go to are populated by porn stars every night of the week. I've fucked porn stars and girls who went on to be porn stars. I've had porn stars in my bed while their porn played on my laptop. Don't tell me about how a porn star's vagina look compared to real life or how people use digital edits in porn as if it was that easy. Stop making shit up, lying fatty.

Truth says:
Sun, 15th Apr 20125:47 pm 

Keep spinning that hamster, fatty. Come back when you have any substantiated facts to disprove those of mine.

Truth says:
Sun, 15th Apr 20125:52 pm 

Your interpretation of the 80% women / 40% men sex ratio only showed how stupid you are. Can't you see that 40% of men ended up mating with 80% of women? Tell me, look at that number again, which sex slept around to spread their seeds and which sex were selective of ONLY the top, best seeds. Retard.

Karl says:
Mon, 16th Apr 20121:14 am 

Udolipixie, I'll try to answer your question that I recall seeing somewhere a while back in that morass of comments. My understanding of your question as I remember it is that you asked why women can't use attraction as a critical selection criterion as men do. I think you also asked something else of a similar theme. One thing that comes to mind is what I stated about the importance of the differences between men and women. Decrease those differences, and the attraction diminishes as well. I as well as other men don't want a mannish woman. Either a man or a woman trying a strategy of being mimetic of the other is not the path to relationship success.

udolipixie says:
Mon, 16th Apr 20122:24 pm 

My question of how is it misandry, ball busting, and man hating to think that that both genders should feel free to pursue attraction then personality came right after you stated misandrist was putting it too lightly.

In Moravec's post right after my both genders should feel free to pursue attraction then personality Geoffrey stated:
"udolipixie, your lack of empathy for a mans issues and high empathy for the exact situation except for that of a women shows your true colors. Your just another misandrist, but no worries, misandry is accepted here in the west."

I questioned him on how that is so as I'm being equal with both genders.
"Explain how it's a lack of empathy to think a woman or man going after their partner for attraction is not shallow but nature and should be accepted equally?
Show me where I lacked empathy for men & had high empathy for women.

When my premise was that both genders should be free to pursue attraction then personality rather than men pursue attraction then personality & women only pursue personality.

Exactly where's the man hate in that both genders should be able to pursue physical attraction not just the male gender?"

You posted:
"Misandrist" is putting it too politely for one such as her. She's an outright ball crusher. Unfortunately her kind is quite common, and more than merely accepted here in the West, constitutes a "protected group" with rights and privileges greater than those of men. Likely she lost her virginity too easily to Mr. Wrong and only then discovered what a huge irreversible mistake that was and so now is bitter for life."

I posted:
"Where's the ball crusher in that it's unfair to state that men get to pursue attraction then personality but women should pursue personality?

Where's the ball crusher in that both genders should be able to pursue attraction?

Or do you throw out terms when you're unable to be rational? "

No response from you.

I repeated my question to you in most of our discussions.

I create two separate posts.
#1 No response

#2 You responded evading answer how it's misandry, man hating, misandry
You stated "It is simply the matter of the nature of a being. Women are not men in women's bodies, and neither is the converse true. Pigs don't fly because it's not in their nature to fly. Trying to pretend that the whole world can be converted to unisex and still work is ridiculous.'

I responded with questioning how pursuing attraction then personality is out of women's nature like a pig flying as generally people seek attraction.

No answer from you on that.

You jumped on ad hominens from another user stating
"Me, too. I imagine she might be so bitter because she's not getting much interest in her vag because she looks like one of those huge fatties seen at Wal-Mart who look like they would squish you. HaHaHaHa"

udolipixie says:
Mon, 16th Apr 20122:28 pm 

As I stated in other words
A woman seeking attraction or using it as a critical selection criteria isn't a woman being a man to me it's her being human.

The differences between men and women to me don't related to women can't use attraction as a critical selection criteria as generally human beings want attraction.

The differences between men and women to me relate to that women and men generally seek different things and have different factors for attraction such as height, weight, body shape, and facial features.

udolipixie says:
Mon, 16th Apr 20122:32 pm 

Seems you have spinning the hamster.
You took the egg/sperm difference to mean men are meant to sleep around and women aren't.

It means that men are able to reproduce more efficiently than women. Sleeping around can be done without reproducing.

You don't have any substantiated facts.
There's no fact or even evolutionary theory stating what you claim.

udolipixie says:
Mon, 16th Apr 20122:53 pm 

Seems you're spinning the hamster again.

The analysis was women our mainly our ancestors because
DNA showed that women slept around resulting in reproduction more than men did. 40% of men reproduced and 80% of women reproduced with women having more varied combos than the men.

Meaning that women had more partners than the men did. As the women slept/reproduced with more men than the men slept/reproduced with women.

The scenario was like this:
Jason, Mark, Anthony, Derek, Matty, Jake, Antoine, Lucas, Tiberius, Mason
Stephanie, Susan, Marilyn, Cassie, Casey, Jenny, Leslie, Maude, Britney, Mary

Britney, Stephanie, Marilyn, Cassie, Casey, Jenny, Leslie all sleep/reproduce with Matty, Jake, Antoine, and Lucas.

The guys each sleep/reproduce with one gal except Matty and Lucas who sleeps/reproduce with all of them.

In other words the guys each have sex with 1 gal except Matty and Lucas who gets all of them.

The gals are clearly sleeping around more as all slept with ore than 1 guy while the guys each slept with 1 gal except for Matty and Lucas who were able to sleep with all the gals.

As for the top best seeds percentages such as 20% or 10% would indicate the best seed to me not 40%. The bit where the women generally slept with the same 10 guys indicates selective to me.

udolipixie says:
Mon, 16th Apr 20123:04 pm 

The gals are clearly sleeping around more as all slept with ore than 1 guy while the guys each slept with 1 gal except for Matty and Lucas who were able to sleep with all the gals.

* In the bit above I'm defining sleeping around I'm as you seem to equate automatically meaning reproducing *

The 8 women and 4 men could have had more partners that did not result in reproduction. As well as all 20 women and men could have slept around but only 8 women and 4 men reproduced.

udolipixie says:
Mon, 16th Apr 20123:14 pm 

The majority of vaginas in commercial porn are digital edits as vaginoplasty is a relatively new procedure.

Digital editing has been in use for quite some time before vaginoplasty. Vaginoplasty is new and while in use the amount of vaginoplasty commercial porn isn't comparable to the amount of digitally edited commercial porn.

It's not making sh*t up to say that X was here and used before Y and is still more used than Y so the majority of things are X.

Seems you can't provide a logical argument or any post without insulting, evading logic, and using shaming language. Yet you call me a child.

udolipixie says:
Mon, 16th Apr 20123:16 pm 

Interesting that you can't refute that I didn't use contraceptives as a point of argument or stated that a guy needs to know the basic vagina parts in order to make a gal orgasm.

Show me where I was telling you what a porn star's vagina look compared to real life?

I stated I know porn stars and those in the industry so I'm highly doubting your creditability or if you're just dismissing that there is more digital edited vaginas then surgical vagians on commercial porn seeing as how digital editing has been around long before vaginoplasty.

Digital edits in porn are quite easy photoshopping isn't that hard of a skill to master nor does it seem that you need high priced software to do such. Plenty of youtubbers showing how to photoshop with free, cheap, or open source software.

Truth says:
Mon, 16th Apr 20129:40 pm 

Whoa, look at that hamster spin. Why are you replying to yourself now, fatty?

udolipixie says:
Mon, 16th Apr 201210:12 pm 

Your interpretation was the hamster spin.

I was explaining the information and results from the DNA analysis.

80% of women and 40% of men reproduced with women having slept/reproduced with more men than men slept with women.

Such as 8 gals reproduced and 4 guys reproduced. The gals all slept with more than 1 guy while the guys each slept with 1 gal except for 2 who were able to sleep with all the gals.

Hence why I put:
"DNA analysis shows that most of our ancestors were females seeing as how 80% of women reproduced while only 40% of men did. Seems women did more sleeping around and reproducing than men."

Truth says:
Tue, 17th Apr 20127:50 am 

Do you not understand numbers, retard? 8 out of 10 women selected 4 out of 10 guys as fit to reproduce with. Those 4 out 10 guys ended up spreading their seeds to 8 out of 10 women.

Now which sex is meant to be promiscuous and spread their seeds.

Which sex is meant to be selective of only the best seeds.

Is your hamster still spinning yet, fatty?

Truth says:
Tue, 17th Apr 20127:59 am 

Okay, fatty. Show me proof. Show me proof that people in the industry use photoshop (LMAOOOOO) to digitally edit porn stars vaginas. Show me proof that these vaginas are the results of special effects.

Oh, you can't. Because it's not true. Because you're just making stuff up to feed your hungry hamster.

Truth says:
Tue, 17th Apr 20123:52 pm 

So a man producing millions upon millions more reproductive cells than women is not a fact?

Whoa hamster, slow down, you're spinning too fast.

Truth says:
Wed, 18th Apr 20128:05 am 

Biologically, women can't screw like men. It just seems that way now because of unnatural factors like contraceptions. Emotionally and psychologically, women can't ever handle casual sex the same way men can, no matter how much they spin their hamsters and lie to themselves.

Truth says:
Wed, 18th Apr 20128:17 am 

There are so many sluts running around nowadays that the average man just assumes every girl he sees is a slut. Why do you think men are no longer chivalrous?

Truth says:
Wed, 18th Apr 20128:18 am 

bitterness and truth indeed. learn game, my friend. then you can take these sluts to the cleaners… to wash your cum stains off their g-strings

udolipixie says:
Thu, 19th Apr 201212:32 am 

Seems you don't understand numbers.

All 8 gals reproduced with more than one guy. They all had sex with and reproduced with 3 of the 4 guys.

Only 2 guys reproduced with more than one gal.

All 100% of gals were promiscuous as they all had 3 partners.

Only 50% of the guys were promiscuous as only 2 out of 4 reproduced with more than 1 gal.

This is going by sex resulting in reproduction as as all 20 gals and guys could have slept around but only 8 gals and 4 guys reproduced.

You're the only one spinning a hamster here.

Interesting that you can't communicate with ad hominens, shaming language, evasion tactics, and twisting words to suit you.

udolipixie says:
Thu, 19th Apr 201212:50 am 

Show me where I stated, suggested, implied, or questioned the sperm production is not a fact.

That's right you can't because I didn't.

I stated your claim that the sperm/egg difference means men are designed to sleep around but women aren't is not a fact.

How am I the one spinning by stating the sperm/egg difference is about reproduction and how men can reproduce more efficiently than women?

You're the one spinning a hamster by taking the sperm/egg difference to mean something no factual evidence, scientific fact, or even evolutionary theory has stated.

The sperm/egg difference doesn't show that men are designed to sleep around but women aren't. It does show that men can reproduce easier and faster than women.

There is a difference between reproduction and sex/sleeping around. You can have sex and sleep around without reproducing or intending to do so.

udolipixie says:
Thu, 19th Apr 20121:56 am 

Proof of digitally editing vaginas in the porn industry:
A graphic designer for a porn magazine digitally editing:
Labiaplasty Hungry Beast http://vimeo.com/9924049

There's documentaries about digitally editing vaginas in porn calling it the Designer Vagina going deep into how the porn industry has classifications and guidelines of what the vagina should look like.
I can link to amazon information pages if you'd like.

The UK even had a Muff March about how digitally edited vaginas in porn had women undergoing vaginoplasty. They provided pictures of the ones proven to be digitally edited.

Check out Google Images photoshopped vaginas in porn or porn mags with the safe search off.

Care to show proof that commercial porn has never or doesn't use digital editing on vaginas?

Oh you can't because it's not true.

udolipixie says:
Thu, 19th Apr 20121:56 am 

Many vaginas in commercial porn were and are cosmetically enhanced using digital editing. To me the digitally editing lead to vaginoplasty being developed.

Note nowhere did I state that all vaginas in commercial porn are digitally edited or that all pornstars have digitally edited vaginas.

I stated most commercial porn have digitally edited versus vaginoplasty as digital editing has been in use for quite some time before vaginoplasty.

You're the only one spinning the hamster if you think commercial porns have never or aren't capable of digitally editing vaginas. Many doctors who perform vaginoplasty use digital editing to show what can be done aka the limits.

Your hamster must be real hungry if you can't see the logic of digital editing was here and used before vaginoplasty so the amount of commercial porn with digital editing exceeds the amount with vaginoplasty.

Truth says:
Thu, 19th Apr 20128:02 am 

"There is a difference between reproduction and sex/sleeping around. You can have sex and sleep around without reproducing or intending to do so."

Yeah, thanks to contraceptions. Basic biology and evolutionary biology state otherwise, hamster.

Truth says:
Thu, 19th Apr 20128:05 am 

It only took 40% of men to impregnate 80% of women. How can your delusional hamster brain spin so much denials out of that simple fact I will never understand, fatty.

Truth says:
Thu, 19th Apr 20128:07 am 

Oh, lmao you are talking about porn MAGAZINE lolololol. Too bad no one reads porn magazines anymore, dumbass. They have something called movies now. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

Truth says:
Thu, 19th Apr 20128:12 am 

Please be specific, fatty. You are talking about porn magazines — which no one jerks off to anymore. People have movies now. And it is no where near as easy as magazines to digitally edit pictures for MOVING IMAGES. Get with the times, dumbass. Vaginas in mainstream porn — the kind that people watch, NOT read — are NOT digital edits. Retard.

udolipixie says:
Thu, 19th Apr 201212:03 pm 

So when provided with proof that refutes your claim and show your irrationality you yet again focus on one thing and attempt to evade logic.

I provided the video of the graphic designer at a porn magazine digitally editing a vagina to show you how it's done. Doing exactly as described "Show me proof that people in the industry use photoshop to digitally edit porn stars vaginas."

Plenty of guys/gals read porn magazines more guys than gals.

When I say the porn industry I'm not just limiting myself to porn videos but all porn related purchases involving female pornstars.

Quite interesting that you skipped over the documentaries, Muff March, and invitation to Google Images.

More interesting that you can't seem to post without using evasion tactics, ad hominens, and shaming language.

udolipixie says:
Thu, 19th Apr 201212:08 pm 

I wasn't talking about porn magazines I was talking about the porn industry digitally editing vaginas.

I provided a video showing a graphic designer digitally editing a porn star's vagina to give you what you requested "Show me proof that people in the industry use photoshop to digitally edit porn stars vaginas."

It is easy to digitally edit pictures for moving images. Exactly how well do you know the porn industry much less the film industry or film production? There's again even youtube videos showing people how to do so.

Seems you're the one who needs to get with the times.

udolipixie says:
Thu, 19th Apr 201212:15 pm 

You're the only one doing any denying here as the DNA analysis showed that 80% of women and 40% of men reproduced with women having slept/reproduced with more men than men did with women.

Exactly what denials am I spinning?

I'm stating the facts that the DNA analysis showed the similar scenario being:
All 100% of gals were promiscuous as they all had 3 partners.

Only 50% of the guys were promiscuous as only 2 out of 4 reproduced with more than 1 gal.

You're the one spinning by
More women slept with men

I'm denying that it shows men are more promiscuous then women.

All 100% of gals were promiscuous as they all had 3 partners.

Only 50% of the guys were promiscuous as only 2 out of 4 reproduced with more than 1 gal.

The simple fact is that even when provided with a small group women had more partners than the men did.

udolipixie says:
Thu, 19th Apr 201212:23 pm 

That's not really thanks to contraceptives.

As I stated much earlier there was always a distinction between reproduction and sex/sleeping around.

Contraceptives just widened the gap.

Again basic biology and fertility doctors can show sex doesn't automatically equate to reproducing what with fertility, periods, and pregnancy.

You're really spinning that hamster by suggesting there it's only contraceptives that makes it so sex doesn't automatically equate to reproduction.

I do like your evasion tactics of when confronted with your irrationality you pick an unrelated bit, put your slant on it, and use more shaming language and ad hominens.

Where's your undeniable facts that men are designed to sleep around but women aren't?

Sperm/egg is about reproduction and how men are designed to reproduce more efficiently and easily.

Fertile or infertile, wanting to reproduce or not, you can have sex/sleep around. Just as not being fertile doesn't mean you can't have sex or sleep around it just means you aren't designed to reproduce.

Truth says:
Fri, 20th Apr 20128:41 am 

Are you still being a retard after I explained it to you?

80% of women SELECTED 40% of men to have sex with. These 40% of men are the creme of the crop. These women were extremely discriminant in their mate selections, they did not fuck every asshole in sight like sluts nowadays are doing.

Of those 40% of men selected, they ended up spreading their seeds to 80% of women. Because that is the purpose of men, to be promiscuous as spread his seed.

Is your little hamster still spinning, retard?

Truth says:
Fri, 20th Apr 20128:44 am 

NO ONE READS PORN MAGAZINES ANYMORE, RETARD. THIS IS NOT THE 1970s. PLAYBOY IS GOING BANKRUPT AND HEF IS SELLING HIS MANSION LOOK AROUND. God you are so fucking stupid.

Truth1 says:
Fri, 20th Apr 20128:52 am 

You showed video of a guy editing a picture for a magazine, idiot. 99% of porn nowadays are videos, not pictures. Get with the damn time.

And you are an idiot if you think it's easy to edit moving images. Frame by frame. Especially something as active and animated as a pee constantly going into a vee. it is time consuming and no way can pornographers afford Hollywood style post-prod budget. I work in the film industry, retard. You are a dumb fucking child who knows nothing. Stop making up lies.

Truth says:
Fri, 20th Apr 201210:05 am 

You are idiot.

Men can produce reproductive cells at a faster pace / don't have to go through childbirth = they are designed to sleep around.

Women produces 1-2 eggs per months / have to go through childbirth = they are designed to be selective and discriminant.

Only in the modern days of contraceptions that women have the freedom to sleep around like sluts without any consequences.

Why are you still in denial about such hard facts? Tell that hamster to slow down.

udolipixie says:
Fri, 20th Apr 201211:59 am 

Men can produce reproductive cells at a faster pace / don't have to go through childbirth = they are designed to be better reproducers.

Women produces 1-2 eggs per months / have to go through childbirth = they are less efficient reproducers.

Societal and legal rules withstanding women and men had the freedom to sleep around. Contraceptives just widened the gap of distinction between reproduction and sex/sleeping around so that women could engage more without consequences.

I'm denying your claim.

No any hard facts, any fact, or even evolutionary theory makes the claim that you do- men designed to sleep around & women aren't.

I'm not spinning any hamster as I'm stating what the sperm/egg difference is about reproduction. The sperm/egg difference shows that men are designed to reproduce easier and more efficiently than women.

Why are you still claiming your interpretation of the sperm/egg difference to be hard facts? Tell that hamster to slow down.

udolipixie says:
Fri, 20th Apr 201212:20 pm 

Amusing that you're trying to explain something you didn't know/knew nor know/knew the results of.

80% of women reproduced with 40% of men with women having a higher partner count than men.

Of the 40% men only a small amount had more than 1 partner.

Of the 80% women all had more than 1 partner.

The women had a higher partner so if promiscuous spreading the seed was the purpose of men the guys in general surely failed and only a small few or already a select few succeeded.

To me the 40% of the guys the women reproduced with weren't the creme of the crop but the small amount of guys who had more than 1 partner were.

I'm not spinning anything.

I'm stating proven facts.

You're stating your intrepretation of facts.

udolipixie says:
Fri, 20th Apr 201212:28 pm 

Again you've shown lacking mental capacity:
You- "Show me proof that people in the industry use photoshop to digitally edit porn stars vaginas."

Me- video showing how a graphic designer at a porn magazine digital edits a vagina

I provided the video to show you that digitally editing a vagina is possible and done in the porn industry.

I also gave politic actions protesting digitally editing vaginas in porn videos.

I also offered amazon links to documentaries about responses to digitally editing vaginas in porn videos.

You've also shown yet again that you can't provide a rational argument by evading rationality and picking one sentence to twist ignoring attempts at logic.

udolipixie says:
Fri, 20th Apr 201212:48 pm 

I also gave politic actions protesting digitally editing vaginas in porn videos.

I also offered amazon links to documentaries about responses to digitally editing vaginas in porn videos.

I also offered search terms in google images that would get you before/after digital editing comparisons of vaginas in porn videos.

You- "Show me proof that people in the industry use photoshop to digitally edit porn stars vaginas."

Me- video showing how a graphic designer at a porn magazine digital edits a vagina.

The video shows digitally editing a vagina is possible and done in the porn industry. The techniques the graphic designer uses is similar to the techniques that video editors use.

If you'd like a video editor in the porn industry digitally editing a porn stars vagina you'd have to buy the amazon documentaries. I didn't see any porn film industries have their editing process up online as a free for all.

Editing a moving image is "easy" in the sense that isn't that hard of a skill to master nor does it seem that you need high priced software to do such.

It doesn't take Hollywood style post-production budget to edit images in a video nor does it take high priced software as again many youtube videos while show you.

I already questioned your credibility in the porn/film industry. Though it may seem you're behind the times if you don't know that photoshopping and amateur film making is becoming something increasingly common skill. Or that affordable, cheap, free, and open source software a bit comparable to high priced Hollywood software isn't hard to get.

Exactly what lies did I make up?
#1 Commercial porn video has and does digitally edits vaginas.
There are documentaries and politic actions protesting such.

#2 Digitally editing vaginas was done before vaginaoplasty and is still done.
There are studies about how the "designer vagina'" by digital edits and vaginoplasty in porn videos is affecting heterosexual males and females

#3 The amount of digitally edited vagina porn videos exceeds the amount of vaginoplasty porn videos.
X was here and used before Y.
Y is new while X is still used and commonplace.
X is the majority.

Karl says:
Sun, 22nd Apr 20123:30 pm 

The desire to contrive a conflict is hostile. Generating unnecessary conflict and insisting on always winning are what many women are doing now that falls under "ballcrushing." You are saying that if men can do something, then under equality, women can do that, too and even angrily demand it. I'm not saying that women can't be pushy like that. I'm saying that it's not good.

udolipixie says:
Mon, 23rd Apr 20128:09 am 

How am I contriving a conflict by stating both genders should feel free to pursue attraction then personality?

What is hostile about that notion?

What unnecessary conflict is generated by that notion?

How is it insisting on always winning for women if both genders pursue attraction then personality?

I would think you're the one contriving a conflict as to me the only conflict would be to those that don't want a certain gender to pursue attraction.

I would think you're the one being hostile as you evaded the question and personally attacked me.

Where did I angrily demand anything?

To me you quickly labeling my notion as misandry, man hating, and ball crushing then personally attacking me shows more anger from you.

udolipixie says:
Mon, 23rd Apr 20128:19 am 

I said women pursuing attraction then personality is nature as humans generally want attraction.

I didn't say if men can do something then under equality women can do that too in regards to pursuing attraction then personality.

I'm saying pursuing attraction is a human thing and therefore it's unfair to me as I seen no reason advantageous to both genders why men should be able to do it but not women.

Care to show where/when I made angry demands?
Care to show where/when I stated under equality if men can do so can women in regards to pursuing attraction then personality?

Dialogue Recap-:
Moravec: The only way for women to win is to stop going after men for shallow reasons and try to get to know men for their true personalities.

Me: That's unfair since men go after women for shallow reasons then get to know her true personality as most men approach by physical attraction.

You: Going after a woman for her physical attractiveness and then getting to know her is not being shallow. That's nature.

Me: A woman going after a man for his physical attractiveness and then getting to know him is not being shallow either.

That's nature.

Women are less visual than men. Not blind.

** Hmm..no angry demands of any kind from me. I've seen plenty of demands of how women should X and women should Y from others and you whether those demands are angry or not is a toss up.

** Hmm..no if men can do something then under equality women can do that too just it's nature and humans generally want attraction.

Karl says:
Wed, 2nd May 201211:58 pm 

It's not my first rodeo. I've learned to have radar for things women start that seem benign but are really preludes to heated conflicts and aparently by original intent of the women, too. It's a sort of ballbusting in which the man gets caught unaware. I attribute it to the Cultural Marxists who set out to ruin marriage in order to decimate the White birthrate by creating division between men and women via radical feminism.

Women using physical attractiveness as a major selection criterion the way men do is a major departure from the way things were back when they were not dysfunctional as they are now. Women taking up the ways of men diminishes the chance of relationship success. Why should women want to fix things like that that aren't broken? The softer, more feminine, wholesome woman whose main interest is in finding happiness in family life is what most men want and what leads to relationship success. Being slutty develops a very different kind of woman and leads to the problems we see between men and women today.

udolipixie says:
Fri, 4th May 201210:29 am 

Nice evasion of answering how am I contriving a conflict or how I'm insisting on women always winning with 'both genders should feel free to pursue attraction then personality' conflict . Essentially your reply is 'you are because I say you are as I have a radar for these things'.

Seems your radar missed that I wasn't angrily demanding as you claim that that if men can do something then under equality women can do that too.

It's a toss up perhaps you those benign statements by women you interacted with were benign and you contrived the heated conflict.

Again I would think you're the one contriving a conflict as to me the only conflict would be to those that don't want a certain gender to pursue attraction.

udolipixie says:
Fri, 4th May 201211:01 am 

It's human nature to use physical attractiveness as a major selection criteria. Women not using it in previous times doesn’t mean they didn't want to as most likely weren't able to exercise using this criteria to their desire because the man was the provider. It would make little sense to further limit your options of partners when you depend on them for financial survival.

The way things were back then were dysfunctional unless- marital rape being legal, domestic violence tendency to be swept under the rug, limited work and education paths, and expectation to rely on another for financial survival isn't indicative of some dysfunction.

Women taking up the ways of humans diminishing the chance of relationship success would hinge on that being in a relationship and having sex with someone you have no to low attraction for is success. Seems like you mean relationship success for the man not both so to me that is something that needs to be fixed. According to the many women I've met things were quite broken for women in previous times as she depended on him for her livelihood essentially she was selling herself to the highest bidder.

It wasn't broken for men as those times were happiest for men as in the words of one of those women 'he had a maid, cook, nanny, and prostitute of the attractiveness and age he wanted who depended on him for her livelihood and all he had to do was have a job and not be a wife beater'. I know many women who lived in those times you'd like say weren't dysfunctional only a very select few were content and even a smaller amount were happy. Most were bitter, hateful, and full of resentment one even dance on her husband's grave.

Would you consider it a relationship success with someone you have no to low attraction where you're the sole or main household/childcare worker always accommodating their high sexual while your lack of desire is never or rarely accommodated knowing you can never leave as you wouldn't be able to provide for yourself much less you and the children and your family would shame you?

Pleasuremeslut says:
Fri, 11th May 20122:41 pm 

The reason women are being so slutty is because retards like you say things like "women are supposed to be caring, loving, motherly figures who act with class and are modest."
I hate sluts too but I kind of understand why they would not want to act how some dick head like you thinks they should act.

JOEYD says:
Tue, 15th May 20124:35 pm 

MOST OF THE WOMEN TODAY ARE FILTHY PIGS, I AGREE VERY MUCH WITH THAT. ATTITUDE PROBLEM, EXCESS BAGGAGE, HARD TO TALK TOO, AND SO ON. WHAT LOW LIFE LOSER WOMEN WE HAVE NOW.

udolipixie says:
Wed, 16th May 20127:34 am 

The same could be said for guys as it's not a gender thing it's a people thing.

Many guys have an attitude problem- hateful, bitter, resentful, misogynistic, self-entitled, or superiority complex.

Many guys have excess baggage- thinking negatively of all or most gals, misgyonist, liar, cheater, abuser, victim mentality, rapist, rape apologist, or been lied/cheated on by some gals so he thinks all or most gals are liars/cheaters.

As for the hard to talk to most likely if a person is hard to talk it's because they don't want to talk or talk to that person. People have no obligation to be friendly they have a soceital obligation to be polite.

Perhaps many gals are hard to talk to because they don't wish to talk to someone who thinks negatively or hatefuly of their gender and they're aware that many guys are bitter hateful possible misogynists who think all or most gals are scums, whores, dogs, useless, worthless, low life losers, or filthy pigs.

ABSOLUTELY RIGHT says:
Sat, 19th May 20122:23 pm 

IT IS FILTHY GARBAGE LIKE YOU WOMEN, THAT ARE CERTAINLY MAKING IT MUCH HARDER FOR US GOOD STRAIGHT MEN THAT ARE LOOKING TO MEET A GOOD STRAIGHT WOMAN NOW. GARBAGE LIKE YOU, SEEM TO BE EVERYWHERE NOWADAYS.

Jester says:
Sun, 20th May 20125:57 pm 

I'll fuck off then, Ann. Go be independently "liberated", and ride the c0ck carousel into the sunset. When you're old and lonely, with no man interested in a pin cushion full of nasty STD's and bitterness, the good men here will be there to say "I told ya so". Feminazi's really need to take a look in the mirror and see how much harm their whoring, cheating, selfish ways are damaging society. I don't know about you, but I do not enjoy living my life wondering whether or not the woman I'm with is just using me for a free ride, or cheating on me, because news flash: Good men do not cheat or use women, yet repeatedly, the good man gets used and cheated on, generally for the simple reason that he's not a selfish prick.

Karl says:
Mon, 21st May 201210:34 am 

Re "…who think all or most gals…" That's not what JOEYD said. He said "most." Most is quite true.

Karl says:
Mon, 21st May 201211:20 am 

Regardless of what a guy thinks of women in general, that doesn't necessarily mean that his approach to any particular gal will be a display of hateful or negative attitudes because we all know that there are some good women out there. The few good women are always taken. They are never without a man unless that's how they want it. The rest of the lot are bad or mediocre women, and they are by far the majority of their gender. Some of the undesirable traits that they frequently display are coldness, rudeness, hatefulness, dishonesty, selfishness, and sluttiness. After encountering a number of such women, it would be insanity for a man to not have his guard up. Do you propose that the natural learning process should be switched off in the case of men's dealings with women even though that's not possible? How many times do suggest that a man get burned before he makes the connection that it's bad women who are making him hurt that badly?

Karl says:
Mon, 21st May 201211:48 am 

Abused or not, they show that they've been poorly socialized or that their parents failed.

Jester says:
Mon, 21st May 201211:04 pm 

Udolipixie might be legally retarded. Just saying… Nobody listens to a child who goes around in circles, constantly repeating "Since guys do it, why is it bad for girls to do the same thing?"

FYI – Women do treat men like shit, even men who love everything about these women. Ball-busting, rude, cold, conniving, emotionally-manipulative broads seem to get what they want from men because they offer up sex every now and again. It's not worth the trouble. As for the women who enjoy sex often, they're usually dubbed "Nymphomaniacs", and will NEVER be happy with one good man for more than a few months. They WILL c0ck hop at any opportunity, and lie to a man's face without batting an eye.

I keep my women at an emotional distance, while enjoying their only useful offerings "Sex and sandwich making". Really, there is nothing a woman can do that a man cannot do better. Heck, even that Beauty pageant transgender chick/dude is hotter than any of the women in the competition. Very strange, maybe this will be the way of the future? Transgendered marriage to straight men, lol.

Brad says:
Tue, 22nd May 20121:13 am 

Your article pretty much agrees with the first article, just you think it's a good thing and the author of the article you mention thinks it's bad. It's also funny how you claim "beta males" are boring etc instead of just saying you prefer assholes, because you yourself are an asshole. So if you're an asshole how do we know we can trust your opinion on the subject, or you're just being egotistical and selfish? Sure freedom is good but it still doesn't make every action good. If I was free to own any weapon I want it still wouldn't mean it's okay to go around shooting missiles.

udolipixie says:
Tue, 22nd May 20125:00 am 

Quite unware why you're telling me that's not what JOEYD said.

I made no statements, suggestions, or implications that is what he said.

Care to show me where I stated, suggested, or implied that it s what JOEYD said?

I stated a possible reason for why many gals are hard to talk to with the reason being because they're aware that many guys are bitter hateful possible misogynists who think all or most gals are scums, whores, dogs, useless, worthless, low life losers, or filthy pigs.

udolipixie says:
Tue, 22nd May 20125:29 am 

The same about the few good ones are always taken could be said for guys. That the rest of the lot are bad or mediocre guys who tend to be hateful, bitter, resentful, entitled, selfish, hypocritical wannabe sluts. By far the majority have nothing to little to offer as a romantic, sexual, or life partner rather touting a default expectation of a human being such as nice. As well as commonly having a hateful attitude towards gals in general and the mindset that gals are a sexual resource to be divided equally amongst guys rather than human beings.

Care to show me where I stated, implied, or suggested anything warranting being questioned if I propose to switch off natural learning process or how many times that a guy get burned?

In fact my statement of why many gals are hard to suggests natural learning process. The process being that many gals may be hard to talk to as they're aware many guys are bitter hateful possible misogynists.

udolipixie says:
Tue, 22nd May 20125:31 am 

To me there's a difference between making the connection that it's bad gals making one hurt badly and JOEYD's most gals are bad.

I suppose unless you're a hypocrite, bias or have an agenda you'd have no complaints if a gal's natural learning process was that there are a few good guys left as most guys are useless worthless misogynistic pigs that are potential rapists.

Quite telling how to you 'both genders should feel free to pursue attraction than personality' is man hating and worse than misandry while 'most of the women today are filthy pigs' is quite true.

sg1 says:
Wed, 23rd May 20121:05 pm 

There was no such thing as marital rape, therefore it not be either legal or illegal, you stupid little girl.
Women's liberations is great, I only wish that only women would pay for it, it's damned expensive. Lets be clear women are inferior to men, that's why to "equalize" things you need so many women's programs and subsidises, but hey they let sluts like yourself think you are something you clearly are not.

udolipixie says:
Wed, 23rd May 20125:17 pm 

There was and is such a thing as marital rape as rape is non-consensual sex. When a married person forces their unwilling or unable to consent partner to have sex with them that's marital rape.

Gal's liberation is great to many guys/gals with it criminalizing rape and giving gals voting rights, property ownerships rights rather than be considered property, and more education/career paths. I do think at least in my country gals will be paying for their liberation as it often seems guys can't function without the free reign to mistreat, abuse, assault, and rape gals. Likely American guys will channel their outrage that gals can say no and exercise more options in selecting a partner into an uproar creating a likely male ideal system where gals are treated like a sexual resource to be divided equally amongst guys.

As for sluts like me I'm a virgin and I'm staying that way while in my country as it seems a hateful misogynistic attitude in common in American guys who seem to encourage violence against gals and have a default disrespect for gals.

Jester says:
Wed, 23rd May 20129:42 pm 

Listen pussycat, smile a bit… You forget that often a woman will say "no" and totally mean "I want you to take me now, but don't want to look like a slut". I think this is where the hot alpha guy continues to push the issue and gets laid with no problems. However, when the beta/non-attractive guy pushes the issue (which they normally don't do, as beta's generally take "No" for an honest answer), even if she enjoys it and changes to a "yes", she can have regrets later (because the guy was not alpha enough) and claim rape.

This confuses the crap out of guys. If a girl says "no no no" to me, I might give her a bit of a close hug and see how she responds. If it's with anything other than "mmmm….", then I stop and tease until she initiates.

It is a big stupid game, and women have no idea what they want at any given time. Their emotions, much like the weather, change from one day to the next, and there's no anticipating when a crazy broad is going to fuck you, or fuck you over.

Udolipixie… Nobody listens to a child who goes around in circles, constantly repeating "Since guys do it, why is it bad for girls to do the same thing?" Plus she's a virgin and knows nothing about male/female sexual relations or relationships. Learn your place and let the grownups share their knowledge, experience and advice.

udolipixie says:
Thu, 24th May 201211:13 am 

You seem to forget the topic was 'there was no such thing as marital rape' and some gals making false rape claims is irrevelant to whether its existence. Do tell how to you is some gals make up false rape claims related to marital rape doesn't exist?

What I'm repeating is that 'it's a human thing not a male thing' as I stated choosing a partner based on attraction is a human thing not a gender thing mutually exclusive to guys. Nowhere did I state, suggest, or imply anything like "Since guys do it, why is it bad for girls to do the same thing?". I haven't even questioned the morality of whether it's a good or bad thing.

I don't need to have had sex to understand attraction or that people generally want partners that are attractive to them and to be attracted to their partner.

Perhaps you'd be best suited to learn to provide a logical counterpoint as your post seems like a strawman argument to evade the topic and end with an ad hominen.

udolipixie says:
Thu, 24th May 201211:15 am 

As for nobody listens bit in my opinion the ones that are like a child running in circles are the ones posting strawman arguments, ad hominens, and evading logic when questioned on how 'both genders should feel free to pursue attraction than personality' is man hating, ball busting, and misandrist as they claimed.