Duke It Out: Fashion Goes Prepubescent?

January 7, 2011 9:00 am     Posted in Reality  Lauren H - The New School g+ page

[It's pretty obvious that the average CollegeCandy reader has some very strong opinions. Opinions that she likes to share with everyone on the site. Sometimes with mean words. We love a strong woman (unless she happens to be charging at us with her fists raised), so we thought we'd give her a real forum to discuss her thoughts, feelings, and perspectives. Every Friday I'll be featuring a hot topic (like ratings sites!) and leaving it up to you, the readers, to duke it out. So, read it and get your debate on in the comments section below!]

Ah fashion, you cruel, sadistic mistress. Unrealistic body image has always been part of the package, considering that most major designers only have a vague concept of what human anatomy even looks like, but historically they have at least pretended that their designs are created for full-grown women. Well, recently, Elle Fanning has become a fashion world darling, praised for her “ballet-dancer frame perfect for Rodarte and Valentino“… did I mention she’s 12? Yeah, she’s 12.

Now, I’m not trying to get down on Elle – she’s a very pretty young girl with a healthy build for her age. There’s nothing wrong with the way she looks (and I’m seething with envy that she’s already 5-foot-6); what’s wrong to me is that her lovely figure is being held up as a pinnacle for women’s fashion when she’s not, in fact, a woman yet. That “ballet-dancer frame”? That’s also known as ‘not-having-hit-puberty-yet’. We’re talking about fetishizing a child here! And in a world where we’re supposedly embracing different body-types and where curves are supposed to be making a come back. In this world, we’re really going to discuss a little girl’s body as something that major designers think that we should strive toward? How sick is that?

But! On the other hand, as demented as I may happen to think the whole concept is, it’s not exactly new. Fashion models have been operating on the younger is better principle for years with girls like Kate Moss and Brooke Shields making a name for themselves in their early teens. 12 may be a little low on the spectrum, but it’s really just an extension of what’s been going on for years. Does that make it any better? Maybe not, but it also means it’s not likely to change.

Alright ladies, what do you say? Is Elle Fanning just another example of fashion’s waif-obsession? Is it a product of something deeper and more messed up in the industry? Or is it just the same-old, same-old? Duke It Out!

13 Comments on "Duke It Out: Fashion Goes Prepubescent?"
  1. Angie Marie says:
    Mon, 10th Jan 201112:02 am 

    While no one seems to have commented on this article, I must say that I enjoyed the read, found it though-provoking and sensitive, and appreciated the author's observations.
    …I've been filling out internship apps all day, ha, so I'm still stuck in "formal" language mode, haha

  2. Casey says:
    Fri, 14th Jan 20119:20 am 

    Dis. Gus. Ting.

    I mean, we all knew the fashion industry had ridiculous standards, but really?

  3. Kate says:
    Fri, 14th Jan 20112:08 pm 

    This is sad, all the pressure they're putting on her to stay that way.

  4. Jorie says:
    Sat, 15th Jan 20119:47 am 

    i'd rather idealize that then a chunky frame.

  5. Matthew says:
    Sat, 15th Jan 20111:26 pm 

    When the fashion industry worships a prepubescent there's a seriously disturbed standard of beauty they're thrusting onto the teenage girl.

  6. Margo says:
    Sun, 16th Jan 20111:16 pm 

    If a womens' designer feels that his or her clothes fit a 12 year old better than a grown woman– or look best on a child. There is something wrong with the designer. Maybe they should make childrens' clothes.

    Personally, I like clothes that would make my body look good.

    By making clothes labels less appealing to women of different body shapes, designers lose respect and following, not gain it.

  7. Linda says:
    Thu, 20th Jan 20119:17 am 

    It's a different level of the same issue-the fashion industry has one definition of beauty, tall and skinny, and then they wonder why people get so obsessed with their looks. Not everyone looks like that, and not everyone can look good in those clothes because of their body types

    And as far as the 12 year old is concerned, she better hope puberty doesn't hit her hard, otherwise it'll be no surprise when they replace her due to her curves

  8. Colleen Carlysle says:
    Thu, 14th Mar 201312:16 am 

    It's becoming more and more obvious that age doesn't factor into fashion anymore. Next thing we know, there will be grade school super models.

  9. Paul Townsend says:
    Sun, 17th Mar 201310:13 pm 

    Now, fashion goes prepubescent. Tomorrow, fashion goes even for babies.

  10. Anne Madison says:
    Tue, 2nd Apr 201312:07 am 

    Why not? There's nothing wrong about having a fashion sense at a young age, now is there?

Tell us what you're thinking...