Sex in the News: Violence Against Women Act

March 20, 2012 4:30 pm     Posted in News, Sex  Leah - Ryerson University g+ page

One Republican woman joined a group of mostly Democratic senators late last week to try and convince Republicans to support an extended version of the Violence Against Women Act.

The act started as a bill created in 1994 to provide money for “emergency shelters, counseling, rape crisis centers, and legal services for victims of sexual assault, domestic violence and stalking.” It passed seven years ago, making it through the Senate without opposition. But a month ago, the new version of the bill was voted down by eight Republican men on the panel. Currently the bill is just two sponsors shy of the 60-vote margin that would guarantee it being passed.

From what I’ve read, the bill is stuck because some politicians oppose the ideas behind the new language. To some, the new provisions appear controversial. Language to include same-sex couples and adding illegal immigrants to its protections are seen as issues by some senators. The Republican senator from Alaska who stood for the bill said: “The Violence Against Women Act is, I think, a ray of hope for those who service victims of domestic violence and sexual assault within our villages.”

Leah has her Bachelor of Journalism in sight with just over a month left at Ryerson University in Toronto. When she’s not working on the Ryerson Review of Journalism she’s baking tasty cupcakes and hunting for a job (hopefully that pays). Follow her @Elleandbee

3 Comments on "Sex in the News: Violence Against Women Act"
  1. terripham says:
    Wed, 21st Mar 20129:59 pm 

    Reblogged this on wwtd? what would terripham do? and commented:
    Its 2012 y’all… Why aren’t women and men treated equally? Why can’t women who are violently attacked get the help they need?

  2. DoctorSandi says:
    Fri, 23rd Mar 20122:40 pm 

    I'm with you. I don't understand it at all. Is it the feeling of power? We have a Rep man in TX running for office who wants to take back our country from the "Social Justice" agenda. I looked it up and the definition of social justice is: The fair and proper administration of laws conforming to the natural law that all persons, irrespective of ethnic origin, gender, possessions, race, religion, etc., are to be treated equally and without prejudice. He's white, male and wealthy so guess rules don't apply to him. And he as a wife and two daughters. Hope none of them are hurt in anyway, 'cause they might not be treated well! Women have got to unite and fight this belief or we will be right back where we were with no rights or recourse. What do you suggest???

Tell us what you're thinking...