Why is that “finding a man” qualifier important? Because EVERY SHOW/MOVIE about a woman or targeted toward women no matter how professional or intelligent she is supposed to be is about finding love.
The implication has been and continues to be that women need to find a man in order to be complete and happy because they are just hot messes who need to be “taken care of.” From the professional women on Sex and The City to the lawyers on Ally McBeal to stupid romantic comedies and all the female action heroes who are still saved by their male counterparts at the end of the movie. It’s annoying and it wouldn’t be if there were different kinds of stories being told but for the most part there isn’t. Until fairly recently women weren’t “allowed” to be leads in TV dramas simply because people don’t take us seriously, people often can’t imagine women in positions of power because they either don’t believe we can do it or is too unfamiliar to them. Shows starring women are seen as for women, where as shows starring men are see as for everybody.
- It includes at least two women,
- who have at least one conversation,
- about something other than a man or men.
Sounds easy enough? LOL. It isn’t. The test was intended for film but it can work in just about any storytelling media. Most shows have at least two women although some do not. The next two parts are the most difficult. If in any story all the women talk about is men then their characters are essentially being defined by men. If the female characters are only talking to men, their characters only exist to be in service to men (like the Manic Pixie Dream Girls of Garden State and Elizabethtown). However these shows pass the test and are critically acclaimed.