Republican Debate Recap: What Went Down In NH
June 14, 2011 1:00 pm Posted in Reality Julianne-Carnegie Mellon University g+ page
College gals are busy these days so I wanted to take a moment to review all you need to know about last night’s debate. It’s hard to squeeze this puppy in because I know you were working your hostess job to pay for yet another unpaid internship or actively note taking in your Monday night class.
Wait a second, you were watching The Bachelorette instead? Well the voting isn’t for a long time anyway… Read on to get your quick fix (nobody will ever know you opted for a roses and vacations to Thailand over the future of your country).
Last night, Republican candidates had the chance to address the American public on a variety issues. Seven potentials attended the event, but save your Palin hating, she wasn’t one of them. Our players, in no particular order, were: Mitt Romney, Tim Pawlenty, Michele Bachmann, Ron Paul, Herman Cain, Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum. The biggest problem of the evening, Presidential candidates COULD NOT limit their answers to 30 seconds, (which is honestly kind of unreasonable anyway), and lead to constant interruptions by moderator John King all night long. Awk.
The winner from the evening (This is America after all, winning is far more important than the ideas) seems to have been Mitt Romney. The front-runner emerged from the evening, amazingly unscathed. Pawlenty had attacked his Massachusetts health care calling it, “Obamneycare” a few days before, but when asked to discuss his attack decidedly fumbled to create a response during the debate, to-to-today junior! Pawlenty chose instead to focus his answer on the problems with plain old ObamaCare.
On just the second question in the debate Bachmann said, “I will not rest until I repeal Obamacare.” She started the evening off with a band as she continued to explain that Obama’s healthcare will kill more than 800,000 jobs.
In fact, criticizing Obama seemed to be the only consistent theme for the evening. The boys (and token lady) played nice last night, their mommies should be proud. It seemed the republicans didn’t duke it out for a top spot in the race but rather presented a strong, anti-Obama front, because our soaring debt, faltering economy, healthcare and recent (dismal) job report provided far too much bait. Despite probing questions aimed to start the attacks, the candidates seemed pretty happy to sit back and be, well, friendly.
Another interesting topic that came up during the debate is the impact of the Tea Party. The Tea Party has been outspoken about their disapproval of Romney (and it the last night debates didn’t seem to win him any extra points with the group) and during the debate, questions about the affect of the Tea Party surfaced without really definitive answers
Totally relevant, CNN decided to spice up the evening with a “This or That” section. Because I don’t know about you but I definitely couldn’t vote for a president who thinks Dancing with the Stars over Idol, or thinks Pepsi is better than Coke. Really.
Bottom Line: We still have a long way to go. And by the way, Ron Paul is pretty hilarious. He lightened up the evening. YouTube him.
Check out some other highlights here.
Tell us what you're thinking...

You've Dated the Men of Sex & the City
Hotter Oral Sex
Which Celeb's Boobs Hung Onto Dear Life?
Signs You've Been Dating in NYC Too Long
Drake vs. Chris Brown. OKAY.
Legendary Celeb Penises
The Perfect Celeb Pony Tail
Watch Miss Utah Self Destruct
Is Your Guy Immature?
Hottest New Dads of Hollywood
JJH says:
Tue, 14th Jun 20111:56 pm
I fail to see how Ron Paul is "pretty hilarious". He's at the debate to present his honest views, like every other candidate there, not provide comic relief. What was even the point of that comment?
Tonya says:
Tue, 14th Jun 20112:27 pm
I thought his intro was pretty funny. Bachmann is probably the most hilarioius, but only because she's so absurd. She's basically a better spoken Palin.
The sad thing is even though Mitt Romney came out the winner and is probably the most viable GOP candidate, he's still not worth voting for over Obama. 2008 Romney was a viable option, but 2012 Romney is a back-pedaler who is pandering to the Republican party.
And what was with T-Pawl backtracking on his "Romneycare" jab? Guess he doesn't want to attack Mitt in case he ends up having to settle for VP.
Glad to see CC covering politics. Maybe as the field shapes up you can write profiles of all the Republican primary candidates?
As someone who is fiscially moderate, it would be nice to see the Republicans get their act together and actually put a decent name out their.
Kit says:
Tue, 14th Jun 20112:55 pm
I'm horrified with these candidates. Like Michelle Bachmann is an idiot? That's not bias. That's fact. She doesn't know basic US history….which should kinda be a requirement for running. And Newt? Newt can't even stick with one wife. How can we expect him to stick with any policies?
Anonymous says:
Tue, 14th Jun 20116:43 pm
I love that CC is providing political coverage but this article really needs some editing. The grammatical mistakes and missing words took away from the great content.
Tay says:
Wed, 15th Jun 201110:57 am
What does sticking to one wife have to do with anything? Some of our greatest, most accomplished presidents (read: Jefferson) had affairs with several slaves (and therefore several illegitimate children). Just seems rather irrelevant…