Glee’s GQ Spread – It’s Really Not That Serious

October 21, 2010 12:00 pm     Posted in Buzz, Entertainment  Zara - Drexel g+ page

GQ magazine is known for racy spreads featuring Hollywood’s hottest – so why was it such a huge deal when Lea Michele, Dianna Agron, and Cory Monteith (of Glee fame) joined the ranks of celebs who have graced the cover?

The backlash from the November issue has been overwhelming. Yes, the show’s female stars flock Monteith, clad in skimpy outfits, and yes, it’s sexy. But how is it any different from when, say Megan Fox, does the same thing?

According to the people who have spoken out about this shoot, GQ is taking advantage of young girls in the shoot – Tim Winter, the president of PTC even went so far as to call it borderline pedophilia. Um, hello – all three stars are well over 18! Winters claims that GQ is exploiting Michele and Agron, both of whom are 24 and, ironically, the same age as Megan Fox. What people (namely Winters) fail to realize is that their lives aren’t confined to the teenage characters that they play.

That is a TV show. And not even a reality TV show.

To me, the photo shoot is their response to the pressure that comes with being tokenized as a “role model”; it features all the characters paying tongue-in-cheek homage to their characters, posing in the hallways of a high school.

It’s frustrating to see how the standards of behavior are tilted the moment a star begins to draw a young fan base. Take Lea Michele, for example. She was virtually unknown before the show, and this allowed her to star in the super-racy Broadway show Spring Awakening. In the show, a younger Lea appeared topless in a steamy love scene; she played fourteen-year-old Wednla Bergmann, a character who is even younger than Glee’s Rachel Barry, but because she didn’t have a band of thirteen-year-olds watching her every move, it was never an issue.

I completely understand if a parent doesn’t want his or her young child to see such scandalous photos, but whether or not the children have access to this particular spread lies entirely in the hands of the parents. So many seem to place the blame on the stars or the execs at the magazine, but to them I say this: why are your children their responsibility?

I think Dianna Agron (who plays Quinn Fabray…who got KNOCKED UP on the show, in case you don’t remember) said it best (homegirl really knows how to make a speech):

“In the land of Madonna, Britney, Miley, Gossip Girl, other public figures and shows that have pushed the envelope and challenged the levels of comfort in their viewers and fans … we are not the first. Now, in perpetuating the type of images that evoke these kind of emotions, I am sorry. If you are hurt or these photos make you uncomfortable, it was never our intention. And if your eight-year-old has a copy of our ‘GQ’ cover in hand, again I am sorry. But I would have to ask, how on earth did it get there?”

5 Comments on "Glee’s GQ Spread – It’s Really Not That Serious"
  1. Chloe says:
    Thu, 21st Oct 201012:26 pm 

    I've been a little shocked by the backlash towards this too, although don't get me wrong, it's pretty icky, I just couldn't figure out why.

    I read articles about it on Bitch, Jezebel, Salon's Broadsheet…ya know… It was actually a commenter (I think it was at Jezebel, but who knows at this point!) who said something that made it click for me finally: What we are (or should be) reacting to here is not the sexualization of two 24 year olds who happen to play high school students on a show, it's the fetishization of high school students in general. So, these two actresses could sex it up minus the high school scenery, and we wouldn't be as skeeved out by it. Part of the problem is that perception does inform our reality, so for my part, regardless of age or vocational specifics, I'm not too thrilled about anyone do a sexy high school themed shoot. Particularly in a magazine 12 year old girls could pick up and purchase at any fine grocery store near you…

    Kudos go out to you, it was nice to finally see a response to this photoshoot that wasn't so over-the-top!

  2. Matthew says:
    Thu, 21st Oct 20106:10 pm 

    Lea Michelle had left Spring Awakening before she was cast on Glee, and it had been running in New York Off and Off-off Broadway with various runs for 6 years with her starring in it before its Broadway run. And what's funny is that she was showing breasts on stage for years playing a character younger than Rachel Berry but you sure as heck didn't see any backlash from the Tony Awards…

  3. Brandon@stingycampus says:
    Thu, 21st Oct 20108:57 pm 

    Imtersting point Chloe. And I really like this article Zara. Great points.

    I think the main thing we're seeing in America is an over sensitization. Every person feels everyone else should cave in to their beliefs. If something offends one person, it should be banned. But that is the complete opposite of freedom.

    I think if something like this offends someone, they have the option of not buying it and not looking at it.

  4. wangli123 says:
    Fri, 22nd Jul 20111:57 am 

    HoteloPort face parte din proiectul TouristRepublik si este sistem de rezervare camere de hotel si pachete turistice online in timp real.

    wholesale authentic jerseys

Tell us what you're thinking...