January 15, 2012
- 2:54 pm
By Caitlin-University of Alabama

Yes, you read that headline right. The web is going on strike! What? Crazy, I know. The internet isn’t shutting down completely, don’t worry. But big name sites like Reddit, Mozilla, and even Twitpic will be unavailable on January 18th in protest of two internet censorship bills: Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and Protect IP Act (PIPA). These bills are making their way through Congress on January 24th and if passed, it will mean the death of the internet as we know it.
The proposed SOPA bill would allow copyright holders and the Department of Justice to file a court order against websites that enable or facilitate copyright infringement. Now, that’s a broad statement. Basically, “the court order could include barring online advertising networks and payment facilitators such as PayPal from doing business with the allegedly infringing website, barring search engines from linking to such sites, and requiring Internet service providers to block access to such sites.” This could potentially shut down sites like Tumblr, Flickr, and more. We certainly don’t want people pirating, but this bill will seriously cripple the internet and our First Amendment right to freedom of speech. Read More »
November 16, 2011
- 3:30 pm
By CC Staff

Today Congress is holding hearings regarding two very controversial bills, the Protect-IP Act and the Stop Online Piracy Act. Both aim to protect copyrighted material on the Internet, which sounds good in theory, but could result in drastic censorship across online platforms we use every day. Think you wouldn’t be affected should these bills successfully pass? Think again. It’s not just those who are illegally downloading movies and music who would be at fault. Anyone who uses Facebook, Twitter, YouTube or other social networking sites could soon be found as doing so illegally.
When we went to check the CollegeCandy Tumblr today, we were met with grayed out images and text. What happened to our dashboard? Where did everything go? In a brilliant move to show users what could potentially happen in a censored online community, Tumblr made sure every user was aware of Congress’ plans today by blocking users’ content. Clicking on any of the censored posts (so, basically, all of them) will land you at this page — a great resource for learning more about both the Protect-IP Act and the Stop Online Piracy Act. Read More »
February 25, 2011
- 12:30 pm
By Charlsie - Hollins University

Rihanna’s latest video for her song “S&M” hasn’t even been out for a week, but it’s stirring up a controversy. Due to the sexual nature of the video and its subject, “S&M” has been banned in 11 countries, restricted on YouTube (it’s only available if you log-in with an account that proves you’re over 18), and pulled from play on some radio-stations until after 7pm. Some radio stations have even changed the name from “S&M” to “Come On.” (Read all about the scandal and watch the full video here.)
But seriously, come on! While some critics and fans are outraged by her sexual lyrics and fetish-filled video, I can’t help but wonder where the boundaries of entertainment actually stand.
Women are seen as sexual beings, but when they express that sexuality in any way that would make someone uncomfortable, it’s not okay. Even recently, the indie film Blue Valentine with Michelle Williams and Ryan Gosling came under fire for the scene where Ryan’s character performs oral sex on Michelle. We live in a world where it’s OK to fellate a man in a movie, but it’s not accepted for a woman to receive cunnilingus. Although the NC-17 rating was eventually dropped (thanks to Ryan Gosling fighting for it in the press), it shows that double standards still exist in movies and in music. This isn’t 1950!
Read More »
Tags: banned videos, blue valentine, Buck Cherry, censorship, charlie sheen, chris brown, consensual sex, double standards, rihanna banned, rihanna banned video, rihanna s&m
February 7, 2011
- 5:00 pm
By Charlsie - Hollins University

Rihanna’s latest video for her song “S&M” hasn’t even been out for a week, but it’s stirring up a controversy. Due to the sexual nature of the video and its subject, “S&M” has been banned in 11 countries, restricted on YouTube (it’s only available if you log-in with an account that proves you’re over 18), and pulled from play on some radio-stations until after 7pm. Some radio stations have even changed the name from “S&M” to “Come On.” (Read all about the scandal and watch the full video here.)
But seriously, come on! While some critics and fans are outraged by her sexual lyrics and fetish-filled video, I can’t help but wonder where the boundaries of entertainment actually stand.
Women are seen as sexual beings, but when they express that sexuality in any way that would make someone uncomfortable, it’s not okay. Even recently, the indie film Blue Valentine with Michelle Williams and Ryan Gosling came under fire for the scene where Ryan’s character performs oral sex on Michelle. We live in a world where it’s OK to fellate a man in a movie, but it’s not accepted for a woman to receive cunnilingus. Although the NC-17 rating was eventually dropped (thanks to Ryan Gosling fighting for it in the press), it shows that double standards still exist in movies and in music. This isn’t 1950! Read More »
Tags: banned videos, blue valentine, Buck Cherry, censorship, charlie sheen, chris brown, consensual sex, double standards, rihanna banned, rihanna banned video, rihanna s&m
November 26, 2010
- 5:00 pm
By Charlsie - Hollins University

We live in a social media obsessed world. There’s Facebook, Myspace, (although I wonder if anyone actually still uses it), Twitter, and many blogging platforms such as Tumblr, WordPress, and Blogger. Although we upload our pictures to Flickr and Facebook all the time or write about our weekend experiences in personal blogs, there could be a possible downside to all of this internet exposure: According to the Wall Street Journal, 85% of hiring managers Google a candidate before or after an interview. This fact, which is becoming more and more well-known, brings up the question: To blog or not to blog?
While I’m not saying that anyone who publicly posts pictures of themselves puking into a fraternity bathroom shouldn’t be a cause for concern, I am posing the question of boundaries and what and when a company should base their decision on hiring someone because of what comes up when they use Google. For example, take all the CollegeCandy contributors. Should our future bosses decline an interview with us, even though our resumes may be well qualified, simply because we once wrote an article that mentions sex or highlights the importance of birth control?
Personally, I think keeping a blog of any kind is a worthwhile venture. As a writer, I like to post things I’m interested in, things that drive me crazy, and of course, continuously write about things that matter to me (this includes everything from literary theory criticisms to the correct usage of the Real Housewives of New Jersey’s infamous phrase “prostitution whore”). However, I often worry that if I post liberal-sided articles or a picture of me enjoying a glass of wine that someone may use those things against me and blow them out of proportion one day. Despite more and more social media outlets being introduced to society on a regular basis, it seems like the idea of censorship or hiding oneself (at least the internet brand of oneself) is becoming a constant battle. Read More »
Tags: birth control, blogger, bloggers, blogging, boundaries, censorship, changes in media, christian louboutin, College Candy, compounding interest, employment, facebook, flickr, fraternity bathroom, google, international trade, internet exposure, job candidates, jobs, liberalism, myspace, negativity, online platforms, opi nail polish, personal judgment, post-grad, public access, public/private, publicity, rachel zoe, real housewives of new jersey, recession, recruiters, Sex, social media, to blog or not to blog, tumblr, twitter, unemployment, wall street, wall street journal, wordpress, writers
June 10, 2008
- 9:30 am
By CC Staff

Last night’s episode was pretty telling. Fred, Robert and Brian were sent packing and no one was surprised. Today, I’m handing out roses for the best WTF moments of the night.
The Rose for using grave digging as a positive and negative experience – Sean
In regards to writing and performing a song for DeAnna he said “I’d rather be digging my own grave than what I’m about to do right now.” Later, after winning the stock car racing challenge he said, “Bury me now. Dig my grave, because I’m a happy man.”
The rose for the worst shirt to wear during a dating show – Brian
It probably wasn’t even a good idea to pack your Home Wrecker shirt dude. It is not shocking you were sent home tonight. Read More »
Tags: abc, breaking my heart, censorship, chemistry, deanna, grave digging, home wrecker, reality TV, the bachelorette, twilley, wife, worst shirt, wtf, wtf moments
July 31, 2007
- 1:00 pm
By CC Staff

In another blow against the tobacco industry, Disney has recently decided to eliminate all depictions of smoking within their films. They also vowed to discourage smoking within films aimed toward adult audiences through Touchstone Pictures and Miramax.
Famous villains such as Cruella DeVille of 101 Dalmatians had previously used smoking to enhance their infamous personas within Disney movies. Who could forget those long, thin cigarettes that Cruella puffed away at throughout the classic film? The rings of smoke swirling around her added a mysterious, evil air to her character. Read More »
Tags: addiction, censorship, cigarettes, Cruella Deville, glamorized smoking, kids movies, lung cancer, smoking, tobacco industry, villains, Walt Disney