December 20, 2011
- 4:30 pm
By Leah - Ryerson University

The women’s rights movement has been great, right?
In many ways, yes. In many ways women are much closer to equal income and in some college programs there are more women that men. All in all, women have been making strides over the years. But this isn’t the case for all women. While rich and middle-class women have been climbing all sorts of ladders, less fortunate women have the same amount of equality as back in the 1970s.
Economic Professor Nancy Folbre wrote for the New York Times’ blog, Economix, that 18 percent of women with only a high school diploma are granted paid maternity leave. This is in contrast to the 66 percent of women with a college degree, and just up from the 1970s when 16 per cent of high school grads received paid mat leave. Read More »
Tags: childcare, college degree, corporate ladder, education, gender equality, glass ceiling, maternity leave, parental leave, sex in the news, women's rights movement, womens rights
November 12, 2011
- 12:30 pm
By Ashley Lee - UC San Diego

If you’re thinking about entering the porn industry, you probably won’t be able to read children’s books to elementary school kids afterwards. Maybe it’s because you’ll stimulate too many of their senses with all your clothes on, or because you’ll somehow send subliminal messages and slip in sexual innuendos while reciting Dr. Seuss rhymes. Sorry, but after a career like that, you’re simply…unfit for this kind of thing. Read More »
June 27, 2011
- 1:00 pm
By Kim- Syracuse University
We’ve all seen those cheesy commercials promising students who enroll in hassle-free online classes at for-profit institutions a job within the lucrative careers of their choice. What these commercials forget to mention, though, are the incredibly steep tuition costs, the even steeper debt that students should plan to graduate with and the statistics of high dropout and low success rates of graduates from these institutions. The government is pouring millions of federal tax dollars and much of its student aid into these for profits, which results in only 3 things: rich CEOs, grads deep in debt and the rest of us college students (at non-profit schools) losing out on more federal student aid each year.
So what’s the real deal with these for-profit colleges?
Well, here’s how the system works. Recruiters are paid upwards of about $750 to practically harass students to enroll in these institutions, which typically offer online courses. Tuition costs an average of $31,000, which is about double that of non-profit public universities who are also federally funded. Ironically, the for-profits spend on their students only 1/3 of the amount that public universities spend on their students. The reasoning for this may be that the for-profits offer most of their classes online. Bridgepoint Education for example, has a 99% of its enrollment online. Campus Progress provided a statistical breakdown of the scams non-profit professionals are running, and the injustices their students face during enrollment and post graduation from these schools. Here’s a rundown of the stats:
- Non-profits are the fastest growing sector of higher learning. Enrollment has increased drastically by 225% in 10 years, yet students of these colleges still make up only 10% of college students nationally.
Read More »

You meet a million people in college. Or so it seems as you go from dorm to class to frat party, seeing thousands of new faces along the way. How’s a busy college student to determine who she’ll like or who she’ll want to avoid?
Well there’s no better instant-indicator than judging someone based on their major. Sure it’s a stereotype and sure it’s not always right, but as most college students can attest it’s usually pretty accurate. So step into our judgmental world and check out our ultimate major translator. You’ll have your entire campus figured out in no time!
Read More »
Tags: art history, business, college, college life, college major sterotypes, college majors, college streotypes, computer science, education, engineering, english, galleries, pysch
October 6, 2010
- 3:00 pm
By Colleen Leahey, Reporter
On Tuesday, October 5, President Obama and Jill Biden hosted the first ever White House Summit on Community Colleges. In an attempt to draw attention to his education plan, Obama claimed, “We want to make it easier to connect students looking for jobs with businesses looking to hire. We want to help community colleges and employers create programs that match curricula in the classroom with the needs of the boardrooms.”
Due to the exceptionally high unemployment rate and our falling world ranking concerning the percentage of college-educated adults, the Obama administration feels we need to focus on community colleges to provide a more affordable education for America’s youth. Obama is looking to improve the number of college degrees by 5 million before 2020.
Undeniably, a two-year, community college education would make many students’ resumes more appealing to any future employer than having no higher education at all. However, after already shoveling over $3 billion to help low-income students at colleges with an average graduation rate of 20% (versus the 58% rate career colleges boast), Obama’s plan is far from cheap.
The move toward this plan would attempt to partner community colleges with various businesses and focus curriculum on skills necessary for students’ desired career choices, making them more appealing to said partners. The plan has received some backlash, especially from for-profit career colleges. However, all-in-all, it hasn’t received much attention. Read More »

I think many (myself included) kind of just wind up at college somehow with little thought in advance as to why we’re there in the first place. There’s elementary school, middle school, high school… college is just kind of the next step in the education process. An expectation for some; a requirement for others. The reason why college is so paramount to parents is because they equate four-year degrees with success and large figure salaries to come in the future. But now, a number of economists, academics, and policy analysts are challenging all this. And experts have some pretty convincing evidence as to why two-year or technical training schools could be a better option for some Americans.
The main argument is that there are just too many people going to college in the first place–many who are unqualified. There is also a large amount of overqualified degree-holders in today’s struggling job market. But there are other major issues dealing with the current state of the economy. Before deciding to imprison yourself in one of these four-year institution, there are factors to take into consideration like rising student debt, stagnant graduation rates and, of course, the high unemployment rate among college graduates. Read More »
March 2, 2010
- 12:00 pm
By Leah - Ryerson University

Yonge & Dundas Intersection in Toronto after Team Canada Win
This week’s Weekly Ten, Why Canada Deserves Silver, stirred up quite the controversy yesterday. Seriously, I didn’t see this much hate on CollegeCandy since one writer expressed her disdain for Taylor Swift. And rightfully so. Yes it was meant to be a joke, but we in Canada aren’t entirely laughing with you. While we know for a fact CollegeCandy loves their Canadian readers, and even has a few Canadian writers (myself included), this post pissed a lot of people off.
But instead of get angry and insult the intelligence of the writer, editor or Americans in general, I decided to take the high road and just show why Canada deserves more than just a gold medal in Olympic hockey. So here is my condensed version (there are way too many reasons for one post!) of all the reasons Canada rocks that they forgot to teach you in high school. Read More »
Tags: arcade fire, beer, billingualism, blackberry, canada, canada kicks ass, education, feist, French, group of seven, health care, inventions, Metric, molson, mosaic, multiculturalism, nationalism, olympic hockey, peanut butter, same sex marriage, sidney crosby, stars, telephone, the weakerthans, tim hortons, tommy douglas, Toronto, universal health care, zippers
November 29, 2009
- 5:00 pm
By Carly - Grinnell
Sometimes, the school you picked isn’t all it’s cracked up to be. Maybe the culture just doesn’t mesh with you, or maybe you realize after a few months that you want to be studying something completely different.
The thought of transferring crosses your mind. And then the thoughts of all you’d have to do - paperwork, credit juggling, and the process of making new friends all over again – flood your brain. My expert advice (I’m a self-proclaimed expert, of course) is to give your school a fighting chance before you go through the grueling process of transferring. But if you’re really unhappy, a change can be well worth it.
There are many different options when it comes to your education, some of which you might never knew existed. Here are a few different routes you can take on your path to academic success and happiness:
• Four-Year College
It might be a public university or it might be a private school, but places are handing out bachelor’s degrees like candy these days (well, if you do the work, anyway). This is probably the type of school most of you are in and the type to which most of you would consider transferring. There are zillions of them, so do your research and really know what you want—don’t just transfer because your boyfriend goes there.
• Career College
If you know exactly what you want to do and you’re on the fast track to doing it, consider a career college. Some of them can be just as pricey as liberal-arts colleges, but they may not keep you there for the full four years, and when you’re done, you’re basically set to get a job or apprenticeship in your field. A quick way to check out your options is to visit a site like CollegeSurfing.com, which lets you search for schools by career interest. Read More »
Tags: academics, beauty school, career college, college, cosmetics, culinary school, directory, education, new school, technical school, trade school, transfer college, transferring, transferring schools, unhappy, vocational school
October 12, 2009
- 4:00 pm
By Brithny - Duke University
Having just “celebrated” banned books week in America, I started thinking about the importance of reading, the beauty of stories and how much books enrich all of our lives. And most of my thoughts came back to one single theme:
W.T.Eff?
Banning books? Seriously? First Obama gets attacked from those crazy moms who think he’s out to brainwash children by giving them talks on the importance of education and now reading is bad for children, too?
The whole thing is just absurd. Have people even read the books they’re trying to ban? How can a story about a pooh named Winnie who likes to eat honey and play in the woods with his other anthropomorphic friends possibly be bad? It seems like a book that is deemed “good” and “appropriate” these days is a book that will not inform your child of the existence of sex, racism, violence, homosexuality, the devil, bad language, and any other concept that will cause children to ask you awkward questions. The whole banned books thing will probably cause my AP Literature class to be renamed AP Literature That Will Morally Damage Your Soul.
Does this mean we should ban Pokemon as well, since the little animals “evolve,” which therefore enforces the idea of evolution and is therefore anti-Christian and therefore is Satanic? Winnie the Pooh may be the poster child for the obesity epidemic, his friend Eeyore for depression, and Kanga for single moms everywhere, but that doesn’t mean our younger siblings can’t read about them. I happen to like Tigger, even if he does have ADHD. And although Harry Potter may have “witchcraft and wizardry” and whatnot, it’s still one of the most significant contributions to literature in our lives, and as such, should be available to anyone who wants to read it.
So let’s take the attention and money away from banning books and focus on some more important things that should be eradicated from this planet. Because in 2009 there are so many things worse than kids in capes flying around on broomsticks or finding a lion in your closet. Read More »
Tags: ads, athletes, banned books, banned books week, bracelets, Celebrities, Crocs, education, facebook, fat people, games, gaming, hollywood, livestrong, obama, president, rachel zoe, reading, school, skinny celebrities, stereotypes, tori spelling, trends, twilight, videos, weight watchers, YouTube
October 2, 2009
- 9:00 am
By Lauren H - The New School

Class all year? FML.
[It's pretty obvious that the average CollegeCandy reader has some very strong opinions. Opinions that she likes to share with everyone on the site. We love a strong woman, so we thought we'd give her a real forum to discuss her thoughts, feelings, and perspectives. Every Friday I'll be featuring a hot topic (like what is cheating!) and leaving it up to you, the readers, to duke it out. So, read it and get your debate on in the comments section below!]
There’s been some debate recently about increasing the number of days public school kids have to spend in class, and while you may be thinking “man, I’m glad I’m not in high school anymore,” think again. Colleges, especially public ones, generally follow the patterns set up by lower levels of schooling, which means that if they cut back on summer, you could kiss it goodbye too.
I’ll give you a moment to go find a paper bag to breathe into.
Proponents of adding school days to the calendar – including President Obama and the Education Secretary – note that American kids go to school fewer days than other countries, the same countries that tend to do better in math and science than we do. And, they claim, adding days has proven effective in some places in the U.S. Loathe though I am to say it, they do have a point. Test scores do rise in schools that have longer school days and years. Read More »
Tags: duke it out, economy, education, education secretary, longer school year, math, obama, school, school schedule, school year round, summer, summer school, test scores, vacation