Chemistry Is Overrated [Sexy Time]
May 10, 2012 9:30 am Posted in Homepage Exclusive, Reality, Relationships, Sex Jasmine R. g+ page

There is a lot of emphasis on chemistry in relationships. It’s that undefinable, inexplicable, completely random spark that binds two people together. Sometimes it’s purely physical, sometimes it’s deeply emotional, and sometimes it’s just a sense of warmth and amorphous attraction. There’s nothing intrinsically wrong with craving sparks, but I think a little too much significance is placed on chemistry.
The thing with chemistry is, it requires no effort. It’s either there or it’s not. You can’t really conjure it up out of nowhere, and when it’s gone, it’s virtually impossible to capture in its original, organic form. So when people talk about how important chemistry is to them, it almost seems like they’re trying to completely absolve themselves from having any agency in building a connection with another person. How many times have you heard someone talk about a date or a hookup and they’ve raved about it, but then said they had no interest in following up because “there was no chemistry.” Even when there’s a perfectly solid foundation to build a potentially worthwhile relationship, people will forgo it in search of immediate sparks, which I think can be ultimately detrimental.
I’ve been dating my boyfriend for over two years. I had gone into it with a high level of cynicism, after a series of less than ideal dalliances. He seemed like a perfectly nice guy, and I had a good time, but I wasn’t head over heels smitten immediately. I took our burgeoning relationship one day at a time, partly out of fear, but mostly because I didn’t want something that caught fire quickly and burned out just as fast. I gave bits and pieces of myself to him, he returned the favor, and we steadily built a sturdy mutual support system. This isn’t to say that instant chemistry and substantial/long-term/worthwhile relationships are mutually exclusive, but a lot of times, people forget that chemistry can be created.
The idea of working to make chemistry flies in the face of the way our society frames it. Chemistry is supposed to be overwhelming and all-consuming. It’s supposed to sweep you off your feet and make you feel like you’re in a Nicholas Sparks movie. But chemistry alone can’t sustain a relationship. The people involved have to be willing to exert themselves by communicating honestly, being willing to compromise, and keeping expectations in check.
[Lead image via Pedro Salaverría/Shutterstock]
Tell us what you're thinking...

Celebs in Swimwear
Are You Being Too Easy?
Fake BFs
The Secret To A Lasting Relationship
Kendall Jenner in a Bikini
Zac Efron.
Kim Kardashian is a Meme
Perfect Celeb Pony Tail
Smoochin' Stars – Guess Who!
What's Rihanna Doing To This Stripper?
Curry says:
Thu, 10th May 20122:40 pm
Wow. I agree with this all the way. I have been a cynic too, no expectations and no sparks, definitely, at first. People who rely on Chemistry are the ones who end up with endless number of flings, and single girl woes. Take it slow, give it a shot. You never know, hey.
Alicia says:
Thu, 10th May 20124:29 pm
I thought you were saying Chemistry as a subject was overrated and I was about to through a fit. Sexual chemistry however, ehn… no issue with that. Carry on.
P.s. Am I the only one who would pee themselves laughing trying to watch a Nicholas Sparks movie?
nefertiti says:
Sat, 12th May 20125:22 pm
So, I am one of those people that says chemistry is really important in a relationship, but that doesn't mean I don't work at a relationship. I've had both flings and longterm relationships (3.5 years) but it's just that I work on the emotional aspects of the relationship instead of the physical. I've definitely had this discussion with my friends before and I have a hard time understanding how to learn to be attracted to someone. The emotional connection is built over time but I don't understand how a physical one can be built. I have known guys who I had a lot of things in common with but I could never date them because I never wanted to be physical with them. We usually stayed friends but my lack of attraction to them never changed. I'd be interested to know how others have been able to build a physical relationship over time with someone they are not physically attracted to. How do you begin to date someone who you don't want to even kiss?
Jasmine - Northern Arizona University says:
Mon, 14th May 201211:40 am
It's quite possible to become more attracted to someone physically as you become more emotionally connected to them. At the same time, it's perfectly fine to not be physically attracted to someone. There's no reason to force something. No one wants to make out with everyone they're friends with.